Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Internet usage and academic performance
Talent is more important than hard work
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Internet usage and academic performance
IQ. An acronym that is not heard as much in today’s world but was a major decision maker back when it was introduced. An intelligence quotient (IQ) is a total score derived from one of the several standardized tests designed to assess human intelligence (dictionary). In his famous book,Outliers, Malcolm Gladwell indites, “The relationship between success and IQ works only up to a point. Once someone has reached an IQ score of somewhere around 120, having additional IQ points doesn’t seem to translate into any measurable real-world advantage.” (Gladwell 79). When referring to IQ results, I have found that Malcolm Gladwell and his reasoning which he builds off of psychologist and author Liam Hudson is incorrect. The more innate talent a person has, the more, the better off that person is going to be. Hard work pays off. Gladwell clearly has no reasoning to support his claim and there is strong evidence that proves him to be incorrect. The Beatles got the opportunity to be so great since they needed to perform their music four hours a day (eight days a week) amid their two-year stint in Hamburg. Bobby Fischer turned into a grandmaster at chess following quite a while of sharpening his skills at the Brooklyn Chess Club. …show more content…
On page 80 he relates IQ to basketball. He says that to a certain extent, height is a major factor in whether a person has a chance of playing professional basketball but after that, once the height is above six feet, he indites that height stops mattering. This is not the argument though. The main problem is that his claim was that there is no advantage as the IQs reach a certain high score which he set as 120 and if you look closely at his basketball analogy, almost everything but the fourth sentence in the second paragraph on page 80 makes sense. He admits that there is an advantage to being six foot two than six one. Here, he is proving his own claim wrong with his
His anecdotes presented in the article are appropriate in terms of his subject and claims. The author responds back to the naysayers by saying that people only look at the test scores earned in school, but not the actual talent. He says, “Our culture- in Cartesian fashion- separates the body from the mind, so that, for example we assume that the use of tool does not involve abstraction. We reinforce this notion by defining intelligence solely on grades in school and number on IQ tests. And we employ social biases pertaining to a person’s place on the occupational ladder” (279). The author says that instead of looking at people’s talent we judge them by their grades in school or their IQ score, and we also employ them based on these numbers. People learn more each time they perform a task. He talks about blue collared individuals developing multi-tasking and creativity skills as they perform the task they are asked to
Success was hard for the Beatles started as the Quarrymen then turning into the Silver Beatles and touring through Germany playing long hours’ day and night at different clubs and venues. In fact, and article written by Andrew Romano from the Daily Beast states that one of Gladwell’s theory is revolved around Hamburg during their intense hours of playing. He states that after the Beatles had reached their point of fame during 1964, they had performed a total of twelve hundred times which Gladwell states” the idea that excellence at performing a complex task requires a minimal level of practice”. According to Gladwell this is what allowed them to become they greatest rock band of all time. Although this was Beatles point of greatness, once returning to Liverpool they still had a point to prove the world. After Brian Epstein spent many days convincing different labels, being rejected by the same record labels, changing their style, and cleaning up their act for the music industry, they were finally able to sign a label with United Kingdom’s leading music record company during May of 1962. By October of 1963, the Beatles had the opportunity to appear on the Sunday Night At the Long Palladium. During this time, if one was able to perform here you had reached a high point in the
Malcom Gladwell, is an author of numerous New York Times Best Sellers, who uses several techniques in his writing to clarify and support his argument. Gladwell’s techniques are using stories to appeal to the reader’s emotions. Using scientific facts and research to logically strengthen his argument. Also, writing about controversial issues to establish credibility with the readers. These techniques are found in “Offensive Play”, “Small Change”, and “Harlan, Kentucky”, works by Gladwell.
...est high school students in America” (Gladwell 82). It was shocking to learn that all the Nobel Prize in Medicine winners did not all come from the most prestigious schools. Also, in the third chapter I notices some aspects that were highly relatable to me. My life relates to subjects included in chapter three because I am a student. It is interesting and helpful to learn that one does not need the highest IQ to succeed in today’s world. This is how I relate to chapter three. The third chapter in Outlier by Malcolm Gladwell had striking information that stated that IQs do not always determine who will be successful, and I can relate to the information in the chapter because I am student who has thought about my IQ before.
In his book, Outliers: The Story of Success, Malcolm Gladwell makes the claim that IQ does not have an accurate correlation to success after a certain point. Specifically, he says, “The relationship between success and IQ works only up to a point. Once someone has reached an IQ of somewhere around 120, having additional IQ points doesn’t seem to translate into any measurable real-world advantage.” IQ tests and other talent assessments have long been used to enroll students in gifted education initiatives. It has been argued that not only are IQ tests inaccurate, but gifted programs are detrimental to a child’s education. While I concede that IQ tests are not the best way to determine intelligence, I still insist that gifted programs are beneficial for children that show a special aptitude in different school subjects. Without advanced programs to challenge children with unique abilities, these students are unable to reach their full potential.
In the minds of many, intelligence not only excels your experience in education, but is also the key to a successful career. In Outliers: The Story of Success, Malcolm Gladwell refutes this thought by expanding on the belief that intelligence can only take you so far, and that creativity and innovation tend to lead to just as much success. This thought process applies to many different levels of life including our interview and acceptance into the ACTION program.
The author argues that certain decision leads to vast amount of untapped human potential and limits success to few who are selected unjustly. This example supports “Mathews Effect”. The Gladwell’s example of Bill Gates proves the “10,000 Hour Rule”, He explained that the timing and opportunity played a huge role to become an expert at computer programming. Bill Gates had access to computers decades before computers became mainstream. Such a timing helped him capture the opportunity to master the tool of trade and put him in the perfect position to start Microsoft. The Gladwell’s example of experiment by Lewis Terman, He argues about that a person’s IQ have a limited control over success. He claims that there is a minimal difference in the levels of success attained by those with IQs between 125 and 170. The author adds that IQ cannot efficiently measure person’s creativity. A person who has a high IQ does not mean that it has a high chance of winning a Nobel Prize because other kind of intelligence matter too. With the help of these facts, Gladwell proves that the relationship between IQ and success is
The results of Terman’s experiment confirm everything that Gladwell has suggested in this chapter three: though Terman selected the “smartest” children, they did not go on to become the most successful adults. He set out to show that IQ is the most definitive predictor of success; what he did prove was that many of our ideas about intelligence and success were misguided or just plain wrong (Chapter 3 Outliers by Gladwell).. Theodor proves that you do not have to just be smart or the to become successful you just have to be determined to do so. Anyone smart enough to get through an undergraduate university degree, is likely smart enough to be successful. Theodore thinks outside of the box, he see thing in a way that others do not.
Take a moment to think about how you make a first impression to somebody. Whether it be to an attractive female/male or a new teacher, we all sit there pondering whether or not that first impression was astonishing, acceptable, or mediocre. Ever heard the saying, “You only have one opportunity to make a first impression” by Natalie Massenet? This quote should prove not only to yourself, but to everyone around you that the first impression is everlasting. If you have ever badgered a first impression, you know how ridiculously hard it is to gain back trust and respect.
The strongest fact was the recalibration system, which kept the score out of hundred through every year though in actuality the IQ score was surging by 3 points per decade. So, placing the once top ten percent generation in the bottom thirty percent now. Next, the strongest fact was the economic growth and how every class has access to the bare minimum of “mindless pop music”. Gladwell could have utilized the statistics based on IQ scores to analyze the rise in smartness due to tv shows and video games whilst statistics of economic growth in various countries could have compared the success rate of the youth who had access to only collateral knowledge to that of explicit knowledge. This would have provided concrete evidence of how the evolution of the television and the video games industry has benefitted the society’s minds.
The con of using this theory to determine intelligence is that there is no distinction between what intelligence is and what talent is.
The Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale is a standardized test that assesses intelligence and cognitive abilities. Intelligence is "a concept intended to explain why some people perform better than others on cognitive tasks. Intelligence is defined as "the mental abilities needed to select, adapt to, and shape environments. It involves the abilities to profit from experience, solve problems, reason, and successfully meet challenges and achievement goals.
Recent information collected showing an increase to our IQs have many asking the question, are we smarting than our ancestors? Unlike our predecessors, we live in a time that poses a greater range of cognitive problems than our ancestors encountered, and as a result we've developed new cognitive skills and the kinds of brains that can deal with these problems. So in a way we are getting smarter throughout history, though it is widely debated if this is due to our environment or genes. Since IQ tests have been standardised many times over the last one hundred years, scientists have participants take a test designed for a previous age and record the results. What (Flynn, 1994) unearthed was that new test takers score much higher than those of the older generation. Flynn and his colleagues guessed that the difference in scores was due to improving modern environments. To them IQ is part heritable and part environmental- provide a child with opportunities to learn and they're likely to have a higher IQ later in
Does Hereditary Influence IQ Scores? Stephen Gould’s monograph, The Mismeasure of Man, examines and denounces the belief of biological determinism. In Chapter 5, titled “The Hereditarian Theory of IQ”, Gould addresses the idea that the average intelligence quotient (IQ) of an individual is strictly based on their hereditary. Gould condemns the belief of hereditarianism through reconstructing and finding inaccuracies in the experiments that leading scientists and researchers in the field, such as H. Goddard, L. Terman, and R. Yerkes, made while supporting the idea of biological determinism. Gould articulates how scientists, who allow their own personal prejudices and bias seep into their data, have inaccurately mismeasured man from the beginning
On the ‘nature’ side of the debate is the psychometric approach, considered to be the most dominant in the study of intelligence, which “inspired the most research and attracted the most attention” (Neisser et al. 1996, p. 77). It argues that there is one general (‘g’) factor which accounts for intelligence. In the 1880s, Francis Galton conducted many tests (measuring reaction times to cognitive tasks), (Boundless 2013), in order to scientifically measure intelligence. These tests were linked to the eugenic breeding programme, which aimed to eliminate biologically inferior people from society. Galton believed that as intelligence was inherited, social class or position were significant indicators of intelligence. If an individual was of high social standing, they would be more intelligent than those of a lower position. However he failed to show any consistency across the tests for this hypothesis, weakening his theory that social class correlated with intelligence. Nevertheless, his creation of the intelligence test led many to continue to develop...