People who enjoy science fiction would enjoy the movie or the short story the Minority Report. This paper is being written to express the differences between the movie and the story. The paper will be written based on the scenes, characters, and the technologies. The movie and the story had some of the same characters but some weren't exactly the same. The movie introduced many different characters and changed some of the others. For example, the movie had the plant lady and had the mentor of Anderton as the founders of Precrime while in the book, Anderton was the only founder of Precrime. Also, Witwer wasn't blond he had black hair and Kapler wasn't named Kapler he was named Crow. In the story they had the red head Fleming who did not exist
in the movie. Anderton’s wife in the book was still married to him, where in the movie they are divorced. Some of the characters that were altered or added changed some of the events in the story making it different. Each, the movie and the book contained different scenes. The movie had the scene of the garden, jumping across the vehicles, and Anderton’s eyes being taken out and exchanged for a new ones. The book had Anderton being Captured by Kapler, taken to the army facility, and getting put into hiding by Fleming. The differences in each of the scenes and the adding of scenes changed how the story flowed. The technology was altered between the movie and the story. In the movie the technology was more advanced, having holograms and wooden balls instead of little cards that tell: when, where, who died, and who murdered them; and had eye scanners all over. In the book, they had tapes to tell what the location looks like for the Precrime equipment and the little cards. The Precrime Agency also had flying cars where they didn’t in the movie. The technology's differences altered how you perceived the story and movie. It affected the development and growth in way the story was told. Each of the differences mentioned changed how the story or movie were perceived, how the events went down or how well it flowed.But in the end both stories ended up with the same conclusion with Anderton killing a moan to protect the Precrime Agency The differences in the movie and the book are very noticeable and aren't very well hidden.
With both the movie and the book there were similarities and differences involving the names of the characters. Justice Wargrave was known as Author Cannon in the movie. Also, Vera Claythorne was Ann Clyde. Another difference is Philip Lombard was Charles Morman in the movie. However, there were some similar names, Mr. Blores’ name continued to stay the same as well as Dr. Armstrong.
There are few similarities between the book and the movie. Usually most movies are similar to
There are many differences in the movie that were not in the book. In the movie there is a new character in the movie that was not in the book. This character was David Isay.
While watching the movie, I could see that the main characters in the book, both their names and traits, were the same in both the movie and book. However, aside from that there were many different as...
In both the novel and movie focus on the war. The war influences the characters to enroll.Also, the main setting is at the Devon School. However, in the novel Gene visits Leper at his house but in the movie Leper lives in the woods.In the novel Gene is coming back to the Devon School 15 years later.However, in the book he is coming to Devon as a new student.Therefore, similarities and differences exist in time and setting in the novel and the movie.In the novel and the movie there are similarities and differences in events, character, and time and setting.
Anderton Called Wally Page and asked if he could come to the monkey block. She demonstrates out to him the “Precog” who produced the Minority Report: Jerry. Jerry’s vision brought the discussion to a conclusion where it looked like that he would kill Kaplan as datum and produced a differing the report where he doesn’t commit the murder. Lisa enters and offers to help him escape.
One major difference in the movie that was not in the book was the starting scene of the movie was set in the moor with Sir Charles being attacked by the Hound. In the book the starting scene was when Watson and Holmes had just found a walking stick that had the initials C.C.H. on it. I think that the movie starting scene was more informative because it let you know about what was happening and it also gave some more suspense to the film.
It is a fool-proof system born to ensure absolute safety…but when it crumbles, would you go against everything it stands for just to save it? This is the platform that Philip K. Dick, author of the sci-fi short story "The Minority Report" (MR), has given us. Set in a futuristic New York City, we see Police Commissioner John A. Anderton as the founder of a promising new branch of policing: Precrime, a system that uses "Precogs" (mutated and retarded oracles) to predict all future crimes. However, the system appears to backfire when Anderton himself is accused to kill a man he's never even heard of. The movie adaptation by the same name also centers on a younger Chief Anderton, a respected employee of Precrime, predicted to murder a complete stranger who he was unaware existed. Amidst scandal, betrayal, and distrust, both Andertons must run from the justice system they've worked so hard to put in place, and admit to themselves, as well as to society, that a perfect system cannot be born of imperfect humans. Though the basis of the film's plot and major conflict stayed true to the story's, many changes were made to the personalities and roles of the characters, as well as the nature and detail of the main conflict and the sub-conflicts.
Mutant humans, nicknamed precogs, have visions of future crimes. An entire police force is dedicated to interpreting these visions and catching the future criminals before they commit these foreseen crimes. Commissioner John A. Anderton was the creator of this institution called Precrime in New York City and has a strong pride in his work. Everything had seemed to be a success, there had not been a murder for five years, but it all starts to fall apart when the precogs have a vision of Anderton committing a murder of a man he has never met before, named Leopold Kaplan. The commissioner believes he has been set up by a young man, Ed Witwer, who will be taking Anderton’s place when he retires and also possibly his wife, Lisa. Anderton goes on somewhat of a quest to find out who is behind all of this. Through his quest he discovers that the strongest precog, which is the female named Donna, sometimes has different visions than the other two male precogs. These are called minority reports, and Anderton finds that he does not have one. He finally finds who is behind his setup, and it is Kaplan, a retired Army General and the man he is supposed to murder. Kaplan had a plan to bring down the Precrime system by keeping Anderton from killing him even though the precogs had envisioned that Anderton would kill Kaplan. In the end, Anderton does kill Kaplan to prove the system still works and Precrime continues (Dick, 1987).
he director, David Attwood, adapted the novel The Hound of the Baskervilles to fit the needs of his film and audience. As a result, there are three major differences. First, the clues in the book and movie are very different. Secondly, the movie has much more action, making the plot diagram quite different. Third, the characters are altered to fit either the book or movies needs or effects. Overall, the clues, plot diagram, and characters in the original The Hound of the Baskervilles can be contrasted in many ways with the movie.
Adaptations are never carbon copies. A prime example is Philip K. Dick’s short story and Steven Spielberg’s 2002 film, Minority Report. The structure of the storytelling is indeed different as well as other key elements. The narrative transforms its structure into a more episodic approach when brought to the screen. Words on paper take on a new identity when brought to life on a visual basis.
Imagine a world in which the thought of murder is a thing of the past; a world that has successfully abolished the system of jails and fines with the aid of gifted individuals that can predict the future (Dick 72). Such a crime free world exists in Philip K. Dick’s famous short story, The Minority Report. Using the adaptation made by screenwriters, Scott Frank and Jon Cohen, DreamWorks was able to release the film version of Dick’s short story in 2002. Furthermore, this futuristic age film was directed by the famous director, Stephen Spielberg. The main focus of the short story and film surrounds the lead character John Anderton and his efforts to understand the minority report. In comparing the portrayal of John Anderton’s physical characteristics and the conspiracy surrounding him in the short story and film, one can clearly state that the character of John Anderton has been well adapted onto the big screen, even far more developed, than in the short story.
Furthermore, one of the main differences between the movie and the novel, Twilight, are the characters. Although both stories share the same characters and background information about the characters, there are differences in their
The characters that are similar are Charlie, Frank, Burt, Algernon, Mrs. Kinnian, and Dr. Strauss. Even though these are the same characters some of their roles are different in the film. There are also some new characters introduced in the film also. In the film Frank and Gimpy were Charlie’s so called friends but there was still bullying like there was in the story. In the film, they aren’t as dirty to Charlie. In the story, they ditch him and keep on tripping him in the bar. During the movie, Gimpy tries to trip Charlie with his cane but Charlie stands up for himself. Burt had a much larger role in the movie because Dr. Nemur was not in the film. He appeared much more and worked closely with Dr. Strauss. Mrs. Kinnian’s relationship with Charlie Gordon was much more romantic. They became close friends. In the short story, Charlie’s mother wasn’t acknowledged whereas in the movie it shows the relationship between them. She signed the paper allowing the procedure to be performed on him. She had abandoned him earlier in life and he went back to visit her after the operation. Dr. Strauss took on some of Dr. Nemurs’ traits in the story. He had much more of an ambition for
In Minority report some technological advances are the videos are in 3D, The cars drive themselves which is much safer because then there will be no accidents, and to determine somebody's identity they have eye scanners, and you cannot go anywhere without having your eyes scanned. They also have pre-cogs who can predict murders before they happen. This is good because they can keep people from being killed, but this is bad because technically they are arresting innocent people because the murder has not been committed yet, and sometimes the pre-cogs predict different futures, this is called a minority report.