Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Influence of the media on the Youth
Influence of the media on the Youth
Influence of media on youth
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Limited Too was the girls and tween store of the 90’s and 00’s. Limited Too was created by The Limited, INC. (“Tween Brands Inc.”). In 1996, it was turned into a tween store and skyrocketed. They had over 600 stores in 2007 at their peak. The store grew so rapidly and spread so quickly through the tween market that Tween Brands, INC. created Justice in 2004. Limited Too died with the fall of the market in 2009, when Justice, which targeted the same age group, took over and the stores merged (“Tween Brands Inc.”). Parents spend over $700 billion on their children, making this market a hot commodity for capitalist gains (Consuming Kids). Limited Too embodies Marshall’s criticism of modern-day consumerism, describing Girlhood as a lifestyle rather than a particular product as seen in their slogan “It’s a Girl’s World!” (Marshall, 97). They sell the entire identity or “world” of being a girl. Their slogan optimizes the 90’s tween girl power movement, or lack-there-of represented throughout their stores. Limited Too also partook in the “full 360˚ immersive marketing” outlined in Consuming Kids, which emanates into every aspect of a child’s life as seen by the variety of products they sell, from lingerie to candy (Consuming Kids). Items focused towards young girls has been a means of selling particular ideas about girlhood (Marshall, …show more content…
95). If this is the case, Limited Too’s ideas of a “Girl’s World” is hyper feminism, glitter-glam, fun, snobby-cutesy and happiness. The messages brands, such as Limited Too, send are that you need to dress feminine to have girl power, and that your spending power should triumph that of your need to understand the importance of money (with clothes sporting sayings such as “Buy it now! Tell Daddy later”), and that to truly be a fan of something, you need to wear clothing that depicts your love for it (with clothes plastered in phrases such as “I LOVE gymnastics!”(“Tween Brands Inc.”). Limited Too has tapped into every aspect of a young girl’s life, through room décor, hair and fashion accessories, mixed CDs of songs exhibiting “fun, parties, and girl power!”, shoes, clothes, candy, and toys. Even though Limited Too follows the gender binary and gliterification of girls, girls are still drawn to its doors.
Even if the world isn’t a girl’s world, they have their own space in Limited Too to be whoever they want. Albeit it is a constricted form, they can still pick and choose within the safe parameters of normative feminism who they will become through what they consume. Perhaps that is the incentive for young girls is that because it is exclusive, they feel free to dance in the aisles or buy shorts that say “I LOVE gymnastics!”. However, this is a privilege of those who can afford Limited Too. Limited Too is a high-end
brand. However, in the midst of profiting off of small children, the messages of “Girl Power” that many of the tween stores sell has lost touch. Zaslow critiques modern-girlhood as “missing elements”, which is shown through the prevailing messages sold to girls through consumerism of products and associated ideas (Zaslow, 10). This is seen through the production of “girly” items of Limited Too that illustrates the importance of money right next to the importance of girl power without defining what girl power is. Throughout my life I have seen misconceptions of girl power emerge through the lack of foundation many of us have when we are introduced to complex social ideas early-on in life. Even though many of the songs on the mixed CDs Limited Too sells have “empowering” lyrics, not one of the songs defines the girl power movement. Perhaps the simple idea of girl power can empower girls, but it does not educate them anymore or provide a set of values that would help in any aspect of life. Limited Too also depicts insulting phrases that are shown off as “cute” and “playful (Yoffee). When shopping, most girls look at the pictures of the cute monkeys, one of Limited Too’s unofficial mascots, and most moms look at the phrases. This superficial idea of girl power has filled the values of girlhood with slogans described as “nit-wit wear” showing things such as “I left my brain in my locker!” (Yoffee). Through these sayings, Limited Too shows its consumer that shopping is the most important thing: more important than your friends, your sports, your family, school, or your wallet. It gives the impression that it sells things for everyone as it does have an athletic wear section, yet it does not empower girls by selling actual athletic equipment next to the dolls or blow-up furniture. If Limited Too’s true goal was to encompass all aspects of girlhood, they would not stop at just tees and toys. Most importantly, Limited Too teaches through their sayings that everything you are as a person is based on the worth of your wallet. The adage “put your money where your mouth is” really applies to the school grounds. This is also seen in their shirt that says “I get straight A’s in cuteness” in cute glittery letters- truly depicting what society has deemed “a girl’s job” which is looking cute above all else. Further, as an elementary school student, most girls exclusively wore Limited Too, Justice and The Children’s Place. My best friend and I would bond over wearing matching outfits from our favorite stores, feeling cool with our scrunchies and arm warmers. Whispers spread through the playgroup quicker than lice: Molly McStravoc’s mom spent over $500 at Limited Too last week! Even as a child, we understood that money meant status, and to spend money made you valuable and important. The trend of “children’s market going high-end” is seen in the introduction of Limited Too, which is focused towards the white upper-middle class girl. (Consuming Kids). The documentary “Consuming Kids” explains that the children’s market is on a rise in prices and now parents are more likely to spend more money on their children. The children’s market is worth $8 Billion dollars and growing annually (Consuming Kids). My childhood experience shows this, as I had seen my mom spend just as much as groceries for the week on my wardrobe for summer just from Limited Too. Limited Too also followed the trend of “full brand emersion” by partnering with Disney in some cases, such as the hit TV show Lizzie McGuire (Consuming Kids). The cartoon inner persona of Lizzie was featured on the front of the catalogue, and in the corner it read “Watch Lizzie McGuire on Disney!” The Jonas Brothers, the Cheetah Girls and Miley Cyrus (as Hannah Montana) dolls were sold in Limited Too stores as well as paraphernalia that went along with their musical careers, usually presenting their faces. Paraphernalia included posters, lip gloss, CDs, Hit Clips (which were similar to MP3), tee-shirts, flip-flops, and purses. This full brand immersion also leads to kids assuming that they cannot have fun without the branded merchandise (Consuming Kids). You could not say you were a Jonas Brother fan if you did not have their poster hanging in your room. Notwithstanding, through the slogan “It’s a girl’s world” girls are told that their world exists in Limited Too, and that the rest of the world isn’t theirs to be had. Gender binaries and stereotypes dominate this mantra. “Boys are exploring the world while girls are exploring femininity” (Orenstein, 22). Girls are sold on the idea of “This is the toy for you, these are the clothes for you” in every store and Limited Too is no different. Their lack of gender androydenous clothing and lack of color diversity within clothing stands to reinforce gendered spaces and gendered clothing and toys. The only toys sold in Limited Too are dolls, makeup/lipgloss, and candy. In contrast, in a boy’s store, they are sold a plethora of items with ranging activity levels in multiple colors. All in all, there are many 90’s and 00’s ideals we hope to leave behind with the reopening of Limited Too. Though Justice took over nearly a decade ago, Limited Too is making a comeback- stores are set to reopen again as early as September 2016 (“Limited Too Comeback”). The millennials who lived through the era of glittery “Girl’s world” are now moms, and the brand recognition with mixed nostalgia is something that’ll bring back the masses and their tween children. Again, the Limited Too and Justice chains will compete and dominate the tween girl market. Limited Too was known for its glitter, 90’s era fashion trends, accessories, and lip gloss. Justice was a lower-priced alternative to the Limited Too prices, but sported the same look with its slogan “Just for Girls!”. It can be hoped that Limited Too will follow its competition in putting out better messages to the youth of today, as places such as Justice sport slogans such as “Smart never goes out of style” (Shop Justice). Hopefully in the future, girl’s stores will cater to more than just normative feminism, and will give girls the keys to allow them to change the world, not just their wardrobe.
This phenomenon suggests that all women are required to remain loyal wives and stay at home mothers who aspire to achieve perfection. In “Mirrors of Masculinity: Representation and Identity in Advertising Images,” Jonathon E. Schroeder and Detlev Zwick claim that “highly abstract connections are made between the models, a lifestyle, and the brand” resulting in a need to associate these products with a specific way of living (25). Instead of simply displaying these luxurious bracelets and handbags, the ad creates an elegant environment through the incorporation of sophisticated items. The women are dressed elegantly in dresses and blouses, adding a conservative element to the ad. The ad presents a rather stereotypical image of the very successful heads-of-household type mothers who have brunch with other elite women in an exclusive circle. Everything from the merchandise they sport to the champagne glasses down to the neatly manicured fingernails provides insight into the class of women presented in this ad. The body language of the women strips the image of the reality element and instead appears to be staged or frozen in time. This directly contributes to the concept of the gendered American dream that urges women to put up a picture-perfect image for the world to see. Instead of embracing individual struggle and realities, the American dream encourages women to live out a fabricated
Lianne George’s article “Why Are We Dressing Our Daughters Like This?” (2014) focuses on the societal issue of an increasingly earlier development of young girls. George states that companies facilitate this early development by producing adult like goods for children that push an adult mindset and behaviour. Through the use of various examples George argues that this trend is ill advised and should not be continued.
Juliet B. Schor, a professor of sociology at Boston College, is the author of Selling to Children: The Marketing of Cool and many other books on the topic of American Consumption. Schor is a professor of sociology at Boston College. In this article, Selling to Children: The Marketing of Cool, Schor talks about what cool is and how it has affected the culture of advertising and ideals. From Schor’s writing we can try to understand why she wrote about this topic and how she feels about the methods of advertising used for kids, providing facts for each of her main statements.
Mary Pipher goes on to say that the problem faced by girls is a ‘problem without a name’ and that the girls of today deserve a different kind of society in which all their gifts can be developed and appreciated. (Pipher,M). It’s clear that cultures and individual personalities intersect through the period of adolescence. Adolescence is a time in a young girl’s life that shapes them into the woman they become. I think it begins earlier than teen years because even the clothing that is being sold for younger girls says sexuality. Bras for girls just beginning in every store are now padded with matching bikini underwear, Barbie dolls are glamour up in such away that these girls believ...
Friday night, as I watched television I evaluated commercial content in relation to the target of women and what message advertisements send to women of all ages. In one hour I saw twenty-four commercials, eleven were targeted at women and every single one had something to do with either the appearance or beauty of women or a domestic focus. These commercials touted products to enhance beauty or lose weight with the underlying message of "improved self-esteem". I have always blamed the media, or more broadly, cultural attitudes for the problems young girls and women face with low self-image and often find myself citing Barbie dolls and the overwhelmingly pink aisles at the toys-r-us as a root cause of the marginalization of women's roles. Peggy Orenstein refers to this as the "politics of the external", a term which, at first, I had a difficult time accepting. Is this not a major implication when discussing a society that promotes female self-censorship and devalued intellectual potential? After reading "Schoolgirls" I came to understand exactly what Orenstein meant and she convinced me that "the internal need not, and indeed should not, be ignored". Although it may not be well documented it is indeed established that although "women's lib" has come a very long way since we received the right to vote there are still social implications that can only confuse women's' identity and self-image. Peggy Orenstein's book has indeed caused me to look deeper into the internal issues affecting self-esteem that women face beginning with adolescence.
In the article, “Little Girls or Little Women: The Disney Princess Affect”, Stephanie Hanes shows the influential impact that young girls, and youth in general, are experiencing in today’s society. This article goes in depth on the issues that impressionable minds experience and how they are reacting as a result. “Depth of gender guidelines” has been introduced to youth all around the world making it apparent that to be a girl, you have to fit the requirements. Is making guidelines of how you should act and look as a gender going too far?
...for Parents." Media and Clothing Market Influence on Adolescent Girls: Warnings for Parents. Ed. Sarah Coyne and Stephen F. Duncan. Forever Families, n.d. Web. 05 Apr. 2014. .
The title itself, Little Girls Gone Wild, along with being a tactless play on words is also turning the girls into the active and sole participants of this phenomenon; it completely excludes the point that they are in fact the ones being manipulated, and only doing so because they think it meets the media standards of being beautiful. The sexualisation of young girls is of course a corrupt practice, but the way to stop that does not lie in equating feminine behavior with sexuality, or confidence with “sluttiness”. Teaching girls to shame sexuality at a young age also reinforces internalized misogynistic ideals, and distorts their own perceptions of sex as they grow older. However, this also does not mean that young girls should be seen as sexualised figures at their age. Combe fails to make this observation; she instead shames girls for doing things that can make them feel better about themselves, vilifying even manicures and 1 inch heels.
I noticed the girls’ toys engaged fine motor skills more than the boys’ toys did. The girls have several different types and sizes of dolls to choose from – however, this also makes dolls or items used with dolls (Barbie clothes, doll clothes, doll houses, Barbie cars, and doll furniture). Over half of all the products in the girls’ section. This shows the stereotypical attitude that all girls like to nurture and will someday be expected to be mothers and the primary care giver for their children. Other toys I noticed that were very stereotypical were the child size vacuum, broom, and kitchen set.
Early in the process of mass market consumers, manufacturers, distributors, and retailers realize significance of using their advertising to target women. Ads were designed and published to speak primarily for women. In the years preceding World War I, marketing techniques targeting women consumers became increasingly effective. Throughout history, women have always struggled for a recognized place in society. Despite the activities of the Suffragettes, support of the Labor Party and some members of the Liberal Party, women still had very few rights in 1900 and certainly no political rights. During the 1900’s women were still trapped in the “cult of domesticity” (Srivastava). A good illustration of the life of women early during those days can be seen in the advertisement O-cedar print ad year 1900 (fig. 1 below). This print ad speaks to house wives, saying that they have a wide variety of products to choose from. Ranging from a polish to protect her floor wood and furniture, dusting pads and mops that, according to their ad “reduce cleaning, dusting and polishing to almost nothing”. It is obvious that this advertisement reflects the stereotypical depictions of women as a “Happy Homemaker”, apron-clad and committed mothers portrayed in self promotional ads.
Firminger examines the ways these magazines represent young males and females. She reveals that these magazines talks about the physical appearance of young girls but also their sexuality, emotions, and love life. The author informs how the advice given by the magazines is negative. The author also argues that these magazines focus more on their social life than how their academic performance
The socialization of children is greatly affected by the toys they are exposed to while growing up. Looking through magazines and walking down the aisles of toy stores it is clear that toy companies are supportive of cultural gender roles biases. Toys designed for girls are commonly found in pink boxes; typically these toys involve housework or taking care of children, for example, dolls and easy bake ovens. On the other hand, “boy” toys are found in blue and black boxes, and a lot of them involve construction and cars.
Often times, magazines use images of youthful looking models to promote lingerie. In the case of the Victoria’s Secret advertisement the target audience are adolescence to middle aged women since the models in the commercial appear to be young in age. Beauty is seen as youth in this advertisement since all of the women in the photo appear to be young in age, with no signs of aging. Youthful looking women in advertisements are seen as vulnerable and show the weakness of women in a patriarc...
Once given birth to a beautiful baby girl, often parents refer to her as their little princess; when having a newborn girl, that baby girl will often get all the attention from her surroundings, she will be showered in the most adorable dresses; cute shoes , baby clothes that say “princess” on it and either a bow or a bedazzled head band, perhaps a room that is nothing but pink, letters on her wall over looking her crib saying “Mommy’s little Princess”. There is nothing wrong with spoiling your baby girl. But as time goes her idea of her gender role begins to develop. Buying her princess toys, surrounding her with pink, and watching the Disney movies about how princesses are beautiful, always gets her prince charming, and lives an enchanted life for ever after, is a dangerous “reality” to create for young girls. Eventually, while growing up from child years to young adults, girls in this type of environment can develop a gender constructed identity that, they are superior and deserve an enchanted life. It’s a dangerous reality for these young girls because they will grow up to believe that, they’re entitled to the fairy tale life, having pure beauty , marry her dream man, conceive beautiful children and live happily ever after, but sometimes life is not a fairy tale and you don’t always end up getting what you want.
The gender stereotypes we are experiencing today are outdated and need change. Right now, gender marketing is higher than it has ever been. A comparison can be shown as Robb states “In the 1970s…few children’s’ toys were targeted specifically at boys or girls at all; nearly 70% of toys had no gender-specific labels at all” (Robb). Since the 70’s gender marketing has climbed its way up to its peak. There is a sort of disconnect between marketing and new gender advancements that have been occurring recently. The gender standards that are currently being used are outdated and do not hold true as more women are excelling in the sciences, while more men choose to become stay at home fathers. The “Let Toys be Toys” campaign website claims that “themes of glamour and beauty in toys and playthings directed at even the youngest girls tips over into a worrying emphasis on outward appearance. Stereotyped attitudes about boys are equally harmful as the constant assumption reinforced in toy advertising and packaging that boys are inevitably rough, dirty, rowdy…which feeds low expectations of boys that undermine their performance at school”(“Let Toys be Toys”). These outcomes are not acceptable, and gender-neutral toys may aid in combat against these old age ideals, and could possibly help make the