Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Good and evil in literature
Good vs evil literary analysis for beowulf essay
Good and evil in literature
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Good and evil in literature
Part of the development of a human being involves acquiring the ability to classify good and evil as well as distinguishing right from wrong. It has become an inherent trait that is invariably used in our everyday lives. In John Gardner’s novel, Grendel, the main character, Grendel, seeks to find the meaning of life. Through his journey, a depiction of the forces of good and evil is revealed. Aside from being a novel about the search for the meaning of life, Grendel also suggest society’s good and evil have a meaningful and imbalanced relationship where good prevails evil yet facing evil is still critical.
The relationship between good and evil is generally morality against immorality and has a major role in the novel. An action that is life preserving and sacrificial is believed to be “good” in our modern society. King Hrothgar’s wife, Wealtheow, is a complete representation of this concept. When tensions run high between the two kings, King Hygmod offers his daughter as “Wealtheow, or holy servant of common good” to King Hrothgar to preserve their peaceful environment (Gardner 100). King Hygmod’s description of her as a “servant” exemplifies the sacrifice of her personal life for assistance in maintaining peace between the two kings. On the other hand, degradation and hurt and overall suffrage created by one’s activity determines the denotation of the word “evil.” This idea is best resembled by Grendel’s feelings toward a statement made by the Dragon he meets on his journey. He is shocked to find that the dragon “could lie” and “that [h]e was evil enough” to do so (Gardner 71). The lie is what degrades Grendel as a person and he interprets as evil. These antithetical opposites of nature are connected because of their strong ef...
... middle of paper ...
... by murdering Grendel, this action is expressed as moral. This idea is reconfirmed when the Dragon explains to Grendel how he is “the brute existent by which they learn to define themselves” in reference to men (Gardner 73). This further suggests that society requires evil to present them an explanation for their life and actions.
Through the analysis of characters and their actions, the novel Grendel suggests society has adopted good and evil’s unequal relationship for meaningfulness in life. The modern society is built on the opposite forces of nature and that evil must be challenged although good prevails it. However, evil and good is subjective which makes the true struggle between good and evil. Moreover, our every day actions are differentiated between good and evil acts. Unfortunately, while this occurs, good and evil will never be a black and white concept.
Grendel, as a character, has a much more complex identity than just a monster and a human. Some, such as Ruud, classify him as a mixture of three different characteristics, but alone, they tend to conflict with each other. By making the connection that Grendel represents immorality, the previous idea makes more sense, while simultaneously incorporating more aspects of the character into the analysis. In either case, Grendel represents much more than meets the eye, and provides a fascinating insight into
the men as the "beasts" and Grendel as the victim. & nbsp; Another aspect of the humans in the story that Grendel defines is their concept of a hero. Not only does he allow for heroes to exist he gives them their purpose in life. Grendel is the monster in the darkness. that every loyal thane would defend his king against. Without Grendel this unique situation would not exist. On the other hand, Grendel has the ability to humiliate and cause a man to be named a coward. He does. this to none other than Unferth. Unferth is treated like a hero because he would defeat the "monster" Grendel, or die trying. When Grendel does not. allow him to complete this task he is shamed by his fellow thanes. Grendel realizes that by killing the man he will be defining him as a hero in the eyes of the humans. Considering the way Grendel was treated by Unferth. and others like him, it becomes easy to sympathize with him extracting this.
In Chapter 8, Grendel exclaims, “I’m a machine. Like all of you. Blood-lust and rage are my character,” (Gardner 123). This profound statement establishes a connection between Grendel and the ambiguous “you,” the reader. The monster, though he confesses to his wrongdoing, asserts that readers are no better than he. Countless bible verses reiterate this concept: “For all have sinned,” (Romans 3:23) “[Humans] are all. .impure with sin,” (Isaiah 64:6). Gardner’s reminder to readers of mankind’s predisposition to sin earns pity for the monster. He expands on these sympathies by describing the nature of Grendel’s lonely existence. “But there was one thing worse,” Grendel states after discovering the dragon’s charm, “no weapon could cut me,” (Gardner 75). In this moment, nihilism overcomes Grendel; if fighting poses no danger, it has no purpose, and neither does he. Any reader who has had an experience which challenged his or her values cannot help but feel empathetic towards the purposeless creature. Perhaps more piteous, however, is the suggestion that Grendel has no choice in being “the dark side. . the terrible race God cursed,” (Gardner 51). The dragon condemns Grendel as “the brute existent by which [humans] learn to define themselves,” telling him that it is worthless to better his character (Gardner 72). It is not until after
In Grendel, each character tells of his or her view on philosophy, theory, and life. Grendel is a monster who is not sure where he fits in life. “Grendel is not just searching for one philosophy; he is just searching for the best way to live in the world” (Simmers 183). He goes to extreme limits to discover his character. Grendel shows a self-centered approach to the world as he exclaims, "The world resist me and I resist the world" (Gardner 28). Nothing in the world is going right for Grendel. Grendel feels resistant to life. Therefore, if society does not need him, then he does not need the society. The Dragon also views the world negatively, as a result of his praiseworthy perception of himself. Out of all the characters in the novel, the Dragon is one of Grendel's closest companions greatly impacting Grendel. The Dragon’s destructive philosophy views the world as meaningless. The dragon shares his selfish approach of life with Grendel telling him, "My advice to you, my violent friend, is to seek out gold and sit
In Grendel, the protagonist spends his ephemeral life attacking Hrothgar’s mead hall, and Grendel takes the lives of Hrothgar’s men during the raids. When Grendel encounters the dragon, Grendel turns into a barbaric machine, after his self-realization. After the dragon, Grendel begins his contentious “war” with Hrothgar. The attacks on Hrothgar are essentially a deranged pastime for Grendel. After the attacks, Grendel feels some remorse, although this could merely be a biological reaction to the tyranny. Even if Grendel feels remorse, it is still no excuse to slaughter. If Grendel’s attacks are means of survival, then he must surely realize his death is necessary. Grendel returns to the mead hall repeatedly, even after the scenes of sick compassion. Grendel’s regrets only last long enough for the reader to see another side of him. The side of remorse and regret quickly disappears as he feels the hunger of death again.
Grendel is the embodiment of all that is evil and dark. He is a descendant of Cain and like Cain is an outcast of society. He is doomed to roam in the shadows. He is always outside looking inside. He is an outside threat to the order of society and all that is good. His whole existence is grounded solely in the moral perversion to hate good simply because it is good.
The people’s inability to understand and see grendel beyond just the creature, created more trouble than peace. Another firm reason for their disapproval of grendel was the fact that grendel did not appear to like humans to begin with. Aside from his original thoughts that people were “dangerous creatures” grendel was not inviting to the groups of people he wanted to be accepted by. He saw their overall ability to “create their own destiny” as a threat and a quality that he himself could not obtain, almost forming a sense of jealousy. This feeling alone was another reason that mankind did not accept grendel with open arms. His fighting with the danes was another reason for their hesitance for any kind of remorse to someone like grendel. Their societal standard’s forced grendel to be vagrant and misguided as he tried to find his only purpose in life, thus showing grendel that there was no hope for a similarity between the people and
In John Gardner’s, Grendel, the main character, Grendel, is a morally ambiguous character. This is because although he does commit evil in killing the men, through his eyes he is doing good by riding the world of these men. Grendel chooses to kill many men in Herot which is view as immoral but according to Grendel this is his purpose and he is right by doing so. To the reader Grendel is morally ambiguous as we know the crimes he commits are wrong but in the end, the reader still is sympathetic towards Grendel. Grendel commits evil acts for the purpose of good deeds which is where the reader's sympathy becomes prevalent.
For one, he was raised in a cave at the bottom of a lake with his mother who is also a monster. He was brought up only knowing evil. He never was given any chances to become good. He also gets angry when he hears pleasure or joy from others and is completely unconscious of the pain he causes others. Unlike other evil figures, he is unaware of the suffering that his actions bring others. The fact that he was only taught evil makes it where he only knows how to be evil. While Grendel does identify himself as being a monster, he does not exactly see himself as being evil. In a way, he feels he is doing what is normal because this is all he knows how to do. He has no problem killing people, yet Gardner uses personification to make Grendel appear more human like because he can think and has feelings just like anybody else. The constant war with the humans is frustrating to Grendel because he wants to be
Gardner introduces Grendel’s tale by quickly unveiling a stream of consciousness empowered by hardship and pain. This, the image of an estranged monster segregated from all of humanity, establishes the theme of suffering. To illustrate, Grendel refers to himself as a “pointless monster crouched in the shadows” and a “poor old freak” that wreaks of murdered men and children (Gardner 6). It is apparent early on how Grendel sees his role in society, as a vilified creature with no reason to exist whatsoever. Moreover, this highlights Grendel’s pain as he, a murderous being, has no place among the humans he watches from the forest. While Grendel is unable to undermine the
Grendel was never formally taught about what was “right” and what was “wrong”. The closest he ever came to learning about how to act was from watching the humans, the other intelligent human beings, the only beings which Grendel could verbally understand, talk about war and the murderous things they were going to do to the opposite bands of men.
This passage emphasizes how the Geats viewed the dragon, who was simply trying to retrieve a stolen cup, as an angry merciless monster who would stop at nothing to kill them all. To them, there is nothing eviler than a creature that destroys everything from their homes to their lives. Yet, that is the exact method that many of the warrior kings use to conquer neighboring towns. In essence, Grendel, Grendel’s mother, and the dragon are all harshly judged by humanity to be evil creatures because of the death they
The Dragon gives logical advice to Grendel to stay clear of the humans because they bring no benefit to him. He explains to Grendel that he is not a magnificent creature, and that he is replaceable adding “if you withdraw, you’ll instantly be replaced (73).” He encourages Grendel to find a different meaning to life than terrorizing the humans, a purpose, such as finding sorting, and organizing treasures. “Do as I do! Seek out the gold – but not my gold- and guard it (62)”. When Grendel asks the Dragon his thoughts on the Shaper storytelling, the Dragon explains that the Shaper’s words are ridiculous and he provides an illusion of reality (65).”The Dragon counteracts Shaper’s ideals by repeating to Grendel the idea of collecting treasures, which would create a greater meaning and a more satisfied life. In the end the future cannot be changed and eventually everyone will die, “ashes to ashes and slime to slime, amen (73).” That Grendel should utilize the time he has while being alive to make an achievement that he can see, hold, and count. The Dragon advice portrays that irrespective of how Grendel feels upon killing the humans and playing a villain in the spectrum of life this deed is
Good and evil is found in everyone. Certain people show either create more than others. “Two Wolves”, by an unknown author, shows the battle between the two. In The Boy in the Striped Pajamas, by John Boyne, Bruno's father exemplifies both of these traits. Everyday, people struggle with deciphering whether good or evil will dominate their personality.
Lurking evil combatted by bravado and strength appears throughout the poem. Right from the start, the author addresses the conflict. “Times were pleasant for the people there,” the epic begins, “until finally one, a fiend out of hell, began to work his evil in the world.” However, Beowulf quickly rushes to the people’s aid. “When he heard about Grendel, [Beowulf] was on home ground, over in Geatland. There was no one else like him alive. In his day, he was the mightiest man on earth.” Two other villains in the story also utilize this same theme, Grendel’s mother and the Dragon. This tenuous balance between forces of good, and the underlying malice of the villain resolves only with the mutual death of Beowulf and his final foe, the Dragon.