Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Arguments about distributive justice
Principles of distributive justice
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Arguments about distributive justice
The universe is like a mirror. Events that occur in life are reflections of what one puts into the universe. The word and idea of luck was invented as an excuse for abnormal events that take place in our lives. Though, everyone has their own preconceived idea of luck and how it works. Their perceptions of luck is one thing that refuses to change unless it benefits them. So, how does the idea that one has of luck affect them in their daily life? Simply that everything is mind over matter. If one believes they have “bad luck” then they will experience what they believe is such, but if they just change their perspective, their perception of the events will change, thus changing the “luck” they believe they have. If one believes that their “luck” …show more content…
Which brings me to my next source of research, Robert Huseby’s article, “Can luck egalitarianism justify the fact the some are worse off than others?” To begin, an egalitarian is a person that believes all people have equality in life thus a luck egalitarian is a person that believes luck is distributed equally among all people. Although it seems Huseby’s view is opposing to my own when mentioning the meaning of luck egalitarianism, he makes good points throughout his article that support my claim. He describes how luck egalitarians seem as choice egalitarians, “Luck egalitarianism, or the species of this theory that I will refer to as choice egalitaritanism, is intuitively a compelling theory of distributive justice. While equality is the default position, inequalities are justified to the extent that they follow from choice (or option luck) rather than chance (or brute luck)” (259). This shows that instead of believing everyone has an equal distribution of luck, they believe that everyone has an equal chance to make correct decisions and luck is based on those choice decisions. The theory shown here supports my main claim and my own theory of luck. The decisions that one makes in their life affects the events that happen in their life. For example, if one sees a girl struggling to open a door because she has her hands full and the person decides to run and open the door to help the girl, they will have just put out good into the universe. That good will come right back into their life, maybe not right away, and it will have a good effect on their life. Rather, if one were to see the girl struggling and choose to ignore them or snicker at her struggling that will put bad into the universe and thus negatively affect their life. This negative and positive energy can be translated to luck that will come into their lives. The one who helped the girl may have an
Indeed, I believe that it is neither advantageous nor even logically plausible to accede to either side of this debate: simply admitting to one extreme (e.g., that luck should never be considered when assessing others, or vice versa) automatically creates a multitude of problems. If we do consider luck when assessing someone's moral character, we open ourselves to the very real possibility of punishing two people unequally for the same exact action or intention, which is incompatible with our notion of justice. Yet if we decide that luck should not be a factor, we are in effect embracing the notion that we are not responsible for our actions, and in such a case, punishment would be futile; without legal guilt and punishment, however, society would be chaotic, which again assaults our notion of justice. We shall see that this issue is closely tied in with the more general idea of free will vs. determinism, which itself is a fundamentally disturbing problem. As long as the free will debate remains inconclusive – as most people feel it is – so too will the debate over moral luck remain unresolved.
“The Lottery,” written by Shirley Jackson in 1948, is a provoking piece of literature about a town that continues a tradition of stoning, despite not know why the ritual started in the first place. As Jackson sets the scene, the villagers seem ordinary; but seeing that winning the lottery is fatal, the villagers are then viewed as murders by the reader. Disagreeing with the results of the lottery, Tessie Hutchinson is exposed to an external conflict between herself and the town. Annually on June 27th, the villagers gather to participate in the lottery. Every head of household, archetypally male, draws for the fate of their family, but Tessie protests as she receives her prize of a stoning after winning the lottery. Jackson uses different symbols – symbolic characters, symbolic acts, and allegories – to develop a central theme: the
4) Schwartz, D. (2010). Luck and the Domain of Distributive Justice. European Journal Of Philosophy, 18(2), 244-261. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0378.2009.00342.x
The case of moral luck was introduced by Williams Bernard and developed by Thomas Nagel in their articles respectively. Both raised the question whether luck can influence the judgment of morality. In this essay, the definition of moral luck and four kinds of moral luck by Williams and Nagel will be discussed through several case examples, and then followed with some arguments from Judith Andre, Donna Dickenson and David Enoch and Andrei Marmor who disagree with the concept of moral luck.
“The Lottery” is a story which shows the complexity and capability of human behavior. Something immoral, like stoning a person to death once a year, is a normal occurrence. The main character, Tessie Hutchinson, is the victim of the lottery. Tessie is a character with a number of seemingly good characteristics, yet her surrounding culture rejects these characteristics. The majority of the people in the village has opposite attitudes and beliefs in comparison to Tessie’s. These attitudes and beliefs reflect her personal desires which quickly struggle against the culture’s expectations. Tessie is unlike the other villagers; she is initially indifferent to the lottery indicating her desires are unrelated to the lottery. Upon winning the lottery, Tessie changes and her personal desires to survive and reject the lottery emerge in her selfishness and outspoken personality. These struggles against the village’s expectations are shown through the culture’s emphasis on tradition and small town ties.
“Lottery” 623 Words Shirley Jackson (1919-1965) was a native of San Francisco and later resided in Rochester, New York. She received a degree from Syracuse University. She settled in Bennington, Vermont with her husband, Stanley Edgar Hyman. He was a literary critic. There she wrote novels such as “The Road Through the Wall (1948)” and thrillers “Hangsaman (1951),” “The Haunting of Hill House (1959),” and “We Have Always Lived in the Castle.”
... Many people seem to enjoy the idea of probability because it is related to so many games that usually involve money. By playing the odds right, someone could win big, either at a card table or on Wall Street. Probability makes random events look very predictable.
Another popular opinion is that a persons will is stronger than that of any barrier put in his way. That this thing called fate is only an obstacle that can be over passed just by the implement of a person’s mind. This breed of people believes that nothing can control all events and that the mind can resist all temptations if properly trained.
Dictionary.com had defined luck as “(a) the force that seems to operate for good or ill in a person's life, as in shaping circumstances, events, or opportunities: With my luck I'll probably get pneumonia; (b) good fortune; advantage or success, considered as the result of chance: He had no luck finding work; (c) a combinat...
I actually don’t believe in pure luck, as I think that it can be attracted by hard work, ambition and faith in your abilities and ideas. It doesn’t matter that the odds are low, as long as you keep working hard and ready to seize opportunities. Who would have thought that a young South African (Elon Musk) would be owning a spacecraft manufacturing company on the way of sending people to Mars? Who would have thought that a young English teacher in communist China (Jack Ma, owner of Alibaba) would become one of the world’s most successful persons thanks to the Internet? They did.
There is no better person than asking Oprah. Oprah suggests that there is really no such thing as luck. According to her, everything that happens in a person's life prepares them for lucky circumstances. Oprah said, "Luck is preparation meeting opportunity." In other words, the odds of being lucky increase when people set goals, take the steps to reach them, and position themselves for meeting opportunity.
So it would only make sense for them to have the least amount of fairness, because everyone (one time or another) has had a chance or an opportunity to find a good job or get a good education, or simply just make their life
Thomas Jefferson once said "I'm a great believer in luck, and I find the harder I work, the more I have of it." What, though, is luck? Webster's dictionary suggests that luck is the "events or circumstances that operate for or against an individual."
For example my friends, which have been given by fate, personally motivate me, and help me make decisions within school. Their impacts on my life will result in how successful I am as a person. Fate always has its ways of bringing the biggest changes into my
...ppens. God has a plan for every person regardless if we listen to it or not. If whether or not we are good or bad determines what happens in our life then there would be no need for God’s mercy. He would not have needed to die on the cross, and we could have all lived our lives relying on karma and luck. Thankfully, however, we do not have to live this way. We can instead look to the one who knows all things. Jeremiah twenty-nine eleven says: For I know the thoughts I have for you say the Lord, thoughts of peace, and not of evil, to give you a future and a hope. This verse is proven in the lives of those who whole-heartedly follow after God; whereas the people who look to fate are caused to question their own existence. Furthermore, serendipity is a nice thought, but it is not a belief, that as a Christian I want to center my life around.