John Gardner's Grendel: The Differences Between Good And Evil

885 Words2 Pages

What's the difference between good and evil? In John Gardner’s classic tale Grendel the line between good and evil is exceedingly blurred. Gardner does a phenomenal job of forcing the reader to question who the real hero of the story is. So is Grendel evil or simply misunderstood? To answer this question one must look at his basic character traits. Grendel is an unloving creature, he enjoys killing and torturing humans, and when he shows any sort of mercy, he later regrets it. Due to these facts it is impossible to label him as “good”.
Grendel does not love, at least not in the way humans do. One could make the argument that he loves Wealthlow, but all signs point to the fact that this is just mere infatuation. Grendel doesn't love her. He's …show more content…

He kills people because he enjoys it. Evidence of this can be found in an abundance throughout the novel. “An evil idea came over me-so evil they it made me shiver as I smiled-and I sidled across to the table.” (Gardner 83-84) This is the point in the story when Grendel is torturing Unferth. He's enjoying himself, smiling. The one time it would have been merciful for him to kill he refuses to do so. This scene can without a doubt prove that Grendel’s intentions are not for the best. He's not terrorizing the humans to “improve their lives”. He's doing it because it's fun to him. The reader can already see that Grendel doesn't care about the humans, so why would he ravage their town to improve their society? The only reasonable answer as to why Grendel does what he does is because he enjoys …show more content…

Perhaps he would actually like to live a normal life with the humans. “Some evil inside myself pushed out into the trees, I knew what I knew, the mindless, mechanical bruteness of things, and when the harper’s lure drew my mind away from hopeful dreams, the dark of what was and always was reached out and snatched my feet.” (Gardner 54) It seems as though Grendel would like to change things if he could, but some outside force will not allow it. Even if this is true, Grendel is still inherently evil. Despite whatever dreams he may have. The reader simply cannot ignore the fact that he still does evil deeds with evil intentions. He is seemingly unable to feel love, or at least disinterested in it. He enjoys torturing and killing humans and rarely shows mercy. Due to these facts, it is impossible to say Grendel is a hero in this

Show More
Related

  • Good vs. Evil in John Gardner's Grendel

    879 Words  | 2 Pages

    the men as the "beasts" and Grendel as the victim. & nbsp;           Another aspect of the humans in the story that Grendel defines is their concept of a hero.  Not only does he allow for heroes to exist he gives them their purpose in life.  Grendel is the monster in the darkness. that every loyal thane would defend his king against.  Without Grendel this unique situation would not exist.  On the other hand, Grendel has the ability to humiliate and cause a man to be named a coward.  He does. this to none other than Unferth.  Unferth is treated like a hero because he would defeat the "monster" Grendel, or die trying.  When Grendel does not. allow him to complete this task he is shamed by his fellow thanes.  Grendel realizes that by killing the man he will be defining him as a hero in the eyes of the humans.  Considering the way Grendel was treated by Unferth. and others like him, it becomes easy to sympathize with him extracting this.

    Read More

  • Literary Criticism In 'Grendel' By John Gardner

    1611 Words  | 4 Pages

    He doesn’t believe that he has done anything wrong, therefore he doesn’t believe that he is a bad person. In the novel Grendel, Grendel states that, “I saw, is merely what pushes me, or what I push against, blindly—as blindly as all that is not myself pushes back. I create the whole universe blink by blink… (Gardner, 22)”. This internal thought from Grendel at the beginning of his story shows his belief that he holds the power to choose his future and that he creates his own reality. He truly does believe that despite his killing nature and that he is not technically human, he can still live among them and rise above his original reputation. In his encounter with the dragon in chapter 5, Grendel is told that, "My knowledge of the future does not cause the future. It merely sees it” (Gardner 63). What the dragon says in this instance sticks with Grendel in the sense that even though he is drawing away from his existentialist views, he still knows that he controls himself. Him accepting this strikes as somewhat half existentialism and half nihilism due to the character arc taking place. In addition to the evidence of existentialism in the novel itself, there is also many instances within literary criticism that suggest Grendel’s

    Read More

  • Grendel And Beowulf: Humanizing The Monster

    833 Words  | 2 Pages

    Grendel, as a character, has a much more complex identity than just a monster and a human. Some, such as Ruud, classify him as a mixture of three different characteristics, but alone, they tend to conflict with each other. By making the connection that Grendel represents immorality, the previous idea makes more sense, while simultaneously incorporating more aspects of the character into the analysis. In either case, Grendel represents much more than meets the eye, and provides a fascinating insight into

    Read More

  • Free Grendel Essays: Good Requires Evil

    738 Words  | 2 Pages

    As in the parallel comparison of beauty to ugliness, it can be seen that good and evil are only identifiable in their contrast of one another. If there was nothing defined as beautiful, for instance, nothing could be ugly. There would be no such concept. Similarly, having no definition of good would make evil, too, a non-existent idea. In Grendel, Gardner grasps this thought, and maximizes its importance with the help of a horrendously confused monster and the society that he terrorizes.

    Read More

  • Is Grendel Evil?

    2263 Words  | 5 Pages

    Grendel is born a neutral being, perhaps even good, but nevertheless, without hate. The transition which he undergoes to become evil is due to misunderstandings between himself and humans and also meeting with a dragon who is questionably evil. As a young “monster”, Grendel knew nothing other than the cave he lived in and his mother who could not speak any distinguishable language. He was a playful creature who seemed to be like a “bla...

    Read More

  • Morally Ambiguous Character In 'Grendel' By John Gardner

    569 Words  | 2 Pages

    In John Gardner’s, Grendel, the main character, Grendel, is a morally ambiguous character. This is because although he does commit evil in killing the men, through his eyes he is doing good by riding the world of these men. Grendel chooses to kill many men in Herot which is view as immoral but according to Grendel this is his purpose and he is right by doing so. To the reader Grendel is morally ambiguous as we know the crimes he commits are wrong but in the end, the reader still is sympathetic towards Grendel. Grendel commits evil acts for the purpose of good deeds which is where the reader's sympathy becomes prevalent.

    Read More

  • Grendel's Change In The Awakening

    301 Words  | 1 Pages

    As Grendel dies, he whispers the words, “ Poor Grendel’s had an accident, so may you all” (Gardner 174). I believe that this is a blessing because throughout the story, it is clear that he has fundamentally changed. Although he does not like society, he is not wishing death upon them, rather he is wishing “an accident”. Moreover, it seems that Grendel has finally understand his change as death draws near, when he sees “cold, sharp outlines, everything around me: distinct, detached as dead men. I understand” (172). He sees the harshness of reality. Grendel has changed, understanding that his search for whatever meaning there was in the world, was essentially and ironically meaningless. This is because his true role was something else and he

    Read More

  • Between Heroes and Villains: The Grey Area Explored

    1715 Words  | 4 Pages

    Throughout this time he begins to lose himself in his philosophy, resorting to more frequent attacks and personal insanity. He begins to believe he is a god, creating everything around him on his whim. During some fits of rage he commits acts that he viewed as horrible when he was still shaping the society. When Hrothgar gets a new queen, Grendel fall into emotional confusion, and he, in a emotion-driven blood lust, “decided to kill her. I firmly committed myself to killing her, slowly, horribly. I would begin by holding her over the fire...I would squeeze out her feces between my fists...Grendel the truth-teacher”(109). Though before he had said the worst act of nihilism he could do was to kill her and he viewed the queen’s life as a high point in her personality, he kills her as soon as he wants to. This unplanned attack represents the mental instability residing inside of Grendel, throwing his reasoning into chaos. Throughout the end of the book he continues to talk to himself, arguing and mocking his actions in his head. Grendel Tries to repress this side of him at first, but in the end the lack of purpose drives the existentialist insane. For what is an existentialist without a purpose but an unintended nihilist, something Grendel despises even until his death. Nearing the end of the

    Read More

  • Punishment In Grendel By John Gardner

    803 Words  | 2 Pages

    Grendel, unlike animals, has complex thoughts much like man, which also allows him the power to control his actions. “It was one thing to eat one from time to time….but it was another to scare them, give them heart attacks, fill their nights with nightmares, just for sport.” This shows that Grendel has complete control over his actions because for the first half of the story he lived his life with this in mind (Gardner, 61). This idea soon faded after his encounters with the old dragon and he found joy in killing the Danes for sport. “As if casually, in plain sight of them all, I

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Grendel And Beowulf

    800 Words  | 2 Pages

    He is portrayed as confused and just strolling through life looking for answers and he does not act like the blood hungry beast in fact he is a kind monster. “Ah, the unfairness of everything, I say, and shake my head. It is a matter of fact that I have never killed a deer in all my life, and never will” (Gardner 8). This depicts Grendel as a nonviolent monster that previously would have killed the deer but in Grendel he does not and has no intention to do so. Grendel is a very confused creature in Gardner’s novel, he would ask his mother, “Why are we here?” (Gardner 11) and he would get advice from the Dragon such as, “You are mankind, or man’s condition: inseparable as the mountain-climber and the mountain” (Gardner 73). Grendel is very much aware that most people fear him and he uses that to his advantage. The Dragon tells Grendel, “They would map out roads to Hell with their crackpot theories!...You improve them my boy! Can’t you see that yourself? You stimulate them! You make them think and scheme” (Grendel 72). The about quote in which the Dragon gives advice to Grendel shows that Grendel is far more superior than humankind is. When Grendel and Beowulf meet in the meadhall, Grendel realizes that he has never seen a creature quite as strong and brave as Beowulf in fact he is quite amazed. After Grendel gets attacked he runs into some animals that do not fear him and he says, “Is

    Read More

  • What Does Beowulf Mean When They Say I Have No Faith In Humanity

    870 Words  | 2 Pages

    Grendel sometimes does seem to be more compassionate than some of stubborn humans in Grendel. Grendel has a variety of, almost human-like, approaches to life, especially when he says “I picked him up gently and carried him home. I laid him at the door through Hrothgar's meadhall, still asleep, killed the two guards so I wouldn't be misunderstood and left." (Gardner, 90) While he did kill those guards, he did do that because he prefers the reputation that he has and that can be interpreted as simply being egotistical. Though he does have compassion for Unferth. Grendel is shown as more human in his perspective, instead of the cold hearted monster in

    Read More

  • Grendel Is Not Evil, By John Gardner

    1406 Words  | 3 Pages

    Evil. It’s a concept that has baffled philosophers, religious figures, and the common man alike for thousands of years. In this millennium, people may exemplify evil as terrorism, genocide, or, perhaps, placing an empty milk carton back in the refrigerator. However, many remain conflicted about the exact definition of evil, as the dispute over the character Grendel, from the John Gardner novel, makes evident. To conclude that Grendel is not evil, readers must first operate under the assumption that the beast is unequivocally and thoroughly evil. Having done so, readers will notice the fallacies within this thought process. By asserting that Grendel is evil, readers blatantly disregard the ambiguity with which humanity defines its actions, as

    Read More

  • Grendel Natural Evil Essay

    666 Words  | 2 Pages

    According to Todd Calder, an assistant professor of philosophy who specializes in ethics and moral psychology, evils can be broadly classified as either natural or moral (“The Concept of Evil”). Moral evils are those perpetrated by a moral agent, or a being that is capable of differentiating right from wrong. Natural evils simply exist; they are not the result of a moral agent going against its conscience. For example, a tornado is a natural evil. It causes suffering, but it isn't anybody's fault. Using this framework, it is tempting to argue that Grendel’s actions are natural evils, that he is driven by instinct and therefore cannot help but to cause suffering. However, Grendel shows throughout the book that he is quite capable of thinking

    Read More

  • Is Grendel Good Or Evil

    536 Words  | 2 Pages

    Grendel was a monster, and a monster can’t help but act like monster. He throws objects, dislikes people, does whatever he wants when he wants to, kills and eats the Danes, and behaves like a wild animal. So just like wild animals that lack free will, so does Grendel. He is limited by his fate. Additionally, Grendel is evil, because he is a descendent of Cain, the first murderer

    Read More

  • Beowulf: Grendel is Pure Evil

    485 Words  | 1 Pages

    Grendel is the embodiment of all that is evil and dark. He is a descendant of Cain and like Cain is an outcast of society. He is doomed to roam in the shadows. He is always outside looking inside. He is an outside threat to the order of society and all that is good. His whole existence is grounded solely in the moral perversion to hate good simply because it is good.

    Read More

More about John Gardner's Grendel: The Differences Between Good And Evil

Open Document