Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essay on emotional
In “A Movie, A Word, and My Family’s Battle,” by Patricia Bauer makes an emotional argument that you cannot use the word “retard”, no matter how you mean it, without offending a large group of people while also setting back years of progress. Patricia Bauer was a former Washington post reporter and one of the founders of the UCLA, a school for young adults with intellectual disabilities, although she gains most of her knowledge on the topic from raising a daughter with Down Syndrome. This article was originally published in The Washington Post, one of the most circulates newspapers in America. When this article came out in August of 2008, two major things were happening concerning mental disabled people. The first was a movie that came out …show more content…
Retard,’ we heard her say, and Margaret wilted” (118). This shows that she has been in situations where the word “retard” affected a person with mental disabilities, in this case her own daughter. To the reader this goes straight to their heart, making them feel bad for everything they have ever used the word “retard”. Later in the argument she show the word not only affects her daughter, but also anyone that cares about her daughter. She says, “For my daughter and my family, it’s more like a grenade, and we’re the collateral damage”. This explains that whenever the word “retard” is used, it’s not only hurts people with mental disabilities but also anyone that cares about people with mental disabilities. Then she goes into how she understands that people, usually aren’t trying to be rude or hurtful, that they are “just joking” or “didn’t mean it like that” but regardless of how it’s meant, it’s still hurtful to the people who are affected by mental disabilities on a daily basis. Falling back on to pathos again, she names of a handful of ways she’s heard “retard” in her day to day life. She says, “A clerk in a store apologizes for being ‘such a retard’... Ouch. Kids at the mall call one another ‘you big retard.’ Ouch. A friend tells a … story…about her recent fender bender, with a punchline about ‘some …show more content…
She uses an extreme amount of pathos to show how much it can personally effect people by using the word “retard”. She also uses the personal experience as a way to show her credibility on this particular subject. Although she does use an extreme amount of pathos, she doesn’t solely rely on it, she also uses ethos to show she knows what she’s talking about. Overall this is a very strong article, and with her extreme use of pathos you can clearly see how the word “retard” not only affects her family, but any family that is connected to mental
With the growing support to ban the word “retard” more and more people have come to the defence of both sides. Patricia Bauer’s “A Movie, a Word and My Family’s Battle” and Christopher Fairman’s “The Case Against Banning the Word ‘Retard’ ” are 2 such examples. Patricia Bauer, a mother of a mentally disabled child, and Christopher Fairman, a professor at the Moritz College of Law at the Ohio State University, have two completely different ideas on weather is should be banned. Bauer argues to ban it, while Fairman is against banning it. Thanks to Christopher Fairman’s good reasoning and convincing evidence, trustworthy tone, and use of background information, his points come across stronger and lead to a better argument.
Throughout this passage Nancy Mairs uses the word cripple to describe who she is and the beliefs of her condition. She does this by describing her condition in a few different ways; the opinion of others and the opinion of herself. As anyone should she decides what her title as a person should be and she doesn’t listen or care for anyone’s opinion outside of her own. Her tone is very straightforward throughout the passage. Mairs describes her condition and how it relates to the actions and response of other people in any situation.
All these and more evidences used in the book support Peterson’s thesis and purpose—all of them discuss how having a disability made Peterson and others in her situation a part of the “other”. Her personal experience on media and
The experience changed her life, she learned to rethink her own attitude and self determination. I learned that people with mental retardation are not to be separated from society or even treated with less respect because of their disability. “Riding the Bus with My Sister” taught me to never neglect people with mental disabilities. Readers learned that people with mental retardation, just like everyone else, have families, desires, and determination. They cry, they laugh, they have emotions just like the rest of us. We can learn new things from those suffering from mental retardation. ‘Riding the Bus with My Sister” taught me that civil rights apply to
Stupid, retarded, crazy, insane; throughout time, these words are used to explain the behaviors of the mentally ill. These are just words, right? Actually, these words can have hurtful connotations. Since the first individual with a mental illness walked this earth until now, hurtful labels have been assigned to them. But society does not stop with just words, there are also unfavorable mannerisms used to explain visually, stupid, retarded, crazy, or insane. These descriptive words and mannerisms used in jest amongst friends can cause distress to anyone who bears witnesses to include an individual who is intellectually disabled or mentally fragile. If we look at it from the perspective of the intellectually disabled, they have been
Charles pleas to pathos is how much media is disrespecting disabled people, “It is important to know the full degree of damage wrecked by the demeaning and wildly inaccurate portrayal of people with disabilities, not it is altogether clear whether much current progress is being made” (531). This causes the readers to feel sympathy for people with disabilities and evokes readers to agree with author. This definitely supports what Charles said in the article because readers will now feel sympathetic for disabled people being portrayed in the media who needs
After reading “People First Language” by Kathie Snow, the first thing that came to my mind was the saying, “Sticks and stones may break my bones, but words will never hurt me.” I have never agreed with this saying because words can inflict pain just like sticks and stones. Words really do matter. Kathie Snow believed that other people’s attitude towards others is the greatest obstacle facing people with disabilities. According to Kathie Snow (2010), “The real problem is never a person’s disability, but the attitudes of others!
Radio takes a story of depicting a mentally challenged man as an inspiration along with working with a big time football coach. Which depicts an average American lifestyle, some people do not like that they made this movie about a mentally challenged young man and made him into the star of this movie because it creates false accusations to real life situations. It stereotypes people who have mental disabilities, although some people with mental disabilities can be very talented not every person with a mental disability are able to have great stories and be able to have the knowledge that others do not have. The majority of the population with mental disabilities cannot stand a day in the real world by themselves, although many have special talents in certain things many cannot do day to day tasks or have an extraordinary talent in any type of task or
In” Disabling Imagery in the media “Barnes asserts,“Disabled people are rarely shown as integral and productive members of the community; as students, as teachers, as part of the work-force or as parents. “(11). Popular culture excludes women with disabilities because they are different. Through Joanne’s character, Nussbaum demonstrates how women with disabilities operate in their daily lives.Nussbaum description of Joanne’s daily routine shows that women with Nussbaum 's character Joanne also demonstrates how women with disabilities are not burdens on
Labeling theory is an issue that has been raised that deserves a closer look. Labeling theory, the impression that the public labels certain people as different from the normal conduct. (Popple and Leighninger, 2011) Everyone labels in society. An actor can be labeled into a certain part thought out his/her career. A boss is labeled horrible for firing one individual. Society uses labels and it defines people. The book brought up two points of labeling that should be explored. The first point is the label of developmental disabilities will give a diagnosis. People who have developmental disabilities have it, and they cannot change the situation. It can be manageable, but there will always be the label. The second point is that the society label and perception of the label. There is a stigma in the public about developmental disabilities. Although more accepted than mental illness, developmental disability has a label of individuals being stupid and slow. Labeling theory can be seen throughout history. Chapter thirteen points out that history can shape individual’s label of developmentally disabilities.
The r-word is one of the most repulsive words in the English language; it humiliates people and is used colloquially without second thought. The word “retard” causes nothing but anguish. The r-word was first used in a medical discipline (e.g. “mental retardation”). The pejorative forms of the word “retard” and “retarded,” however, are used in society to deride people with intellectual disabilities. I find this social injustice unacceptable, especially because the r-word is often used to call people without intellectual disabilities “stupid.” When the r-word is used incorrectly, it reinforces the painful stereotypes of people with intellectual disabilities as being less-valued members of society.
Because when I think of what to do about the r-word, my first thought is not about the actual word “retarded”. When I graduated in 1992 and started working as a physical therapy assistant with people with developmental delay the term was used as a medical diagnosis. That’s how I used it, and that is how it was used in reports and charts. Was it used as an insult? Yes, and before I worked with the population I admit I also used it that way. But, when I realized what the term was, and started working with people with Intellectual disabilities, I realized it was wrong, and I stopped using it for anything other them clinical reasons. Reynolds et al (2013), bring up a good point – the words moron, fool, idiot and retarded all started out as purely clinical terms to help understand developmental delay. In fact, Howe came up with his classification to help demonstrate that not all people with delays are the same, a positive reason. But it was the general population that decided to take these words and use them as an
People with intellectual disabilities can and do learn new skills, but they learn at a slower process. There are varying degrees of intellectual disability, from mild to profound. In society today, mental retardation is no longer the appropriate political terminology when referring to people with an intellectual disability or developmental disability. Today the term used in the medical professional is intellectual disabled.
The term “retard” is usually used as common slang and plenty of folks simply do not perceive or understand the hurtfulness that comes with it for several individuals. Respectful and comprehensive language is crucial to the movement for the dignity and humanity of individuals with intellectual disabilities. However, a lot of of society doesn't acknowledge the hurtful, dehumanizing and exclusive effects of the R-word. Use of the R-word, “retard” or “retarded,” is hurtful and painful and whether or not your intentions wasn’t to hurt anybody, the use of the word is a style of bullying. Most of the people don’t consider this word as hate speech, however that’s precisely what it sounds like to countless folks with intellectual and organic process disabilities, as well as their families and friends.
As children, we are taught what to say, how to say it, and who to say it to. Language and communication are taught through a series of social interactions in and out of the classroom that we begin experiencing as young children. As we continue our education through high school and beyond, bullying, profanity, and discrimination begin to transform into something common and unfortunately, socially acceptable. Somewhere along the way the words "retard" and “retarded” became acceptable as a replacement word to describe something or someone that one finds to be "ignorant," "foolish," or "silly." I can’t tell you how many times I have heard these words being used on our campus inappropriately. Every time I hear these words being misused I become enraged at the oversight and inconsiderateness that is