Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Constitute knowledge
What is knowledge
What is constitute knowledge
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Constitute knowledge
Knowledge is a rather abstract word taking on different meanings depending on the society that defines it. However, one of the defining point’s common in almost all of the definitions that I could find is that knowledge involves the collective use of facts. In reference to Human Sciences and History, I believe the statement “Knowledge is nothing more than the systematic organization of facts” to be false. While facts are indeed an important part of knowledge and learning, it is not the only portion of it. It is not always feasible or even possible to organize all the facts required to respond properly to certain scenarios. On occasion, along with having the facts, one must apply inductive or deductive reasoning. Looking at the area of knowledge …show more content…
Because a lot of the information gathered in this area of knowledge is obtained by observing human behavior, there are many limitations to this field of study. Beginning in the observation stage, there are three main limitations. While we may be able to observe human behavior, we have no way of knowing exactly what is going through a person’s head at the time of experiment, which rules out some forms of study. However, if the experiment allows a subject to speak about what they are thinking about it still leaves room for a subject to lie if they so choose. Which leads into the next limitation, humans tend to be effected by the observer effect; when subjects are observed they tend to act differently than when acting normally which can affect the study. Another limitation in observation is that the questionnaires given to subjects can be misleading or biased to one side. Because humans have an intense need to seem normal, known as the social phenomena, subjects may tend to lean towards the side that seems most positive, or the side that most other people would …show more content…
History connects things in our present to our past, which enables us to foresee in what direction we progress. Because in order to progress, we must have a clear picture on the basis on which some institutions are founded, and the study of history paints that picture for us. History not only links the present to the past, but it also contributes to our general sense of identity because, “a country without a history is like a person without a memory.” Without history we are without identity and direction. The Area of Knowledge History is uses the historical methodology which relies on the gathering of primary and secondary
The scientific method is how psychologists gain knowledge about the mind and behavior. It is used by all scientists. The experimental method is the one way to engage the scientific method, and the only way to find a cause and effect in relationships. It is summarized in five steps, observing some phenomenon in the world, forming a hypothesis which is an educated prediction about relationships between two or more variables, examining the gathered information by using empirical research, determining what the results are and drawing them, and evaluating the results whether it will support the hypothesis or not. Researchers, at the end, submit their work for publication for all to see and read (King, 2016). There are three types of psychological research in the scientific method, descriptive research, correlation, and experimental research (King, 2016). The article The Effects of Negative Body Talk in an Ethnically Diverse Sample of College Students (Katrevich, Register, & Aruguete, 2014) is an example of the experimental method.
The world is living histories. For instance, communities speak the languages that are inherited from the past and, practice cultural and religious traditions that have not been created on the spur of a moment. In this sense, acknowledging history is essential for rooting people in time. Nonetheless, sometimes a dreadful past can inhibit a country to undertake its own history. For example, the United States has long been telling
Knowledge is something that can change day to day, which can be learned through both the natural and human sciences. Knowledge changes in the natural sciences when an experiment is conducted and more data has been gathered. Knowledge changes in human sciences when patterns are recognized in society and further tests have been conducted. Does our knowledge of things in the natural and human sciences change every day? I think that our knowledge grows everyday but does not necessarily change every day. The areas of knowledge that will be discussed in this essay are natural and human sciences. In History we can see that at one point something that was considered knowledge then transformed into different knowledge, especially in the natural sciences. However, in the past, due to lack of technology, it might have been more of a lack of knowledge that then turned into knowledge on the topic.
Psychology is the scientific study of the mind, brain, and behavior. In psychology, and all of the other sciences, relying on opinions is abandoned in order to find out which explanations best fit the evidence or data given. Science continually forces us to question our findings and conclusions. Over time, psychology has advanced greatly and a main reason for such progressiveness is because of the change in the research model used.
Our knowledge is indeed an interpretation of our experiences and facts that we have learned or acquired throughout life. Nonetheless, it is impossible to have a full knowledge of everything or to, at least, try to know everything because knowledge is so broad and extensive that it makes this task quite impossible. Therefore, we store our knowledge in structures so we can navigate through it. It is important to have in mind that there is not absolute knowledge because the acquisition of it is also biased by our different ways of knowing such as emotion and reason. Thus, this statement is to a large extent true that our knowledge is a collection of scraps and those new fragments that are found can alter our entire design of our knowledge. For example in natural sciences, theories and laws of physics, biology, and chemistry can modify the way that we explain natural and artificial events because our world is in constant change, so does technology, which leads scientists and researchers to new finding, this might complement the knowledge that we already know or it might also change it drastically. Furthermore, in history new archeological findings can contradict and ultimately alter our formal conception of the events that have happened in the past. On the other hand, this statement can be somehow not truth, in a small extent, because regardless of new findings, these, so called, new information can be limited to the public thus not leading to an open overview of the subject. For instance, in history, new archeological findings are limited to the public thus they are not fully aware of the situation and past events that might have happened. While, in natural sciences is different because the issue relies on the people who keep believ...
History comes from the Greek word historia, meaning "inquiry, investigation” and it later came to specifically mean “investigation of the past”. It is a field of study which uses a story to scrutinize and evaluate a chain of events in order to objectively determine patterns of cause and effect of past events. All events that are remembered & safeguarded in some way or the other form part of a historical record.
Knowledge has a preliminary definition which is that it is justified true belief. Due to its dynamic nature, knowledge is subject to review and revision over time. Although, we may believe we have objective facts from various perceptions over time, such facts become re-interpreted in light of improved evidence, findings or technology and instigates new knowledge. This raises the questions, To what extent is knowledge provisional? and In what ways does the rise of new evidence give us a good reason to discard our old knowledge? This new knowledge can be gained in any of the different areas of knowledge, by considering the two areas of knowledge; History and Natural Sciences, I will be able to tackle these knowledge issues since they both offer more objective, yet regularly updated knowledge, which is crucial in order to explore this statement. I believe that rather than discarding knowledge we build upon it and in doing so access better knowledge, as well as getting closer to the truth.
Though our history may bring back horrible memories of the ?grimmest dimensions of human nature? (Limerick 472), it is necessary to have a good historical background. History gives us the ability to improve future outputs, satisfy our unending need for knowledge, and understand how many policies and regulations have come to be. Without history mankind would be very primitive and ununified. Our complete molding of the world today is almost completely dependent on the fact that we study our history. Without history present day humans would be nothing more than cavemen.
History is not only a valuable part of knowledge, but opens the door to many other parts, and affords materials to most of the sciences. And indeed, if we consider the shortness of human life, and our limited knowledge, even of what passes in our own time, we must be sensible that we should be forever children in understanding, were it not for this invention, which extends our experience to all past ages, and to the most distant nations; making them contribute as much to our improvement in wisdom, as if they had actually lain under our observation. A man acquainted with history may, in some respect, be said to have lived from the beginning of the world, and to have been making continual additions to his stock of knowledge in every century.
History, like others courses, teaches in school, is a scientific branch of learning that is interested in comprehending the past of humanity and human civilizations and seeks to reconstitute it. Being a science, history has its objective, methods, and plays an important function in human civilizations. We know about history through the written documents or textbooks. We study history to learn and to analyze events, individual exploits, and civilization of the past. This process takes into account the time and the space because the examination of a historical object requires placing it in time and in a given space.
The development point of view of social psychology has changed the understanding of human nature in relation to social contexts. Social psychology is the study of how individuals act, think, and feel in relation to the context of society. Furthermore, social psychology concentrates on how other people influence an individual’s behavior, thoughts, and feelings. Basically, social psychology has changed our understanding of human nature as it investigates how an individual’s behavior influences a groups’ behavior or internal mechanisms; attitude or self-concepts. Post-World War 2(WW2), researchers were curious to investigate the reasonings for why people follow orders, despite the potential repercussions of those actions. Furthermore, social experiments are usually applied to demonstrate key
History is the bridge that connects the past with the present. Without history, we have no future. The past gives value to our present. David C. McCullough stated, “History is a guide to navigation in perilous times. History is who we are and why we are the way we are”. I agree with McCullough, history gives us a purpose. History allows us to investigate and interpret the past in order to see how we developed and where we came from. We can get an idea of what has influenced our past and present, and also what will shape our future. We can see what previous generations did and whether or not t...
` Knowledge from my point of view is cumalitive to some extent. As humans, we are always learning and discovering new ways to pursue improvements in life.Science and history are two branches of knowledge that effect our perception of the world around us. In science, we gain knowledge through every discovery we make and with every experiment we conduct, it may be a result of an accident or pure scientific work. Scientific knowledge has gradually accumulated over successive generations, with each new generation building on the advances of previous ones. In history, the past affects and changes the way we view the world around us. History is never discarded but adapted and learned from to better the future. However, we can say knowledge is not always discarded, but rather,becomes the basis of advanced knowledge. This is one of the ways that knowledge evolves.
To explore what it really means to have knowledge we must first have to come to common understanding of this word means. There is a common definition by the oxford dictionary published in 21th century claiming knowledge to be the facts, information, and skills acquired through experiences or education; the theoretical or practical understanding of a subject. We all have our own connotations to this word, but to build a common understanding we stick to the definition of the word.
History is the study of the past, particularly on how it relates to humans. (Anderson, 2014) Traditionally, historians record past events and also attempted to answer historical questions through the study of written documents and oral accounts. In general, the sources of historical knowledge that historians consult can be separated into three distinct categories: what is written, what is said, and what is physically preserved. (Lemon, 1995) However, History does not rest solely on memory but on critical understanding. It is difficult to distinguish the truth and determine, from many differing accounts, which is most factually accurate. Those who know only by tittle-tattle the role of criticism are aware of its use in historical circles. And yet this is only part of the task of historical studies. (Ranke, 2010) As a result, Ibn Khaldun invented a scientific method to the study of history, and he often referred to it as his "new science". (Franz Rosenthal, 1967) As Ranke wrote, “Just as science endeavours to press on to the inner sources of nature from which all things spring, so it is with history.” (Ranke, 2010) As such, History is a science as it attempts to formulate a hypothesis of the past based on empirical historical evidence. However, History and Science differs on their purpose and reliability. Despite these differences, History ultimately aims to