Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Classical hollywood film paradigm
Classical hollywood film paradigm
Classical hollywood film paradigm
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Mary Shelley's Frankenstein Different Film Techniques
Compare and contrast the way in which the directors of 'Mary Shelley's
Frankenstein' (1994) and 'Frankenstein' (1931) use different film
techniques to build up atmosphere in their opening sequences:
The two films I will be addressing in this essay are Kenneth Branagh's
and James Whale's versions of 'Frankenstein', a horror novel written
by Mary Shelley in 1816, when the author was 19. The incentive for it
was provided by the famous poet, Byron, who was a friend of Mary
Shelley and suggested they write horror stories as a pastime. His was
never published. Many adaptations have been made for cinema in the 20th
century, those addressed in this essay being the most significant.
I hope to compare and contrast the opening sequence in each film,
based on the most successful aspects of their filmmaking, namely, use
of camera, sound, editing, lighting and colour and mise en scène (i.e.
setting, props, costume, body language of actors and make-up).
The first film I will be analysing will be 'Frankenstein', directed by
James Whale. It is a black and white adaptation, released in 1931,
which was a period in Hollywood's history commonly considered a
'golden age'- Hollywood was young but its films considered innovative
and impressive, and the success of this film is what launched Boris
Karloff's legendary career. When released, it was considered so
terrifying that those of weak dispositions were discouraged from
viewing it- both on posters advertising the film and in a short
prologue at the beginning of the film.
The film was shot by Universal Pictures, a powerful Hollywood studio,
...
... middle of paper ...
...urces
and special techniques available at the time. In James Whale's version
this is the theme of science versus religion, whereas in Kenneth
Branagh's it is the theme of the unnatural violence that the monster
is capable of. This is why I believe the two films differ so much- the
older version does not need high sound quality or subtlety- it simply
needs to show its audience the sacrilege that Dr. Frankenstein is
committing in digging up the graveyard. However, for this reason, the
newer version requires strong special effects and state of the art
sound quality- the horror is in the reality and the reality cannot be
achieved if the above look even remotely unrealistic. This is why the
atmosphere of the two sequences is so different (and therefore the
techniques used to create it, too), yet they are both so successful.
stupid. He was unable to talk or read. The monster would just rome the world
Hollywood has played a big part is our lives. Growing up we’ve seen numerous movies, some that scared us others that touch us, and those images stayed with us forever. So what happens when Hollywood takes a classic piece of literature such as Frankenstein and turns into a monster movie. It transforms the story so much that now some 50 years later, people think of Frankenstein as the monster instead of the monster’s creator. It became a classic monster movie and all the high values of the original were forever lost.
Anyone who has had the chance to read Mary Shelly’s original Frankenstein and watch the movie Young Frankenstein is aware that there is quite a difference when it comes to the two of them. For one it is easy to point out that Young Frankenstein is set out to be a comedy while the original version of Frankenstein is made to be serious. Young Frankenstein is a 1977 film that tells the story of Victor Frankenstein’s grandson. The film adaptation is essentially a parody of the classic tale along with other versions of Frankenstein. It pointed out from the start of the movie that it would run directly parallel with the original tale when Fredrick Frankenstein was mentioned to be the grandson of the infamous Victor
The period during which Mary Shelley wrote Frankenstein there were many scientific developments in the world, that contributed to the gothic genre of her novel as well as the author’s personal experiences. The main scientific development that possibly may have inspired the author to produce a gothic novel is similar to Luigi Galvani’s experiment, during which Galvani observed the relationship between electricity and life. In chapter four, Shelley has mentioned the scientific improvement that occurred during the 19th century: “when I considered the improvement which every day takes place in science and mechanics”.
Frankenstein, a novel by Mary Shelley, illustrates the trials including Victor Frankenstein's triumphs, a character who owned a lovely with memorable life experiences that shaped the independent college student he became. Despite Victor growing up in a welcoming setting, he struggled to find the intellectual purpose of acquiring a college education in his physical science interest to generate the likelihood of reviving a dead corpse with electricity to acquire the comfortability to feel like God. Mary Shelley used diction and imagery to convey shifts in mood that supported the plot of chapters one through five in Frankenstein to inundate the reader with the feelings the characters of the story were facing.
Frankenstein is a fictional story written by Mary Shelly. It was later adapted into a movie version directed by James Whales. There are more differences than similarities between the book and the movie. This is because, the movie is mainly based on the 1920’s play, other than the original Mary Shelly’s book Frankenstein. A text has to be altered in one way or the other while making a movie due to a number of obvious factors. A lot of details from the book were missing in the movie, but the changes made by Whales were effective as they made the movie interesting, and successful.
Most Americans have some idea of who Frankenstein is, as a result of the many Frankenstein movies. Contrary to popular belief Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein is a scientist, not a monster. The "monster" is not the inarticulate, rage-driven criminal depicted in the 1994 film version of the novel. Shelley’s original Frankenstein was misrepresented by this Kenneth branagh film, most likely to send a different message to the movie audience than Shelley’s novel shows to its readers. The conflicting messages of technologies deserve being dependent on its creator (address by Shelley) and poetic justice, or triumph over evil (showed by the movie) is best represented by the scene immediately preceding Frankenstein’s monster’s death.
discrepancies between the two. First I'll address the overall flow of the movie, in other
The film that was produced after the novel has a lot of differences and not as
How Mary Shelley creates a sense of horror in Frankenstein. Frankenstein Introduction In this essay, I will be writing about how Mary Shelley creates sense. of horror in Frankenstein. Horror stories are usually dark and sinister.
I am going to compare the first 20 minutes of two film versions of the
Mary Shelley, with her brilliant tale of mankind's obsession with two opposing forces: creation and science, continues to draw readers with Frankenstein's many meanings and effect on society. Frankenstein has had a major influence across literature and pop culture and was one of the major contributors to a completely new genre of horror. Frankenstein is most famous for being arguably considered the first fully-realized science fiction novel. In Frankenstein, some of the main concepts behind the literary movement of Romanticism can be found. Mary Shelley was a colleague of many Romantic poets such as her husband Percy Shelley, and their friends William Wordsworth and Samuel Coleridge, even though the themes within Frankenstein are darker than their brighter subjects and poems. Still, she was very influenced by Romantics and the Romantic Period, and readers can find many examples of Romanticism in this book. Some people actually argue that Frankenstein “initiates a rethinking of romantic rhetoric”1, or is a more cultured novel than the writings of other Romantics. Shelley questions and interacts with the classic Romantic tropes, causing this rethink of a novel that goes deeper into societal history than it appears. For example, the introduction of Gothic ideas to Frankenstein challenges the typical stereotyped assumptions of Romanticism, giving new meaning and context to the novel. Mary Shelley challenges Romanticism by highlighting certain aspects of the movement while questioning and interacting with the Romantic movement through her writing.
the film have been cast as parts. It worked well for the film, but I
Both movies where shot back to back and would have gone great together, but alas, we get what we get. BLU-RAY SPECIAL FEATURES Nothing, but the joy of witnessing this movie on
the better of the two. The thought in the movie that, there is unlimited communication between the two,