Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Summary of all summer in a day by ray bradbury
Summary of all summer in a day by ray bradbury
The theme of the most dangerous game essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Nick McReath
Mrs. Kearney
Lit. Genre and Comp.
25 November 2014
Все конфликты различны
Wisely said by Gunderson, “A desire can overcome all objections and obstacles.” Anyone can overcome obstacles and face their conflicts if they have a desire. Both Margot and Rainsford face problems, but Rainsford from “The Most Dangerous Game” by Richard Connell, doesn’t face internal conflict whereas Margot from “All Summer in a Day” by Ray Bradbury, does. The mood of the story ¨The Most Dangerous Game¨ and the story “All Summer in a Day” are set differently by the author as well as the motivation of the characters.
Margot and Rainsford both have struggles throughout the story, but they are entirely different conflicts. Firstly, Margot thinks “She sensed it, she was different and they knew her difference and kept away”(Bradbury 194).
…show more content…
Margot has an internal conflict. She thinks she is different and she is constantly putting herself down and the other kids do too. Margots problem is her depression and her inner conflicts and her thinking she is different. In contrast as Rainsford is being hunted, “Rainsford’s impulse was to hurl himself down like a panther, be he saw that the general’s right hand held something something metallic - a small automatic pistol”(Connell 16). Rainsford has an external conflict. He has to survive and fight for his life against the general. Rainsford’s external conflict is a life or death situation and he has to put his body to the test. Unlike Margot’s internal conflict Rainsford’s is external. Margot suffers from an internal conflict which is depression and bullying. Rainsford on the other hand is fighting for his life and pushing his body to the limit, so his conflict is external. In the stories the moods are set different just as the conflict is different. For example, The narrator says “It had been raining for seven years; thousands upon thousands of days compounded and filled from one end to the other with rain”(Bradbury 192). When they say this they set the mood of the story with depression and sadness. This is at the beginning of the story and it describes the world with only rain which is saddening and no sun which is happiness, so there is no happiness. On the other hand, the author writes “Rainsford held his breath. The general’s eyes had left the ground and were traveling inch by inch up the tree. Rainsford froze there”(Connell 16). The author approaches this story in a way to build suspense and excitement. So he set the mood for this story as exciting, suspense filled, and thrilling. The author of “The Most Dangerous Game” made the story suspenseful and exciting unlike the depression of “All Summer in a Day” In “All Summer in a day the mood is saddening and depressing whereas “The Most Dangerous Game” makes the story thrilling. The two stories have almost opposite moods set by the author. In the two stories “The Most Dangerous Game” and “All Summer in a Day” the motivations of the main characters; Rainsford and Margot are completely different.
For instance Rainsford is driven by survival “Rainsford took up his flight again. It was flight now, a desperate hopeless flight”(Bradbury 18). Rainsford’s survival is key and as he’s being chased he needs to run so his motivation to run is his survival. Rainsford knows he will need to run to survive so he does. He runs because that is his only chance of survival and survival is his motivation. Whereas, Margot wants to see the sun again “Only when they sang about the sun and the Summer did her lips move”(Connell 194). Margot won’t do anything in the world with no sun unless she is talking about the sun or singing about it because she is motivated by the sun and seeing and feeling it. Margot does activities and gets excited to hear about the sun because that’s what she wants she is motivated by it and wants it back. Rainsford and Margot both have motivations, but they are different. Rainsford is motivated to keep going by survival whereas Margot is motivated by the sun and her memories of
it. In conclusion as Gunderson said, “A desire can overcome all objections and obstacles.” Rainsford and Margot did exactly what Gunderson said. They used their desires, or their motivations to keep moving forward. The two stories had almost nothing in common they differ in almost everything including conflict, mood, and the motivations of the characters. Both Margot and Rainsford face problems, but Rainsford from “The Most Dangerous Game” by Richard Connell, doesn’t face internal conflict whereas Margot from “All Summer in a Day” by Ray Bradbury, does. The mood of the story ¨The Most Dangerous Game¨ and the story “All Summer in a Day” are set differently by the author as well as the motivation of the characters.
First, the author uses conflict to show what the characters have to overcome throughout the course of the story, such as Mrs. Baker forcing Holling to do chores at school and
Overall, Rainsford doesn’t show much characterization throughout the story but he definitely shows a lot of dynamic change. At first, he is overconfident and cocky. By the end of the story, he learns that the prey he had hunted did feel pain and fear from being
A recurring theme is shown in The Veldt and All Summer in a Day. This theme teaches that letting hatred and desire take over can drive people to do awful things. Despite this alikeness, the characters of the stories are quite different. Wendy and Peter from The Veldt play the role of the antagonist. However, Margot plays the role of the protagonist, her classmates (the supporting characters) being the antagonists. But overlooking this, the big picture of the stories remains the same; that letting hatred and desire take over can drive people to do awful
Individuals read books and plays in order to relate life to the characters. In both works of literature, The Great Gatsby by: F.Scott Fitzgerald and Fences by: August Wilson different characters show that they wanted to achieve better goals for their future. In The Great Gatsby the characters allows emotions of love to drive them. In both works the characters struggle with in their lives. The character’s demonstrate their limits within their everyday lives. The characters lead very different lives within the stories. Although some may say that one’s motivation does not differ based on Daisy and Troy’s gender. Motivation actually comes from what one proposes to do or by someone by the gender.
...ference between them is there moral differences, Zaroff is willing to cross the line and kill innocent people and Rainsford will not unless his life and others depends on it. Both Rainsford and Zaroff are very competitive. Sanger Rainsford refuses to give up, and stays calm. Zaroff is overly proud and loves to win, he shows it when he smiles and says “to date I have not lost”. Throughout the story Zaroff constantly has the upperhand, they are playing cat and mouse. Rainsford has the ability to turn the tables and in the end make Zaroff fear for his life.
Throughout our lives, it seems when we have no one else to help us, our most challenging problems occur leaving ourselves to use our wit and emotion to persevere. People can have test or a big game where we have teachers and coaches to help us prepare and succeed. However, in the movie, High Noon, a Marshall named Will Kane is faced with a challenge of an arriving Frank Miller looking to kill. In the short story, "The Most Dangerous Game", a hunger named Rainsford is deserted on a island after he fell off his yacht, and he would soon find out a sociopath with the unique taste for hunting down humans was out for him. With the two characters in these suspense-building products somewhat trapped we can take out many lessons and ideas from the action packed movie and short story. The movie, High Noon, and the short story, "The Most Dangerous Game, are alike and at the same time very different.
A motivation is a reason someone has for doing something a certain way. The Tiger’s Heart is a story written by Jim Kjelgaard in which the protagonist, Pepe Garcia has been making decisions based on forces within him. These forces all contributed in their own ways for Pepe’s decision making and outcomes in the story. These forces have helped define what Pepe is as a human being within the story. The forces motivating Pepe are security, fear and courage, greed and exploitation, and power. These forces motivated Pepe.
Throughout quarter three, our class has read four short stories, each one portraying human behaviors. I am comparing and contrasting two characters from “Miss. Brill” by Katherine Mansfield and “The Destructors” by Graham Greene. Miss. Brill and Old Misery or Mr. Thomas have many similarities and differences including the internal forces that affect them and the external forces that make them who they are.
In order to understand what changes happen to twist the views of the 2 main characters in both novels, it is important to see the outlook of the two at the beginning of the novels in comparison ...
Conflict is the sole thing that pulls a story together and pushes it forward. Without conflict, there is no action or force moving the story. External conflict usually pushes the story forward with scenes such as fights and internal conflict pulls the story together with more insightful information about the characters’ personalities. However, they could do both pulling and pushing at times. In the fictional short story “The Most Dangerous Game” by Richard Connell, there are many instances of conflict in the story between all the characters.
In Summary, both stories were interesting enough to hold the attentiveness of a devout reader. Though they weren’t identical in every element, they both held similarities that contributed to the reader becoming engulfed with eagerness to continue reading. “The Destructors” by Graham Greene and “The Most Dangerous Game” by Richard Connell reveal similarities in both conflict, and brilliant use of suspense in a ploy to keep the reader engaged.
Brontë also uses the intensity of the rain to display what her characters, especially Jane, feel during the transformation process. When Jane lives at Gateshead, a heavy rain falls with a “ceaseless, lamentable blast” (Brontë 60) and the “rain [beats] strongly against the panes” (Brontë 346). The intensity of the rain further highlights the volume and magnitude of the abuse that Jane faces at Gateshead as well as the suffering that perpetually plagues her. At Lowood the rain continues to “fall in torrents” (Brontë 79) and at Thornfield the rain serves as “assaulting, relentless [and] harsh” (Brontë 190). In each location the relentless rain represents a significant overall theme of intense suffering such as when John Reed throws a book at Jane. When “the volume was flung, it hit me, and I fell, striking my head against the door and cutting it. The cut bled, the pain was sharp: my terror had passed its climax” (Brontë 8). The violent suffering that Jane endures reflects the constant subservience along with feelings of hatred that are spewed towards her throughout her lifetime. Brontë uses the rain’s intensity as described above to highlight the sheer quantity of abuse and sadness as well as assist in describing Jane Eyre’s life story and transformation. Brontë uses rain in the scene where Jane reunites with the blind Rochester to indicate transformation in Jane’s life as well as a change in Rochester’s life. Here, Rochester “stands quiet and mute in the rain” (Bronte 636) until Jane encounters him. While Brontë uses rain to depict suffering in Jane as opposed to Rochester, a transition in Rochester still occurs. When Jane reunites with Rochester inside the cottage, Rochester abstains from dominating Jane or controlling every department of her life. Instead, Jane takes the lead role in the marriage because Rochester is blind as well as helpless. During their marriage,
Motive theory is one more way psychologists evaluate personality. The motive theory searches for reasons why people do what they do. It asks questions like what drives people. The underlying idea of the motive theory is that behavior reflects underlying needs. A need represents an unsatisfactory state of being. For instance, primary needs are biological, such as a need for air, water and food. After these basic needs are met, less important needs can be met such as friendship and even love. David McCelland and John Atkinson studied the need for achievement. The need for achievement is the desire to do things well and have pleasure in overcoming obstacles (Clark et al., 1956). The need for achievement varies depending on sex, and childhood
The author believes that goals and desires require an individual to be motivated to move from one state of being to the next. This motivation encompasses the emotional, cognitive, social, and biological drives that trigger behavior (Maslow, 1943). Accordingly, the word motivation befalls the frequently used description of why an individual achieves a goal, and the term motivation originates from the Latin root movere, which means “to move.” Therefore, motivation stands as the state that “moves” an individual to act in a particular way. For instance, when one is lying on the beach on a warm summer day and begins to feel hot, the physical need to cool down might cause one to stand up, go to the water for a dip. If the heat remains too over-bearing,
In the novel The Great Gatsby, the conflict is created by the differences in the two opposing characters.