Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Stages of childhood development
Lifespan development
Stages of childhood development
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Stages of childhood development
Vanessa Codorniz November 27, 2015 Ethics My Ethical Framework In everyday experience one is likely to encounter ethical dilemmas. This paper presents one framework for working through any given dilemma. I have chosen to integrate three theories from Ruggerio Vicent, Bernard Lonergan and Robert Kegan. When making a deceison you must collabrate different views to come to a one conclusion. Ruggerio factors in different aspects that will take effect. Depending on which order of conciousness you are in by Kegan we can closely compare this with Ruggerio's theories also. As I continue I will closely describe the three theories with Kegan and how this will compare with Lonerga's theory combining the three. While Family, …show more content…
Te first theory is Constructivism. Constructivism is known that human are meaning makers. We are not neutral with respect to the world. We actively interpret the world and make meaning of something. By interpreting images to mean something we compel and impose its meaningful use. As humans we look at three cause such a physical causes, psychological causes and spirtual cuases. The second thoery is on Development. While we evolve in mental complexity through out lives we have adaptive balances or stages of mental complexity. Starting at infacy to late adulthood. There are six order of conciousness which are zero to five. We will be discussing only he stages two through four. We make meaning different depending of which order of conciousness we are in. The two places of grow are slow or very slow. One will never move backwards. The last thoery is Holding Enviroment which consist of three components. The three components are confirmation,contradiction and continuty. Confirmation is described as holding on, support and encourgement. It appeals to our yearning for belonging. Contradiction is described as letting go, challenege and setting limits. It appeals to our yearning for agency,acheivement and autonomy. Continuty is described as staying out, remaining in place and being there. It appeals to our need for stability and predictability. '' A healthy holding enviroemnt provides an ingenious blen of support and challene and attends to the relationship between a persons mental capacity and the demands placed upon her by the cultural curriculum '' (Kegan;
At times in a person’s life, they might come across a few situations that leave them with a major decision between two or more options that challenge what they believe or what they might think is wrong or right. These are known as ethical dilemmas. Be it seeing a friend steal something and choosing between being honest and speaking up or letting it go. It can also be getting paid more than you earned and deciding if you’re going to be greedy and keep the money or return it. We run into these situations in our lives, some bigger and more influential on our destiny’s while others are small with no real consequences.
moral decisions, we will be analyzing why this scenario poses a dilemma, possible actions that
By looking further into this dilemma using various ethical standpoints allows for a broad understanding of principles and complexity in a specific situation with these paradigms. The focuses are three prominent ethical paradigms such as: teleological utilitarianism, deontological duty theories and virtue based ethics. Each of these three paradigms will be applied to the aforementioned dilemma, each will be evaluated and the best option will be revealed.
Everyday individuals are faced with difficult situations, and in some cases these situations bring into question a person’s moral code. These dilemmas make people think about what the right thing to do is and what the wrong thing to do is. Any person can follow the four basic frameworks of ethics to figure out what needs to be done. Those frameworks being ethical egoism, utilitarianism, deontology, and virtue ethics. But first I will put you in a tricky situation and shed some light on the different routes an individual could take according to those four ethical frameworks. Then I will give my opinion on what I would do in the situation and I will state some objections a critic might have on my opinion.
Choose between doing and not doing, or take a path or other (any choice implies a loss) suggests that the best ethics is that produces more benefits to all those involved. Reality has permanent and changing situations. The individual is a being bodily and spiritually able to configure his life with responsible freedom always referred to God, to others and the world, and all of this flows from circumstances, different situations that must respond to the practice of ethical virtues for its further development. Therefore, different situations do not arise for an ethical subjectivism, but precisely because human beings are imperfect, the various changes and circumstances are called or moral challenges to be major human being and a better person. The responsibility to choose and act according to the straight conscience as moral ultimacy in case of serious conflict that cannot delay and be determined. Even with the possibility of error, which means the ethics of well-understood situation, and what distinguishes one situation of another shall base on reciprocity, in the love for the
Throughout life, one will use ethics to make decisions, solve dilemmas and determine right from wrong, without consciously knowing. During this semester in my Ethics course, I have closely studied the four “Steps of Ethical Analysis” created by Ruggeiro and Lonergan’s system of “Operations of Consciousness”. These similar concepts merge into one framework because both focus on the way humans make choices throughout their lives. In this essay, I will go more in-depth about the ethical frameworks Ruggerio and Lonergan created and show how they closely relate in solving an ethical dilemma.
What is ethics? Ethics are the philosophical principles of good verses bad moral behavior. It is a guideline to help people make decisions or make a judgment calls. There are two main types of ethical principles that will be discussed in this paper, and how they are applied to the decision making process. They are Deontological and Utilitarian. Deontological ethics are based on the righteousness or wrongness of the action-taking place. It does not base itself on the bad or good consequences that come from the action. Immanuel Kant introduced deontological ethics in the 18th century. Kant believed that every decision or action made by a person had to be evaluated by his or her moral duty. He stated that humanity shouldn’t side on its
In the case of Joelle, this study will significantly identify the different ethical principles that can be applied in the case. In addition to it, the study will also arrive in one ethical theory that Joelle can be applied in her situation in order for her to effectively determine what she will do and if her decision and action can be considered ethical or the right thing.
In philosophy, there are many different views regarding what is thought to constitute ethical behavior. Among them are the cultural relativist, utilitarian, and Kantian. Given a situation where someone must choose to either kill one person out of thirty so that the others could live or let all thirty people die in order to maintain their moral duty, the distinctive philosophical views would lead to varying responses. They contribute opposing ideas on what the right decision is. Generally, these three ethical theories have the power to influence what happens next.
When it comes to making an ethical decision everyone, has their steps and processes to reach their best moral decision. My purpose for this essay to show you how I reach the best ethical decision. I have selected five steps from several of the class readings that coincide with what I believe to be ethical and moral. I have used Baker’s model and his interpretation of Kidder’s model, Josephson’ Model and Patterson and Wilkins examples. That best works with my ethical and moral principles and me. By the end of this essay, you will be able to see my process and understand my reasons for following these step.
Unit I In the article "Ethical Blindness", the writers examine how sometimes choices are frequently made without the individual notwithstanding knowing about it. The choices can be a consequence of an association between individual qualities of the person and attributes of the circumstance. Most research on ethical decision making still expands on the suspicion that choices are made by reasonable people. The rationality presumption is shown different ways. The traditionally moral logic, business ethicists more often than not expect that there is an ethical perspective from which ethicality of a choice can be assessed. It is comprehended that the ethical perspective can be translated in an unexpected way, contingent upon the particular background philosophy, yet they share the presumption that there is a target and unprejudiced line that individuals can use to measure contentions and achieve an answer. An example of this would be that some managers use different philosophical lenses when making a decision – reflecting
The first definition of ethical in the dictionary is “pertaining to, or dealing with morals or the principles of morality; pertaining to right and wrong in conduct.” The first definition Dilemma is defined as “a situation requiring a choice between equally undesirable alternatives.” Using these two definitions, an ethical dilemma can be defined as when a person has to choose a decision that goes against one’s morals. One alternative may have a negative impact on one’s life or another person’s life. Another alternative may be an excellent choice for one person but may have negative impacts as well. Therefore, an ethical dilemma often puts ones morals and values into question. This paper will review a case study of euthanasia,
This paper will examine this ethical dilemma further, including why it is an important issue...
Throughout the centuries, the great thinkers of mankind have sought to develop comprehensive theories of ethics. The proper study of ethics requires us to consider such questions as right and wrong, vice and virtue, obligation, and value. It is this sort of self-reflection on the part of mankind that separates us from the animal kingdom. Indeed, the importance of studying ethics cannot be understated, as the eminent philosopher Louis. P Pojman writes in his book Ethics Discovering Right and Wrong: A knowledge of ethical theory has enormous practical benefits.
Heinz’s Dilemma provides a moral problem that depends on how each person looks at. Heinz is faced with a dilemma of whether to steal the only drugs that make his wife better. He is “contemplating stealing them since the pharmacist will not reach a consensus with him” (Heinz’s Dilemma). Since he cannot afford the drugs, he “has made various suggestions to the pharmacist, but the pharmacist has proven to be stubborn and leaves Heinz with only one option, which is stealing the drugs” (Heinz’s Dilemma). This dilemma shows a person who cares about his beloved person looking at the dilemma from ethic of care p...