Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
An essay into literary devicees
Literary devices english12
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The Hound of the Baskervilles written by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle and the movie The Hound of the Baskervilles directed by Jeremy Bret are two works of art that are mainly telling the same story. There are, however, many differences about the book and the movie. Those differences don’t affect the outcome of the story, but they give less impact to the story. Along with the differences there are many similarities, and those similarities give you confidence that it is the same story. One major difference in the movie that was not in the book was the starting scene of the movie was set in the moor with Sir Charles being attacked by the Hound. In the book the starting scene was when Watson and Holmes had just found a walking stick that had the initials C.C.H. on it. I think that the movie starting scene was more informative because it let you know about what was happening and it also gave some more suspense to the film. In the movie Holmes, in the beginning, was much more prideful and rude to Watson and people in general, but later on, Holmes was a lot nicer and somewhat humble at least compared to the book. This difference made the viewer feel less liking of the character of Holmes and it almost seemed that the director tried to save Holmes’s character by making him nicer at the ending. The difference had a big impact on the feeling of the movie because it felt that he was so stuck up he was rather unapproachable. ... ... middle of paper ... ...aid in the book that the maid died of exhaustion from running so it must have been a little bit larger than how the movie shot it. I pictured all of the characters differently but that is just personal opinions and everyone would have those. I was overall pleased with the movie, because it stayed fairly close to the book's descriptions and the storyline. The storyline didn’t change except for the Hound dieing. The book and movie had many more differences and a lot of similarities yet they had the same storyline. Work Cited Doyle, Sir Arthur Conan. The Hound of the Baskervilles. Great Britain, Penguin Groups, 2004. New York, Berkley Publishing Group,1993. The Hound of the Baskervilles. Jeremy Bret. Granada Television Limited, 1984
book was blander. The book did not catch my attention as much. The movie really caught my
The movie and the story had some of the same characters but some weren't exactly the same. The movie introduced many different characters and changed some of the others. For example, the movie had the plant lady and had the mentor of Anderton as the founders of Precrime while in the book, Anderton was the only founder of Precrime. Also, Witwer wasn't blond he had black hair and Kapler wasn't named Kapler he was named Crow. In the story they had the red head Fleming who did not exist
In both the novel and movie focus on the war. The war influences the characters to enroll.Also, the main setting is at the Devon School. However, in the novel Gene visits Leper at his house but in the movie Leper lives in the woods.In the novel Gene is coming back to the Devon School 15 years later.However, in the book he is coming to Devon as a new student.Therefore, similarities and differences exist in time and setting in the novel and the movie.In the novel and the movie there are similarities and differences in events, character, and time and setting.
In the movie, it is told in a third person point of view and the characters look a lot more different than how they do in the book. The movie goes by much quicker than the book. Also Pony goes straight home after the church burns down.
There are many similarities and many differences between the book and the movie. In the movie Of Mice and Men there are over 15 differences. For example, the first major difference from the book and the movie is at the end of the in the movie George does not hesitate to kill Lennie, but in the book it was very hard to shoot him. He first aimed the gun at Lennie and then put the gun down but he had to put the gun back to Lennie head. That is a major part because George hesitating to shoot causes suspense and sorrow. George‘s best friend that he has been through everything with and he has to kill him. The director changed this scene to change the tone and outcome of the movie. The book had a better ending than the movie because it makes you feel depressed also the movie did not get as intense as the book did, because the director explained the outcome a different way.
Overall, the movie and book have many differences and similarities, some more important than others. The story still is clear without many scenes from the book, but the movie would have more thought in it.
I have only included what I have to believe are largely important plot gaps and differences in the movie version in comparison to the book one, and so I apologize again if I have missed any other major ones. Forgive me, please.
First of all, the movie is concise and more meaningful than the original book. Take an easy example of Macbeth, the movie
“The Hound of the Baskervilles” demonstrated the differences between the upper class and the lower class and even between those people who were in the same class as each others at the end of the 19th century in England. Beside those differences, there were also some similarities between the two classes. In this essay, I will analyse how they are alike and different in some main aspects such as the belief in the curse, the relationship to the law, their mysterious actions, and especially the subjugation between people in the same class.
The differences are sort of minor, but they are still fairly noticeable. One character difference is in the movie. There is one young man who is killed by the tiger but is not the boyfriend of the princess. This does not happen in the book. Also, in the movie, the characters are more modernized. The king has bodyguards and escorts (when he is driving to the amphitheatre), which is not mentioned at all in the short story. In the story, the king is so respected that one assumes he probably didn’t even need bodyguards since he had an iron will and that the people would do whatever he
The book and movie share very similar plots, however there are key details that progress the plot in different ways. To start, Liesel steals many more books in the book opposed of the movie. This is a major difference because Liesel stealing books is of course the basis of the
The biggest difference is that the film included two characters who were not mentioned in the book, and both characters played important roles. The first was the fisherman who discovered Grendel and warned the village, and the second was the man who stole the dragon’s treasure and made it attack the village. Another key difference is that the movie did not include a heated argument between Unferth and Beowulf. In the book, Unferth accuses Beowulf of being unworthy to challenge Grendel and claims that he will die if he tries. He says this out of spite because he wants the fame and glory for himself. In the movie, Unferth does not make as big of a scene. In the book he makes such a big scene that he causes some villagers to question the abilities of Beowulf and wonder if he can actually protect them and not make Grendel even more blood-thirsty. Despite these differences, the endings to both stories were virtually identical. This was important because it helped keep the stories closer to each other. Both accounts of the tale followed the same basic story, but the novel did a better job because it had more details and better portrayed the life of Beowulf. It is clear in the book that Beowulf’s people thought very highly of him and were grateful for his protection and leadership. In the closing paragraph, the novel shows how
The book The Hound of the Baskervilles, by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, and the BBC version of it, The Hounds of the Baskerville share many similarities, yet are quite different in countless ways. The general gist of the two plots is rather similar; in both of them, there is a mysterious, possibly supernatural hound, that a man (Sir Henry, or Henry Knight) fears, and Sherlock Holmes and his assistant Watson are called upon to solve the mystery and help Henry have his piece of mind. However, a great deal of the characters have different attributes, certain themes vary, many aspects of the plot have been tweaked, and the setting has been rather drastically modified. One of the most reworked aspects seen on the BBC version is indeed, the setting. The change of the setting from a vast, desolate moor and a large mansion to a minefield and a top secret laboratory
Watson states “I will come, with pleasure,” said I. “I do not know how I could employ my time better.” (Doyle, 34). This statement alone shows that he is willing to do whatever and go wherever Holmes wanted. However, you do see that Watson truly does enjoy being with Holmes it makes him think of situations in a different way. For example, what we would think is a simple scratch on the floor could be so much more significant to the eyes of Holmes and Watson. In a way you can say that without Holmes, Watson would be bored and probably wasting his life away dealing with less important things. However, the excitement and joy you see in this statement you can assume the Watson will stay by Holmes side and continue on their adventure. Not only does Watson continue to follow Holmes he is starting to get just as excited about the unique opportunity they have stumbled upon. Watson even states “It is evidently a case of extraordinary interest, and one which presented immense opportunities to the scientific expert.” (Doyle,
Sir Arthur Conan Doyle's writing style in “The Hound of the Baskervilles” utilizes trends from opposite ends of the Victorian Era. Doyle is well known as a late Victorian author and yet he has characteristics in his writing style of the early Victorian era. The literature in the Victorian era had a variety of commonalities focusing on behavior of a man and how views changed over the era. The drive for social advancement, what it is to be an “Englishman”, and rebellion against idealized notions and codes of conduct are the most prominent factors in “The Hound of the Baskervilles” and representation of the Victorian era through the writings of Sir Arthur Conan Doyle.