Douglas Light said that our imagination is better than any answer to a question. Light distinguished between two genres: fantasy from fiction. He described how fantasy stimulates one’s imagination, which is more appealing, but fiction can just be a relatable story. In the same way, Books and movies are very different entities. In the short parable Doubt, the readers are lured in to the possibility of a scandalous relationship between a pastor and an alter boy. The readers’ curiosity is ignited because they are not given all the details. Therefore, their mind wanders further than the plot to create a story and characters that acted on one’s imagination; thus, the story became entertaining- flooded by the questions of what? Who? How? By which the reader can only answer. At this point, the readers create their own movie in a way. They will determine important aspects: how the character speaks, looks like, and reacts. Whereas, in the movie, the reader has no choice but to follow the plot laid out in front of them. No longer can they picture the characters in their own way or come up with their different portrayals. The fate of the story, while still unpredictable, was highly influenced by the way the characters looked, spoke, and presented themselves on screen. The movie leaves little to viewers' imaginations.In order to be entertained by literature or art, the viewer needs to feel that they can use their imagination and not be confined to a plot that reveals all.
In the parable Doubt, the controversial topics presented by John Patrick Shanley sparked differing views that the reader was torn between..It introduced a storyline revolved around a nun accusing a pastor of partaking in inappropriate engagement amongst the alter boys. Si...
... middle of paper ...
...der further than what we have in front of us. We want to impose our opinion on everything. We want to relate to it in a way that can only be done through out imagination. So, due to this, when we are not given the flexibility, then the context no longer becomes entertaining. The viewers do not want to be told how to think. Given these points, if they are influenced to believe that Sister Aloysius is a cruel individual like the movie portrays, then at the end of the movie and book when Sister Aloysius says, “ I have doubts! I have such doubts!” they will take that as a confession from her, and be further lead to believe that the accusations against Father Flynn are false. I think John Patrick Shanley chooses specific diction to create a conflict that has no precise resolution,he wanted the reader get lost in story and enter into their own story manifested within.
John Patrick Shanley creates a movie as a whole I feel was more informative than the play. In the play you have 4 characters Sister Aloysius, Father Flynn, Sister James, and Mrs. Muller. While the movie introduces a few other characters, for instance the children. For me the children made a difference because they for one made me understand what kind of kids Sister James was dealing with. I really thought that being able to see the way Father Flynn interacted with all of the young boys including Donald Muller was really helpful when trying to draw your conclusion of Father Flynn versus when reading it your left to imagine for instance; what some of the kids are like. The way the book sets you up your left leaning to Father Flynn being exactly what Sister Aloysius accuses him to be. We also get to see how sister James interacts with the kids and how Sister Aloysius influences her to change the way she deals with and teaches her class.
The plot of the novel is creatively explained in a way that anyone can visualize through the event...
Authors often make use of rhetorical strategies for additional effects, appeals to the reader, relating to an audience, or even for simply drawing attention to a specific section/part of a work. Nonetheless, these Rhetorical Strategies can prove crucial in the unraveling of such a work. The preceding is the case for a work entitled Something Wicked This Way Comes, by Ray Bradbury. Within the context of the story, a circus enters a small town and changes its overall atmosphere with never before seen mystical evils. Only two boys, Will Halloway and Jim Nightshade, stand in their way. These uncanny occurrences bring out the morality and malevolence of several characters in the story. In Bradbury’s work, there are many discrepancies in the moralities of each character relative to the development of the plot and their overall portrayal in the novel. Bradbury adds many instances in which certain characters have to make a choice between what they wish to do and what they should do. Such decisions accurately portray the conflict as an internal discontinuity between the ultimatums of good and evil. Thus, making the readers question his or her interpretation of each and challenge the societal parameters that encompass them.
Due to production costs and financial restrictions, the director and screenplay writer can never fully reproduce an entire literary work into a screen version. With the complications of time restriction in major motion pictures, a full-length novel is compacted into a two-hour film. This commonly leads to the interference in the sequence of events, alternation of plots and themes, and the elimination of important characters or events. But the one true adversary of novel-based films is Hollywood fabrication. Producers, directors, and playwrights add or eliminate events and characters that might or might not pertain to the storyline for the sake of visual appeal, therefore defacing the author’s work.
Sister Aloysius recruits a young, naive nun (Sister James) to assist her in monitoring the suspicious yet charismatic Father Flynn. She also addresses her concerns to Donald's mother, who surprisingly is not horrified or even shocked by the allegations. (Mrs. Muller is more concerned about her son getting into high school and avoiding a beating from his dad.) The play concludes with a one-on-one confrontation between Sister Aloysius and Father Flynn as she attempts to get the truth out of the priest. This nun is a diligent task-master who firmly believes that subjects such as art and dance class are a waste of time.
In The Parable several characters are presented to the reader. Each one has their own behavioral characteristics which one may or my not approve of. The two characters whose behaviors I most approve of are Lee Pai and Hernando. The characters whose behaviors I do not approve of are Sven and John. There are several reasons why I approve of the behaviors of Lee Pai and Hernando and do not approve of the behaviors of Sven and John. All of these reasons I have based on my interpretation of the story, The Parable.
A very common saying is “Don’t judge a book by its cover” which essentially means that everything is not always as it seems, there is usually much more to the story than what meets the eye. Death of a Salesman and “The Cat’s Table” both involve major elements proving that not everything is black and white, including setting, point of view, and symbolism. All of these crucial parts of literature help in proving that there is always more to a story, and that people do deserve the benefit of the doubt.
Before taking this course, I always looked at films and read books just as the average person does; interesting plot and how long will it hold my interest, but this course gave me an entire different perspective when watching films and reading books. Now that I have taken this course and have watched the required films, the most important thing when watching other movies and reading books, is the meaning behind each scene and how they relate and affect our world. For this paper, I will discuss a book that I read a long time ago, which is She’s Come Undone by Wally Lamb and how this book relates to this course.
Ambiguity in The Turn of the Screw and The Innocents How successfully does the black-and-white film version of The Turn of the Screw, The Innocents (Jack Clayton, 1961), render the ambiguity of James' original text? Ambiguity, the art of deliberately creating something that can have more than one meaning, lends itself to the written word without difficulty. A written story can involve ambiguity in the characters, plot, narrative - every factor in the story can have to it a sense of uncertainty. However, uncertainty concerning ambiguity is subtly different from uncertainty involving vagueness; the former is a deliberate ploy by the writer to leave interpretation open to the reader's own imagination, whereas the latter comes
Through using different sources, the fact that the novel is more developed than the film is strongly reinforced. The novel provides descriptions of the symbols, characters, and the setting. The symbols are clear in the novel. On the other hand, symbols are not present on the film. Characterization is well developed in the novel, but there is little characterization in the film. According to Bosley Crowther, author of an article titled, “Screen: Agitating Fable of Wild Boys: Savagery Is Depicted in Lord of the Flies”, the kids were not apt to make the film. The kids did not follow the characterization that the novel developed. Crowther states in his publishing, “The acting is woefully uneven, and, except for two or three fair performances, gives unmistakable evidence of having been done by spirited amateurs.” This passage describes the overall lack of characterization in the film for the actors do not seem to have the same qualities or characteristics that the kids in the island have. In addition, Crowther agrees that the film does not do justice to the novel, for it lacks the depth and description that Golding provides in his novel. Lastly, the setting contributes to the plot of the novel by correlating the decay of the island with the decay of morality, while the film does not show anything. The setting also serves as a microcosm view of society. E.C. Bufkin, author of Lord of the Flies: An Analysis, agrees that the novel is not only well developed, but that the island where the novel takes place serves as a microcosm of what society really is. Overall, the novel portrays Golding’s message through the use of symbolization, characterization, and description of the setting whereas the film does not make the message as clear as the novel does. Certainly, the film, compared to the novel, lacks crucial depth with its symbolism, characterization, and
Have you ever watched a movie or read a novel without a plot? Most likely your answer to this question would be no, because it would be dull. No one wants to hear a story with no intrigue or conflict. As you read a novel or watch a film, you want to connect with the characters and feel you can relate to the situations they’re dealing with. In every film and every story there’s a conflict the main character(s) is facing. The story of King Arthur, and the film With Honors appear at first to be on opposite sides of the entertainment spectrum. However, both are excellent examples of searching for ones inner human, and life’s meaning.
Both try to win Sister James over throughout the play, however, Sister Aloysius succeeds in the end. Father Flynn’s opinion of Sister Aloysius is made clear in the beginning of the film when he uses zoomorphism to describe her and says, “The dragon is hungry.” Sister Aloysius attempts to make the situation clear to Sister James and asks, “What have you seen?” (21). Shanley returns to the motif of vision to show that Sister Aloysius wants Sister James to open her eyes and see the truth about Father Flynn, that he may be molesting Donald Muller. Sister James is quick to switch sides in parts of the play though. When Father Flynn tells them that Donald stole the altar wine and he did not give it to him she is overwhelmed with relief saying, “Oh, what a relief! That explains everything! Thanks be to God! Oh, Sister, look, it’s all a mistake!” (34). In the epigraphs at the beginning of the novel, the quote “The bad sleep well” applies to Sister James at the end of the play and shows the effect that Sister Aloysius had on her. Sister James tells Father Flynn, Oh I can’t sleep. Actually one bad dream and then I haven’t slept right since” (58). Sister James finally sees the guilt in the world that Sister Aloysius wanted her to see. She is the good in the world and sees the cruelness of Father Flynn
Sister Aloysius has such different views from Father Flynn that she refuses to see any good in him. Due to this she always suspects the worst and, refuses to accept any other explanation. So when she finds out Father Flynn had a private talk with Donald Muller instead of thinking about what is best for the boy Sister Aloysius accuses Father Flynn of rape forcing Flynn to reveal what happened. This accusation not only forced Father Flynn to have to remove Donald Muller from the alter boys being the only group he enjoyed it also removed Father Flynn the only person Donald Muller would look for guidance from his
Their personalities are drastically different. Sister Aloysius was shown to be the not most agreeable person. Father Flynn was considerate and wanted to have a warm and loving relationship with the students so that the school will be a welcoming environment. "I think the message of the Second Ecumenical Council was that the church needs to take on more familiar face. Reflect the local community. We should sing a song from the radio now and then. Take the kids out for ice-cream." (Shanley 47) Sister James is naïve and innocent which allows her to be easily influenced. From the way that other characters relate to Sister Aloysius, it is learned that she is a fearful person. The students are afraid of her and Father Flynn is standing up for the students. Father Flynn is the type of person who liked his nails long and sugar in his tea. Sister Aloysius is so strict and she even mentioned how Frosty the Snowman shouldn’t be performed due to the magical element of the snowman coming to life. (Shanley 44) This causes an obstacle between the relationship of Father Flynn and Sister Aloysius. The conflict was worsened when Sister James reported to Sister Aloysius that Donald Muller was called out of class by Father Flynn and came back with alcohol in his breath and was acting unsettled. (Shanley 37) Sister Aloysius presented her id impulse, for Father Flynn to leave in an acceptable way
Sometimes, I wonder why the author wrote this story, to gross us out in the beginning or to make us wonder, what in the world is this? But I guess, the author just wrote it to show us a lesson, but to also let us just read it for fun. Seriously, in reality, books are just for reading and for relaxation, not to just know everything about it. I mean, if I had to read for understan...