Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Literary analysis essay
Literary analysis essay
Literary analysis essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
he director, David Attwood, adapted the novel The Hound of the Baskervilles to fit the needs of his film and audience. As a result, there are three major differences. First, the clues in the book and movie are very different. Secondly, the movie has much more action, making the plot diagram quite different. Third, the characters are altered to fit either the book or movies needs or effects. Overall, the clues, plot diagram, and characters in the original The Hound of the Baskervilles can be contrasted in many ways with the movie.
First off, the clues in these two works of art are very different. In the novel, the letter addressed to Sir Henry was created out of newspaper clippings; however, the “moor” was inscribed in black ink because the author of the letter was not able to acquire this less common word. At Baskerville Hall, Sir Henry and Watson heard both footsteps and a woman crying. After a couple nights, they followed the footsteps, where they confronted the Barrymores and found out right away what had materialized. Holmes also finds the brown boot
…show more content…
David Attwood continuously throws in more action than anticipated, constructing a thrilling movie. The exposition found in the novel portrays Watson and Holmes in their home office, examining a cane left by an anonymous individual. Also, the hound never hurt Sir Henry, and Mrs. Stapleton was fine. In the movie, the exposition shows Stapleton being chased by the police, completely changing the beginning’s perspective. The film shows Holmes finding the boot in a drawer, before Stapleton died. In the movie the hound hurt Sir Henry fatally. Mrs. Stapleton also is hung, unlike the book where she is fine. In the movie, Stapleton and a few others are found talking to spirits, which never happened in the book. Also, Holmes gets stuck in the mud chasing Stapleton, but before long he is
For example, Mama goes to the bank in the movie and is given a hard time about paying her mortgage, but this did not happen in the book. Another major difference is that the school bus scene, where the Logan kids played a trick on the white kids, was not shown in the movie, even though it was an important part of the story. There are some character changes as well. Lillian Jean, Jeremy, R.W, and Melvin are Simms’ in the book, but in the movie they are Kaleb Wallace’s children. However, the main plot difference is how the movie starts in the middle, summarizing everything from the first part of the book very briefly. Additionally, many scenes are switched around and placed out of order. Altogether, the plot and character changes contribute to my unfavorable impression of the
The movie and the story had some of the same characters but some weren't exactly the same. The movie introduced many different characters and changed some of the others. For example, the movie had the plant lady and had the mentor of Anderton as the founders of Precrime while in the book, Anderton was the only founder of Precrime. Also, Witwer wasn't blond he had black hair and Kapler wasn't named Kapler he was named Crow. In the story they had the red head Fleming who did not exist
Overall, the movie and book have many differences and similarities, some more important than others. The story still is clear without many scenes from the book, but the movie would have more thought in it.
Everybody expects to see the best parts of the book when going to see a movie that is based on a book, but most of the time “The book is better than the movie” and that is what happened in Into the Wild. The movie’s theme is somehow same but the way it is presented quite different than the book. The book Into The Wild, is a travel essay written by Jon Krakauer. It is about a young suburban man from a well to do family who hitched hiked to Alaska without informing his family. He was Christopher Johnson McCandless, a fine man but stubborn with his own idealism. He disappeared immediately after graduating from college with honors on the summer of 1990, donated his grad school fund of $24,000 to Oxfam, abandoned his car and belongings, burnt all the cash and identity, changed his name into Alexander Supertramp and started wandering across Northern California. He worked in several places, made new friends, and lived where people welcomed him. Finally he reaches Alaska, his dreamland. He was found by moose hunters dead in the bus 142. He was very much influenced by Leo Tolstoy who gave up his wealth and wandered into woods. He actually avoided his parents and the social surrounding but unfortunately he died lack of topographic map, flooding in the river and eating the moldy seeds. Krakauer portrays Chris as a gloomy, grudge-holding, very unlike the happy wanderer of the film. The movie excluded essential parts from the book and concentrates on Chris’s quest. It focuses more on Chris being adventurous, friendly, warm yet resentful towards his parents while Krakauer shows other side of Chris.
There are usually differences in two different versions of something. This can often be seen when a book is made into a movie. There are many similarities and differences in the book and movie versions of To Kill A Mockingbird by Harper Lee.
In the movie Holmes, in the beginning, was much more prideful and rude to Watson and people in general, but later on, Holmes was a lot nicer and somewhat humble at least compared to the book. This difference made the viewer feel less liking of the character of Holmes and it almost seemed that the director tried to save Holmes’s character by making him nicer at the ending. The difference had a big impact on the feeling of the movie because it felt that he was so stuck up he was rather unapproachable. ...
I have only included what I have to believe are largely important plot gaps and differences in the movie version in comparison to the book one, and so I apologize again if I have missed any other major ones. Forgive me, please.
There are usually differences in two different versions of something. This can often be seen when a book is made into a movie. There are many similarities and differences in the book and movie versions of To Kill A Mockingbird by Harper Lee.
Sir Arthur Conan Doyle’s The Hound of the Baskervilles is the third of four novels written about his world famous detective, Sherlock Holmes. However, unlike the other books written about Sherlock Holmes, much of The Hound of the Baskervilles is absent of the detective. Instead, the audience is left to work through the mystery of who murdered Mr. Baskerville with Sherlock Holmes’ assistant and friend, as well as the narrator of the novel, Dr. John Watson. There are multiple reasons Doyle may have decided to make Watson the narrator, and to remove Holmes from a large portion of the novel. First, as Holmes is such a dry and clinical person, by making Watson the narrator, Doyle is able to employ more descriptive and entertaining writing. Second,
In the novel, The Hound of the Baskervilles, by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, Sherlock Holmes and his sidekick, Dr. Watson, is confronted with an eerie mystery situated around the fabled Hound of the Baskervilles. They are challenged with many risks and in the end must unearth the mystery before it is too late. Throughout the enigma, Sir Arthur explores the theme of what can happen when one does or does not let themselves be ruled and dominated by fear.
After a slow week Watson observes that Ms. Stapleton saying to go back to London to Watson. Watson puts that into his first memo to Holmes. In his second Memo he had put in that there was a convict on the moor. Also during that memo he mentioned that he heard the howl of a strange animal. He also adds the description of all the suspects. One night they follow Barrymore into a room where he has a candle up against the window. Watson found out that the convict on the moor is Mrs. Barrymore’s brother and they were feeding him. Watson and Sir Henry decided to go catch the convict that night. That night they chase the convict to run from the moor when they see a shadow of a man in shape somewhat like Holmes. Later that week Barrymore gives Watson some critical evidence of who could have killed Sir Charles. Barrymore gives Watson an end of a burnt letter with the initials L.L. The next day Watson goes to everyone in the moor who has the initials of L.L. He finds out it was Laura Lyons and goes to her the next day.
I chose to rewrite chapter one of The Hound of the Baskervilles from Sherlock Holmes’s point of view for many reasons. I thought it would be interesting to read a Holmes novel form Sherlock’s view point, so getting to write it myself somewhat provided me with that opportunity. Although it was not Doyle that did the writing, I feel as though I got better in touch with Sherlock Holmes as I was doing the rewrite. Having to try and think like Sherlock to write the story from his view, made me see the story in a new aspect. I think it would be extremely interesting to have an entire novel from Sherlock’s viewpoint rather than Watson’s.
Have you ever read a book and then watched the movie and saw many differences? Well you can also find lots of similarities. In the book “The Adventures of Tom Sawyer and the movie “Tom and Huck” there are many similarities and differences having to do with the characters personalities, the setting, the characters relationships with one another and the events that take place.
Sir Henry and Dr. Watson figures out for Barrymore’s strange behavior. Mrs. Barrymore admits her brother is the escaped convict, Selden, each night Mr. Barrymore will bring bread and meat to him. After hearing this, Dr. Watson and Sir Henry agree on going out into the moor, and putting him in a place where he can do no harm. This is when they hear the howl of a hound. In fact, in the novel, it states, “ … a long, deep mutter, than a rising howl, and then the sad moan … the whole air throbbing with it, strident, wild, and menacing … [Sir Henry] ‘I am not a coward … seemed to freeze my very blood.” (135-136) It also states, “[Watson] ‘Shall we turn back’ [Sir Henry] ‘No … we have come out to get our man, and we will do it.” (136) The Hound of the Baskerville has haunted them for generations. When Sir Henry hears this howl, it frightens him. He could have easily ran away, but decides to overcome that fear to catch the convict. This relates to the theme because, Sir Henry overcome his fear of the supernatural myth of the hound by allowing himself to understand the
“The world is full of obvious things which nobody by any chance ever observes,” states Sherlock Holmes (Doyle, The Hound of the Baskervilles loc 1238). According to TV Tropes, mystery is a genre of fiction where the plot revolves a mysterious happening that acts as the driving question. With any given problem there is a solution; however, and the question is “how does one come about to that solution”? Extremely high intelligence level, keen observation, creative imagination and sensitivity to details are just some of the qualities that Holmes possesses. In the process of solving mysteries, there is always a borderline between mere guessing, a coincidence, and a scientific approach that Holmes calls deductive reasoning. In Sir Arthur Conan Doyle's 1902 novel, The Hound of the Baskervilles, Dr. Mortimer seeks advice from Holmes as he explains the curse that has been plaguing the Baskerville family. With the power of deduction, Holmes realizes that Mr. Stapleton is actually a Baskerville descendant and has been planning to get rid of the other members of the family to claim the family fortune. Conan Doyle tells the reader what their mind is capable of doing by incorporating Holmes through his novels as he uses observation, deduction and knowledge in solving his cases. One important key that makes him different from most people is that he sees everything that people often neglect to pay attention to. A remarkable proof which shows that Holmes holds an extraordinary analytical mind and is uniquely capable of solving a mystery through his great sensitivity to minute details and the ability to draw connections from it was shown as he observes and deduces information from the letter received by Sir Henry Baskerville the moment he arrived...