Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The evolution of management theory
Importance of having management skills at the place of work
Features of scientific management theory
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The evolution of management theory
Management Foundations Esay
The classical management perspective represents the first well-developed framework of management (Davidson. P. et al, 2000). It’s the framework from which later theories evolved and concerns efficiency and productivity, which in turn leads to effective and efficient management. Scientific management and the Administrative theory are both classical management theories, which provide information on managing in the workplace, which are very useful and vital to have in the workplace. These theories are very different in many ways as they both have different purposes when managing in the workplace although there are one or two similarities, which illustrate its importance in the workplace. Both these theories contribute greatly to the understanding of management in many ways and can impact on contemporary management practices. The following analysis will further explain the classical management theories, which are scientific management, and the administrative theory. In analysing scientific management and the administrative theory one gains a greater knowledge of management and how it contributes to the workplace. It will then go onto comparing and contrasting the two theories and how they contribute to the understanding of management. And finally it will go into the importance, if any, for contemporary management practices. Through scientific management and the administrative theory one is able to understand management in the workplace and the importance of the theories.
According to Davidson. P. et al. “Scientific management is a series of approaches aimed at improving the performance of individual workers through the use of analytical procedures to lift workplace efficiency”. The system was developed...
... middle of paper ...
...stralia, Ltd.
5. Davidson. P., and Griffin. R. W. (2000) Management Australia in a Global Context, John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.
6. Fells. M. J. (2000) Fayol stands the test of time, Journal of Management History, Vol. 6, pp. 345-360.
7. McNamara. C. (1999) Brief Overview of Contemporary Theories in Management, [Online] Available: http://www.managementhelp.org/mgmnt/cntmpory.htm [2006, April 9th]
8. Nyland. C. (2000) An early account of scientific management as applied to women’s work with comment by Frederick W. Taylor, Journal of Management History, Vol. 6, pp. 248-271.
9. Robbins. S., Bergman. R., Stagg. I., and Coulter. M. (2006) Foundations of Management, 2nd ed., Pearson Education Australia.
10. Smith, A. (2000) Contemporary Management Practices, [Online] Available: http://pdf.rincondelvago.com/contemporary-management-practices.html [2006, April 6th]
Robbins, S.P., & Coulter, M. (2009). Management (10th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Robbins, S. P., & Coulter. M. (2014). Management (12th ed.). Retrieved from: Colorado Technical University eBook Collection database.
Wren. (2005). The History of Management Thought (5th ed.). Danvers, MA: Wiley & Sons. (Original work published 1976)
By the constantly changing dynamics of the 21st century business world, it is clear that it would be highly unproductive for managers to employ what is in actual fact a restrictive, controlling theory of management. As a results of globalisation of the economy, intensification of international competition, pervasive influence of the social market economy, increasing participation of women in the labour force and ecological consciousness, scientific management is no longer suitable in modern workplaces, as this theory tends not to allow for the constant innovation that is necessary to maintain a competitive advantage in the marketplace.
Jones, G. R., & George, J. M. (2011). Contemporary management. (7 ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Frederick Taylor and Henri Fayol are both considered classical contributors to management theory. Both were developing and expression their viewpoints at similar time period with the aim of “raising standard of management in industry” (Brodie,1967, p7) in a period were very few publications and theories on management. While both theories were developed with the same influencing factors such as war, social struggles and industrial revolution (Urwick. 1951, p7) each developed quite different management theories. Frederick Taylor is considered the Father of Scientific management and he developed scientific principles of management, focusing on the individual,...
The classical approach to management was the result of an effort to develop a body of management thinking, and the management theorists who participated in this effort are considered the pioneers of management study. The classical viewpoint emphasises efficiency in managing work and organisations in order to increase production (S. C. Certo & S. T. Certo, 2006).... ... middle of paper ... ...
Today’s era of business world adapts to everything new but these modern concepts are an indirect tribute to the theories produced by Taylor, Fayol, Mayo and Weber. Taylor’s Scientific management theory is one such example which has become such an important aspects of modern management that it feels unbelievable that his concepts were a part of the history. It is falsely assumed that as the society progresses, the older theories tend to lose their importance. The thing to be noted here is that these theories are based on basic human needs which do not change with time; the thing that changes is the method to fulfil those needs. Investigating earlier management theories is important because these theories are less complex and provide immediate solution to the problems. These theories basically help us to go to the root of the problem and understand its complexity. The better understanding we have about the problem, the easier it is to accomplish the objectives of the company. The following essay states the importance of the Taylor’s Scientific management theory and how it is implemented even today in the business world.
There are several theories that examine an organization and it’s approach to managing work in an effort to develop efficiency and increase production. Two classical approaches to management are Taylor’s scientific management theory and Weber's bureaucratic management theory. Both men are considered pioneers of in the study of management.
Stephen P. Robbins and David A.Decenzo, Fundamentals of management: essential concepts and applications (USA: pearson prentice hall, 2003), PP.13-14.
the study of time and action; b) the management on assignment; c) the theory of organization. (8)Taylor’s theory created a revolution in the subject of management because it was the first scientific method in field of management science. (1)After that, management became a truly scientific knowledge and it expanded and modified by later generations. Therefore, Taylor is “known as the father of scientific management”. (2) Taylor put forward a perspective which was “study the character, the nature and the performance of each workman” and moreover, to “train and help and teach this workman”. (3) In the following paragraphs, will exploring the relevant and irrelevant hypotaxis between Scientific Management and organizations.
There are three well-established theories of classical management: Taylor?s Theory of Scientific Management, Fayol?s Administrative Theory, Weber?s Theory of Bureaucracy. Although these schools, or theories, developed historical sequence, later ideas have not replaced earlier ones. Instead, each new school has tended to complement or coexist with previous ones.
Scientific management is governed by laws, rules and principles which are clearly defined hence they can be used in all social activities. It can be used to manage non-profit institutions, homes, churches, businesses, farms, universities and government agencies. It is therefore important in organizations for increasing efficiency and ensuring that there is no waste which is a major problem in organizations. This paper will discuss the main features of scientific management and how it relates with modern management models. It will also focus on the relevance of scientific management in modern business organizations (Hollway, 2002).
The evolution of management though the decades can be divided into two major sections. One of the sections is the classical approach. Under the classical approach efficiency and productivity became a critical concern of the managers at the turn of the 20th century. One of the approaches from the classical time period were systematic management which placed more emphasis on internal operations because managers were concerned with meeting the growth in demand brought on by the Industrial revolution. As a result managers became more concerned with physical things than towards the people therefore systematic management failed to lead to production efficiency. This became apparent to an engineer named Frederick Taylor who was the father of Scientific Management. Scientific Management was identified by four principles for which management should develop the best way to do a job, determine the optimum work pace, train people to do the job properly, and reward successful performance by using an incentive pay system. Scientifi...
The strengths in creating a divide between management functions and work functions have been employed widely at all levels and in all industries. Scientific management makes organisations efficient by replacing the rule of the thumb