Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
An essay about multiculturalism
Importance of multiculturalism
An essay about multiculturalism
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: An essay about multiculturalism
The purpose of this research is to investigate the liberal critique of the concept of multiculturalism. This study seeks to answer the research questions, what is multiculturalism, and why this concept may contradict with liberal philosophical approaches. Goals are to understand the key principle of multiculturalism, to investigate its liberal roots, to explore key critical liberal arguments in modern political philosophy. The first part is about liberal roots of multiculturalism. The aim of the second part is to reconstruct the key arguments of the concept of multiculturalism. The third part is about liberal arguments against the concept. This research expects to have following outcomes: the key features of multiculturalism and their connection with liberal political theory, liberal arguments against multicultural theory and its inner contradictions. Introduction Background. The second part of the 20 century was accompanied by different changes, such as the destruction of socialistic and colonial system. As a result, the growth of migration became a central topic in modern …show more content…
The aim of the first part is to find liberal roots of the concept of multiculturalism. The second part is about key arguments of the concept of multiculturalism. The aim of the last part is to find critical arguments against the concept. The main potential outcome of the research is the inner contradictions of the concept of multiculturalism. The key questions of the study are what multiculturalism in Will Kymicka’s approach is and how the theory is linked with liberal tradition of political
The mention of the abolition of multiculturalism for a “new” post-multiculturalist approach becomes difficult to understand. It claims, “to avoid the ‘excesses’ of multiculturalism” (47), however where does this notable governmental and social switch take place? How is the term coined, and how is it understood in theory versus in practice? How is it different from its predecessor? Even the classification of history struggles to define what is considered to be modern, let alone post-modern, and yet the term suggests a positive approach to alleviating difficult assimilation projects similar to those faced elsewhere (47). This notion may developed on the grounds of “someone else’s problems” ¬– in regards to its Canadian context – as a means to label, or justify, miscellaneous aspects of multiculturalism. However, with the government-wide commitment to policies and programs, in conjunction with social understanding, it naturally becomes subject to a wide array of differing opinions. As both immigration and citizenship policies change, its public reception often shifts as well. Especially since the channels referred to within the ‘multiculturalism...
Critical Race Theory is an informative and useful tool that not only it allows people to trace race and racism’s attack in a society, but it also creates and promotes a better solution to comply with the issues. CRT’s processing is based on its five principles to create a race and racism hypothesis in which Yosso’s argument relies because she thinks it is “a dynamic analytical framework” (6). Critical Race Theory has become highly subject and inspired many people, in practicing the theory into their research. Because of the uncomplicated of the five concept of CRT, people can able to apply the theory into many different social structure’s perspective even though they have no knowledge about any legal training
...Multiculturalism: Essential Primary Sources. Ed. K. Lee Lerner, Brenda Wilmoth Lerner, and Adrienne Wilmoth Lerner. Detroit: Gale, 2006. 353-355. Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 11 Apr. 2014
middle of paper ... ... Given that multiculturalism is a framework that says that anyone can sit at the table so long as they accept certain political and cultural divisions which ultimately work to make impossible your ability to change the basic structure of meaning in society, or which seek to extract any political potential from the things you say, the things you embody and the things you want. You can have holidays, but not your language. You can have a month of the year for your race, but no justice.
This book is mainly inspired by the minority report that Schlesinger write for the task force as a review of the New York State social studies syllabus. In this book, the author emphasized the intellectual flaws and political dangers of the ethnocentric recommendations advocated by the majority. With the summarization of the traditionalist position, he leads a contemporary debate about multiculturalism.
These “individualistic” assumptions of multicultural values are not necessarily “liberal”, however, but they do define a broader evaluation of class, race, and gender through social mediums that expand upon capitalistic and liberal ideology as source of theoretical criticisms of modern society (Foucault, 1984, p.41). More so, postmodern theorists, such as Foucault, as a means of understanding the limitations of Marxist criticism: ‘Foucault rejects the idea that there is a single master principle of universal domination that needs to be addressed by a single theoretical logic, such as Marxism” (Agger, 2013, p.63). In this manner, multiculturalism is not defined by any single philosophy as a postmodern definition of social analysis or
The multiculturalism idea is about how to respond towards challenges that are associated with religious and cultural diversity. The term is used as a descriptive term that characterizes the diversity facts in the society. The proponent of multiculturalism rejects the melting point idea though the term has encompasses a variety of claims. The melting point idea is that members of the minority group maintain a distinct collection of practices and identities.in general multiculturalism means the practices and policies that respond and recognizes ethnic diversity (Roach et al, 2005 pg. 37). The first black president elected in us Barack Obama describes the different points of view regarding multicultural societies. Though each Atlantic side are
Bloemraad, Irene. “The Debate Over Multiculturalism: Philosophy, Politics, and Policy.” www.migrationpolicy.org. September 22, 2011. Web.
We need to be aware of the diversity in the classroom. Cultural diversity includes: bi-racial, adoptive, immigrant, gay, and step-families. It is a large majority of the students today even in my generation. Focusing on making a balanced curriculum that exposes the students to all of these different backgrounds is very important. I know that it is likely that a teacher will not be able to cater to every student, but it is important to involve each of them. There is a large percentage of students that have dropped out due to the lack of having a connection with the curriculum. It is frustrating that we are lacking progress in our schools to help these children connect when studies show that each cultural group will soon be equal in numbers. We need to form a better
Multiculturalism is the ethnic and cultural diversity that exists within a certain area. Different countries display various forms of multiculturalism. The most common form of multiculturalism is whereby a citizen of a certain country is born overseas, or of the parents of the individual is born overseas. English speaking countries have a lot of multiculturalism in them. Just like the United Kingdom, Australia has adopted multiculturalism as a national identity. My essay explores how Australia appreciates and accepts many different ethnicities and cultures.
In his article “The Failure of Multiculturalism”, Kenan Malik uses the diverse European culture to study and explain the irony of multiculturalism. He defines multiculturalism as “the embrace of an inclusive, diverse society” (Malik 21). Integration between cultures is practically inevitable, but several nations view this as a threat towards upholding their culture. Due to this, many countries have made attempts at properly integrating new people and ideas while trying to prevent the degradation of their own. This can result in unjust regulations and the reverse effect of an intended multicultural society.
...oblem in not Muslim countries. As it is obvious the differences in norms due to different culture, religion, region and so on, could turn very simple things into a problem and these differences become much more obvious when there is a multicultural work place or in general community. As I mentioned in the beginning of this essay, Ethics can guide us to make the right choice and decide correctly in every given situation. Not to mention that this becomes even more important in Healthcare system settings and among the healthcare providers cause they are responsible for giving the best health care possible to the patients. For such an important duty not only they need to respect the other people’s rights as humans despite their differences, but also they need to communicate well with their coworkers and ignore each other differences and overcome to the language barrier.
I think the best, most logical, and most realistic explanation of abnormal behavior is the multicultural model, which according to the textbook is “the view that each culture within a larger society has a particular set of values and beliefs, as well as special external pressures, that help account for the behavior of its members” (62). This particular model attributes environmental and social factors as causing abnormal and dysfunctional psychological functions, because of their prominent and powerful influence on individuals’ conscious and subconscious, thoughts, feelings, and behaviors. This models also acknowledges and respects cultural diversity, while catering to these differences in ways that specifically emphasizes and celebrates these
Originally, drawn from genetics to characterise an end product created out of the mixture of two species (Stross, 1999; Baaz and Palmberg, 2001), in colonial discourse, the term hybridity has often a derogatory connotation because it is imbued in nineteenth-century eugenicist and scientific-racist thought (Young, 1995). Pieterse argues that hybridity is often held as inauthentic because it problematises boundaries (2001: 220). However the problematic associations with this term did not prevent academics celebrating it as the conceptual apparatus for eradicating essentialist notions of culture.
Will Kymlicka writes in the Multicultural Citizen that national minorities and immigrant groups should be given room and protection to practice and express their cultures. He argues that cultural expression is key to individual freedom and allows for a greater freedom of opportunity. National minorities, as large ethnic minority populations within a nation that have historic and cultural ties to the land (Kymlicka, p. 79), should be given the utmost cultural freedom and protection culture as it enhances the nation as a whole. Immigrant groups, who by immigrating have given up their homeland, will in time assimilate into a dominant national culture, but should be given strong protection from discrimination and room to express themselves. But what happens when a national minority oppresses immigrant groups to protect its own culture? Bill 60 of the Québec government pits national minorities against immigrant groups complicating Kymlicka’s views on liberal freedom and culture. The answer to this problem lays in looking back to John Locke’s political society to show national minorities take priority over immigrant group in relation to culture.