Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Importance of quality in assessment method
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Importance of quality in assessment method
Types of Literacy Assessments
Most schools systems have a Literacy Assessment that is given at the beginning of the year. The types of Literacy Assessments include: Map Testing; Star Reading; and PALS (Phonological Awareness Literacy Screening). However, “Universal literacy screenings such as DIBELS Next and AIMSweb are often characterized as fluency assessments because they measure both accuracy and efficiency in completing tasks,” (Munger, n.d.). While these assessments assist core-content teachers in determining where a student stands in the fluency of reading, teachers in other non-core content areas, such as Business Education might not be privy to test score results.
Issues become a problem with the authenticity of literacy is excessively
…show more content…
shortened by assessments that are not multidimensional such as the constant usage of the same types of question such as multiple choice. Instructors will see the lack of validity of the assessments unsatisfying because the final outcomes do not reflect the students’ knowledge, comprehension, or their capabilities. Formal and Informal Assessments: Purpose; Their Pros and Cons Assessments have a lot of benefits and downsides as well. While instructors like the benefits of informal assessments. It gives the teacher an idea of how much progress the student has made in the class or in the subject area. It also gives the teacher an insight as to what the student needs to work on. Assignments in reinforcement or enrichment can be given to assist the student in the comprehension of the subject area. The downside of informal assessments may not be documented, or be used in planning assignments. Mostly its impromptu and most of the time, it might not require the use of technology. Most formal testing requires the use of technology, those tests include, “standardized reading readiness tests, used in a diagnostic manner are known to drive the curriculum.
These tests which assess skills such as auditory discrimination, letter identification, letter-sound association, following directions and copying letters result in a readiness program designed to master these skills,” (Harlin & Lipa,1990). The pros of formal assessments- its provides data for certain subjects but mostly core content area. School administrators are able to take the data that is given and compare it to previous data from years past, or compare to other schools in the county, other counties within the state, or on a national level. While the pros have benefits, there are cons to formal assessments. Cons can possibly include failure in technology- computers can shut down or fail to operate properly during testing, internet fails to transmit data, or student is not computer literate. Other cons can include student performance, whereas the student is not a good test taker and struck with anxiety or nervousness. A student’s non-performance or poor performance on a formal assessment can be a disadvantage in when it comes to the data. Especially if the content on the test has not been covered during the course of the school year. Most students complain at the end of the test that certain information they did not know because the concepts or content information was never introduced in the class.
Content area such as business education, culinary arts do not have formal assessments at the end of each school term. However, CTAE (Career, Technology, and Agricultural Education) have a pathway assessment at the completion of the pathway. While the CTAE is not literacy geared, however there is a lot of literacy-involved reading in the
classes. Literacy Tools Aiding with Instruction One literacy tool that has been introduced to students, and has been a success in the classroom is Newsela. This resource is actually used as additional resources pertaining to any content area. This resource can keep the class engaged for group discussions or individual reading. Teachers can set up the account so students can access it at school or at home. Another useful literacy tool is TrackStar. This “allows teachers to collect a series of websites and annotate them so that students can follow an online journey. With a little work, teachers can create a visual vocabulary field trip for students. Teachers determine topics which support units of study,” (Teach Thought Staff, 2015). Supporting Technological Resources for Literacy Assessments Teachers are faced with a plethora of challenges, and literacy is one of them. Teachers are faced with an undaunting task of introducing new literacy in the classroom in addition to be being underprepared when using technology. (Kajder, 2005). Being underprepared include issues such as lack of resources, skills, as well as lack of comprehension using technology for assessments. In the book, Contextualizing the New Literacies of Information and Communication Technologies in Theory, Research, and Practice., the authors acknowledged vital ideas instructors can use in the classroom to introduce students to new literacies: • “Simply using software programs on computers does not prepare students for new literacies' expectations. • New literacies are deictic in that they constantly change and require teachers to embrace these changes. • New literacies are essential in classrooms so that equal opportunities are offered to all students,” (Leu, et.al., 2005). Assessment websites such as USATest Prep has made their website mobile friendly. This is helpful for teachers, especially since school computer labs might be in use. Teachers can allow the students to use the smartphone to complete the assignment on the cellphone versus waiting for students to get a lab day. Conclusion To be an efficient educator in the twenty-first century, one must be able to work with students that are technology savvy, be up-to date on educator-preparedness programs and attend professional development sessions offered by the school district. As technology continues to evolve, it has an important use in the classroom. “There can be infinite uses of the computer and the new age of technology, but if teachers themselves are not able to bring it into the classroom and make it work, then it fails.” (Parker, personal communication, 2018). The beauty of technology, includes the an educator’s ability to introduce a variety of new literacies to students in their classes.
Lines, S. (2014). Effectiveness of the National Assessment Program - Literacy and Numeracy: final report. Canberra: Senate Printing Unit, Parliament House.
Assessments should guide instruction and material selection. Any likely manner, assessments should measure student progress, as well as help, identify deficiencies in reading (Afflerback, 2012). One important indicator of reading deficiencies is spelling. Morris (2014), advocated the importance of administering a spelling assessment in order to have a better understanding of a student’s reading abilities. My school uses the Words Their Way spelling inventory to assess students’ reading abilities at the beginning of the year and throughout the reading year.
Throughout this semester I have learned many ways of writing through two main essays literacy narrative and comparison and contrast. These two essays have taught me how to correctly fix my comma splices, thesis statements, and capitalization. I have engaged in numerous learning material during this summer class. Many times when I thought it would be hard to work on those three developments I never gave up. I gain more positive feedback from my teacher because he pointed out most of my mistakes I made on both literacy narrative and comparison and contrast essays to help me understand what is it that I need to work on. My development as a writer became stronger.
My literacy journey commenced at a young age. My story begins with the typical bed time stories and slowly progresses into complex novels. Some points in my literacy journey have made me admire the written word but other times literacy frustrated me. These ups and downs within my story have made me the person I am today. My parents noticed that my reading was not up to par with other children in kindergarten and I was diagnosed with mild dyslexia at the age of five. My parents provided me a reading mentor named Mrs. Mandeville who has shaped my literacy journey in many ways. Events in my childhood have shaped my literacy in various ways.
How many of us really believe that a child's intelligence, achievement, and confidence can be represented adequately by standardized tests? How can any distribution curve classify all children? What about all we have learned about children?s growth and their response to education? Few teachers and parents would accept that a single test score could define any child (Russel, 2002). We must ask if these tests address the educational concerns of teachers and parents and do they provide useful information about individual children or the class. Almost all teachers feel pressure to teach to the tests and feel that tests clearly limit educational possibilities for students (Russel, 2002). We feel it is detrimental to a child's education to enjoy reading. An article reported by the BBC news (2003) entitle...
Literacy embraces reading, writing, listening, and speaking. Integrating all of these into a literacy program is key. Teachers must provide endless and ongoing opportunities for their student to read, write, listen, and speak.
This paper explores a few of the many alternatives to standardized testing within the education system. Also, this research helps the reader understand what standardized exams are, why they are used, and how educators can use other ways of assessing to “test” the children’s/students’ abilities throughout the year. Some of these substitutions may include personal portfolios, developmental benchmarks, and a variety of analyses on comprehension by recording different sessions. Furthermore, this exposition uses research from many different resources to support the importance, credibility, and objectivity of other assessment tools besides standardized test. By reading this composition, one will learn the pros and cons of uniform evaluation implementations and why it is important for everyone’s individual learning and development that standardized testing are no longer required.
Teachers gather information everyday form student’s through classroom activities to get a picture of where a student’s progress and abilities are. There are many different ways to collect a child’s artifacts such as using a checklist, anecdotal notes, teacher reflections, video and audio recordings, and work samples. Each student has their own folder where all their notes, videos, recordings, and artifacts are kept. As stated in the text (Enz, 2014, p. 207, “They must systematically collect, store, organize, and analyze the samples in order to understand the children’s growth and to plan their next teaching” (Ackerman & Coley, 2012). I learned that an on-demand assessment is more like an annual physical checkup. On demand assessments happen at specific times during the course of the year. One day children will be asked to do something specific such as circle the numbers the teacher says out loud, or having to take a test with a pencil and paper. Some label on -demand assessments as tests. This is because children are asked to perform the same action at the same time and in the same manner during an on-demand assessment. “Standardized tests are administered, scored, and interpreted in the same way for all test takers” (Enz, 2014, p. 208). Some examples of an on-going assessment that could be used in a comprehensive approach to literacy
My relationship with literacy began when I started elementary school and that was the first starting point of my positive relationship with literacy. I really started to grow as a reader and writer throughout my middle school and high school years. Throughout my years of going to school I had many positive experiences that shaped my view of literacy today. My literacy skills have also enhanced throughout my educational years.
There are pros to standardized examinations as tools for gaining information about student’s literacy strengths and weaknesses that can influence instruction. A pro to standardized examinations is that every student in the same state will take the same tests. This allows a precise comparison between schools. There are negatives to this comparing schools in this manner. These are that some schools or specific educators are obligated to teach to the test. Educators are suffering from an extreme amount of pressure to prove they are effective educators. Regrettably, the primary statistic judged is the success of their student’s performance on these standardized examinations. Some school reprimand there educator if too many students fail thus, scaring educators to teach to the test.
Assessments were not aligned and incongruent with what was happening in the classroom. It was difficult to accurately measure student success (Polikoff, Porter, & Smithson, 2011). One of the greatest contributors to the difficulty of aligning assessments to standards is that the standards are so complex (LaMarca, 2001.) How can a single assessment demonstrate mastery of so much content? Also, some assessments items measure multiple standards. This can be difficult to analyze. Furthermore, some assessment contain content that is neither developmentally appropriate for the intended audience or it may content that is not mentioned in the standards (Polikoff, Porter, & Smithson, 2011). This can be discouraging and frustrating for both students and
Educators often need to assess students' learning and achievement. There are multiple forms of assessments that educators use to not only gain knowledge about a student's level of understanding but also to guide the direction of future lessons and course curriculum. This lesson will differentiate between formal and informal assessments and performance-based assessments used in educational settings.
Thurlow, Martha, and James Ysseldyke (2002). Including Students with Disabilities in Assessments. Washington, D.C.: National Educations Association.
Through assessment students and teachers are able to determine the level of mastery a student has achieved with standards taught. Both formative and summative assessment should be purposeful and targeted to gain the most accurate data to drive further instruction (Ainsworth, 2010). While this syllabus does a good job of identifying the need for both formal and informal assessments, the way in which this is communicated does not provide enough detail for understanding. Simply listing assessment types does not give any insight into how these assessments fit in the learning process of this course. While some of the assessments mentioned could be common assessments chosen by the school or district to gain insight into the effectiveness of instruction, the inclusion of authentic assessments is most beneficial to students and demonstrates learning in a context closer to that of a work environment (Rovai, 2004). Unfortunately, this particular course, according to this syllabus, relies heavily on quizzes and traditional tests and essays to form the bulk of assessment opportunities. While other activities, such as formative assessments, journaling and discussions are mentioned as possible avenues for scoring, they are given a very low percentage of the overall grade. This shows that they are not valued for their ability to show progression and mastery. If this is indeed the case, this puts the students as a
The time in which traditional assessments such as after the unit tests are designed to provide feedback is at the end of a unit only. There is also generally a time limit to complete this type of assessment as well. These are not true of alternative assessments. A KWL or pre-test can provide feedback before a lesson or unit. Nearly all alternative assessments can also provide ongoing feedback during the lesson or unit as well as after it is completed. Also, many alternative assessments do not have a time constraint to demonstrate understanding of content.