Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Death in modern poetry
My experience with writing
My experience with writing
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Death in modern poetry
Throughout different eons, poets have contemplated the cycle of life and death, as well as the cycle of the seasons. Different perspectives pervade different forms of poetry, culminating in either finding meaning in the movement of time, or perhaps taking a more pessimistic view of the inconstancy of human life in contrast to nature’s eternity. Millay, in her poem “Spring”, takes a more skeptical view of the trope that spring brings with it consolation and recompense for loss, signifying rebirth and a revitalization of the world. Instead, she focuses on the reality of life in the now; the fact that the seasons come and go doesn’t change that. The trope is superficial, as a facade of flowers and happiness won’t change or fix time. However, …show more content…
For Millay, her lack of structure directly reflects her stern and skeptical tone, almost to the point of ridicule, as she calls the personification of April “an idiot.” Life to Millay still remains the same despite the season’s arrival, and therefore death remains prevalent to her, a necessity to life. To reflect this cynical lack of revitalization, there is no conformity to structure or repetition. On the other hand, Bethell uses the flower, an image of spring, life, and happiness, to reflect on death, as flowers also harken back to funerals and tombstones. This connotation showcases the reflective yet bittersweet tone of the speaker. And even though Bethell’s poem contains an “ABBA” rhyme scheme within each stanza, which creates the image of links to a chain, it wobbles and threatens to fall apart in the first, fourth, and fifth, when Bethell opts to use assonance instead: “Because their fragrance / As the seasons hasten.” (2223) This slight change in rhythm reflects the speaker’s hesitant tone, and her contemplations while moving on from her loss. The assonance itself creates a fragile feeling during these slant rhymes, as if the words themselves are about to break. The constant struggle between moving on and realizing that death is just part of the cycle of life is important throughout Bethell’s poem, and is further reflected in its structure by her use of the word “flower” in the first and last lines. Despite her initial hesitation throughout the poem, she ends …show more content…
The second line of her poem personifies memory: “Memories ask garlands.” (2) In this line, the speaker externalizes her “memories”, and the use of “ask” further establishes the hesitation felt throughout the rest of the poem. Since Bethell uses garlands as a symbol of circularity, the memories almost seem to be asking for stability, or perhaps for the return of the deceased. In either case, memories are also viewed as a chain of events in which each link is connected to the next. This comparison connects the manmade with the natural, further supporting the cyclicality of the poem and how the cycle might involve us as well. Involving humanity in the cycle is further established by the personification of death: “When Death, newcomer” (7), further connecting man with the cycle of life. Millay, in contrast, gives her personification a foolish, naive, almost annoying character, similar to that of a young child. The beginning of the poem directly apostrophizes April, a month that usually represents the coming of spring, and asks “to what purpose, April, do you return again?” (1) This tone matches that of asking a child why they’ve returned for the umpteenth time, with slight irritation. As Millay digs deeper however, contemplating life itself, her contempt for this facade grows. She ends
...ntion of memories sweeping past, making it seem that the grass is bent by the memories like it is from wind. The grass here is a metaphor for the people, this is clear in the last line, “then learns to again to stand.” No matter what happens it always gets back up.
Although this section is the easiest to read, it sets up the action and requires the most "reading between the lines" to follow along with the quick and meaningful happenings. Millay begins her poem by describing, in first person, the limitations of her world as a child. She links herself to these nature images and wonders about what the world is like beyond the islands and mountains. The initial language and writing style hint at a child-like theme used in this section. This device invites the reader to sit back and enjoy the poem without the pressure to understand complex words and structure.
Millay is associating death with happiness. This unlikely comparison allows the reader to become relaxed about the hardships the author was facing in the earlier passages of the poem. As the earth gave way and Millay sank softly and perfectly six feet under the ground, the reader celebrates as if a runner was finally crossing the finish line. Comparing death to a successful situation is an unusual way of looking at the end of life. Yet, this view of death is a positive outlook and is quite wonderful as opposed to other literary views of death such as "death: the gatekeeper of hell who has conquered the Earth." Millay makes the reader believe that the sinking earth is more of a pair of open hands waiting to hold the weary soul of man. Death is a chance of catching up on that sleep that you never quite caught up on. Another image that Millay gives the reader is that of a mother embracing her child. Mother Earth welcomes home her tired child and allows him to rest his head upon her soft breast. She runs her hands through his hair and lays them on his brow as to cool him off. She whispers her tired child to sleep through the sweet and friendly sound of rain.
Time is equated with constant decay throughout the entire poem, which is primarily shown in the speaker’s comparison of the concept of eternity to a desert. Love, and other concepts felt in life, are subject to this negative force of deconstruction over time, and are vanquished in death; this idea can be seen in the witty commentary at the end of the second stanza, “the grave’s a fine and private place, but none I think do there embrace”
The confronting theme of life is shown through poetic techniques in the poems, Pieta and November. The cycle of life is shown through Pietà and November in two different ways. The child’s life is unfortunately cut short as it, ‘only [lives] one day.’ Whilst in November, the subject of the poem is about a Grandmother who is at the end of the cycle of life. This is unlike the baby in Pietà who is not able to live, or have a chance of living a long life. This may cause the audience to ponder about the purpose of life. Armitage uses consonantal alliteration and visual imagery, in ‘sun spangles,’ to symbolise that, ‘the only thing you can get, out of this life,’ is the beautiful happy moments. This logic is true for many non-believers as the purpose of life is unknown to them and the only positive reason for life is by creating happy memories.In November,the last moments of life are shown through the enjambment and flow. The audience is involved with the journey of bringing the woman to the hospital as if you are, ‘with your grandma taking four short steps to [your] two.’ This is effective as the audience can put themselves in the place of the narrator in the story.This is unlike Pieta which is written in past tense and is not able to put themselves in the place of mother but the audience is more sympathetic towards the mother and her loss of her child.
“We pluck and marvel for sheer joy. And the ones still green, sighing, leave upon the boughs…” (14-16). This emphasis on nature reflects the respect and connection to the natural world the culture was trying to convey in their poetry. The colorful and illustrative descriptions of the physical world are indicative of the mindset and focus of these poems. Namely the fact that they were concerned with the world around us and the reality we experience as opposed to that of abstract concept of god or the supernatural as seen in other historical texts. This focus on nature is important because it sets the context in which the major theme of loss and separation originate from. In this poem the poet chooses to emphasize the passing of time in the choice of comparing the two seasons. Spring, in which life begins a new, and fall, in which the leaves begin to fall off and die. The poem reads “And the ones still green, sighing, leave upon the boughs- Those are the ones I hate to lose. For me, it is the autumn hills” (15-18). This juxtaposition of these two
The poem, “Field of Autumn”, by Laurie Lee exposes the languorous passage of time along with the unavoidability of closure, more precisely; death, by describing a shift of seasons. In six stanzas, with four sentences each, the author also contrasts two different branches of time; past and future. Death and slowness are the main motifs of this literary work, and are efficiently portrayed through the overall assonance of the letter “o”, which helps the reader understand the tranquility of the poem by creating an equally calmed atmosphere. This poem is to be analyzed by stanzas, one per paragraph, with the exception of the third and fourth stanzas, which will be analyzed as one for a better understanding of Lee’s poem.
In this poem, Millay talks about the many past lovers she had in her life, using metaphor. The speaker says, “The rain is full of ghosts tonight that tap and sigh” (3-4). She is reminiscing over memories of her past lovers, who haunt her memory even after all these years. She goes on to say, “In my heart there stirs a quiet pain for unremembered lads that not again will turn to me at midnight with a cry” (6-8). She is upset about the fact that those people, men or women, will never be with her again. This shows us
as much about life as it is of death. The next two verses fit in with the theme of green, fertility and springtime. White roses bloom after rain. They hold water and sunlight. This is a similar question.
The first half of the poems’ images are of life, coming of age, and death.
She is known for creating radical novels, which stuck discord in many of its early readers, and writing highly respected sonnets. Similar to Behn, Smith also captures the inner thoughts of not just women, but all human beings in the sonnet “Written at the Close of Spring” and juxtaposes the beauty of the annual spring with the frailty of humanity. In the first stanza of this poem, the speaker uses imagery in order to help readers connect with the beauty and delicacy of spring flowers. In the second stanza, she calls to attention the fact that the spring flowers are dying and, to experience the beauty again, one will have to wait until next spring to enjoy them. In the third stanza, the poem’s focus changes from nature to humanity and asserts that as people age and begins to take part in, “tyrant passion, and corrosive care” (Line 11), youth becomes wasted. The speaker comes to the realization that once youth vanishes, it will forever, unlike the yearly revival of spring. The major fault of this sonnet is that it can be difficult to understand and has several different messages, some of which are not as strong or enlightening as
The outset begins with how the character could not stop for death, so death stopped for her. Afterward, she and death boarded a quaint carriage that slowly drove. The poem states that they passed the school, the fields, and the setting sun--and twists the speech with an "or rather--he passed us", referring to the
In “Written at the close of Spring,” Smith’s second sonnet, she focuses on the wonderful ability nature has in rejuvenating itself each year. Smith personifies Spring in the way it “nurs’d in dew” its flowers as though it was nursing its own children (“Close of Spring” 2). While it creates life, Spring is not human, because it has this ability to come back after its season has passed. Human beings grow old and die; we lose our “fairy colours” through the abrasive nature of life (“Close of Spring” 12). Smith is mournful that humans cannot be like the flowers of Spring and regain the colors of our lives after each year.
“Spring” by Gerard Manley Hopkins (1918) is a sonnet divided into two distinct sections, the octave and the sestet. The author’s use of alliteration, rhyming and vivid imagery takes the reader from an energetic view of springtime to a desperate prayer for the innocent.
Despite the free metre, the poem has a strict form with an elaborate rhyme scheme: The rhyme [-ɔrɡən] twice encloses the same two rhyming couplets, the second of which ends with identic words, as do the first and the last verse of the poem. The only enjambments connect the third to the fourth, and the eighth to the ninth verse. This cyclic structure might represent the cyclic nature of life and the renewal of nature in spring. The poem starts with a juxtaposition of nouns that draw the reader into the scene.