Virtue Ethics

646 Words2 Pages

When we discuss morality we know that it is a code of values that seem to guide our choices and actions. Choices and actions play a significant role in determining the purpose and course of a person’s life. In the case of “Jim and the Indians”, Jim faces a terrible dilemma to which any solution is morbid. On one hand, Jim can choose to ignore the captain’s suggestion and let the whole group of Indians be executed. Alternatively, he may decide upon sacrificing one Indian for the sake of saving the rest. Both options involve taking of person’s life. Regarding what should Jim do in this circumstance, there are two approaches according for Jim’s dilemma that should be examined. By looking into the Deontological moral theory and the moral theory of Consequentialism we can see what determines an action that is morally required. Consequentialism tells us not to look at the act, but to look at the outcome. The one thing that Jim should consider is how many lives are saved. To kill one of the Indians in order to save nineteen or to not kill and all 20 will die. Jim would Compare and weigh both outcomes. Therefore, Jim as a consequentialist chooses the better outcome and kills one in order to save the other nineteen Indians. Who does the act is morally irrelevant, when the outcome is for the good of the whole. This is what matters as the greatest happiness principle like John Stuart Mill (1806-1873) who gives importance to the consequences of the act for the good of the whole. The outcome is what matters and not the process that gave rise to the outcome. Therefore, a consequentialist sacrifices his morality in order to save 19 lives. In this case, Jim has to choose who of the Indians to kill in order to save the rest of the nineteen India... ... middle of paper ... ...to save 19 lives or not kill at all by letting the sheriff kill, both cases are down to the person in this situation to weigh their decision. Moreover, whatever one decides to do in this case is down to their personal values. If a person feels moral justification for their act, then they would act on that principle. Every aspect has this main feature; a person has to live with their decision. Therefore, the value that one puts on their morality is more important than the act or the consequences. Works Cited Aristotle, The Nichomachean Ethics (London: Penguin Books, 1976), pp. 123-4. Davis, N., ‘Contemporary Deontology’, in Singer, P. (ed), A Companion to Ethics, Blackwell, 1991. J.J.C Smart & Bernard Williams, Utilitarianism: for and against, Cambridge, CUP, 1973. pp.98-99. Kant in William Frankena, Ethics (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Parentice-Hall,1973)2nd edition.

Show More
Related

  • Kai Nielsen’s Support of Consequentialism and Rejection of Deontology

    1487 Words  | 3 Pages

    A common objection to consequentialism, that agents are burdened with duties to help others at the expense of their own happiness, was not even addressed. This in itself seems to be one form of absolutism that riddles consequentialism in general. Nielsen made it clear that one should not be absolute about insisting on weighing consequences when they are barely known, but would he reject this notion as well? It is not clear that this absolutism, of always valuing the good of others over the agent’s own self, is separable from the concept of consequentialism; so it is not clear that consequentialism can escape absolutism as Nielsen concluded in the second argument recounted here.

    Read More

  • How To Read Literature Like A Professor Literary Analysis

    684 Words  | 2 Pages

    In Franz Kafka’s The Metamorphosis, symbolism, archetype, and myths are three concepts he uses to compose the unique story. The symbolism in the story stands out vaguely. An archetypical reference occurs at the very beginning of the story that carries on throughout the book. The mythological aspect is sensibly the whole concept the story is about. All three of these notions are openly highlighted throughout the story. They each obtain explanations for multiple subjects. The book, How to Read Literature Like a Professor by Thomas C. Foster helps explain the three concepts in Kafka’s, The Metamorphosis.

    Read More

  • How To Read Literature Like A Professor Summary

    428 Words  | 1 Pages

    In the introduction of Thomas C. Foster’s How to Read Literature Like a Professor, Foster sets the scene for the upcoming chapters by pointing out crucial literary devices. Through several references, it is further explained how memories, symbols and patterns help to create broader understandings throughout literary texts. Foster continues by stating that the usage of these devices establishes the advanced readers from “the rest of the crowd” (xxvii).

    Read More

  • Consequentialism In Training Day

    908 Words  | 2 Pages

    Consequentialism is a term used by the philosophers to simplify what is right and what is wrong. Consequentialist ethical theory suggests that right and wrong are the consequences of our actions. It is only the consequences that determine whether our actions are right or wrong. Standard consequentialism is a form of consequentialism that is discussed the most. It states that “the morally right action for an agent to perform is the one that has the best consequences or that results in the most good.” It means that an action is morally correct if it has little to no negative consequences, or the one that has the most positive results.

    Read More

  • Homeless Hotspots Case Study

    924 Words  | 2 Pages

    moral decisions, we will be analyzing why this scenario poses a dilemma, possible actions that

    Read More

  • Utilitarianism: Jim Doesn T Kill One Indians

    661 Words  | 2 Pages

    Including the Indian that Jim would have killed in the first place to save the others. If Jim refuses, Pedro might not kill all twenty of the Indians, so if Jim does kill one he could be causing more harm. But, if Pedro does kill all of the Indians he is morally at fault for doing the incorrect thing; even by killing the same Indian that Jim, himself, was about to kill. If killing that one Indian is morally okay when Jim does it, why is it not okay morally when Pedro does it? It would be okay for Jim to not kill any Indian because Pedro could end up sparing all of them, and because Pedro is only encouraging a criminal act; which should be morally wrong if Jim does it, just as well as it should be morally wrong when he does it. So, Jim should not kill the Indian and potentially let all twenty

    Read More

  • The Problem Debate: The Trolly Car Problem

    1368 Words  | 3 Pages

    The ‘Trolley Car Problem’ has sparked heated debates amongst numerous philosophical and jurisprudential minds for centuries. The ‘Trolley Car’ debate challenges one’s pre-conceived conceptions about morals, ethics and the intertwined relationship between law and morality. Many jurisprudential thinkers have thoroughly engaged with this debate and have consequentially put forward various ideologies in an attempt to answer the aforementioned problem. The purpose of this paper is to substantiate why the act of saving the young, innocent girl and resultantly killing the five prisoners is morally permissible. In justifying this choice, this paper will, first, broadly delve into the doctrine of utilitarianism, and more specifically focus on a branch

    Read More

  • Summary Of How To Read Literature Like A Professor By Thomas Foster

    620 Words  | 2 Pages

    Learning how to read literary works like a college professor can be tough, so when feeling lost like Dante while reading a confusing book, it helps to have a Virgil guide us. Thomas C. Foster, author of How to Read Literature like a Professor thoroughly guides his readers to look for similar literary elements or ideas from different works and make connections. His idea for this book comes from his love for books which thrived as a child and leads him to inspire others with his works. Actually, it even inspired me. This is an informative book that revolves around the idea of creative thinking, which has opened my eyes and made me like the book even more than I did before.

    Read More

  • How To Read Literature Like A Professor Summary

    250 Words  | 1 Pages

    Overall, How to Read Literature Like a Professor starts off really confusing since you are trying to understand what is going on while also trying to figure out how he proves his theories. In the beginning of the book, Foster’s theories seemed so far-fetched because of the way he worded them. In chapter three Foster stated, “Ghosts and vampires are never only about ghosts and vampires.” (Foster 18). Immediately, I began to think about how professors tear apart books for symbols that are not really there. Many authors in the past have stated that they have written books that have no deeper meaning and are not filled with symbols. After I pondered this thought, I was hoping Foster was going to further explain his statement to make me agree.

    Read More

  • John Harris Experiment Of The Survival Lottery

    721 Words  | 2 Pages

    The goal of this paper is to examine John Harris’ experiment of the “Survival Lottery.” Specifically, I want to argue that the lottery makes too high a demand on us to give up our lives. Especially, when I’m pretty sure everyone wants to live. Prior accounts show that Harris proposes that if the argument of the distinction between “killing” and “letting die” is properly contrived, then killing one person to save two could happen on a regular basis. It would be an exception to the obligation not to kill innocent people in regards to the argument that there is a distinction between "killing" and "letting die.” The difference between killing and letting die presents a moral difference. As far as this argument we are obligated not to kill. I

    Read More

  • How To Read Literature Like A Professor Essay

    745 Words  | 2 Pages

    In writing, pure originality is impossible. The novel, How to Read Literature Like a Professor, compares writing to setting up a camp. The ground has already been camped on, yet camp is set up in that spot again. The camps in the same spot will have structural similarities, but still be different enough. The same idea applies to writing. Even writers like James Joyce, who sometimes coin their own words use the same words as everyone else, and it is only so often those words can be combined in a way that is completely unique (Foster, 195). For example, using conflict to develop theme is found in most works of literature. These works feature similar conflicts and themes allowing the same story to be told in slightly different styles. Authors often utilize the conflict or resolution of the conflict to exemplify the theme. Furthermore, the short stories, “Araby” and “The Boarding House”, by James Joyce exemplify the use of conflict to develop theme.

    Read More

  • Essay On Killing And Killing

    1232 Words  | 3 Pages

    Determining the moral difference between killing and letting die has been a constant debate between many philosophers, with the basis of arguments cemented through the explanation of theoretical cases. However, as Winston Nesbitt states, the ethical theory that one holds determines their personal stance on the issue, and thus although to some extent individual morality is based on and developed by common societal grounds, it is not always clear what is morally correct on the whole. (NESBITT). This is evident in the example of John Lad’s case where the comparison is presented between killing someone by pushing them into river when you know they cannot swim verses not rescuing someone who is drowning in a river even if you are capable of doing so, thus letting them die. (LADD) Most would agree in this case that the behaviour in the first scenario would be notably morally worse than in the second. Nesbitt, however, believes that this is an inaccurate conclusion as we have only come to it due to the assumption that there are differences in motives, such that we are inclined to associate a malicious motive with the case of killing, while maybe only fear or indifference with the case of failing to save. Typical acts of ki...

    Read More

  • Virtue Ethics

    905 Words  | 2 Pages

    Virtue Ethics Virtue ethics is a theory used to make moral decisions. It does not rely on religion, society or culture; it only depends on the individuals themselves. The main philosopher of Virtue Ethics is Aristotle. The. His theory was originally introduced in ancient Greek.

    Read More

  • Code of Ethics

    537 Words  | 2 Pages

    As a law enforcement officer, my fundamental duty is to serve mankind; to safeguard lives and property; to protect the innocent against deception, the weak against oppression or intimidation, and the peaceful against violence or disorder; and to respect the constitutional rights of all men to liberty, equality and justice.

    Read More

  • Ethics in the Modern World

    1524 Words  | 4 Pages

    Ethics is a system of moral principles and a branch of philosophy which defines what is acceptable for both individuals and society. It is a philosophy that covers a whole range of things that have an importance in everyday situations. Ethics are vital in everyones lives, it includes human values, and how to have a good life, our rights and responsibilities, moral decisions what is right and wrong, good and bad. Moral principles affect how people make decisions and lead their lives (BBC, 2013). There are many different beliefs about were ethics come from. These consist of; God and Religion, human conscience, the example of good human beings and a huge desire for the best for people in each unique situation, and political power (BBC, 2013).

    Read More

More about Virtue Ethics

Open Document