Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Process of acquired knowledge
How knowledge is gained through experience
Different ways of acquiring information
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Process of acquired knowledge
Definition of Knowledge
Truth is the essence of all knowledge. Our Knowledge is justified true
belief. Everyday people hear and experience things and then choose
whether or not to believe them. It is the justification of the
knowledge that we acquire that makes something believable to a person
or not. The justification for our knowledge allows us to decide
whether to believe something is true or not. People tend to use things
like scientific evidence, first hand experiences, word of mouth,
logic, faith and many other things everyday of their life to determine
whether something is truthful or not.
Before continuing, it is important that it is stated that nothing
should be taken for truth simply because it is written by any
particular person. The statements in this text are no exception. This
text, along with other statements, should be judged only by whether
they are consistent with evidence or logic. Even if there are many
examples of proven truths in this texts, that does not mean all
statements in this text are true.
The most common source of knowledge is experience. People are
constantly acquiring knowledge through their senses. Someone can see
something to determine if a statement or idea is true or not. For
example, if a person were trying to prove that "cats are black" they
would simply have to see one, sense it, experience it, and determine
whether the statement was true or not. Seeing something a number of
times also inforces a belief in something. For example, seeing only
black cats for a number of years would give someone the idea that "all
cats are black", this is an example of experience leading someone to
un...
... middle of paper ...
... live in could be a deception, an
illusion. The only thing that can be proven to be completely true is
that I, myself, exist. Descartes proved this with the statement "I
think, therefore I am". This allows me to prove to myself that I do
exist, because if I do not exist I could not have come to this
conclusion.
To conclude, the problem with attempting to prove a theory of truth,
is that there can be no theories of truth. This is because truth is
required for a theory of anything. No theory can exist without truth.
Every "proven" statement of every theory is based on the implication
that it is true. So we may believe things to be true, because of
scientific proofs, experience or just because we believe, but most of
these "truths" cannot be backed up by strong enough evidence to prove
that they are completely true.
William C. Plachers’ article, “Is the Bible True?” explores deeper into the subject of the Bible and if it content it contains is credible information. Through Plachers’ statement, “We need to understand the genre to understand a text. Reading a text literally is not always reading it faithfully,” we are able to reach the idea that the Bible is in fact true, but it all depends on how the individual interprets the text.
...at people say even though when it is not true because we tends to believe what others says. Our memories in our mind can be tricky and get mixed up by what people say; it can trick us in to believing that it is true. In which that makes them unable to separate what is fake, fantasy, from reality.
The source of knowledge is not a topic that is universally agreed upon. To rationalists, who usually have a sense of the divine, innate ideas give them cause to base knowledge in reason, being derived from ideas. To empiricists, who do not hold innate ideas to be valid, knowledge is unearthed through the senses, derived from observations. The presence of a concept of the divine is the deciding factor of whether knowledge originates from the senses or the ideas.
Confirmation evidence should not count except when it is the result of a genuine test of the theory; and this means that it can be presented as a serious but unsuccessful attempt to falsify a theory.
There is no concrete definition of knowledge, but there is a definition that is widely agreed upon, or a standard definition. This definition may be widely accepted, but just like most things in philosophy, it is controversial and many disagree with it. The definition involves three conditions that must be met in order for one to truly say that they know something to be true. If one were to state: “The Seattle Mariners have never won a world series,” using the standard definition would look like this: first, the person believes the statement to be true. Second, the statement is in fact true. Third, the person is justified in believing the statement to be true. The three conditions are belief, truth, and justification. There are the “necessary and sufficient conditions” for knowledge. Necessary and sufficient conditions are linked to conditional statements, ‘if x, then y’ statements.
Human beings’ belief systems don’t always work according to evidence. Belief is made up of
Beliefs unlike our knowledge of things have the quality of either being true or false. Like with all information of things, persons, places or objects we either know of their existence or we do not. There does not exist a state of mind where there exists truth or falsehood associated with something that is known by the existence of that thing. We could be wrong about the knowledge we have of things but that knowledge could not be deceptive in nature, you either know of the existence of a thing or you do not. This means that while belief can be true or false knowledge of things does not have this property. Conversely we know that beliefs can both be true or false as many people can have widely varying opinions on the same subject that contradict
Throughout the book Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, an American Slave many themes are developed relating to slavery. Such themes that are well developed include corruption, brutality, and knowledge. Perhaps the most important theme that was developed was knowledge and its power in everything. Frederick Douglass gained knowledge throughout his life, defying the laws surrounding slavery. Perhaps one of the most impressive things from the life of Frederick Douglass was the fact that, except for a few months at the beginning of his engagement with Mr. and Mrs. Auld, he was a self taught man who took it upon himself to expand his knowledge. Frederick Douglass discovered the power of knowledge and applied this to his life in many different stages. First, he discovered that knowledge is power. Second, he went out of his way to obtain all the knowledge he could. Third, he used that knowledge, that he had gained over years and years of self-taught, underground learning, and used it to run away from the brutal life of a slave. Finally, he used the knowledge he had gained to publicly speak against the institution of slavery and make it a point to earn the right of universal suffrage for all men. He presented many ideas, which we today, can see were very strong and moral convictions from his views as an abolitionist.
Many times we have been in a dilemma whether to believe or not someone who tries to persuade us for something and very often by listening his arguments and by having enough evidence we finally manage to get out of the dilemma. Nevertheless sometimes we cannot be sure about an event because although there is enough evidence, our minds cannot be persuaded. An example to justify that is the existence of the Loch Ness monster, or as it is widely known “Nessie”.
Whether someone's belief is true is not a prerequisite for belief. On the other hand, if something is actually known, then it categorically cannot be false. For example, if a person believes that a bridge is safe enough to support him, and attempts to cross it, but the bridge then collapses under his weight, it could be said that he believed that the bridge was safe but that his belief was mistaken. It would not be accurate to say that he knew that the bridge was safe, because plainly it was not. By contrast, if the bridge actually supported his weight, then he might say that he had believed that the bridge was safe, whereas now, after proving it to himself, he knows it was
Truth can be defined as conformity to reality or actuality and in order for something to be “true” it must be public, eternal, and independent. If the “truth” does not follow these guidelines then it cannot be “true.” Obviously in contrary anything that goes against the boundaries of “truth” is inevitably false. True and false, in many cases does not seem to be a simple black and white situation, there could sometimes be no grounds to decide what is true and what is false. All truths are a matter of opinion. Truth is relative to culture, historical era, language, and society. All the truths that we know are subjective truths (i.e. mind-dependent truths) and there is nothing more to truth than what we are willing to assert as true (Hammerton, Matthew). A thing to me can be true while for the other person it may not be true. So it depends from person to person and here the role of perception comes into play. As truth is a vital part of our knowledge, the distinctions between what is true and what is false, shape and form the way we think and should therefore be considered of utmost importance. We often face this situation in real life through our learning curves and our pursuit of knowledge to distinguish between what is true and what is false. The idea of there being an absolute truth or also known as universal truth has been debated for centuries. It depends on many factors such as reason, perception and emotion.
Descartes defines knowledge as doubt and uncertainty. He describes that our main source of knowledge is our sense perception.
Basically, our lives and our existence revolve around the concept of truth. An easier definition of truth is that truth is the conformity of the human mind with reality. Truth is a very controversial topic even in the field of philosophy due to the contradictory views on it. There are two types of truth and they are the objective and the subjective truth.
So we see ¡§truth is connected to knowledge¡¨. True ideas are those that we can corroborate and verify. Truth works in way of our thinking. So you see to achieve complete truth there must be correspondence between our mind and reality and to know exactly what reality really is. For example If we say ¡§ the Auckland blues are going to win the super 12¡¨ and later on they actually win, therefore your mind did indeed correspond with reality. Through this example we see that knowing what is reality is almost impossible, if a man is completely sure that he has grasped reality he is GOD.
Knowledge produced with difficulty triggers our emotion and reason, allowing for the knowledge to hold greater value. Do we truly only value knowledge when it is produced with difficulty? Knowledge is information we gain through experiences. Value is how important something is to us, how we receive and utilize this knowledge. The target Way of Knowings I chose are Emotion and Reason. The first Way of Knowing is Emotion. Emotion works in conjunction with our ethics and how our personal experiences are influenced by emotional attachments. Emotion also affects the way we take in information The second Way of Knowing is Reason. We reason with our knowledge in different ways based on the type of information being taken in. Reason affects our intake