Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
A term paper on mediation
Evaluating mediation
Strengths/weaknesses of mediation
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: A term paper on mediation
Definition of Mediation
Mediation is in general defined as "the intervention in a standard negotiation or conflict of an acceptable third party who has limited or no authoritative decision-making power but who assists the involved parties in voluntarily reaching a mutually acceptable settlement of issues in dispute."
Mediation codes of ethics generally require mediators to remain impartial and neutral, to avoid conflicts of interest or its appearance, to obtain informed consent for the involvement of the participants, to uphold confidentiality, and to implement the process in a timely fashion.
Initial Contact with Parties
Mediators may enter disputes at the direct request by the parties, referrals, direct initiation by the mediator, or by
…show more content…
"A mediation plan is a projected sequence of procedural steps initiated by the intervenor that will assist negotiators in exploring and reaching an agreement.” The parties and the mediator generally develop a plan together. A mediation plan should consider who will be involved in the mediation, the location of mediation, whether third parties may be present, which issues are of most importance to the parties, a behavioural guideline, a plan to educate the participants about the mediation process, a general plan for the first meeting, and how any probable deadlocks may be …show more content…
This statement introduces the mediator and the parties, commends the parties for their willingness to participate to seek a solution and address their relationship challenges, defines the mediator's function, describes the mediation procedures including mediator impartiality and neutrality, , explanation of the proposed mediation procedure, confidentiality, and an explanation of private caucuses (meetings), describes the meeting format and schedule, and proposes behavioural guidelines/ground rules for the sessions. The mediator may then address any questions from the parties, and seek a confirmation of a joint commitment to begin. The mediator then shifts the attention to the opening statements of the
Sue contracts with Tom to deliver a quantity of computers to Sue’s Computer Store. They disagree over the amount, the delivery date, the price, and the quality. Sue files a suit against Tom in a state court. Their state requires that their dispute be submitted to mediation or nonbinding arbitration. If the dispute is not resolved, or if either party disagrees with the decision of the mediator or arbitrator, will a court hear the case? Explain. (See Alternative Dispute Resolution.)
My brother, Andrew stated that he felt betrayed how his best friends go out and party with him, then turned around and call my mother, Faye, and told them that he was addicted to cocaine. Two days went by; my brother, Andrew, avoided all phone calls from my mother and his best friends. Finally, on the third day after the confrontation, my oldest brother, Gary, and mother, Faye, showed up at Andrew’s dorm room and explained to him if he went with them to get a drug assessment then he would be able to stay in school and keep everything that my family had threatened to take away from him. My brother, Andrew, had already lost most of his trust in his friends, but he agreed to take a drug assessment because he did not want to lose what he had.
Mediation is typically ordered in types of cases that there is significant emotional ties; creating a potential for hostility, loss of relationships or personal feelings getting in the way of reaching an agreement. Arbitration is the best option for cases where the parties simply cannot come to an agreement and decide to have someone else decide the outcome of the case for them, without the expense and formality of a trial. Arbitration is also useful in highly complex cases where it is necessary to have a highly trained professional come to the
A good mediator steers the couple away from arguments and name-calling and makes the process as businesslike as possible. Mediation eliminates much of the rancor found in divorce court. The mediation process focuses on the real-life issues occurring at the end of a marriage instead of rehashing past ill will. A mediator doesn’t advise either partner, but helps them arrive at the best decisions possible through discussion and compromise.
2. Mediation allow parties to be involved, they want them to see how everything will go. Some cons about mediation is it can cost a lot of money it is very expensive. A lot of people think maybe one day it will be mandatory. The concerns are that using arbitration will keep companies confidential and in cases like this it will be bad for the company and its business.
Immediacy is a key component in the helping process because it is used to talk about something important with your client or to alleviate something that is happening in their life. There are many different ways that a client can respond to immediacy, such as building barriers in the relationship, having thoughts, feelings and reactions to what is being brought up and having mixed emotions about the counselor themselves. The purpose of immediacy is to be used when their needs to be a open discussion about the relationship between helper and helpee and to help the client develop new skills that will aid them in their self-understanding, communication and relationships in the near future. There are two different types of immediacy, which are relationship immediacy and here & now immediacy.
William James once said, “Whenever you’re in conflict with someone, there is one factor that can make the difference between damaging your relationship and deepening it. That factor is attitude.” Mediation is a process that can help parties resolve conflict. Even though mediators are not supposed to change the attitudes of parties they can show them the situation in a different light, thus causing the parties’ attitudes to change and the conflict to be resolved. Mediators need to understand there is a lot that goes into conflict and by understanding these concepts and theories they can mediate the dispute in a more thorough and proper way. Some parties might be trying to save face and that is why they are not being honest or telling the truth. Parties could be dealing with the tensions of connectedness and separateness, certainty and uncertainty, or even openness and closedness. The parties’ conflict styles could be avoiding, accommodating, competing, collaborating or compromising. It is important for mediators to be aware of all these different concepts and theories that can affect mediation. Through a thorough examination of conflict management styles, Face Negotiation Theory, and Relational Dialectics Theory it will be shown how important these theories and concepts are to effective mediation.
Ott, Marvin C. "Mediation as a Method of Conflict Resolution: Two Cases." International Organization 26.04 (1972): 595-618. JSTOR. Web. 3 Dec. 2013.
Poitras, J. (2007). The Paradox of Accepting One's Share of Responsibility in Mediation. Negotiation Journal, 23(3), 267-282. Retrieved January 23, 2012, from ABI/INFORM Global. (Document ID: 1313496891).
Its essence is that it is an agreement through which the parties involved in a dispute try to solve it outside a court system. For the most part, businesses request that workers consent to an arbitration, in which they surrender their right to sue in court over employment-related issues, for example, termination and discrimination. A worker who consents to an arbitration agreement promises to pursue any claims through arbitration, rather than a lawsuit. One detriment to the arbitration process is it restricts the amount of data every side can get from the other. Generally, this hurts the employee because the business is generally the one possessing the majority of the reports and data relating to the employee 's case. Mediation, on the other hand, is a system in which there is an active participation of a third party, which plays a role of facilitating the process of dispute resolution and suggests the solutions for resolving such disputes (Sirbu, 2013). The employment situation that is best solved by arbitration is a situation in which there is a dispute between the labor unions and the employers concerning the wages of the employees. Mediation best solves a situation in which employees are pushing for their
Unlike judges, mediators do not have the authority to deliver binding judgments. Nevertheless, they may have significant influence on not only the lives of those involved in the mediation but also individuals affected by the settlement. The actions, judgments, strategic choices, and interactions of a mediator with the disputants in mediation have an undeniable impact in relation to the dispute at hand as well as the results of the mediation
Although functions of mediators and arbitrators have several characteristics in common, there are significant instrumental differences that make them distinct from one another. Firstly, whereas the arbitration process is similar to litigation in its adversarial nature, in which parties have the objective to win the dispute, the fundamental goal of mediation is to bring the disputants to settlement through compromise and cooperation without finding a guilty party. In arbitration, parties compete against each other in “win-lose” situation. During mediation, parties work on mutually acceptable conditions with the assistance of a facilitator. In this process, mediators do not have power to make decisions, they work to reconcile the competing needs and interests of involved parties. The mediator’s tasks are to assist disputants to identify, understand, and articulate their needs and interests to each other (Christopher W. Moore,
The first stage of the negotiation is preparation. It is the fundamental process of negotiation. The purpose of preparation is to identify the opposing interests and priorities on the issue addressed (Ya’akub, 2014). The negotiator must have the information and knowledge of factual facts regarding the issue discussed. In addition, it is also to ensure that the negotiator be knowledgeable about the relevant information of the matter addressed. During this stage, the preparation includes the outlining of both sides negotiator interests for the purpose of identifying common interests among them (Ya’akub, 2014). It is important in order to ensure that mutual agreement will be achieved. This is because both sides of negotiator will have different interest in the same issue that will be addressed. Other than that, the preparation also includes the preparation for alternative options in case the initial options are rejected. As for this reason, the outcome of the negotiation is depending on how well does the negotiator being prepared for any possible change of plan. Moreover, the negot...
Mediation is a way to solve a dispute without having to resort to court procedure which sometimes could turned out to be rigid, formal and time consuming especially when it needed a lot of paperwork and the possibility of adjournment which could consume years. Besides that, unlike in court, mediator as a third impartial party did not acted as a judge who decides on the resolution however, the mediator will help the parties to explore the needs and issue which before preventing them from achieving a mutual resolution and settlement. The mediation process gave the authority towards the parties to agree with each other and open up the chance for the parties to meet with a resolution at the end of the mediation session.
It takes a diplomatic approach, and seeks an agreement with the least amount of hostility. The following is a quick overview of how the process works. Mediation seeks to find common ground With a mediator, you are still going through a divorce, but the process is aimed at a settlement that is agreeable to both parties without the intense level of animosity that is so common in a traditional divorce. As soon as a husband and wife get their own attorneys, the battle lines are drawn. Each attorney working to get as much for their client as possible.