Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Book reading and movie compare
Effects of media communication
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Book reading and movie compare
There are many sharp differences in the application of reading and movie going, and the dramatic differences will be exposed in this essay. As an intense reader, one often finds that the movie experience will let them down in their expectations in areas such as film quality, cast characters, and removed scenes. Likewise, movie goers often lose a part of context when seeing a movie and not reading the book. Those simply viewing movie either feel as if they have not been told the whole story, or that they are missing a vital piece of the storyline. A further difference between viewing movies and reading books would be the noise level. Reading makes significantly less noise than watching a movie, simply because the written words measures to a higher standard than the needed explosion as extreme dialogue shifts. Movies often are loud simply because they require the noise to attract attention when they lack a significant storyline. These fiery explosions and rapid action often mask the lack of storyline, because of this it is very difficult to pause a movie for an extended amount of time and then to resume it, which is where another of the beautiful aspects of reading come into play. It is very easy to resume reading of a book after long periods of time due to the way the mind processes the written word. Another aspect of reading is that it engages a readers imagination. One can visualize the very scenes, can further their own understanding over characters, and can know minute details about a character through the very wording of a paragraph. In the film industry it becomes much harder to convey this type of information visually instead of mentally. While there is room for creativity within the film industry one often loses a certai... ... middle of paper ... ...ther that be a good storyline or nonsensical violence, it is up to the viewer. They share a common basis in the human desire for entertainment and communication. They mold and form and contour to whatever viewers desire often caving to the whim of the many because that is the tendency that arises the most profit. Books offer more to the mind than most movies though due to their flexibility when films are structured by other creators. Many things go into the production of movies that can make or break the production. These are not limited to scenes, scripted lines, actors, budgets, technology, and the director themselves. The film and movie community has and always will bicker about the most useful exchange of information. Both suffer drawbacks that the other does not and benefits in ways that the other never can. Nevertheless both offer endless hours of amusement.
The only real way to truly understand a story is to understand all aspects of a story and their meanings. The same goes for movies, as they are all just stories being acted out. In Thomas Foster's book, “How to Read Literature Like a Professor”, Foster explains in detail the numerous ingredients of a story. He discusses almost everything that can be found in any given piece of literature. The devices discussed in Foster's book can be found in most movies as well, including in Quentin Tarantino’s cult classic, “Pulp Fiction”. This movie is a complicated tale that follows numerous characters involved in intertwining stories. Tarantino utilizes many devices to make “Pulp Fiction” into an excellent film. In this essay, I will demonstrate how several literary devices described in Foster's book are put to use in Tarantino’s film, “Pulp Fiction”, including quests, archetypes, food, and violence.
In conclusion, details involving the characters and symbolic meanings to objects are the factors that make the novel better than the movie. Leaving out aspects of the novel limits the viewer’s appreciation for the story. One may favor the film over the novel or vice versa, but that person will not overlook the intense work that went into the making of both. The film and novel have their similarities and differences, but both effectively communicate their meaning to the public.
Lehman, Peter and Luhr, William. Thinking About Movies: Watching, Questioning, Enjoying. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell, 2003.
From a structural perspective, movies and novels appear as polar opposites. A film uses actors, scripts, and a set in order to create a visual that can grab and keep the attention of their viewers. However, an author strives to incorporate deeper meaning into their books. Despite these differences in media, 1984 and The Hunger Games present unique, yet similar ideas.
First of all the movie is more interesting if you like to watch movies then reading it. Now if you like to read that’s a different story. When you watch the movie you get more experience and you get to actually watch what’s going on. In the movie it’s just more exciting and you get to relax and the movie gives more action and detail. If you are better at watching the movie and understanding it then reading it then the movie would be better.
Film and literature are two media forms that are so closely related, that we often forget there is a distinction between them. We often just view the movie as an extension of the book because most movies are based on novels or short stories. Because we are accustomed to this sequence of production, first the novel, then the motion picture, we often find ourselves making value judgments about a movie, based upon our feelings on the novel. It is this overlapping of the creative processes that prevents us from seeing movies as distinct and separate art forms from the novels they are based on.
Whenever books are adapted for film, changes inevitably have to be made. The medium of film offers several advantages and disadvantages over the book: it is not as adept at exploring the inner workings of people - it cannot explore their minds so easily; however, the added visual and audio capabilities of film open whole new areas of the imagination which, in the hands of a competent writer-director, can more than compensate.
At this point, the readers create their own movie in a way. They will determine important aspects of how the character speaks, looks like, and reacts. Whereas, in the movie, the reader has no choice but to follow the plot laid out in front of them. No longer can they picture the characters in their own way or come up with their different portrayals. The fate of the story, while still unpredictable, was highly influenced by the way the characters looked, spoke, and presented themselves on screen.
Relations between sympathy-empathy expressiveness and fiction have become a significant issue in the debate on the emotional responses to the film fiction. Due to their complexity many scholars found it useful to diagram them. With his essay, “Empathy and (Film) Fiction”, Alex Neill tries to develop new theory for analyzing the fiction and, especially, the emotional responses from the audience on it. The project of this essay is represented with an aim to show the audience the significant value of the emotional responses to the film fiction. From my point of view in the thesis of his project he asks a simple question: “Why does the (film) fiction evoke any emotions in the audience?”, further building the project in a very plain and clever way. Tracing the origins of this issue, he distinguishes between two types of emotional responses, sympathy and empathy, as separate concepts in order to understand the influence of both types of emotional responses to fiction. However, relying mostly on this unsupported discrepancy between two concepts and the influence of the “identification” concept, Neill finds himself unable to trace sympathy as a valuable response to fiction. This difficulty makes Neill argue throughout the better part of the text that empathy is the key emotional factor in the reaction to (film) fiction and that it is a more valuable type of emotional response for the audience.
I prefer to read the book because it gave me more imaginations to construct. On the other hand the movie gave us lively and specific scenes. Therefore, both of them have their own advantages.
In his essay, “It’s Just a Movie: A Teaching Essay for Introductory Media Classes”, Greg M. Smith argues that analyzing a film does not ruin, but enhances a movie-viewing experience; he supports his argument with supporting evidence. He addresses the careful planning required for movies. Messages are not meant to be telegrams. Audiences read into movies to understand basic plotlines. Viewers should examine works rather than society’s explanations. Each piece contributes to Smith’s argument, movies are worth scrutinizing.
As stated numerous times throughout this essay, movies must stay true to their book predecessor for full effect. Books are normally beautifully described and written, and help the reader visualize a completely new world. Most movies, not just The Book Thief, normally omit several
Conflict in movies are currently debated as people have similar and different opinions on the topic. Movies as of today have
Barsam, R. M., Monahan, D., & Gocsik, K. M. (2012). Looking at movies: an introduction to film (4th ed.). New York: W.W. Norton & Co..
People have to be determined and focused in order to complete a whole book. Everyone has, at some point of their life tried to read a book and some have even given up after battling to read through the first page. On the other hand, watching movies is easy and can save a lot of time. Usually a movie takes about two hours, while reading a book could take more than a week or even months for some readers. Individuals think perusing books and watching movies are the same, so they will watch the movie for their time 's sake. Also, watching movies provide superior picture about the story since it is visual and is within a short timeframe so, the audience can remember the story easier. To add more, you can complete a movie in one sitting while to complete a book, you have to work hard and give a lot time for it. Furthermore, you can do anything while watching movies. For instance, you can do your assignment while watching movies or cook food and watch movies. On the other hand, while reading a book, you need to be fully focused on it else you don’t understand what’s happening in the story. Besides, movies continue renewing each week, whereas for a book to be composed and distributed takes a lot of time (Lee, wordpress.com). Before movies were made, most of the population read books to engage and improve themselves. Since movies came out, people are pulled in by the delightful and bright representation in the motion