Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Why is charlie in flowers of algernon
Flowers for algernon charlie’s character development over the course of the story easy
The theme identity in flowers for algernon
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Why is charlie in flowers of algernon
“Flowers for Algernon” is a short story by Daniel Keyes and was made into a film by Mark Winemaker in 2000. It is about a low intelligence man, named Charlie Gordon, who had an operation to become smart. He is a genius but he faces many hardships because he is intelligent. He gradually becomes dumb again. The story and the motion picture can leave audiences with diverse views. In comparing and contrasting the “Flowers for Algernon” short story and film, there were many similarities and differences in the story elements. These include theme, characters and plot. The themes are both very similar in the short story and film. But in the movie the theme of ethical boundaries is show directly during the convention in Chicago. Charlie points it …show more content…
out while he is speaking. The theme bullying isn’t as direct as it is in the short story. The story has Charlie notice a boy in a restaurant getting mocked and gets angry. There is also a theme in both which is people can be highly intelligent but not have enough heart. Not all of the characters are the same in the film and short story.
The characters that are similar are Charlie, Frank, Burt, Algernon, Mrs. Kinnian, and Dr. Strauss. Even though these are the same characters some of their roles are different in the film. There are also some new characters introduced in the film also. In the film Frank and Gimpy were Charlie’s so called friends but there was still bullying like there was in the story. In the film, they aren’t as dirty to Charlie. In the story, they ditch him and keep on tripping him in the bar. During the movie, Gimpy tries to trip Charlie with his cane but Charlie stands up for himself. Burt had a much larger role in the movie because Dr. Nemur was not in the film. He appeared much more and worked closely with Dr. Strauss. Mrs. Kinnian’s relationship with Charlie Gordon was much more romantic. They became close friends. In the short story, Charlie’s mother wasn’t acknowledged whereas in the movie it shows the relationship between them. She signed the paper allowing the procedure to be performed on him. She had abandoned him earlier in life and he went back to visit her after the operation. Dr. Strauss took on some of Dr. Nemurs’ traits in the story. He had much more of an ambition for
fame. The plot in the short story and the film is alike but it differs also. In the beginning of the short story and the film before the operation the plot line is comparable to the film. A main difference is the setting. Charlie had worked and a plastic factory in the story and in a bakery in the film. After the operation bigger differences start occurring. In the film Charlie begins to remember the memories of bullying from his childhood. He liked a little girl named Harriet and he asked his cousin to write a letter to her saying he liked her. His cousin wrote an awful letter full of terrible words. After kids heard about it they came and beat him up. The story doesn’t tell of him receiving these childhood memories. A change that appeared in the movie is that Charlie is angrier than he was in the short story. He is very pleased with his life and loves being smart in the story but in the movie he gets very stressed with everything. Charlie uses a computer to learn in the film but in the story he has a sleep machine that he uses every night. Chicago was a turning point where a big difference occurred. In the short story, it just stated that Charlie and Algernon went to the Psychiatric convention. In the film, Charlie asks Dr. Strauss to speak. This reveals the theme. He talks about the thin line between ethical and unethical science at the convention. The experiment had been done by a Russian scientist and had a 100 percent chance of failure. Knowing this, the operation was still performed on Charlie. He mocked them for the unethical actions. Throughout the film it also shows that Charlie and Mrs. Kinnian had a romantic relationship. She came with him to Chicago, checked on him when he stopped coming to the doctors, and even spent a night with him. Towards the end of the film Charlie visits his mother and learns about some of his past. She sent him away when he was young because he was too much for her to handle. It was hard to keep everything similar to the film because the story was told in first person and it’s awfully tough to do in a movie. The producers had to add and change events so the feelings from the shorts story could be expressed in the movie. In the short story and film, Flowers for Algernon, there are many similarities and differences in the theme, characters, and plot.
With both the movie and the book there were similarities and differences involving the names of the characters. Justice Wargrave was known as Author Cannon in the movie. Also, Vera Claythorne was Ann Clyde. Another difference is Philip Lombard was Charles Morman in the movie. However, there were some similar names, Mr. Blores’ name continued to stay the same as well as Dr. Armstrong.
Another similarity in the book and movie is that the characters have to go against their morals in order to decide what to do in certain situations. An example of this in the book is when Skip realises he would have to trespass and steal in order for him to keep himself and his friends alive. Or in...
The movie switches the roles of the cyclopes and the hero so that the movie has its own version of this event and so its not exactly like The Oddyssey. Everett and his crew also face a version of the Seirenes. The movie introduces the Seirenes when Pete gets out of the car because he hears this beautiful song that he cannot resist. are very similar, but the movie portrays the book in a unique, interesting way. The movie has most of the characters the book has, but some of the characters do their part in a different way in the movie, that is what makes this new way of the book interesting.
While watching the movie, I could see that the main characters in the book, both their names and traits, were the same in both the movie and book. However, aside from that there were many different as...
The movie and the story had some of the same characters but some weren't exactly the same. The movie introduced many different characters and changed some of the others. For example, the movie had the plant lady and had the mentor of Anderton as the founders of Precrime while in the book, Anderton was the only founder of Precrime. Also, Witwer wasn't blond he had black hair and Kapler wasn't named Kapler he was named Crow. In the story they had the red head Fleming who did not exist
In both the novel and movie focus on the war. The war influences the characters to enroll.Also, the main setting is at the Devon School. However, in the novel Gene visits Leper at his house but in the movie Leper lives in the woods.In the novel Gene is coming back to the Devon School 15 years later.However, in the book he is coming to Devon as a new student.Therefore, similarities and differences exist in time and setting in the novel and the movie.In the novel and the movie there are similarities and differences in events, character, and time and setting.
Three things that were similar and different include the following. In the book it showed they lived in an annex above Mr.Frank's business. In the movie it also showed them hiding in a secret annex above Mr.Frank’s business for hiding from the Nazis so they didn't get caught. Another similarity that happened was Anne and Peter start liking each and visited each other and visited each other in the attic, which was also in the book, along with the movie. There are a lot of similarities that were in the movie and the book, but these are just some of them.
Since they cut out some of the scenes when Byron is being especially mean in the movie, Byron is more friendly. Joey is told about the bombing instead of in the book how she never finds out because they leave right away after the bombing. The dad adds more responsibility to Byron because the family stays later than they planned, but the dad has to leave. Although Byron takes his responsibility way too seriously, he is not so mean and immature in the movie as he is in the book. The family has different appearance in the movie, for example, Momma doesn’t have a tooth gap.
Sister Flowers and A View From the Bridge are two short stories with strong correspondence and likeness. In the story, Sister Flowers by Maya Angelou our narrator Marguerite, a young African American female gives the reader introspect of her life and how a scholarly educated and aristocratic woman named Mrs.Bertha Flowers has made an impact on the narrator's life. While in the story A View From the Bridge by Cherokee Paul Mcdonald a man talks about his encounter with a boy he met on a bridge. Both short stories from the choice of character comparisons with both Marguerite and the boy on the bridge , The author's theme,syntax and symbols to overall effectiveness of both narratives proves that these two stories are more the same as a sense to their overall message they are trying to communicate to the reader.
The similarities are prolific in their presence in certain parts of the novel, the very context of both stories shows similarities, both are dealing with an oppressed factor that is set free by an outsider who teaches and challenges the system in which the oppressed are caught.
Some of the characters in the novel, like Lennie, are portrayed differently in the movie. In the novel, Lennie is said to be “a huge man” (2), but in the movie he isn’t very big, although he is bigger than George and some of the other characters. In the movie he is stronger and bigger than the others, but not to the extreme amount that the book portrays him to be. Also, Lennie is depicted as very mentally challenged, which is shown by the way he speaks. Whereas in the book, Lennie is said to have a mind of a young child instead of being disabled. As well as Lennie, Curley’s wife is represented a little bit differently. In the movie,...
The similarities are quite apparent, the movie plot mainly follows the basic plot that the book took, leaving the viewer’s with a sense of accomplishment, as this is sometimes not achieved in the highest degree. Scout still has a brother, Jem. They both still meet Dill and have a few adventures with him throughout the film. Jem and Scout still have a single father, Atticus, having lost their mother many years ago. Calpunia is still their cook. And the whole story still has an overpowering sense of focusing on two main stories, Boo Radley (Arthur Radley) and Tom Robinson’s trial.
Although the novel and film are similar in terms of plot and theme, they are different in terms of characters. Charlie’s emotions and personal trials were a large part of both plots because the whole story is about his personal maturation and experiences. Intolerance was an important issue in the life of Charlie Gordon because it was hard for him to be accepted anywhere else but the bakery. Although some of the original characters were removed from the film, their personalities were incorporated into that of another character.
The first subplot is Charlie and Miss Kinnian relationship. The first similarity is Charlie goes to night school in both the movie and the book, and Miss Kinnian is his night school teacher. “ I’ll get it in a few minutes becaus I'm not so fast, sometimes i'm a slow reeder too in Miss Kinnians class for slow adults, but i'm trying very hard.” This shows us that he wants to get smarter in both the movie and the book. The second similarity is Miss Kinnian tells Charlie that
To begin, there are many similarities and differences in the characters personalities. One similarity would be Aunt polly not having the hear Tom when he was being naughty in both the book and the movie. Another similarity would be Huck and Tom always acting michiviouse they’re always going on adventures and causing trouble for adults. One difference would be Huck in the movie seemed a little self centered, he seemed that way because when he had the chance to help Muff he didn’t want to because he was scared he would be killed by Injun Joe. Another difference would be Muff seemed more caring in the movie like when he was telling stories to the kids and he took them in the cave which made you feel a little sorry ...