Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Narrative point of view in the lottery
Religion influence on literature
The role of religion in American literature
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Narrative point of view in the lottery
Written in 1941 by Jorge Luis Borges, The Lottery in Babylon expresses the writer's agnostic and anti-Nazi beliefs through the use of science fiction. Argentina, the home of Borges, supported the Axis powers during World War II. Borges, known for his philisophical writing rather than political writing (Laraway, 563); uses this science fiction short story to depict and question beliefs about religion as well as the use of religion as a tool by the empires of the world. The Lottery in Babylon is a science fiction short story about a mythical city, with a historical name. A lottery began as a game initiated by merchants and enjoyed by the common people of Babylon. The Babylonian society became bored with the game as the entrepenuers of the lottery could not afford to continue. A negative aspect was instituted into the lottery, a fine was imposed on the owners of certain tickets. If the unfortunate ticket holder refused to pay the fine he was imprisoned. This increased the popularity and the power of the lottery. The lottery became so popular that it became mandatory as a cultural norm and the Company became the all powerful ruler of Babylon. All of society participates and acceptes its rewards and consequences. The Company, by enticing the public to believe the world is chaotic and at the mercy of chance, grows into an empire. Borges uses the Company metaphorically in the science fiction storyThe Lottery in Babylon to explain how the Nazi's manipulated religion and the occult to assist in the growth of the Nazi Empire.
The evidence that the Company is a metaphor for the Nazi Party begins in the title. Babylon, according to Laraway, “. . . . is widely agreed to designate not only a generic kind of antithesis of Isreal but more...
... middle of paper ...
...litical Studies, 32(2), 190-202.
4) Schwartz, D. (2010). Luck and the Domain of Distributive Justice. European Journal Of Philosophy, 18(2), 244-261. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0378.2009.00342.x
5) Kurlander, E. (2012). Hitler’s Monsters: The Occult Roots of Nazism and the Emergence of the Nazi ‘Supernatural Imaginary’*. German History, 30(4), 528-549.
6) Carey, J., & Paulhus, D. (2013). Worldview implications of believing in free will and/or determinism: politics, morality, and punitiveness. Journal Of Personality, 81(2), 130-141. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2012.00799.x
7) Poewe, K. O. (2006). New Religions and the Nazis. New York: Routledge.
8) Phelps, R. H. (1963). ‘‘Before Hitler Came’: Thule Society and Germanen Orden.’’. Journal of modern history, 35(3), 245-61.
9) Ellic Howe, Rudolf Freiherr von Sebottendorff, unpublished typescript (1968), p. 67.
Koch, H. The Hitler Youth: Origins and Development 1922-1945. New York: Cooper Square Press, 1975. Print.
" Metaphors of Evil: Contemporary German Literature and the Shadow of Nazism. Hamida Bosmajian. University of Iowa Press, 1979. 27-54.
Hagen W (2012). ‘German History in Modern Times: Four Lives of the Nation’. Published by Cambridge University Press (13 Feb 2012)
The main purpose of the book was to emphasize how far fear of Hitler’s power, motivation to create a powerful Germany, and loyalty to the cause took Germany during the Third Reich. During the Third Reich, Germany was able to successfully conquer all of Eastern Europe and many parts of Western Europe, mainly by incentive. Because of the peoples’ desires and aspirations to succeed, civilians and soldiers alike were equally willing to sacrifice luxuries and accept harsh realities for the fate of their country. Without that driving force, the Germans would have given up on Hitler and Nazism, believing their plan of a powerful Germany...
The government of Nazi Germany greatly resembled the Party, the government in 1984, as both were very power-hungry governments.
The debate as to whether Hitler was a ‘weak dictator’ or ‘Master of the Third Reich’ is one that has been contested by historians of Nazi Germany for many years and lies at the centre of the Intentionalist – Structuralist debate. On the one hand, historians such as Bullock, Bracher, Jackel and Hildebrand regard Hitler’s personality, ideology and will as the central locomotive in the Third Reich. Others, such as Broszat, Mason and Mommsen argue that the regime evolved out from pressures and circumstances rather than from Hitler’s intentions. They emphasise the institutional anarchy of the regime as being the result of Hitler’s ‘weak’ leadership. The most convincing standpoint is the synthesis of the two schools, which acknowledges both Hitler’s centrality in explaining the essence of Nazi rule but also external forces that influenced Hitler’s decision making. In this sense, Hitler was not a weak dictator as he possessed supreme authority but as Kershaw maintains, neither was he ‘Master of the Third Reich’ because he did not exercise unrestricted power.
Mckale,Donald M.. Hitler’s Shadow War, the Holocaust and World War 2. New York: Cooper Square.2002.Print.
Norton, James. The Holocaust: Jews, Germany, and the National Socialists. New York: The Rosen Publishing Group, Inc., 2009. Print.
The problem of free will and determinism is a mystery about what human beings are able to do. The best way to describe it is to think of the alternatives taken into consideration when someone is deciding what to do, as being parts of various “alternative features” (Van-Inwagen). Robert Kane argues for a new version of libertarianism with an indeterminist element. He believes that deeper freedom is not an illusion. Derk Pereboom takes an agnostic approach about causal determinism and sees himself as a hard incompatibilist. I will argue against Kane and for Pereboom, because I believe that Kane struggles to present an argument that is compatible with the latest scientific views of the world.
Bibliography Primary Sources J Hite and C Hinton, ‘Weimar and Nazi Germany 2000’. Manchester Guardian Report, 13th April 1933. Franz Von Papen’s Speech at Marburg University, 17th June 1934. Rohm’s Speech to foreign press April 18th 1934. Field von Weich’s account of Hitler’s Speech to the leaders of the SA and most of the senior Reichswehr generals 28th February 1934.
Goldhagen, Daniel Jonah. Hitler's Willing Executioners: Ordinary Germans and the Holocaust. New York: Vintage, 1997. Print.
Fulbrook, Mary. A Concise History of Germany. 2nd ed. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press, 2004. Print.
Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1969. Kitchen, Martin. A History of Modern Germany: 1800-2000. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2006. Sprout, Otto.
Freedom, or the concept of free will seems to be an elusive theory, yet many of us believe in it implicitly. On the opposite end of the spectrum of philosophical theories regarding freedom is determinism, which poses a direct threat to human free will. If outside forces of which I have no control over influence everything I do throughout my life, I cannot say I am a free agent and the author of my own actions. Since I have neither the power to change the laws of nature, nor to change the past, I am unable to attribute freedom of choice to myself. However, understanding the meaning of free will is necessary in order to decide whether or not it exists (Orloff, 2002).
Shmoop Editorial Team.” Adolf Hitler in World War 2.” Shmoop.com. Shmoop University, Inc., 11 Nov. 2008. Web. 26 Feb. 2014