Death is something everyone must face at one point or another. For varying reasons, many people are willing to die for a certain cause. Some find that there is no other way out of their dilemma. Other feel so strongly about what they believe is right, that they are more than willing to pay the ultimate price. Moral or ethical dilemmas are pivotal devices used in many literary works. However, the literary characters explored in this essay are so firm in their convictions that they are willing to sacrifice themselves for their own respective beliefs. As readers of these works, we are often so moved by their beliefs that we often side with the characters in their journey. We, as readers, are offered insight on situations that we become deeply …show more content…
invested in, despite not having experienced the events personally. With the moral dilemmas faced by The Awakening’s Edna Pontellier, The Road’s unnamed Man, and Hamlet’s eponymous protagonist, readers can learn a lot through these characters’ eyes about what it means to be human and how far one could go in pursuit of their beliefs. In Kate Chopin’s The Awakening, Edna Pontellier is faced with the conflicting nature of discovering her true self in the world and being bound by society’s expectations of women. The narrative is characterized by the slow realization that Edna has about herself and the world around her. From the beginning of the novel, it is known by virtually everyone that Edna Pontellier “was not a mother-woman” (Chopin 16). The moral dilemma that Edna would have to face was starting to arise when she “was beginning to realize her position in the universe as human being, and to recognize her relations as an individual to the world within and about her” (Chopin 25). Soon after that, Edna grasped her situation. She recognized that she wanted to, for the first time in her life, be her own person. Furthermore, when first Edna swam alone in the ocean, she felt something deep within her and realized that “she wanted to swim far out, where no woman had swum before” (Chopin 47). At that point, a switch had been flipped within Edna; there was no turning back. Edna Pontellier was going to possess a sense of solitude, even if it meant in death. Edna yearned for solitude and began to unabashedly go against societal conventions for women and wives, often leaving her house to walk around town in exploration and “[leaving] no excuse” for visiting friends and neighbors (Chopin 85). Edna wanted the freedom that men got and began to act on those freedoms at her own discretion. At one point, Mrs. Pontellier “drank the liquor from [a] glass as a man would have done” (Chopin 131). Edna’s actions were in much of the dismay of others who blindly followed the unspoken rules of times. However, this did not affect Edna Pontellier, it was her decision and no one else’s. Solitude and freedom were all that Mrs. Pontellier craved, perhaps they are what possessed her to take her final swim. In the end, Edna, retaining a new sense of being, swam out in the ocean, swimming further and further with all that she could physically muster. In the final page of the novel, Edna ponders going back to the shore, however, it is “too late; the shore was far behind her, and her strength was gone. She looked into the distance, and the old terror flamed up for an instant, then sank again” (Chopin 190). In what would appear to be her last moments, Edna Pontellier experiences solitude and freedom, and quite possibly some sort of peace and happiness. Perhaps Edna knew that she could never be truly free or happy in the world she lived in; perhaps she felt this was the only way to get out of her dilemma. Edna knew that her new found identity did not match what everyone expected of a wife and a mother. Readers of The Awakening have most likely never been in exact situation that Edna was in, but that does not make it any less relatable. Chopin’s novel is about discovering yourself and meaning to life, which are some of the most human themes there are. We all face hardships and struggle with what people want us to do, those are human qualities we all share. Edna Pontellier had these exact feelings, maybe even on a grander scale, and she was willing to pay the ultimate price for her personal freedom. And she most certainly did. Cormac McCarthy’s The Road deals with a father and son’s fight for survival in a post apocalyptic setting.
Both characters in the novel go unnamed to create a more relatable and easily assessable experience for readers. The Man fights for his survival and, more importantly, his son’s throughout the narrative. However, the Man accepts death to be inevitable, for example when the Boy asked his father if they are “going to die” he responds by saying “Sometime. Not now” (McCarthy 10). The moral dilemma that the Man must face is how far he would go in order to keep his son safe. The Man carries with him a pistol that has two bullets: one for his son and one for himself. But, when the Man has to use a bullet to save his son’s life from a man threatening to kill him, he is left with only one bullet which he saves for his son in case circumstances get too grim. The Man decides that he would rather face whatever were to happen, whether it be gruesome murder, being eaten alive, or other horrific acts of violence from fellow man as long as his son does not have to. Not only is the Man willing to die for his son, but the sole reason that he is fighting for life is to keep his son safe. As the Man put it, “the boy was all that stood between him and death” (McCarthy 29). The story takes a turn when the Man becomes ill, and with his illness worsening by the day, he realizes that he is dying. The Man’s fears of not being able to care for his son becomes realized. But, when he knows that …show more content…
death is near, the Man comes to a realization and says “I cant. I cant hold my son dead in my arms. I thought I could but I cant” (McCarthy 279). With his death within mere moments, the Man realizes that his son is going to be alright and finds comfort in the fact that “goodness will find the boy. It always has. It will again” (McCarthy 281). The Man dies knowing that he can no longer help his son, but that is okay; the Son has learned from his father and he will be safe. Readers of Cormac McCarthy’s The Road have definitely never been in the exact situation that this father and son experienced, but this work is easily accessible to most. This is the story about the hardships of love and growing up, which are very universal themes about humanity. In the beginning of the novel, the Man is willing to die for his son’s safety, and in the end, he is willing to die for his future. You do not get for human than that. In William Shakespeare’s classical drama Hamlet, the title character Prince Hamlet goes through the ethical dilemma of avenging his father’s death.
From the beginning the play, Hamlet is upset about the marriage of his mother to his father’s brother, remarking that Queen Gertrude “married – O most wicked speed: to post / With such dexterity to incestious sheets, / It is not, nor it cannot come to good” (Shakespeare 1.2.156-158). But, it is not until the ghost of Hamlet’s father tells Hamlet that he was murdered by his own brother that Hamlet plans to enact revenge. Throughout the play, Hamlet is shown to be content with the idea that his actions will most likely end in his death. In some of the drama’s most famous lines, Hamlet
ponders: “Whether ‘tis nobler in the mind to suffer The slings and arrows of outrageous fortune, Or to take arms against a sea of troubles, And by opposing end them.” (Shakespeare 3.1.56-59) Hamlet is willing to die for his father’s honor. Readers of William Shakespeare’s Hamlet have been able to relate to the idea of respect for family and wickedness of breaking those bonds. Prince Hamlet is willing to die in order to avenge his father’s death and, in the end, he does. As humans, death is something we all must face. It is our inevitable end and it holds a lot of emotional weight to us all. It is very meaningful to readers to see characters willing to give up the precious gift of life for something they feel is more important. Edna Pontellier gave up her life for her own identity and freedom that her society would never give her. The Man gave up his life for his son’s future. Hamlet gave up his life in honor of his father. Identity, family, and respect are essential to the human experience and are ideas that, in certain circumstances, anyone would be willing to die for.
It’s the year 2028, and the world we used to know as bright and beautiful is no longer thriving with light. A disease similar to the plague broke out and caused great havoc. Although it may seem like forever ago, sickness spread only a few years ago. The Road by Cormac McCarthy is about a man and his son who fortunately survived this sickness; although they made it, the struggle to keep going is tough. Before most of the population became deceased, people went insane. They started to bomb houses, burn down businesses and towns, and destroy the environment. Anyone who had the disease was bad blood. Many saw it as the end of the world, which in many cases was true.
The Road by Cormac McCarthy is about a father and son who are surrounded by an apocalyptic world where they are trying to survive. Many of McCarthy’s books are about negative or violent times like Blood Meridian and All The Pretty Horses. McCarthy enjoys writing about the terror in the real world. When writing literature, he avoids using commas and quotation marks.. Many works of literature have a plethora of themes throughout them, in The Road, the theme that sticks out the most is paternal love. The boy is the only thing that stands between the man and death. Aside from that, the father doesn’t kill anyone for food, he only takes the life of people who threaten the boy. Lastly, the man allows the boy have the last of their supplies, food,
“Most of the important things in the world have been accomplished by people who have kept on trying when there seemed to be no hope at all” - Dale Carnegie. In The Road by Cormac McCarthy, the father continues through a multitude of intense situations along with his son, because of his desire and need to survive for his son in a post apocalyptic world.In order for one to survive, a person must be able to have and never relinquish the vigor and hope to withstand daily negative situations and to truly connect and create relationships with other humans.
The Road, a post-apocalyptic, survival skills fiction book written by Cormac McCarthy and published in 2006 is part of the Oprah Winfrey book club. During an interview with Oprah, McCarthy answered questions about The Road that he had never been asked before because pervious to the interview he had never been interviewed. Oprah asked what inspired the heart breaking book; it turns out that McCarthy wrote the book after taking a vacation with his son John. While on the vacation he imagined the world fifty years later and seen fire in the distant hills. After the book was finished, McCarthy dedicated it to his son, John. Throughout the book McCarthy included things that he knows he and his son would do and conversations that he thinks they may have had. (Cormac). Some question if the book is worth reading for college course writing classes because of the amount of common writing “rule breaks”. After reading and doing assignments to go along with The Road, I strongly believe that the novel should be required for more college courses such as Writing and Rhetoric II. McCarthy wrote the book in a way to force readers to get out of their comfort zones; the book has a great storyline; so doing the assignments are fairly easy, and embedded in the book are several brilliant survival tactics.
In Cormac McCarthy’s Sci-Fi novel, “The Road”, two mysterious people, a father and his curious son, contact survival of the fittest during tragic apocalyptic times. With a shopping cart of food and supplies, they excavate into the remains of tattered houses, torn buildings and other sheltering places, while averting from troublesome communes. In the duration of the novel, they’re plagued with sickness that temporarily unable them to proceed onward. Due to the inopportune events occurring before the apocalypse, the wife of the son and father committed suicide due to these anonymous survivors lurking the remains of earth. The last people on earth could be the ‘bad guys’ as the young boy describes them. In page 47, the wife reacted to this, stating, “Sooner or later they will catch us and they will kill us. They will rape me. They'll rape him. They are going to rape us and kill us and eat us and you won't face it. You'd rather wait for it to happen. But I can't.”
The Road by Cormac McCarthy revolves around a man and his son, who are on a journey to the coast. In this post-apocalyptic world, the inhabitants have lost their humanity and have resorted to cannibalism or murdering to survive. At this point, most people have forgotten what humanity was like before the world turned harsh and cruel. People, including the man, will throw their morals away in order to survive, but that doesn't mean everyone is inherently evil. Although this book demonstrates what the world would be like in a place with no faith or hope; there is always some light and goodness in all the evil. The Road may represent most of humanity as pessimistic, but throughout the book that changes, the boy is shown as a sign of hope to
Hamlet is Shakespeare’s most famous work of tragedy. Throughout the play the title character, Hamlet, tends to seek revenge for his father’s death. Shakespeare achieved his work in Hamlet through his brilliant depiction of the hero’s struggle with two opposing forces that hunt Hamlet throughout the play: moral integrity and the need to avenge his father’s murder. When Hamlet sets his mind to revenge his fathers’ death, he is faced with many challenges that delay him from committing murder to his uncle Claudius, who killed Hamlets’ father, the former king. During this delay, he harms others with his actions by acting irrationally, threatening Gertrude, his mother, and by killing Polonius which led into the madness and death of Ophelia. Hamlet ends up deceiving everyone around him, and also himself, by putting on a mask of insanity. In spite of the fact that Hamlet attempts to act morally in order to kill his uncle, he delays his revenge of his fathers’ death, harming others by his irritating actions. Despite Hamlets’ decisive character, he comes to a point where he realizes his tragic limits.
His uncle, along with the kingdom, had to mourn for at least a year before an event like a royal marriage, however, his uncle underwent one anyway. Hamlet rejects him, stating that, “[His] father’s brother, but no more like [his] father than [himself] to Hercules…” which builds his anger towards his uncle for seemingly abandoning and disrespecting his father when instead, he should celebrate his father’s achievements and mourn him. As with his mother, Hamlet feels that his uncle never truly loved his brother and unlike his mother, Hamlet feels as if his uncle envied or at least despised his brother from the way he openly broke the mourning period for the royal marriage. Furthermore, Hamlet feels enraged at his uncle for seducing his and charming his mother into accepting the marriage, so soon after his father’s death. While Hamlet recounts the marriage, his rage grows when he exclaims, “O, most wicked speed, to post…to incestuous sheets!” because he feels disrespected and offended at the speed of which the marriage progressed. Because of this, his suspicions only increased with his anger while he correlates the short time of his father’s death with the royal marriage. As a result, Hamlet grew to despise his uncle even further, and treats him as the stranger who stole his mother away. Ultimately, Hamlet recognizes that breaking tradition will lead to poor events, when he states, “It is not…good…but…I must hold my tongue!” and accepts that his mother and uncle wish to use him for appearances and to keep anyone from questioning their love and respect towards Hamlet, Hamlet’s father, and the mourning traditions of the kingdom. With these recent events in his mind, Hamlet uses his solitude to express his anger and sadness towards everything, and finally vent the stress his uncle and mother
The Road, by Cormac McCarthy, follows the journey of a father and a son who are faced with the struggle to survive in a post-apocalyptic world. The two main characters are faced with endeavors that test a core characteristic of their beings: their responsibilities to themselves and to the world around them. This responsibility drives every action between the characters of the novel and manifests in many different ways. Responsibility is shown through three key interactions: the man to the boy, the boy to the man, and the boy to the rest of the world. It is this responsibility that separates McCarthy’s book from those of the same genre.
Shakespeare’s Hamlet is a tragic play about murder, betrayal, revenge, madness, and moral corruption. It touches upon philosophical ideas such as existentialism and relativism. Prince Hamlet frequently questions the meaning of life and the degrading of morals as he agonizes over his father’s murder, his mother’s incestuous infidelity, and what he should or shouldn’t do about it. At first, he is just depressed; still mourning the loss of his father as his mother marries his uncle. After he learns about the treachery of his uncle and the adultery of his mother, his already negative countenance declines further. He struggles with the task of killing Claudius, feeling burdened about having been asked to find a solution to a situation that was forced upon him.Death is something he struggles with as an abstract idea and as relative to himself. He is able to reconcile with the idea of death and reality eventually.
With his thinking mind Hamlet does not become a typical vengeful character. Unlike most erratic behavior of individuals seeking revenge out of rage, Hamlet considers the consequences of his actions. What would the people think of their prince if he were to murder the king? What kind of effect would it have on his beloved mother? Hamlet considers questions of this type which in effect hasten his descision. After all, once his mother is dead and her feelings out of the picture , Hamlet is quick and aggressive in forcing poison into Claudius' mouth. Once Hamlet is certain that Claudius is the killer it is only after he himself is and and his empire falling that he can finally act.
He shows his brotherly love for Ophelia when he says “For Hamlet, and the trifling of his favor,/Hold it a fashion and a toy in blood,/A violet in the youth of primy nature,/Forward, not permanent, sweet, not lasting,/The perfume and suppliance of a minute,/No more” (Shakespeare 1.3.6-11). Meanwhile, Hamlet embarks on a mission of revenge in which he does not seek revenge on behalf of himself but rather, for someone else. Hamlet’s revenge mission begins when he is visited by his father’s ghost who commands “Revenge his foul and most unnatural murder” (Shakespeare 1.5.31) after his father recounts the cause of his murder. From this point on, Hamlet begins to act mad in order to put his revenge mission into action.
In addition to this internal struggle, Hamlet feels it is his duty to dethrone Claudius and become the King of Denmark. This revenge, he believes, would settle the score for his mother’s incestuous relationship and would reinstate his family’s honor. These thoughts are solidified in Act I, Scene 5, when his father’s ghost appears and informs Hamlet that is was Claudius who murdered him, and that Claudius deprived him “of life, of crown, and queen” (line 75). This information leads to Hamlet’s promise to kill Claudius, while not punishing his mother for their incestuous marriage. His statement, “thy commandment all alone shall live within the book and volume of my brain” (lines 102-103), demonstrates his adamant decision to let nothing stand in the way of his promise for revenge.
Once Hamlet has learned of his father’s death, he is faced with a difficult question: should he succumb to the social influence of avenging his father’s death? The Ghost tells Hamlet to “revenge his foul and most unnatural murder” (1.5.31) upon which Hamlet swears to “remember” (1.5.118). Hamlet’s immediate response to this command of avenging his father’s death is reluctance. Hamlet displays his reluctance by deciding to test the validity of what the Ghost has told him by setting up a “play something like the murder of (his) father’s” (2.2.624) for Claudius. Hamlet will then “observe his looks” (2.2.625) and “if he do blench” (2.2.626) Hamlet will know that he must avenge his father’s death. In the course of Hamlet avenging his father’s death, he is very hesitant, “thinking too precisely on the event” (4.4.43). “Now might I do it…and he goes to heaven…No” (3.3.77-79) and Hamlet decides to kill Claudius while “he is drunk asleep, or in his rage, or in th’ incestuous pleasure of his bed” (3.3.94-95). As seen here, Hamlet’s contradicting thought that Claudius “goes to heaven” (3.3.79) influences him to change his plans for revenge. Hamlet eventually realizes that he must avenge his father’s death and states “from this time forth my thoughts be bloody or be nothing worth” (4.4.69). From this, Hamlet has succumbed to the social influence and has vowed to avenge his father’s death.
In a typical revenge tragedy, a hero is called upon by the ghost of a family member to avenge his death ("Revenge Tragedy"). Hamlet is the main protagonist and hero called upon by his father's ghost to "revenge his foul and most unnatural murder" (1.5.31). When Hamlet first hears that his father was murdered, he exclaims, "Haste me to know't, that I, with wings as swift...may sweep to my revenge" (1.5.35-37). He is hungry to avenge his father; however, Hamlet does nothing and at the end of Act II he scolds himself that "this player...could force his soul so to his own conceit...all for nothing...yet, [he]...can say nothing for a king upon whose property and most dear life a damned defeat was made" (2.2.578-598). Hamlet is upset that he hasn't yet acted to avenge his father, but some mere actor can build up so much emotion for nothing. Shakespeare complicates the plot because revenge tragedies are supposed to have a courageous and aggressive protagonist who swiftly carries out his deed of revenge; instead, Shakespeare modifies the hero and portrays Hamlet as an indecisive and contemplative man.