Performance Appraisals have been around for several years. Every year employees and managers both dread this time of year. The employees dread it because they are not looking forward to the feedback they will hear from their boss. The boss is dreading it because they are wasting time filling out the “standard” form, and basically checking the box that the appraisal has been completed. In our textbook it states, “Giving performance feedback is the No. 1 dreaded task of managers (Kreitner 283). Performance appraisals should not be a dreaded part of the job for the employer or employee. Employers this it is hard to remember all of the different aspects throughout the year, as well as finding time to present it to the employee. There are many studies that list out the positives and negatives of giving performance appraisals, as well as other alternatives for giving feedback to employees. I feel that performance appraisals, if given correctly, can be positive for both the employee and the company as a whole. My focus for this paper is to learn why performance appraisals are not working and researching other methods such as Management by Objective, Graphic Rating System, as well as 360 Degree Feedback. I will also discuss the history of performance appraisals, as well as the pros and cons.
When performance appraisals came about, the process was a way to determine if the wage of the employee was equal to their performance. “Appraisals were used to decide whether or not the salary or wage of an individual employee was justified”
(Archer North). If after the appraisal, the employee still does not meeting the requirements that their boss was grading them on; they would be docked in pay. The reverse is true if you were going abo...
... middle of paper ...
...erformance Appraisal. 2010. Web. 19 Aug. 2011. .
Schraeder, Mike, Bret Becton, and Ron Portis. "A Critical Examination of Performance Appraisals: An Organizations Friend or Foe?" The Journal for Quality and Participation (2007): 20-25. Print.
Segal, Jonathan A. "The Dirty Dozen Performance Appraisal Errors - BusinessWeek." Businessweek - Business News, Stock Market & Financial Advice. 14 Jan. 2011. Web. 19 Aug. 2011. .
Fenton 10
Shipper, Franklin. "A Long Term Study of the Impact of a 360 Feedback Process on Self-others' Agreement and Performance." Academy of Management. Print.
Tosi, Henri L., and Stephen Carroll. "Some Factors Affecting The Success Of 'Management By Objectives'" Journal of Management Studies 7.2 (1970): 209-23. Print.
It allows the company to move towards its goals efficiently and effectively. Being specific in the objective sets a clear picture of what is need. Including systems to measure the output and success of the objective allows for future improvement and to ensure thing stay on track. A company always wants to ensure that their objective is achievable. The tasks should be challenging but not create hardship or frustration. Objectives that are realistic take into account the skills, funds and other resources available to completing the task. In the case of Maersk, an example of following a SMART objective was the response by the company to the 2008 recession. Maersk’s HRM team had to set short term objectives to maintain growth while improving its workforce. The implementation of different strategies aided the company in its successful development and hiring of qualified candidates to support the short term
The performance assessment and appraisal forms are crucial within the performance management system (Aguinis, 2014). However, the appraisal form within the case study provided is designed for the supervisor’s use thus missing one vital factor throughout the entire process, employee participation. Thus, questioning the validity and reliability of the process. This is especially concerning as the bottom 10 per cent of employees are being fired and the top 20 per cent are being rewarded with $5,000.00 based on what their supervisor records on the form without consultation with employees. Thus, supervisors may not provide accurate scores as they do not have to justify their responses (Aguinis,
Banner, D. K., Graber, J. M. (1985). Critical issues in performances appraisal. Journal of Management Development. Issue 4. Pp. 27-35.
Performance appraisal provides the employer an opportunity to communicate with the employees about the mission, strategy, vision, values and objectives of the organization, and it personalizes organizational strategy into individual performance criteria (Chattopadhayay, Rachana, Ghosh, Anil Kumar, 2012). It has been observed that employee motivations to perform, to develop capabilities and to improve future performance are influenced by the performance appraisal system (Landy et al., 1978; Kanfer, 1990). According to Saiyadain (1998), the basic purpose of performance appraisal is to judge the relative worth or ability of an individual employee in performing his/her tasks. There are many advantages to using a formal system if performance appraisals are designed and used properly (Murphy and Cleveland, 1995). If objectively done, appraisal can help to identify a superior, moderate and poor performance. The methods chosen and the instruments used to implement these methods are crucial in determining whether the organization manages its performance
In every business organization, employees have to play a vital role in determining its survival. (Rusli Ahmad, 2007 cited by Ahmad & Bujang, 2013)The employees are the most important assets for organization. Therefore, most of the organizations are comprehensive using performance appraisal to review and evaluation the performance of employees. According to Swanepoel et al. (2000), performance appraisal is a formal systematic process of identifying, observing, measuring, recording and developing the job-relevant strengths and weaknesses of employees. (Cited by Esfahani and Abzari et al, 2014) Performance appraisal is a results of employees in how well they performing within the organization. For example, they have joining and success in certain project of organization. Performance appraisal also is a process within the overall performance management process. (Dowling & et al, 1999, cited by Jafari, Bourouni & et al, 2009) The performance management process is including organizational objectives, day to day performance, professional development, rewards and incentives.
Numerous definitions as been given to performance appraisal by numerous scholars, researchers and practitioners. According to Flippo (1984), "performance appraisal is the systematic, periodic and an impartial rating of an employee’s excellence in the matters pertaining to hi...
Highly competitive market requires a highly competitive organization. High performing organizations depend on their cultures, streamlined processes, and people with the right skills, knowledge and attitudes. Performance management is vital to building a high functioning organization. Performance management is a cyclical process aligning organizational goals to its functions and employees as it measures continuous improvement. “Performance management is a continuous process of identifying, measuring and developing the performance of organization’s members and align performance with strategic goals of the organization” (Aguinis, 2007). An employee review or performance appraisals falls under a large umbrella of performance management; however,
Performance appraisal is a process of obtaining, analyzing and recording information about the relative worth of an employee. It is a systematic periodic and an impartial rating of an employee’s excellence in matters pertaining to his present job and his potential for a better job. A good appraisal system provides right feedback about the quality of performanc...
Performance appraisal is a method to evaluate the job performance of an employee. The overall objective of performance appraisals is to measure and develop the performance of employees and enhance their future potential and significance to the company. The process should comprise a minimum of four elements: initial goal setting, monitoring and data availability, continuous feedback, and annual assessment. The initial goal setting explains how all employees should have goals. The performance appraisal process is commonly used to make sure that every member of the organization sets and achieves effective goals. The performance appraisal procedure allows the organization to give a clear-cut understanding of the performance expectations to every
Performance management requires the willingness and commitment to focus on improving performance at the level of the individual or team every day/ “Cascio, 2015, p. 354). Performance appraisals plays a key role in performance management as it is a judgment and feedback process. Cascio, 2015 states that appraisal serve two purposes which are:
Allan, P. (1994). Designing and implementing an effective performance appraisal system. Review Of Business, 16(2), 3.
Performance appraisal is viewed as important in terms of appraisal being part of the accountability apparatus of the public service. Being able to show that appraisals are carried out and that performance issues are being discussed is considered an important element in presenting information to politicians and the public and provides assurance around accountability for the performance of public organisations. The level of conformance with carrying out PMDS appraisals, for example, and the scores received, are seen as issues of public concern and
Performance appraisal is the key ingredient of performance management .each year, employees and their immediate bosses enter into an elaborate gaming exercise called the performance appraisal
Appraisal is the evaluation of the worth, quality, or merit. In the organizational context, performance appraisal is a systematic evaluation of personnel by superiors or others familiar with their performance. Performance appraisal is also described as merit rating in which one individual is ranked as better or worse in comparison to others. The basic purpose in this merit ranking is to ascertain an employee’s eligibility for promotion. However, performance appraisal is more comprehensive term for such activities because its use extends beyond ascertaining eligibility for promotion. Such activities may be training and development, salary increase, discharge, etc. besides promotion.
Strategic human resource management incorporates providing ways to help all employees grow for both themselves and the company. One way management helps individuals succeed is through conducting performance appraisals. A performance appraisal is used to evaluate an employee, by the form of communication, on how he or she is performing their job and establishing a plan for improvement. Performance appraisals are used for many reasons, but the main goal should be to promote a healthy change in an employee’s behavior and performance. Increasing an employee’s personal growth benefits both the individual and the organization. Other uses of performance evaluations are for promotions, pay increases, and personal goal achievements. A meaningful performance