Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Performance appraisal systems introduction
Performance appraisal systems introduction
Performance appraisal systems introduction
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Performance appraisal systems introduction
1. What are some problems with Precision’s performance appraisal process that might cause challenges for Jackson to implement a merit pay program? The challenges Jackson will face firstly is, employees do not have the written description of their job that clearly states what they are supposed to do. Every year they collect the reviews and all the employees receive the review of average and no further guidance or encouragement to do better from the employer. Secondly, the supervisor and the employees do not talk to them on daily basis. They only meet once a year for the review and if there is a serious matter with the employee’s performance. 2. What changes do you recommend Precision make to the performance appraisal process to align it with
Mujtaba, B. G., & Shuaib, S. (2010). An Equitable Total Rewards Approach to Pay for Performance Management. Journal of Management Policy and Practice vol. II (4), 111-121.
Miller, C. E., & Thornton, C. L. (2006). How Accurate Are Your Performance Appraisals? Public Personnel Management, 35(2), 153-162.
The performance assessment and appraisal forms are crucial within the performance management system (Aguinis, 2014). However, the appraisal form within the case study provided is designed for the supervisor’s use thus missing one vital factor throughout the entire process, employee participation. Thus, questioning the validity and reliability of the process. This is especially concerning as the bottom 10 per cent of employees are being fired and the top 20 per cent are being rewarded with $5,000.00 based on what their supervisor records on the form without consultation with employees. Thus, supervisors may not provide accurate scores as they do not have to justify their responses (Aguinis,
In April 2010, KK BB, the CEO of Marshall & Gordon, a leading public relations firm met with the firm’s leadership committee off-site in Miami. This off-site brought together Marshall & Gordon’s executive committee, practice and regional heads, and senior HR officers to discuss on redesigning the firm’s compensation system. A global advisory taskforce, under the direction of an external consulting firm, had spent three months collecting and analyzing data. Marshall & Gordon hired external specialists to design the new performance management program. The specialists proposed that the senior managers and human resource form a global advisory unit together with Marshall & Gordon partner to represent the firm’s five regions of the firm and lead the design process. The advisory unit surveyed all consultants in February in order to understand their way of thinking about the fairness, worth, and effect of the current performance management system. Majority of the interviewees responded to the corporate surveys implying that the subject was topic was especially exciting to them. Interviews gave insights on present and prospective business plans and direction. The survey also showed that specific focus across certain employee populations should be given. Six current hires from key competitors were also interviewed to comprehend competitor pay practices and compensation program structures. Further focus groups discussions and key information interviews enabled the taskforce’s to understand the needs of certain groups within Marshall & Gordon’s worker population. The survey culminated with the taskforce conducting interviews of 20 partners and principals togeth...
The analytical lens that will be constructed aims to allow for an interpretation of how students who are attempting to be upwardly-mobile are helped with moving beyond roadblocks that prevent mobility. This is mobility is achieved through a combination of adherence to meritocratic systems and the borrowing of cultural capital. I will argue that reproduction occurs when reliance on meritocracy in the educational system and the limited cultural capital of the student’s working-class parent/s are solely employed. In order to move beyond a mere reproduction of the parent’s social class, I argue that the student must interact with individuals or groups from higher social spheres who know how to activate cultural capital in specific instances
Today, the cost of college is high and is continuing to rise. However, the number of students attending college has risen in the last twenty years. Importantly, how are more students having the ability to pay for the rising cost of higher education? To cover the rising cost colleges and universities have implicated a program of merit aid (non-need-based aid) and financial aid. This creates a discussion on whether merit aid benefits all students at every income level. However, to understand how important merit aid is one must understand the students’ elasticity of demand for college. The case study on the Robinson College reveals how the elasticity of demand and merit aid work to reduce students’ elasticity of demand, and how it increases revenue
Performance related pay is a financial reward given to employees whose work is considered to have reached a required standard or is above average. “PRP criteria can relate to the individual employee, to work groups or to the organization as a whole” (Armstrong, 2002). It is fair to provide people with financial rewards as a means of paying them according to their contribution (Armstrong 1993:86). The primary purpose of performance related pay in any organization is to recruit, retain and motivate the workforce. It also helps in focusing employees’ minds on particular goals (Protsik, 1966); communicate to employees an organization’s core values, and change the culture of that organization (Kessler and Purcell, 1991).
Chapter 42 “Democracy and the Public Service: The Collective Services” by Frederick C. Mosher discusses unions as they were discouraged by conservative members of state legislatures, city councils, boards of education and county boards but they developed in parts of the federal establishment, and had a growing influence on federal employment policies (431). Federal unions have decreased in numbers of efforts to damaging the civil service as there aims was fundamentally the same as civil service, unions have civil service the common enemy of partisan patronage (431). The federal government avoids “collective bargaining” and “unions” but instead use “employee management cooperation” and “employee organizations” as general legitimacy of the unionization of public employees (433). Labor organization and collective bargaining are frowned upon in government for most of U.S. history and are still forbidden in some
How employee & supervisor will work together to sustain, improve, or build on existing employee performance.
Banner, D. K., Graber, J. M. (1985). Critical issues in performances appraisal. Journal of Management Development. Issue 4. Pp. 27-35.
When it comes to performance-related pay or in other words, merit pay, I believe that most people are familiar with this concept. This method of payment means that with more labor, better performance, and results, people can get a higher salary in return. It is very common in many industries, such as in sales or on production lines. However, whether it should be applied to the teaching profession is always a controversial issue. Some people think that it would be unfair for teachers, but others think that this can help increase competition, thereby improving the quality of teaching. These two completely opposite views both seem sensible. However, in my opinion, merit pay for teachers is necessary because it can improve teachers’ motivation,
3. How does performance appraisal influence employee morale, and how does it impact the company’s profits?
Although performance is a major objective at top organizations, successfully addressing poor performance is also a key focus. Although many employees feel or dread performance appraisals they are directed to enforce clarity with individual employees day-to-day work-load, performance appraisals develops responsibility while making employees accountable for performance expectations, reinforces future career planning, helps the organization with determining training needs, and provides a stem of documentation for legality purposes. Performance management in detail is much broader than many employers, and employees assume and necessitates so much more. Proficient appraisals should represent a summary of on-going dialogue. Focusing only on an annual performance evaluation leads to misrepresentation of the performance management process in its
Grubb, T. (2007). "Performance Appraisal Reappraised: It's Not All Positive." Journal of Human Resource Education. Vol. 1, (No. 1,): 1-22.
Corporations are looking for new ways to improve employee performance as well as remain competitive. Pay for performance is one method some businesses are utilizing to improve employee performance. Performance-based compensation exists when compensation is tied directly to that portion of an individual’s performance that can be effectively measured. There are a number of ways in which this may be accomplished and a number of examples as well how it is applied. One of the oldest examples is taken from the ancient Egyptians, where slaves working in the pyramids were given bread for superior performance. Payment of commission for sales production is one of the methods used today.