Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Help me write a literary analysis
Help me write a literary analysis
Help me write a literary analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The British novelist Laurence Sterne inscribes how no one can understand the struggles of being torn by two opposing ideals with equal force at the same moment, except one who is in that position or dealing with that problem. Stern asserts that opposing forces plaguing a man can destroy his sanity. In the novel, Grendel by John Gardner, Grendel is the protagonist who deals with two conflicting ideas on how he should live his life. Throughout the novel, Grendel contemplates the meaning of life and seeks to discover the workings of the universe, observing how men interact with each other. One significant observation is one of the Shaper who is a storyteller who creates meaning out of life that Grendel longs for. As the story continues, Grendel …show more content…
The Shaper derives a meaning out of life, which Grendel longs for. The story first mentions the Shaper as a blind man’s arrival at Hrothgar’s hall, the place Grendel spends most of his time stalking. His presence in the hall causes a sense of empowerment and pride in their race to the Hrothgar men. He is able to tell the men a history of their ancestors and bring a sense of harmony to the people. “They would seize the oceans, the farthest stars in Hrothgar’s name! Men wept like children; children sat stunned (43).” As a result of the Shaper’s encouragement, Hrothgar decided to build a hall that may become a symbol of his greatness and accomplishment, which will lead a legacy for his future generations. Not only did the Shaper produce this reaction from Hrothgar, he also converts Grendel to take on the idea that he is a monster, and encourages Hrothgar’s men to feel invincible. Grendel describes his conversion stating that he is a ridiculous creature to …show more content…
The Dragon gives logical advice to Grendel to stay clear of the humans because they bring no benefit to him. He explains to Grendel that he is not a magnificent creature, and that he is replaceable adding “if you withdraw, you’ll instantly be replaced (73).” He encourages Grendel to find a different meaning to life than terrorizing the humans, a purpose, such as finding sorting, and organizing treasures. “Do as I do! Seek out the gold – but not my gold- and guard it (62)”. When Grendel asks the Dragon his thoughts on the Shaper storytelling, the Dragon explains that the Shaper’s words are ridiculous and he provides an illusion of reality (65).”The Dragon counteracts Shaper’s ideals by repeating to Grendel the idea of collecting treasures, which would create a greater meaning and a more satisfied life. In the end the future cannot be changed and eventually everyone will die, “ashes to ashes and slime to slime, amen (73).” That Grendel should utilize the time he has while being alive to make an achievement that he can see, hold, and count. The Dragon advice portrays that irrespective of how Grendel feels upon killing the humans and playing a villain in the spectrum of life this deed is
Rudd cites various sections of the poem, describing Grendel as a “night-monster of the border lands” (Rudd 3), and the translation of the poem says that Grendel was, “...Conceived by a pair of those monsters born Of Cain, murderous creatures banished By God…” (Raffel 42). Rudd also gives evidence for Grendel being seen as demonic, and reasons that Grendel attacks the Danes out of “...not mere thirst for gore, as we might suspect… but rather… envy of the Danes’ happiness- and envy was a chief characteristic of the medieval devil.” (Ruud 5). He then ties this devilish persona to Grendel’s humanistic aspects, stating Grendel has a heathen soul, and therefore he must be human. Ruud also notes, however, that there are critics who question the validity of portraying Grendel as this three-sided figure, asking questions such as, “How can Grendel be a devil when he has a physical body? How can he be a man when he is so manifestly bestial?” (Ruud 7). Ruud believes that the original poet of Beowulf is doing this for effect rather than consistency, but a more reasonable explanation that encompasses all three characteristics is that Grendel represents the evil in
"The state is an organization of violence, a monopoly in what it is pleased to call legitimate violence (Gardner, 119)." This excerpt from John Gardner's Grendel shows one of the many issues he deals with in his satire of man, and that is the issue of the use of violence in society. Gardner shows this throughout the book, but most prominently in chapter eight, in which we learn of the arrival of Hrothulf, Hrothgar's nephew, at Herot.
Like animals they are frightened of anything that is different from what they are used to. When Grendel attempts to communicate they show their ignorance and simple-mindedness. Instead of taking the time to understand. the anomaly in their world, they panic and decide to destroy it. Without being able to view the story from Grendel's point of view the reader might assume that the humans had every right to attack. Another example of the same type of simple-mindedness is their second premature attack on Grendel. After hearing the shaper's words, Grendel weeps, "'Mercy! Peace! ' " ( ch.4 pp.50) in the hopes of salvation from the god of these men. The men, in a drunken state, merely misunderstand Grendel's intentions and attack him. once again. Instead of killing the men, which would have been an easy task. for the giant, Grendel escapes into the night. This action alone defines.
This is evidenced by the fact that Grendel decided to take on the great human: Beowulf. It was not a random choice that Grendel ended up fighting Beowulf. He fought Beowulf intentionally. Beowulf represents the great hero who came to save the people. By choosing to fight Beowulf specifically, Grendel locked in his role as “foe” in the context of the Shaper’s stories. Beowulf is physically able to harm Grendel and to drive him to death. This is evidence that Grendel truly has defined himself by his mortality. Because he is harmed, it is obvious that the dragon’s curse no longer protects him from the humans. This symbolizes the fact that the dragon’s influence over Grendel lost, while the Shaper’s influence won.Grendel was too mortal and therefore too short-sighted to truly internalize the dragon’s lessons, but he was just aware enough to be enticed into the pursuits of the characters in the Shaper’s
Perhaps he would actually like to live a normal life with the humans. “Some evil inside myself pushed out into the trees, I knew what I knew, the mindless, mechanical bruteness of things, and when the harper’s lure drew my mind away from hopeful dreams, the dark of what was and always was reached out and snatched my feet.” (Gardner 54) It seems as though Grendel would like to change things if he could, but some outside force will not allow it. Even if this is true, Grendel is still inherently evil. Despite whatever dreams he may have. The reader simply cannot ignore the fact that he still does evil deeds with evil intentions. He is seemingly unable to feel love, or at least disinterested in it. He enjoys torturing and killing humans and rarely shows mercy. Due to these facts, it is impossible to say Grendel is a hero in this
Towards the end of the novel, Grendel finally becomes ‘himself’. Grendel is unable to decide what to make of himself and of the world surrounding him. He has only ever known the world as wild and mechanical, yet he is charmed by the artistic brilliance of the Shaper’s words. Grendel ultimately meets a brutal yet peaceful demise. Standing on the face of the same cliff he found himself in at the beginning of the novel, surrounded by mindless eyes, he states, “Poor Grendel’s had an accident.
Throughout John Gardner’s Grendel, the audience bears witness to a creature who has been ostracized by the world around him. Throughout his journey, the stories protagonist tries to live out his own life the way he wants to, despite being labeled as evil by those around him. Due to this constant criticism by his peers, he develops an inferiority complex that he desperately tries to make up for as the story progresses. Throughout his development, Grendel very rapidly moves past his existentialist beginning, through a brief phase of forced skepticism, and into a severely nihilistic point of view.
Grendel's interludes with the dragon portray, at their onsets, the dragon as a worldly, wise creature with much to share. The dragon haughtily informs Grendel about his vast store of knowledge as he teases him with how much he knows. As Grendel's interests are piqued, the dragon expends the cumulative result of his travails: "Know how much you've got, and beware of strangers…My advice to you, my violent friend, is to seek out gold and sit on it" (Gardner page #). Although the dragon serves as a vessel to point out the necessity of Grendel and makes some pointed observations about mankind, all his respectability is lost with those two short sentences. The author is making an observation about materialism and the falsehood of wisdom always accompanying age. After all his years of intense scrutiny, the dragon can only grasp from human- and animalkind alike that possessions are the key to life's existence.
In Grendel, nearly all of the characters are driven to shape the world to their ideas. Hrothgar spends his life crafting a government. Grendel's mother is described as loving her son "not for myself, my holy specialness, but for my son-ness, my displacement of air as visible proof of her power (138)." Both Grendel and the Shaper constantly seek the ability to reshape reality with words. While they have differing motives, all of these acts of creation give power and significance to the creator. As Baby Grendel desperately convinces himself, it is the act of observing and commenting on what is outside that makes one real: "I understood that, finally ...
Throughout the novel, this monster, Grendel, seems confused as to whether he wants to view life like his existentialistic dragon mentor, or like the ignorantly optimistic humans on which he feeds. At times he is captivated by the romantic songs of the Shaper, and feels no desire to kill, while at others he thrives on the "knowledge" of the dragon, and goes on bloody rampages. At one point during Grendel's insecure state, the dragon tells him something that changes his outlook, and gives him a new feeling of self-worth.
With the introduction of the Shaper, Grendel’s ideals are transformed by another’s words. The Shaper is able to show Grendel that he can have an identity and not just be a mere obstruction in the dark. The Shaper created his own theories and stories about life and fed them to the people in a way that enabled them to follow what he said as truth. The Shaper gave the Danes a purpose by telling them what great feats they had overcome and his words excited and encouraged the men to become even more magnificent. The more Grendel listens to the Shaper’s songs, the more apparent it is that Grendel is captivated by the Shaper’s perspective on life. The Shaper’s songs tore at Grendel because he wanted to believe in everything said, but felt ashamed to live his life believing in lies: “I listened, felt myself swept up. I knew very well that all he said was ridiculous, not light for their darkness but flattery, illusion, a vortex pulling them from sunlight to heat, a kind of midsummer burgeoning waltz to the sickle” (Gardner 47). Grendel wanted to believe in the Shaper and his theories but he knew that in the end they were all lies meant to deceive, to fool, and to ensnare the listener. It was the Shaper’s skill and imagination that stirred him, but as much as Grendel wanted to accept the Shaper’s tales, he knew they were not the truths he was looking
Many may contend that the novel’s main character, Grendel, is guilty of evil by virtue of his vile actions. However, Gardner’s description of Grendel’s resistance to evil impulses and capability of human emotions suggest that Grendel is simply responding to his environment. Furthermore, Gardner deftly accrues readers’ sympathies towards Grendel, making it difficult for the empathetic reader to condemn the monster ex officio. By forging connections between humanity and his protagonist, Gardner indicates that readers are equally as guilty of sin as Grendel. Through this implication, he insinuates that humans are unqualified to judge Grendel’s actions, and, perhaps, each other. After all, if Grendel can be called evil, can the same not be said of all of mankind? The novel’s ultimate truth seems to harken back to Tupac Shakur’s assertion that, “Only God can judge me,” (Tupac
He seeked guidance from “The Dragon” however, it can be argued that The Dragon was never real, yet a figment of Grendel’s imagination. Many people would rather hear a comforting lie than a painful truth; thus, that is what Grendel was seeking. At first The Dragon tells Grendel his purpose is to be a monster. He tells him, “you are the brute existence by which they learn to define themselves” (73). This supports process philosophy because it states how everything in life is connected. Grendel must fulfill his role as the monster to give the humans their purpose. He continues to compare Grendel and mankind to a “mountain climber and the mountain” (73). Thus arguing a mountain climber would be nothing without a mountain just as mankind would be nothing without Grendel. Therefore, everything in life is connected and everything has a purpose. However, although The Dragon seems to be in support of process philosophy, he utters words of nihilism. When Grendel asks The Dragon, “but why” (72) he responds “Why? Why? Ridiculous question! Why anything?” (72) therefore there is no real purpose to life, there is no reason why. Grendel only hears what he wants to hear, which is the nihilistic aspect of The Dragon’s lesson. After this, he commits the ultimate act of nihilism and becomes a true monster. A goat is “climbing, mindless, mechanical, because it is the business of goats to climb” (139).
Soon after he becomes a full-fledged killer, Grendel meets The dragon, a mysterious advice-giver inside his mind. He claims to know the past, present, and future and tells Grendel: “My advice to you, my violent friend, is to seek out gold and sit on it” (74). In this way Grendel is being offered a glimpse at a more positive way of living. One of the consequences of letting nihilism control his life is that he is backed into a corner he cannot easily escape. However, by choosing to abandon the evil philosophy and be content with the world as it is, Grendel can stop his life of senseless killing. The dragon knows Grendel’s worldview, as well as the fact that Grendel will never be able to go back to innocence, so he advises him to stop following nihilism and sit on gold, or do nothing. At the very least Grendel would waste away the rest of his life without harming others, but more likely he would eventually find happiness in something and experience the positive aspects of life. Readers of Grendel can learn from the dragon’s advice and stop the evil inside of them; all it takes is satisfaction with being unable to define and understand every working of the
Soon after the death of the Shaper, Grendel expresses his feelings to the reader, saying that he should have been responsible for the death of the Shaper. This point in time is critical, as Grendel has a realization of the ‘real’ world, which alters his Nihilistic view of the people and his surroundings. These words spoken by Grendel provide insight into how Grendel is ‘born again,’ the death of the Shaper contradicts Grendel’s Law; Grendel’s law follows a system of balance,