Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Cross-cultural conflict
Cross cultural conflict resolution strategy
Cross cultural conflict in mediation
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Cross-Cultural Mediation
Introduction
This paper discusses a cross-cultural conflict scenario in which a mediator must apply the appropriate skills to resolve the conflict. In order to resolve these types of conflicts mediators must apply a non-bias approach to the conflict because the mediator must perceive and identify the cultural differences in order to appropriately resolve the conflict. The mediator must facilitate communication, and they must invoke trust with the disputants for successful cross-cultural conflict resolution.
The conflict discussed in this paper revolves around a custody dispute in which the disputing parties are a divorcing couple who are having conflict over the cultural difference in which each parent would like their daughter raised. The father is of Arabic descent that was raised with Islamic values and significantly embraces his culture in every facet of his life. According to Schencker (2011)“Traditionally, Muslim dads head up their households and are responsible for supporting their families and helping to teach their children about life and Islam as they grow older.”
The mother was born in the United States and is not committed to any one religion. Her morals and values are firmly based on the United States judicial system. She would consider herself a free spirit who enjoys the cultural freedom found in American culture. She wants her daughter to enjoy new experiences that the American culture provides without being tied down to strict inflexible cultural beliefs. These cultural differences are creating significant conflict in the child custody proceedings. Both parents would rather try to resolve this conflict through mediation rather than litigation.
The parties involved in this conflict not...
... middle of paper ...
... Social Work, 49(3), 506-13. Retrieved January 22, 2012, from Research Library. (Document ID: 671516321).
Poitras, J. (2007). The Paradox of Accepting One's Share of Responsibility in Mediation. Negotiation Journal, 23(3), 267-282. Retrieved January 23, 2012, from ABI/INFORM Global. (Document ID: 1313496891).
Poitras, J. (2009). What Makes Parties Trust Mediators? Negotiation Journal, 25(3), 307-325. Retrieved January 22, 2012, from ABI/INFORM Global. (Document ID: 1823235871).
Schencker, L. (2011). Utah's Muslim dads: Leading by example, not force. The Salt Lake Tribune. Retrieved January 23, 2012, from ProQuest Newsstand. (Document ID: 2378719021).
Werner, Barbara Lynn. (1994). Mediator and client communicative behaviors in child-custody mediation. Women and Language, 17(2), 21. Retrieved January 22, 2012, from Research Library. (Document ID: 4517660).
Lewicki, J. R., Barry, B., & Saunders, M. D. (2011). Essentials of negotiation (5th ed.). New
Fisher, Roger, William Ury, and Bruce Patton. Getting to yes: negotiating agreement without giving in. 2nd ed. New York, N.Y.: Penguin Books, 1991. Print.
Lewicki, R. J., Saunders, D. M., & Barry, B. (2006). Negotiation Readings, Exercises, and Cases Fifth Ed. Bill Brubaker, Mark Asher, A Power Play for Howard Negotiation (pp. 616-626). New York, NY: Mcgraw-Hill Irwin.
Lewicki, J. R., Barry, B., & Saunders, M. D. (2011). Essentials of negotiation (5th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw Hill. ISBN-13: 9780073530369
Family and gender among American Muslims: issues facing Middle Eastern immigrants and their descendants. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Lewicki, R., Saunders, D.M., Barry B., (2010) Negotiation: Readings, Exercises, and Cases. 6th Ed. McGraw-Hill Irwin. New York, NY
Michael R. Carrell, C. H. (2008). Negotiating Essentials: Theory, Skills, and Practices. New Jersey: Pearson.
Brubaker B. and Asher M., (2007). A Power Play for Juwan Howard. Lewicki-Barry-Saunders: Negotiation: Readings, Exercises, and Cases, Fifth Edition. The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2007
Lewicki, R. J., Barry, B., & Saunders, D. M. (2007). Essentials of Negotiation. New York: McGraw-Hill/ Irwin.
Lewicki, R. J., Saunders, D. M., & Barry, B. (2010). Negotiation: Readings, exercises, and cases. New York: McGraw-Hill Irwin
Gulevich, Tanya, and Frederick S. Colby. Understanding Islam and Muslim Traditions. Detriot, Michigan: Omnigraphics, Inc., 2004. Print.
In all societies, marriage is an enormous milestone and celebration. This is no different for immigrant families, especially muslims. While muslim marriages differ depending on the country of origin, they are all held together by Islamic law and the Quran. Marriage is also a good indicator of the status of social assimilation in regards to immigrants. Through these intimate social interactions, a glimpse of the overall attitude in society can be viewed; social boundaries between immigrants, specifically those who practice Islam, and the members of the country that they moved to are complex and ever changing, but intermarriage can provide a clue into the challenges faced by many muslim immigrants.
I found myself in a conflict last week and thought to myself, that it would be nice to have a third party help mediate a conversation I was about to have with my business partner. Since this wasn’t an option available to me, I had the conversation on my own. I do not believe that this talk was successful and if I had had a trained third party mediating our conflict I believe that the conversation and outcome would have been much different. Instead of me talking sternly to the individual and him not admitting to his faults, maybe we could have shared our frustrations and found a conflict free agreement on how to handle a certain si...
Mediation is a form of the Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR). Mediation is a process which it assists disputed parties to arrive to a mutually agreed resolution without going to court. As the out of court problem solving approach, mediation is a more convenient way for parties which trying to avoid the hassle and loving some flexibility from the more rigid court procedure. Mediation can be said as an informal process of which parties during this process is encouraged to work together among the disputed parties in good faith in order to solve their problems and disputes at a lower financial cost and it consume lesser time as opposed to the court procedure. Mediation recently has become more common as one of dispute resolution process especially for disputes which have relations to divorce matter, child custody or even for child visitation especially for its privacy and confidentiality.
Different parties in a conflict have different interests. These interests in turn will define the level of commitment of different parties once they sit on the table with the purpose of negotiating a peace agreement (Mitchell, 2002; Guelke, 2003). Lederach (1997) argues that parties need to develop trust, and approach the process with good faith in order for the negotiation process of the peace agreement to be successful. Whereas, Guelke (2003), in investigating the signs that show if a party is committed or not, found out that non-committed parties tend to make requests that cannot realistically be fulfilled. As for the timing of the negotiation process, Zartman (1995; 2008), a well- known scholar on this topic, argues that only when the parties are ready to negotiate is it the right time to do so, otherwise the negotiation process will lead nowhere. Another group of scholars such as Stedman (1997), and McClintock and Nahimana (2008), who are interested in the negotiation process of the peace agreements have looked at the parties involved in the process. Most researchers agree on the importance of including all actors with a stake in the outcome of the conflict. If some crucial actors are not included, they will undermine the negotiation process and hinder the implementation of the peace agreement once it is achieved (Stedman, 1997; McClintock & Nahimana, 2008; Wains-St & Kew, 2008; Lanz, 2011; Nilsson, 2012; Paffenholz, 2014). Some of these scholars have focused specifically on actors which tend to be left out of the peace agreements negotiation process such as women and civil society (Nilsson, 2012; Paffenholz,