Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Introduction of research methodology
Research methodologies
Research methodologies
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Introduction of research methodology
3.0 Introduction
Methodology is a body of knowledge that enables researchers to explain and analyze methods – indicating their limitations and resources, identifying their presuppositions and consequences, and relating their potentialities to research advances (Miller 1983). Moreover, it underpins the types of questions that can be addressed and the nature of the evidence that is generated (Clark et al. 1984). Figure 1.0.1 below illustrates different layers and approaches that are available and must be consistently employed when conducting a research. In accordance with the research onion, prior data collection and analysis techniques can be determined, considerations on several issues must be completed.
Figure 3.0.1 The Research Onion - Saunders et al (2007)
3.1 Research Design
The following subsections explain philosophical positions, research approaches, strategies, and time horizon of this study.
3.2 Research Philosophies
The first layer of the ‘onion’ is the Research Philosophies. A research philosophy is a belief about the way data about a phenomenon should be collected and analyzed (Levin 1988). There are four different philosophies namely; Positivism, Realism, Interpretivism and Pragmatism.
Positivism is working with an observable reality. Research can produce laws. Results can be generalised, similar to those produced by natural scientists.
Realism is working with an observable reality. Research can produce laws. Results can be generalised, similar to those produced by natural scientists.
Interpretivism is an epistemology that advocates that it is necessary for the researcher to understand differences between humans in our role as social actors. This emphasizes the difference between conducting resea...
... middle of paper ...
...h will be conducted as well as the findings written and displayed in a moral and responsible fashion. Interviews, questionnaires and company records will be treated with the strictest confidentiality. Information gathered will only be utilized to the benefit of the company and not derogatively. This will be in keeping with the thoughts of Saunders, Lewis and Thornhill (2009) who stated that Research Ethics relates to questions about how we formulate and clarify our research topic, design our research and gain access, collect data, process and store data, analyze data and write up our research findings in a moral and responsible way.
3.10 Summary
In keeping with Moser and Kalton’s thoughts on the role of researchers, the Author will diligently make recommendations, suggestions and offer a new marketing strategy to achieve the listed objectives.
Word Count 2133
In response to the question set, I will go into detail of the study, consisting of the background, main hypotheses, as well the aims, procedure and results gathered from the study; explaining the four research methods chosen to investigate, furthering into the three methods actually tested.
Realism, in philosophical terms, refers to the concept that there is a reality beyond our perception. This means that how we see things and what we believe about them has no impact on the nature of said things. For example an individual may see an object as blue and another see the same object to be red, this is merely a disagreement between both parties about how they should label the colour. This wouldn’t mean that both parties are discussing different objects, this shows that no matter what individual’s beliefs or thoughts on the real world are only ever approximations and do not accurately capture reality. (O’Brien, M and Yar, M, 2008)
Realism claims that what we can review about our surrounding is established in the fact that they absolutely exist. What we believe about gathered information is what we think about the actual world. It states that there is an actual world that assimilates directly with what we think about it.
In comparison, anti-positivism rejects naturalism and partakes in an anti-naturalism approach to research. This approach is known as methodological dualism because it separates natural sciences from human sciences (CITE). Anti-naturalism assumes that culture shapes human behavior through reason, values, desires, and traditions. Humans are not autonomous; that is to say, humans are not merely an object but have beliefs and traditions that evoke social practices (Bevir and Rhodes, 2004: 131). For the reason that “the social world is what we experience is to be: it is subjectively created” (Halperin and Heath, 2012: 40). Interpretivism argues that it is impossible to gain knowledge through “objective regularities of behavior” because our interpretations construct the social world (Halperin and Heath, 2012: 40) Anti-positivism, moreover, doesn’t believe that facts rule social behavior, but there is a deeper context to behavior. Rejecting naturalism is a better approach because it moves past the causes of
The father of quantitative analysis, Rene Descartes, thought that in order to know and understand something, you have to measure it (Kover, 2008). Quantitative research has two main types of sampling used, probabilistic and purposive. Probabilistic sampling is when there is equal chance of anyone within the studied population to be included. Purposive sampling is used when some benchmarks are used to replace the discrepancy among errors. The primary collection of data is from tests or standardized questionnaires, structured interviews, and closed-ended observational protocols. The secondary means for data collection includes official documents. In this study, the data is analyzed to test one or more expressed hypotheses. Descriptive and inferential analyses are the two types of data analysis used and advance from descriptive to inferential. The next step in the process is data interpretation, and the goal is to give meaning to the results in regards to the hypothesis the theory was derived from. Data interpretation techniques used are generalization, theory-driven, and interpretation of theory (Gelo, Braakmann, Benetka, 2008). The discussion should bring together findings and put them into context of the framework, guiding the study (Black, Gray, Airasain, Hector, Hopkins, Nenty, Ouyang, n.d.). The discussion should include an interpretation of the results; descriptions of themes, trends, and relationships; meanings of the results, and the limitations of the study. In the conclusion, one wants to end the study by providing a synopsis and final comments. It should include a summary of findings, recommendations, and future research (Black, Gray, Airasain, Hector, Hopkins, Nenty, Ouyang, n.d.). Deductive reasoning is used in studies...
Following the principles of the second camp, van Fraassen offers his alternative to scientific realism. His stance is known as constructive empiricism. According to van Fraassen, “science aims to give us theories which are empirically adequate; and acceptance of a theory involves a belief only that it is true”. The quote means that a theory must fit in an observable, empirical world and its descriptions about the world must be true. In addition, the theory must also save all phenomena related to theory and not just the observable ones. Van Fraassen also mentions that the acceptance of the theory involves more than belief. It requires certain commitments that reveal a pragmatic aspect to the acceptance of a theory.
This essay is going to critically discuss the advantages and disadvantages of using surveys and questionnaires as a method of Socio-Legal research. When conducting socio-legal research, a number of methods can be used to collect useful information.
Now within the rest of this paper you will be finding a few different things getting discussed. Staring it off we will be discussing the articles that we have found to make our arguments and hypotheses. After wrapping up the literature reviews we will be discussing the hypotheses thus continuing onto our variables and indicators. Once we discuss our hypotheses we will be moving onto the research design. The research design will have our general issues, sampling, and methods.
Positivism Paradigm is considered the “scientific method”; Interpretivist Paradigm approaches understanding using the world of “human experience”. Critical and Transformative researchers "believe that inquiry needs to be intertwined with politics and a political agenda" (Creswell, 2003, p.9). Pragmatism theorists are not committed to any specific system of philosophy or model that use the most relevant theory applicable to their research. Understanding paradigms is essential to preparing for dissertation research. Paradigms provide a framework to write and explain my philosophies, accurately support the data compiled and structure the narrative research. Selecting the paradigm will determine if the research will include qualitative data, quantitative data or a mixed method which will incorporate a blended method approach. Choosing an incorrect approach can lead to research flaws and
Positivists is believe that reality is constant and observable and describable from an objective viewpoint (Levin, 1988), i.e. Study of phenomena without interfered. Positivists should repeat the isolated phenomenon and observations. This frequently includes control of reality with varieties in just a solitary autonomous variable in order to distinguish regularities in, and to frame connections between, percentage of the constituent components of the social world. (dissertation.lib, 2015)
...oherent research practice functions to collect and communicate information about the world, a scenario enabled by key concepts of ontology and epistemology.
Positivism is a research method that developed from the behavioral revolution, which sought to combine positivism and empiricism to politics (Halperin and Heath, 2012: 27). This research approach is governed by natural law to observe, understand and to find meaning in the empirical world. A positivist would investigate empirical questions that assume how the world works through the accuracy of a probable truth (Gerring, 2001: 155). This type of research seeks to answer two empirical questions, such as “what is out there” and “what do we call it” (Gerring, 2001: 156).
Whereas, all approaches that are non-positivist have commonalities, with reference to their methodology and ontological viewpoint. The data that is required by interpretative social scientists to validate their study is fairly dissimilar to the data required by positivistic social scientists.
Positivism is a research method that developed from the behavioral revolution, which sought to combine positivism and empiricism to politics (Halperin and Heath, 2012: 27). That is to say, this research approach is governed by natural law to observe, understand and to find meaning in the empirical world. This type of research seeks to answer two empirical questions, such as ‘what is out there’ and ‘what do we call it’ (Gerring, 2001: 156). Positivism is only interested in phenomenons that can be observed through our senses. Thus, positivism is interested in social realities that can be observed and measured by the scientific method (Halperin and Heath, 2012: 29). Furthermore, positivism believes that the gathering of evidence through scientific method can create knowledge and laws, known as induction (Halperin and Heath, 2012: 27). That is to say, evidence can be verified and later generalized then applied to multiple contexts. A positivist would investigate empirical questions that assume how the world works through the accuracy of a probable truth (Gerring, 2001: 155).
Research philosophy, refers to the development of knowledge adopted by the researchers in their research (Saunders, Lewis and Thornhill, 2009). In other words, it is the theory that used to direct the researcher for conducting the procedure of research design, research strategy, questionnaire design and sampling (Malhotra, 2009). It is very important to have a clear understanding of the research philosophy so that we could examine the assumptions about the way we view the world, which are contained in the research philosophy we choose, knowing that whether they are appropriate or not (Saunders, Lewis and Thornhill, 2009). According to Saunders, Lewis and Thornhill (2009), three major ways of thinking about research philosophy are examined: ontology, epistemology and axiology. Each of them carries significant differences which will have an impact on the way we consider the research procedures. Ontology, “is concerned with nature of reality”, while epistemology “concerns what constitutes acceptable knowledge in a field of study and axiology “studies judgements about value” (Saunders, Lewis and Thornhill, 2009, p110, p112, p116). This study is intent on creating some “facts” from objective evaluations which are made by the subjects. Therefore, epistemology will be chosen for this study as the way of thinking about the research philosophy.