Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Emergency and crisis response plan
Emergency and crisis response plan
Emergency and crisis response plan
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Emergency and crisis response plan
For most of us, it’s impossible to know how we would react when faced with a situation that puts lives on the line. We can only truly know our reactions when we are faced with a situation such as a home invasion or a natural disaster. However, we can determine one thing: in a time of crisis, is it more important to us to save our own life or the life of someone else?
In times of crisis, the actions of a person often depend on their morals and values. It is common for a person to choose to not only save someone else’s life, but choose whose life they will attempt to save. In the novel Wave of Destruction, Dang makes the decision to leave a woman who is trapped in the rubble of the deadly Thailand tsunami of 2004 and attempt to search for her children instead (Krauss 122). When one has the option of choosing to save the life of a family member or the life of a complete stranger, most people would choose to save their family member. When one has to make the decision to save their own life or the life of a loved one, again, their decision is based on their morals. One article states that Dean Higgins, a 60 year old Australian tourist who was put in a crisis when an avalanche occurred on the mountain he was climbing, chose to risk his own life to dig his wife and three companions out of the snow that had buried them. One of Mr. Higgins’s companions said, “He ended up saving everyone else, but he was only wearing a t-shirt and was unable to save himself. He died of hypothermia.” (Bill 52). In this case, a man was aware that if he attempted to save his family and friends, he would die. Those who believe that their loved ones are the top priority in their lives are often completely content with dying for them. Robert J. Wright, a victi...
... middle of paper ...
...unable to survive. It is common for people who are frightened of a crisis to choose to save their lives rather than the lives of others. In The Impossible, many of the people portrayed were foreigners visiting Thailand. Because they were unprepared for a massive disaster, many of them believed that if they attempted to help others, it would cost them their lives, so they simply ignored any people in need of assistance (Bayona 2012). Unfortunately, choosing to save one’s own life rather than the life of someone else often results in the unassisted person being harmed.
Everyone reacts differently when faced with a crisis. Some react by panicking, others remain composed, and some become utterly petrified. No matter what reaction one has, a choice must be made when faced with the question: is it more important to you to save your own life, or the life of someone else?
In Shimon Wincelberg’s Resort 76, there were several instances in which one man was willing to sacrifice himself to save the life of another, including Schnur’s voluntary surrender to the SS to ensure that no one else would die on account of his own actions and the willingness of Blaustain to care for Madame Hershkovitch’s illegal cat even though he knew it would endanger his own life, so that they could eventually trade it in to feed her five children and take care of his ill wife, Ester. If these two men would have sided with temptation and attempted to save their own lives, then they would not have been able to have the satisfaction of knowing that they
steadiness as the only common good and go extreme to preserve safety. Nevertheless, situations exist where people have to abandon some
Death is something everyone must face at one point or another. For varying reasons, many people are willing to die for a certain cause. Some find that there is no other way out of their dilemma. Other feel so strongly about what they believe is right, that they are more than willing to pay the ultimate price. Moral or ethical dilemmas are pivotal devices used in many literary works. However, the literary characters explored in this essay are so firm in their convictions that they are willing to sacrifice themselves for their own respective beliefs. As readers of these works, we are often so moved by their beliefs that we often side with the characters in their journey. We, as readers, are offered insight on situations that we become deeply
...when there is a person who tells you what to do, when to do it and how to do it you will listen out of fear, nationalism and to be respected. In today’s day and age we still have this because we still listen to each other’s opinions and what goes on in each other’s life but when it does come down to it you will not take your own life unless it is unavoidable. This may be because you are a person who has no hope to go on with your life. You may have experienced your own trauma that can’t escape your mind or maybe you live your daily life in fear of the world you live in. When you feel like there is nothing that you have to live for death seems like a better option whether we are talking about a traumatic event from almost forty years ago or a traumatic event in today’s day and age. Life does not always seem more rewarding in someone who is hurting’s eyes.
“It just barely missed me, but in my place it swallowed everything that mattered most to me and swept it off to another world. I took years to find it again and to recover from the experience-precious years that can never be replaced” (133). Individuals who find themselves in life or death situations experience a spectrum of factors that play into the aftermath, including, mental, moral, and costly forms of accountability. The decisions individuals are forced to make in order to survive is what causes this accountability. Therefore, individuals should not be held responsible for their decisions when in survival situations.
It is unquestionably true that the real individuality, the real human nature can be revealed in extreme situations, when the human life is at stake. This work represents an attempt to show that each individual has an opportunity to change his/her life completely, to make it really humanistic and do something good even if it is the last thing he/she can do in his/her life. A Lesson Before Dying suggest the audience to reevaluate its views on life and realize that everything may be changed. At the same time, it is never late to change the life for better and reveal positive traits of character or even commit some heroic or humanistic acts even if it threatens to end the entire life of the individual.
Tragedy strikes at every hour of the day, no matter where in the world a person lives. The true test of a person’s humanity is how they handle the tragedy. All over the country, people are hit with life changing catastrophes and feel hopeless. Taking their feelings out on others around them who are just trying to help, their pain translates into the bad traits of humanity such as selfishness, conceitedness and unreliability. Others though, work through their struggles and show the world how strong they can really be. People in terrible situations can also be mature, self-confident and sympathetic. It all really depends on the individual going through the tragedy. Many authors also play on this fact when they write their novels. For example, in Tatiana De Rosnay’s novel Sarah’s Key, De Rosnay’s characters go through some very powerful and personal struggles. Some characters put their best foot forward but others close up and only look out for themselves. Although people go through horrible personal tragedies, some people bring out the best traits in human nature and some bring out the worst.
Everyday thousands of individuals put their lives at risk for no more than a sense of thrill. These daredevils decisions usually result in situations that require rescues that cost society large amounts of tax dollars. People who put themselves in a life-or-death situation should be held accountable for their rescue and should also be responsible for their actions. Being in a life-or-death situation does not excuse anyone from choosing a wrong path while knowing it isn’t the correct decision.
When we discuss morality we know that it is a code of values that seem to guide our choices and actions. Choices and actions play a significant role in determining the purpose and course of a person’s life. In the case of “Jim and the Indians”, Jim faces a terrible dilemma to which any solution is morbid. On one hand, Jim can choose to ignore the captain’s suggestion and let the whole group of Indians be executed. Alternatively, he may decide upon sacrificing one Indian for the sake of saving the rest. Both options involve taking of person’s life. Regarding what should Jim do in this circumstance, there are two approaches according for Jim’s dilemma that should be examined. By looking into the Deontological moral theory and the moral theory of Consequentialism we can see what determines an action that is morally required.
In life, situations arrive that force us to make tough choices. Sometimes those choices are not what we feel are compassionate or morally right. We make these decisions to save ourselves. These are decisions of self-preservation, and they override compassion. Tadeusz Borowski depicts these choices in his book This Way for the Gas, Ladies and Gentlemen. He shows that when people are put in the choice of doing what’s right or preserving their life, one is preferred over the other. Would they rather save their selves or just watch others be sent to their death. In the novel, the narrator wrestles with his decisions and like Borowski suffers from them.
There would be no time to consider oneself in this moment of panic, the good within us knows only to hurry and save the
Ethical dilemmas create a challenge between two or more equally alternative problems requiring moral judgment. This creates both an obligation and dilemma for those involved. Living in such a globalized world with cross-cultural borders, races, and ideas; negotiating what is considered morally “right” can sometimes be very difficult. Both religion and laws have a major impact in ethical duties. What an individual may presume as right cannot be guaranteed by the government or political party. The Overcrowded Lifeboat is just one example in which all the ideas above come to play in ethical decisions.
One of the desirability of virtue ethics is the elasticity to measure each situation independently, searching for action guidance in bearing in mind what a naturally virtuous person would do. This would be clarified and informed by the pertinent facts and personal ethical sensitivities of that situation. This permits and heartens creative resolutions to very difficult problems, which may be harder to disc...
As a trained police officer, I run towards the fight while everyone else retreats. This sometimes means putting my personal safety second to someone in need. There are inherent dangers that come with my profession. In fact; if I take the time to actually reflect on my 23-year career, it is terrifying to comprehend the situations that could have ended a number of different ways. Every call I answered potentially could have been the last.
If life were merely a contest with fate, then should we not think before we act? Though some may argue that the proper time to reflect is before acting, I have learned from experience that, more times than not, this is not the best approach. The ability to act on instinct is crucial to success, in many situations. During an earthquake, for instance, one must quickly respond in whichever way necessary to protect themselves, as well as their loved ones. No matter how prepared, or trained, one may be, there is no way to predict what the essential motions should be taken at the time of an emergency.