Blood Done Sign My Name Analysis

635 Words2 Pages

Blood Done Sign My Name, penned by Timothy Tyson in 2004, “is both memoir and history” that unflinchingly centers on the complex chronicle of race relations in North Carolina (Tyson 323). Through the author’s attempt to rediscover “the other South” – the South that has been systematically obliterated from history, the memoir suggests that white Americans must candidly confront its society’s segregated past if they are to genuinely reconcile. There can only be restorative justice if the perpetrators – white supremacists and neo-confederates – acknowledge their wrongdoings and society takes steps to amend them. The world is living histories. For instance, communities speak the languages that are inherited from the past and, practice cultural and religious traditions that have not been created on the spur of a moment. In this sense, acknowledging history is essential for rooting people in time. Nonetheless, sometimes a dreadful past can inhibit a country to undertake its own history. For example, the United States has long been telling …show more content…

It is because, in certain situations, history can heave painful and embarrassing memories, as demonstrated in the tone of repentance in Tyson’s reflection. Hence, refusing to confront the past appears inevitable for many human beings in the effort of maintaining the ‘welfare’ of their psyches. However, in this situation of post-Civil Rights Era’s misapprehension, a candid confrontation can remedy the ignorance and passiveness of America, as it will explain what they are reconciling for and, why, while helping America to restore its root. In addition, it is also imperative to not confuse between acknowledging the past and being accused for what happened. Only then can the United States of America fully heal and mingle with its nowadays-multicultural

Open Document