The Case Study Concerning Joelle

1080 Words3 Pages

Ethics plays a very important role in one social system and basically on how the people will make their actions or decide on a particular thing on whether it is the right or the wrong thing. Ethical consideration is very important. It helps a person or a group of person understands whether the actions are right or wrong. Ethics is a very critical factor most especially when considering where the ethical standards are to applied. Aside from it, weighing results of actions or decision is also another major concern because of the fact that a person has critically analyze whose side is needed to satisfied. There are instances that moral obligations are also considered, in which moral is defined as a universal accepted personal human behavior that allows a person to decide whether an action or decision is good or bad.

In the case of Joelle, this study will significantly identify the different ethical principles that can be applied in the case. In addition to it, the study will also arrive in one ethical theory that Joelle can be applied in her situation in order for her to effectively determine what she will do and if her decision and action can be considered ethical or the right thing.

UTILITARIANISM

Utilitarianism is an ethical theory in which determining the rightness or wrongness of action or decision is based on determining whether the greatest benefit or happiness will be provided in the highest or greatest number of population. This simply means that action or decision must be based on the highest amount or number of beneficiary (Martineau, 2006). However, this ethical theory has two major types. First is the “act utilitarianism” and second is the “rule utilitarianism.” Act utilitarianism specifically adh...

... middle of paper ...

... the pollution, it can be concluded that total external population has the most number of population that will benefit from the decision. Generally, the position that Joelle must take is to mention the illegal dumping modus operandi of her company.

Works Cited

Dooley, D. (1996). Equality in Community: Sexual Equality in the Writings of William Thompson and Anna Doyle Wheeler. Ireland: Cork University Press.

Frederick, R. (2002). A companion to business ethics. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.

Gardiner, S.M. (2005). eVirtue Ethics, Old and New. New York: Cornell University Press.

Kaufman, A. (1999). Welfare in the Kantian State. New York: Oxford University Press.

Martineau, J. (2006). Types of Ethical Theory, Volume 1. New York: Cosimo, Inc.

Reese, C.D. and Eidson, J.V. (1999). Handbook of OSHA construction safety and health. Boca Raton, FL. CRC Press

Show More
Related

  • Animal Testing Dbq

    597 Words  | 2 Pages

    Ethics is an important proponent when considering any decision. Knowing the difference between right and wrong is something everyone should know. However, the importance of ethics gets minimized when a decision that seems wrong actually has benefits. In the efforts of improving society, often ethics is violated. Sometimes in order for society to be better off as a whole, there has to be little sacrificing of ethical practices along the way to do so.

    Read More

  • Jim's Moral Theory: The Case Of Jim

    1189 Words  | 3 Pages

    In other words, it means an action is only right if and only if and because the action will produce at least the maximizing outcome when compared to performing a different action at that time. Act utilitarianism is expressed only by actions with pleasurable results and the avoidance of any actions consequences that revolve around pain. In order to thoroughly understand act utilitarianism there are five fundamental elements that outline the significance of this theory. First, it is direct; the action is right or wrong due to the actual action’s consequences. Second, it follows a maximizing version of right conduct and yields the greatest value of right action. Next, it encompasses a welfarist theory and is universalist, meaning that all individuals will be considered when deciding the actions outcome. Lastly, it follows an impartialist model; all persons are equal when an action results in the same size benefit or loss to an

    Read More

  • Immanuel Kant's The Quinlan Case

    1386 Words  | 3 Pages

    What is ethics? Ethics are the philosophical principles of good verses bad moral behavior. It is a guideline to help people make decisions or make a judgment calls. There are two main types of ethical principles that will be discussed in this paper, and how they are applied to the decision making process. They are Deontological and Utilitarian. Deontological ethics are based on the righteousness or wrongness of the action-taking place. It does not base itself on the bad or good consequences that come from the action. Immanuel Kant introduced deontological ethics in the 18th century. Kant believed that every decision or action made by a person had to be evaluated by his or her moral duty. He stated that humanity shouldn’t side on its

    Read More

  • Quiz Show by Robert Redford

    1538 Words  | 4 Pages

    Ethics are the principles that shape individual lives in modern society. It is a subjective idea that seems to have a standard in society. Ethics and morals are the major factors that guide individuals to make right and wrong choices. Something that is morally right to one person might be the very opposite of what another person would view as right. There are many factors that can trigger a change in an individual’s view of morality.

    Read More

  • Is rule-utilitarianism preferable to act-utilitarianism

    1769 Words  | 4 Pages

    Classical utilitarianism is a normative ethical theory which holds that an action can only be considered as morally right where its consequences bring about the greatest amount of good to the greatest number (where 'good' is equal to pleasure minus pain). Likewise, an action is morally wrong where it fails to maximise good. Since it was first articulated in the late 19th Century by the likes of Jeremy Bentham and later John Stewart Mill, the classical approach to utilitarianism has since become the basis for many other consequentialist theories such as rule-utilitarianism and act-utilitarianism upon which this essay will focus (Driver, 2009). Though birthed from the same utilitarian principle of maximising good, rule-utilitarianism and act-utilitarianism provide two very different accounts on how the maximising of good should be approached. This essay will compare these two approaches and try to ascertain whether rule-utilitarianism is indeed preferable to act-utilitarianism.

    Read More

  • Bernard Williams and Utilitarianism

    686 Words  | 2 Pages

    The utilitarian faces many problems because he loses any ability to live a personal life. By this is meant that in making decisions the utilitarian must consider the steps which lead to the highest level of goodness in society. The utilitarian reaches for the greatest good for the greatest number of people. Two main aspects dominate the light of utilitarian beliefs. The consequentialist principle explains that in determining the rightness or wrongness of an act one must examine the results that will follow. The utility principle is that you can only deem something to be good if it in itself will bring upon a specific desired state, such as happiness or fulfillment. There are two types of utilitarians: Act utilitarians and Rule utilitarians. An act utilitarian believes that a person must think things through before making a decision. The only exception to this idea applies with rules of thumb; decisions that need to be made spontaneously. The right act is the one that results in the most utility. Rule utilitarians believe that an act is only deemed appropriate if it fits in line with the outline of valid rules within a system of rules that target the most favorable outcome.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Ethics And Social Contract Theory

    774 Words  | 2 Pages

    Ethics refers to a person 's moral values, to their beliefs about what is right and what is wrong. The word ethics also refers to the study of moral beliefs. Descriptive ethics refers to the study of moral beliefs that people have and why they have them. Normative ethics is the study of the moral beliefs that people should have. Even though ethics is taught, not everyone acts or is expected to behave accordingly. This paper is to enlighten you guys with two ethical theories, which are, Social Contract Theory and Ethical Egoism. These theories provide a framework for moral decision-making within the current law, intended to be suitable to all members of some society.

    Read More

  • Consequentialism And Rule Utilitarianism

    1061 Words  | 3 Pages

    This paper will discuss the differences between rule utilitarianism and act utilitarianism, and whether or not the former is an adequate alternative to the latter with regards to consistency with ideas of right and wrong. This topic is particularly poignant because, like many philosophical questions, it does not have a definite answer, as both sides have their own deficiencies.

    Read More

  • Exploring Utilitarianism: A Comparative Analysis

    1013 Words  | 3 Pages

    The ethical theory of utilitarianism has one basis, one must chose the action that will contribute to the greatest good; the greatest good for the greatest number. In any instance one may ask, which action will make the most people happy and how long? As a method

    Read More

  • The Ethical Theory Of Utilitarianism

    1194 Words  | 3 Pages

    ‘’Utilitarianism is a normative ethical theory that places the focus of right and wrong solely on the outcomes (consequences) of choosing one action and or policy over others (Cavalier, 1996)’’. It is a morally demanding position and asks one to do the

    Read More

  • Jeremy Bentham's Utilitarianism

    1702 Words  | 4 Pages

    Utilitarianism is a movement in ethics which began in the late eighteenth centaury and is primarily associated with the English philosopher Jeremy Bentham and was later adapted and fully developed by John Stuart Mill in the ninetieth century. . The theory states that we should try to achieve ‘the greatest good for the greatest number’. Utilitarianism is a teleological theory of ethics. Teleological theories of ethics look at the consequences to decide whether an action is right or wrong. Utilitarianism is defined as a doctrine that the useful is the good and that the determining consideration of right conduct should be the usefulness of it consequences: specifically: a theory that the aim of action should be the largest possible

    Read More

  • Understanding Utilitarianism: Act vs Rule

    657 Words  | 2 Pages

    Utilitarianism is a form of consequentialism and a theory in normative ethics. According to utilitarianism, this is a theory that it is concerned on whether an action will result the greatest amount of pleasure (happiness) for the greater number of individuals (Shafer-Landau, 2014, p.138). In order to address the scenario given, the terminology of the two forms of utilitarianism (act utilitarianism and rule utilitarianism) and deontology need to be understood so it can be applied on how and why each type will act in this specific scenario.

    Read More

  • Mid Term Case Study

    1238 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Utilitarian Approach: the ethical decision should provides the greatest good for the greatest number;

    Read More

  • The Difference Between Ethics And Morality

    1100 Words  | 3 Pages

    The principal aim of this assignment is to understand the difference between ethics and morals and their perspectives because it seems that most people think that both are the same and they think it is not an important topic to apply in our daily life and business. Since I was a child, I had learnt in different ways the meaning of ethics and morals, so I did know the difference between each other, although to be honest when I started this course I was still confused. Therefore, during this course, I will learn more knowledge and I will have the ability to explain each topic. The main goal is to know the meaning of each word and the differences, and then let me explain the ethical perspectives such as utilitarianism,

    Read More

  • Ethics in the Modern World

    1524 Words  | 4 Pages

    Philosopher David Hume divided the term “ethics” into three distinctive areas; meta-ethics, which focuses on the language used when talking about ethical issues. The general approach to this area of ethics is, it explores the nature of moral judgement, and it looks at the meaning of ethical principles. Normative ethics tries to find practical moral code that we can live by. It is concerned with the content of moral judgements and the criteria for what is right and wrong. Finally applied-ethics is the application of ethical theories and using them in real life issues such as medical research or human rights (Hume D, 2011).

    Read More

More about The Case Study Concerning Joelle

Open Document