Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The Wednesday Wars analysis
'The Wednesday Wars' summary
Role of conflict in 'The Wednesday Wars
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The Wednesday Wars analysis
In the novel, The Wednesday Wars, by Gary D. Schmidt, Holling finds out that his new teacher, Mrs. Baker, wants him to spend every Wednesday afternoon with her, catching up on schoolwork and learning new things, such as reading Shakespeare books and taking tests on them. At first, Holling thinks that it is because Mrs. Baker “hates his guts,” but after a while, he establishes a good relationship with her and she helps him in many areas, even outside of the classroom. The three literary elements addressed in this stunning book are conflict, characterization, and tone. First, the author uses conflict to show what the characters have to overcome throughout the course of the story, such as Mrs. Baker forcing Holling to do chores at school and …show more content…
Hoodhood and Holling. “So, Holling, what did you do that might make Mrs. Baker hate your guts, which will make other Baker family members hate the name of Hoodhood, which will lead the Baker Sporting Emporium to choose another architect, which will kill the deal for Hoodhood and Associates, which will drive us into bankruptcy…” (8). This is characterization because it shows that Holling’s father feels that his business is the first priority in the family. This is important because his architecture business led to a few major parts in the story, like the argument Holling had with Meryl Lee about her father stealing his father’s architecture design. “I looked at my desk. I didn’t see any trip wires, so probably there weren’t any explosives. I checked the screws. They were all still in, so it wouldn’t fall flat when I sat down” (10). This is characterization because it shows that Holling does not trust Mrs. Baker. This is important because throughout the story, his thoughts towards Mrs. Baker change, and she becomes a crucial person in his life. This shows that Schmidt uses characterization to demonstrate the traits of all the characters, like Holling and his
Holling is the only student in his class who is presbyterian. Throughout the novel The Wednesday Wars, Holling Hoodhood is influenced by his teacher Mrs. Baker, his friend Danny, and his sister Heather. One influence in Holling’s life is Mrs. Baker. Mrs. Baker helped Holling for his Cross Country meet.
Strategy is about making choices, trade-offs; it's about deliberately choosing to be different.- Micheal Porter. In wednesday wars by Gary D. Schmidt you can see Holling transform from a boy to a man. He was insecure about himself and didn’t want to end up like his dad. But then he found himself with help from his friends and family You can be your own person, you don’t have to be the person you are told to be, you have your own choices.
“Tomorrow When The War Began” is a novel written by the author John Marsden which includes valuable lessons of resilience when hardships arise and courage over fear to save other lives. Two characters that portray these themes are Ellie and Robyn. Ellie overcomes the hardship of killing young soldiers and Robyn overcomes fear in order to save other lives, by putting her life at risk. John Marsden’s story emphasizes the life lessons which Ellie and Robyn have to experience to save their hometown of Wirrawee.
Some of the conflicts were the times when the kid was throwing rocks at his first whirligig, and when he left his whirligig book on the bus. Each conflict leads to a good ending though. The kid that was throwing rocks at it somehow gained a respect for the whirligig, after his mom told him off. Brent figured that the whirligig had helped him this far and now it was time for the book to help inspire someone else. So the whirligigs turned into a far bigger influence than anyone else could imagine.
War has been a constant part of human history. It has greatly affected the lives of people around the world. These effects, however, are extremely detrimental. Soldiers must shoulder extreme stress on the battlefield. Those that cannot mentally overcome these challenges may develop Post Traumatic Stress Disorder. Sadly, some resort to suicide to escape their insecurities. Soldiers, however, are not the only ones affected by wars; family members also experience mental hardships when their loved ones are sent to war. Timothy Findley accurately portrays the detrimental effects wars have on individuals in his masterpiece The Wars.
Every story has a conflict. Conflicts can be either internal or external. Internal conflicts occur within a character’s mind. The main character in Seventh Grade, Victor, deals with an internal conflict. External conflicts occur with a character and an outside force. The main character in Melting Pot deals with an external conflict. Both stories’ conflicts have winners.
2) What is the main conflict in the book? Is it external or internal? How is this conflict resolved throughout the course of the book?
Fussell believes that the soldier of world war two, "suffers so deeply from contempt and damage to his selfhood, from absurdity and boredom and chickenshit, that some anodyne is necessary", and that the anodyne of choice was alcohol. I would argue that Fussell is correct, especially regarding the connection between the absurdity of the war and the associated damage to soldiers image of themselves as good and patriotic, and the use of alcohol to block out the reality of the war. I think this connection is evident in the interviews presented in Terkel’s "The Good War", especially those of John Garcia and Eddie Costello.
Firstly let us consider conflict. In each act of the play, we see the overpowering desire to belong leading to a climax of conflict amongst the characters, which has the consequence of exclusion. Conflict is a successful literary technique, as it engages the audience and focuses our attention on the issue of conflict and exclusion, brought about by the characters’ desires to be accepted by their community.
As you can see, there are a lot of major internal conflicts. However, there are many more not so important conflicts that weren’t listed! Ranging from racism to loneliness, the characters in this novel have gone through a lot, physically and mentally. As the novel progresses all the characters seem to go from a negative, depressed mental state to a positive and loving one. Jefferson dies with courage because Grant was able to crack Jefferson and help him, which also ended up helping himself. Miss Emma and Tante Lou are now at peace thanks to Grant’s affect on Jefferson. The only reason the novel ended with everybody in a positive state of mind is due the decisions and actions made because of the internal conflict. In conclusion, internal conflicts are very important to the story causing conflicts and plot twists to interest the reader and pull the novel together.
Michael Oren’s intention in writing Six Days of War was to provide a detailed, unbiased account of the Six-Day War in an approachable way for readers. He also wished to utilize as many available sources as he could in order to address each viewpoint and aid in his writing of an objective report of the events of the war. Overall, Oren did an excellent job of accomplishing this goal.
As previously mentioned, one conflict includes idealism versus reality. The middle-class in general, and George and Lennie specifically, illustrates the problems they face when dreams of a better life are short-lived due to the reality of circumstances encountered and the Depression. Also, the man versus man conflict is seen on a regular basis throughout the novel. The ranch hands indirectly put pressure on George to shoot Lennie. The ranch hands forced that Candy's dog be shot. Also, the novel sheds light on the inner conflict within certain characters. For example, George struggles with the caring for Lennie, or putting both himself and Lennie at peace for good by killing Lennie. Candy also fears that he, like his dog, will be cast aside whenever he is no longer of use.
... constant struggle of oppression that human beings have faced throughout history and continue to face. These books are a testimony to the strength of those caught in the struggle and how good change and growth can evolve out of the bad. Struggle is a part of life and through it people can become stronger and learn more about themselves and the world. Power struggles offer opportunity for the oppressors to escape societies hold on them and to become truly aware of the suffering of those who they oppress, it offers the oppressed the opportunity to rise up and it offers society a chance to reform itself and its people. Events of oppression and the inevitable uprising of the underdog offer the perfect opportunity for important change to occur for the greater good of all.
Conflict first arises when Blanche arrives at the Kowalski household and Stanley's authority over his home is questioned. Stanley has always had authority and control of his home and also his wife Stella. When Blanche arrives he feels that he is being invaded and doesn't agree with it. His "rat race" style of life doesn't match with Blanches but has somehow converted Stella. One of the main themes about conflict is that Stanley and Blanche are in a battle to win Stella and neither of them will give her up.
The conflict correlates with the central idea because this is the society’s way of legally getting rid of someone that is trying to protest what they have always known. When Mrs. Adams says, “Some places have already quit lotteries.” Old Man Warner comes back and says, “Nothing but trouble in that...pack of young fools.” Later on, Old Man Warner tells us that he has been in the lottery seventy-seven times. (32) This example demonstrates how if you follow tradition, the society will not be violent toward you. Old Man Warner clearly respects the tradition and therefore has not been harmed by it, even though he has been apart of it many times. Another example of society vs character is at the end of the story when Mrs. Hutchinson is about to be chosen, a girl whispers “I hope it’s not Nancy.” Old Man Warner replies to this by saying, “It’s not the way it used to be.” (34) Old Man Warner’s response shows how he is aware of the manipulation taking place. Also, at the very end of the story, Mrs. Hutchinson has the piece of paper with the black dot in her hand but has yet to show it to the crowd. Mr. Summers says “It’s Tessie… Show us her paper, Bill.” (35) This example shows us that Mr. Summers already knew who was going to be picked and that it was the society vs. character, who is Mrs. Hutchinson. Another way the conflict is demonstrated throughout the story is how Mrs.Hutchinson clearly the only one trying to rebel against