Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Society attitudes towards people with disabilities
Society attitudes towards people with disabilities
Society’s Attitude Toward People with Disabilities
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Society attitudes towards people with disabilities
Retard “Sticks and stones may break my bones but words will never hurt me”; one of the most inaccurate saying of all times. Words can have a huge emotional impact on people and often negatively affect their self-esteem. Since the word retard is becoming more and more common in our society’s everyday language, many people do not realize how offensive the word actually is. Throughout the years retard has had multiple definition changes. The word retard came about from the medical term mental retardation, defined by the Merriam-Webster Dictionary, as a “sub average intellectual ability...manifested especially by delayed or abnormal development, by learning difficulties, and by problems in social adjustment”.Nine times out of ten, this term The word traces back to Latin roots retardationem, and retardare, meaning “to make slow, delay, keep back, or hinder.” It is the same root as “tardy,” meaning late. Not only has the definition of the word changed, but the nature of the word has been altered over time as well. It has become more popular in our society to use retard as a noun rather than a verb. If we look at the various definitions of the word, we can see the unfairness. Retard can be used as a verb, when it means “to make slow; delay the development or progress of (an action, process, etc.).” It can also be used as an adjective, when it means “characterized by retardation,” which similarity means “slowness or limitation in intellectual understanding and awareness, emotional development, or academic progress”. Finally, it can be used as a noun, when it means “a mentally retarded person.” The word is dehumanizing and problematic primarily when used as an adjective or noun. Similarly,“fire-retardant pajamas” root word is retard, where as flame retardants is defined as “slows down the spread of fire”,which corresponds to the word retard, classifying people with an intellectual disability as slow. Society should be significantly concerned with people who use the term as a noun or adjective meant to dehumanize and insult a person, idea, or
This lack of correlation between facts and her claim happens throughout her entire article and really hurts the article's credibility. After listing a slew of facts and anecdotes her response was “I find these facts and statistics terrifying”, this explanation does not give any insight on why on I should stop saying “retard” or the consequences that saying has. Throughout her entire article the only real point that states why we shouldn't say the R-word is because it hurts her feelings. I belive that hurt feelings are not what I would call a good reason in an argument to ban the word retard. Her entire article is based on appealing to people's emotions rather than appealing to people’s logic. A great contrast to Patricia Bauer’s article is Christopher Fairman’s “The Case Against Banning the Word ‘Retard’. Although he uses less facts and statistics than Bauer’s article, he uses them in a more impactful way and states how the fact is connected on the use of the word. One such example of this is when he talks about the N-word as an
The human race is rather ignorant. We give a label to people that we think are challenged because they are not like the majority. The people that do label, are the ones who are truly blind or deaf. They see nothing, they hear nothing except what they want to hear or what they think they want to hear or see. For you see the "handicapped" can do things that non-handicapped can not. If one really thinks about it, they are not handicapped. If any one is handicapped it is the
Eli Clare in Freaks and Queers observes how individuals use certain words to reaffirm their identities and also distinguish themselves from the rest of society. Being a disabled transman, Clare mentions various words, like handicapped, cripple (crip), gimp, amongst others, which have come to be accepted by the disabled community. He says, “cripple makes me flinch…but I love crip humor, the audacity of turning cripple into a word of pride” (p. 83). Some of these words, like queer for the LGBT community, are used as a means of agency and community for minority groups. But he also turns to the ugly side of language, which can be used to decrease and erase the worth of an individual. He mentions his discomfort with the word ‘freak’ and how
Stupid, retarded, crazy, insane; throughout time, these words are used to explain the behaviors of the mentally ill. These are just words, right? Actually, these words can have hurtful connotations. Since the first individual with a mental illness walked this earth until now, hurtful labels have been assigned to them. But society does not stop with just words, there are also unfavorable mannerisms used to explain visually, stupid, retarded, crazy, or insane. These descriptive words and mannerisms used in jest amongst friends can cause distress to anyone who bears witnesses to include an individual who is intellectually disabled or mentally fragile. If we look at it from the perspective of the intellectually disabled, they have been
Rett syndrome is often misdiagnosed as autism, cerebral palsy, or a nonspecific developmental delay. Children with Rett syndrome tend to exhibit autistic-like behaviors
In “A Movie, A Word, and My Family’s Battle,” by Patricia Bauer makes an emotional argument that you cannot use the word “retard”, no matter how you mean it, without offending a large group of people while also setting back years of progress.
After reading “People First Language” by Kathie Snow, the first thing that came to my mind was the saying, “Sticks and stones may break my bones, but words will never hurt me.” I have never agreed with this saying because words can inflict pain just like sticks and stones. Words really do matter. Kathie Snow believed that other people’s attitude towards others is the greatest obstacle facing people with disabilities. According to Kathie Snow (2010), “The real problem is never a person’s disability, but the attitudes of others!
Mental retardation was renamed Intellectual Disability in the DSM-5. This was to guide away from relying on IQ test scores for the diagnosis of mental retardation and to try and rely more on day to day tasks that one should be doing for their age and cultural lifestyle. There are four levels of mental retardation, mild, moderate, severe, and profound. (Nolen-Hoeksema, 2011). The least severe of them is the mild mental retardation. Children...
In conclusion, Fairman concludes his article by saying that the Special Olympics’ plan of banning the word retard and protecting intellectual disabled people from the use of the word will not succeed because new words will form to replace old words, he also concludes by saying the freedom of expressing words is very important and precious so as a result, banning a word is not worth it.
While the advocates are working towards helping those who suffer from this problem a simple fix has yet to be found. Many states and courts still disagree on the terminology that defines someone as mentally retarded and the definition can be very grey. With education, time and advocates those who truly suffer from this illness can seek intervention and still have their rights protected under the U. S. Constitution and the eighth amendment.
Labeling theory is an issue that has been raised that deserves a closer look. Labeling theory, the impression that the public labels certain people as different from the normal conduct. (Popple and Leighninger, 2011) Everyone labels in society. An actor can be labeled into a certain part thought out his/her career. A boss is labeled horrible for firing one individual. Society uses labels and it defines people. The book brought up two points of labeling that should be explored. The first point is the label of developmental disabilities will give a diagnosis. People who have developmental disabilities have it, and they cannot change the situation. It can be manageable, but there will always be the label. The second point is that the society label and perception of the label. There is a stigma in the public about developmental disabilities. Although more accepted than mental illness, developmental disability has a label of individuals being stupid and slow. Labeling theory can be seen throughout history. Chapter thirteen points out that history can shape individual’s label of developmentally disabilities.
The r-word is one of the most repulsive words in the English language; it humiliates people and is used colloquially without second thought. The word “retard” causes nothing but anguish. The r-word was first used in a medical discipline (e.g. “mental retardation”). The pejorative forms of the word “retard” and “retarded,” however, are used in society to deride people with intellectual disabilities. I find this social injustice unacceptable, especially because the r-word is often used to call people without intellectual disabilities “stupid.” When the r-word is used incorrectly, it reinforces the painful stereotypes of people with intellectual disabilities as being less-valued members of society.
just that; a word. It is a term that sprouted out of ignorance and continues to
Disability: Any person who has a mental or physical deterioration that initially limits one or more major everyday life activities. Millions of people all over the world, are faced with discrimination, the con of being unprotected by the law, and are not able to participate in the human rights everyone is meant to have. For hundreds of years, humans with disabilities are constantly referred to as different, retarded, or weird. They have been stripped of their basic human rights; born free and are equal in dignity and rights, have the right to life, shall not be a victim of torture or cruelty, right to own property, free in opinion and expression, freedom of taking part in government, right in general education, and right of employment opportunities. Once the 20th century
I conducted research by observing and interviewing several different school/ classroom settings. The first class I observed was at a Therapeutic Day school on the North West side of Chicago. The class included nine students between the ages of nine and fifteen and their learning abilities range from zero comprehension through average grade level. Only three of the students were within average grade level for their age, the rest of the students are at or below the second grade level. The teacher explained that one student (who is ten years old) has profound mental retardation and has a one year old cognitive level. This student is also the student who bites and hits when he becomes frustrated. Three of the students need diaper changes throughout the day; the others need constant attention and assistance. The classroom had only one te...