Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Importance of conflict resolution
Effects of unresolved conflict in marriage
Conflict Resolution: Resolving Conflict Rationally and Effectively
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Importance of conflict resolution
. Marital conflict
Most studies in marital conflict pertain to three particular dimensions of communication. The first dimension is affect which refers to messages that express positive or negative feelings about another person, such as supportiveness, hostility, confirmation, coercion, sarcasm, or global positiveness or negativeness (e.g., Gottman, 1979 and Sillars and Wilmot, 1994). The second dimension to characterize conflict behaviors is whether they are constructive or destructive for the parties’ relationship. Research in the United States indicates that exiting from the relationship and neglecting the partner are destructive problem-solving responses and are more powerfully predictive of couple distress than giving voice to problems and being passive loyal (e.g., Rusbult, Johnson, & Morrow, 1986). The third dimension to characterize conflict management is engagement versus avoidance (e.g., Hocker and Wilmot, 1991 and Sillars and Wilmot, 1994). Engagement is reflected in direct, overt verbal confrontation of conflict issues, while conflict avoidance is reflected in withdrawal and aversion to dealing directly with conflict issues (Canary, Cupach, & Messman, 1995) and includes circumscribed, irrelevant, or ambiguous communication. Since the purpose of this study is to examine the effect of culture on marital conflict strategies and marital satisfaction, the discussion will be limited to the third dimension of marital conflict, engagement–avoidance, along with Rahim's styles of conflict.
References
Baucom, D.H., Shoham, V., Mueser, K.T., Daiuto, A D., & Stickle, T R. (1998). Empirically supported couple and family interventions for marital distress and adult mental health problems. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psycholog...
... middle of paper ...
...voidance in marital interaction: A longitudinal view of five types of couples. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 61(1). 6-15. 4. Jacobson, N., & Addis, M. (1993). Research on couples and couple therapy: What do we know? Where are we going? Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 61. 85-93.
5. Noller, P., & Fitzpatrick, M. A. (1991). Markal communicafion. In A. Booth (Ed.),Contemporary families: Looking forward, looking back, (pp. 42-53). Minneapohs, MN: National Council on Family Relations.
Marriage and Conflict
Marital satisfaction and other related contacts (e.g., marital adjustment, marital quality, and marital happiness) are studied widely by family researchers. However, there is no consensus regarding their definition and measurement. Some scholars have argued that these constmcts are not synonymous (e.g., Heyman, Sayers, & Bellack, 1994;
Szapocznik, J., Schwartz, S. J., Muir, J. A., & Brown, C. H. (2012). Brief strategic family therapy. Couple and Family Psychology: Research and Practice, 1(2), 134–145.
The dimensions of relationships are classified as: interdependence, ideology and conflict. It is said the more interdependent the couple is, “…the higher the level of companionship, the more time they spend together, and the more they organize their space to promote togetherness and interaction” (Berkowitz and Fitzpatrick 1964). Ideological matters like are viewed differently from individuals and couples. “The beliefs, standards, and values individuals hold concerning their relationship and family are a major factor guiding not only the interactions with the spouse but also the judgments individuals make about these interactions and their outcomes” (Berkowitz & Fitzpatrick 1964). Conflict distinguishes perception towards being open to conflict between individuals and couples. “Couples vary as to their willingness to engage in conflict and their degree of assertiveness with one another” (Berkowitz & Fitzpatrick
Gurman, A. S., & Kniskern, D. P. Research on marital and family therapy: Progress, perspective and
Gottman (1999) conveys that the integration of active listening and conflict resolution techniques is not sufficient to safeguard marriages from a probable divorce. Due to that couples who develop throughout the years a high level of
Spanier, G. B. (1976). Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 38 (1), pp. 15-28.
Olson, D. H. (1970). Marital and family therapy: Integrative review and critique. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 32(4), 501-538.
Fig 1.0 shows the possible relationship that might exist between the main variables of the study: Self Consciousness, Couple Power and Marital Satisfaction. It has been cited in many studies that there is a positive significant relationship existing between the variables. The study would like to know if the affirmation of the relationship exists in the Philippine context with the househusbands as the respondents of the study.
Umberson, D., Williams, K., Powers, D. A., Liu, H., & Needham, B. (2005). Stress in childhood and adulthood: Effects on marital quality over time. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67(5), 1332-1347.
This aim of this study is to examine whether people with divorced parents, have a lower relationship satisfaction with their partners compared to people whose parents are not divorced. Relationship satisfaction is the degree to which a person is content with their partner in regards to their intimate relationship (frequency of conflict, and intimacy) (Funk & Rogge, 2007) The importance of understanding relationship satisfaction allows us to get a greater understanding of the true effect that parental divorce has on their children’s future intimate relationships. If this is indeed the case, then we may be able to counteract this growing problem in the world by working on ways to boost relationship satisfaction of those who come from divorced families. Those children from divorced families, would then be able to better understand how parental divorce may affect their future relationships and work on ways to diminish those effects. The independent variable in this case would be the parental divorce, while the dependent variable would be their relationship
Rogers, Stacy J., & Amato, Paul R. (1999). Do Attitudes Toward Divorce Affect Marital Quality? Journal of Family Issues, vol. 20 no. 1, 69-86.
According to Normal family process Driver, Tabaras ,Nahm and Gottman (2013), John Gottman , has found that the leading difference between stable and unstable marriages is the quantity of positive thoughts and actions partner engage in each other . For example, the Sandoval’s marriage both focuses on their positive interactions. On other hand, marriage that have negative interactions such as criticizing, demanding, holding grudges, name calling and ect. Their relationship tends to suffer. There is also marriages that do not have any negativity and this can also be a problem because, it means frustrations are being to discussed between the partners and therefore, unsettled tension is accumulating to both partners. It is clear that there must be a balance between both extremes. Some of the things the Sandoval’s do to keep a positivity in their marriage is: truly listening to each other needs, taking joy in each other’s achievements.
It can be complicated understanding who we are in a relationship especially if we do not know ourselves. G is complex and exhibits actions driven by emotions, beliefs and one’s perspective (Carl, 2006). It is these behaviours demonstrated in a relationship that negative or positive. Usually a negatively impacted marriage constitutes of a lot of weaknesses leading to separation or divorce, whereas a positive marriage remains strong due to strengths of both parties (Corey, 2009). In support Goldenberg & Goldenberg (2000) suggests that couples need to work collectively on their weakness as to reduce
The readings helped me understand that conflicts for some couples may be a normal. The therapy may help them communicate their differences in a collaborative and clear manner. The readings also affirmed my view about patterns of resolution in a healthy couple consist of solving problem constructively. However, this pattern may not be universal and some methods of resolving conflicts may consist of aggression, avoidance, or withdrawal.
Numerous theories about the presence of a correlation between relationship satisfaction and affection deprivation exist. In fact, affection deprivation has been found to negatively correlate with relationship satisfaction time and time again throughout this body of work (Burleson & Kunkel, 1994; Floyd, 2002; Floyd, 2014; Hesse & Mikkelson, 2017). For example, Hesse and Mikkelson (2017) believe to have found a significant correlation between relationship satisfaction and affection deprivation in serious couples. In addition, affection deprivation is thought to have a strong correlation with the level of satisfaction of the relationship experienced by the partner who is not receiving affection (Floyd, 2014). Additionally, affection deprivation
(MFMER), M. F. (n.d.). Marriage counseling: Working through relationship problems. Retrieved November 30, 2013, from CNN Health: http://edition.cnn.com/HEALTH/library/marriage-counseling/MH00104.html