Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
King arthur literary analysis
Topics for a paper on king arthur
Topics for a paper on king arthur
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
One cannot flip through the different news channels or scroll through a news column without seeing a story or two about violence. Violence has become a regular occurrence and rarely do people think about the motives behind crimes, robberies, and fights. Similar to society today, the Arthurian world is full of violence and brutality. Each aggressive action that a knight commits has some sort of rationale behind it that motivated the knight to act violently. The individuals in Arthur’s world rely on violence toward others and engaging in violent actions to display their power to and get what they want.
Launcelot and Meliagrance strive to show their dominance over others by fighting for love and honor. Throughout Book XIX of Le Morte d’Arthur
…show more content…
Meliagrance displayed his power over Sir Launcelot because he was able to take something of Launcelot and use it to his advantage. Not only did Meliagrance have authority over Launcelot in that moment he also had the Queen and her knights under his control because after much fighting and people dying the Queen decided to surrender and go with Meliagrance to his castle (2). In this moment, Meliagrance was given the power to rule over a group of people that he previously could not have through the use of violence. Sir Launcelot definitely has power over many people in the Arthurian world because of his strength and good battle skills. However, there are many instances where he must fight for his honor in order to keep his dominance over the Arthurian world. Launcelot has just heard news that Queen was taken and he must go and get her back because he did not want to be shamed by society. The best archers of Sir Meliagrance killed Launcelot’s horse thus, he must find another way to get to Guenever by riding in the cart, “Then Sir Launcelot leapt onto him [the carter], and gave him such a buffet that he fell to the earth stark dead.” (5). Launcelot killed the cart driver because his …show more content…
Sir Meliagrance believes that one of the ten knights that were in the room with the Queen slept with her over the night and challenges Sir Launcelot to a battle in order to prove that he is right (9). The problem is that Meliagrance knows that he is going to lose because he is fighting against Launcelot and in order to win Meliagrance planned a trap, “ he [Launcelot] trod on a trap and the board rolled, and there Sir Launcelot fell down more than ten fathom into a cave” (10). Meliagrance did this violent act in order to further his own interests and well-being. If Launcelot did not attend the battle, Meliagrance would win, Queen Guenever would be burnt at the stake, and the mention of any of the treason that he committed would be gone. Meliagrance believes he deserves to be given mercy and not punished for any of his wrongdoings because he pleads for mercy multiple times to Launcelot and the Queen. Launcelot also uses the technique of fighting to get what he wants; in this case, it is the woman, Queen Guenever. During the battle between the two knights, Launcelot does not want to give mercy to Meliagrance so instead, he gets approval from the Queen and tells Meliagrance that he will fight unarmed and with his left hand tied behind his back (12). With this disability Launcelot still can win, “and then with great force Sir Launcelot
In this tale Lyonet was sent to find a noble knight to rescue her sister from the Red Knight of the Red Launds.When she came to King Arthur’s court to ask of such a knight to aid her, a man to the name of Sir Beaumains asked to be the one to rescue the sister of Lyonet. At this point of the tale Sir Beaumains was considered to be not as noble as Lyonet had wanted. Beaumains wouldn’t leave her on her journey back to her sister. Lyonet kept referring to Beaumains as a kitchen knave from King Arthur’s court and would give him no respect as a knight. Throughout the journey Beaumains would not reveal his true identity and Lyonet kept wishing him gone. She would tell all of the knights that they came across in their journey what kind of man he was and taunt them to get them to fight. Every time Beaumains would win. Finally Beumains overcame the Red knight of the Red Launds and saved Lyonet’s sister, Dame Lyonesse. Once Lyonesse was freed she fell madly in love with Beaumains and wanted to be with him. Everytime Lyonesse would sneak into the room to “be with” Beaumains Lyonet would send a knight into the room and to do great harm to Beaumains so that they could not do the things they were trying to do. Lyonet never trusted Beaumains to be a truly noble knight until his name was revealed and his lineage was known.
Every aspect of life is virtually preordained. These circumstances revolve around the figure Lanval by Mari de France. Mari de France introduces Lanval as a courteous and distinguished knight of King Arthur’s court. Lanval possesses the most moral nature of all of King Arthur’s knights, yet even so, the other knights of King Arthur’s round table despise him. The many knights neglect acknowledgment of his nature as does
From the power of persuasion to the value of honor and beyond, one can witness many facets of human nature played out among the pages of “Sir Gawain and the Green Knight”. No theme of which can be seen more impeccably than the showcase of virtue verses sin. As Gawain is launched into tests of courtesy it is clear that much more is being examined than just his execution of courteous behavior, it is the nature of those around him that is also being taken into account. It is interesting how an author uses the combination of a negatively imbued foe and a positively inspired hero to highlight the traits most desirable for the mere mortals reading such a tale. In “Sir Gawain” the author uses some of the seven deadly sins to poetically draw their reader numerous and highly elaborate verbal pictures. For instance, in the opening passages of “Sir Gawain” the reader is told of rich and sumptuous clothing, decadent banquets hosted by Arthur and the lavish finery in his court. The reader might find that Arthur’s court is gluttonous in these displays of wealth while reading this section. Opulence, however, is laced thoroughly as reoccurring theme through many of the court and hall scenes in this particular romance. Another specific instance of the seven deadly being used is when the reader is shown that courtesy is a “big deal” for Arthur and his court. On display here is pride, chief of the seven deadly sins, which obviously reigns supreme when it comes to the reputation of courtesy in Arthur’s court. It comes into question here if these traits are entirely good or if they have a darker, more sinful nature attached to them. Thus as Gawain was tested for his diligence to courteous behavior, here and thence five of the seven deadly sins that a...
In Sir Gawain and The Green Knight, the author shows, in a deeper, fictional descriptive fashion, a look into English life of the late 1300s to the 1400s. Written in an ambiguous undertone, this poem is left for interpretation by the reader. This seemingly unknown author examines the personalities and character traits of Sir Gawain, and other people within the patriarchy by examining them through the different what they did in life, and how they conducted themselves within specific company. Particularly through Sir Gawain, the Pearl Poet examines more than just pride within this text, but bravery, honor, and temptation.
In the Medieval poem “Lanval” by Marie De France, she explores the traditional theme of Guinevere by utilizing literary interests and demonstrating the original ideas of Guinevere’s character. Accordingly, she approaches when Guinevere favors others over her husband and how she follows a plan to seduce them. For this poem., Guinevere remains to be a supporting character who causes unfortunate events for the main character, Lanval. Wanting to start an affair with him, Guinevere rushes herself over to him and displays her fiery personality to the hero offering herself to him. Completely blindsiding her, Lanval refuses and walks away from her. De France shows how Guinevere manipulates Arthur by devising a well-built lie, claiming Lanval asked, “For a love-affair” and when she refused him, he insulted her beauty (De France line 318). Playing her cards to ignite a flame
Knights must go out into the regular world, or the dark forest, to embark on their quest. There they will be tested in their morals and virtues. The noble knights of King Arthur’s court are constantly tested by the Dark Forest and all of its temptations, creating many different conflicts within the knight’s moral codes. Facing those conflicts and coming out on top with new found knowledge is what separates great people from average
So then there was made great ordnance in this ire, and the queen must needs be judged to death. And the law was such in those days that whosoever they were, of what estate or degree, if they were found guilty of treason* there should be none other remedy but death, and either the mainour or the taking with the deed should be causer of their hasty judgement. And right so was it ordained for Queen Guinevere...theses proofs and experience caused King Arthur to command the Queen to the fire, and there to be burned. (478)
In the Medieval Period, knights dedicated their lives to following the code of chivalry. In Sir Thomas Malory’s Le Morte d’Arthur, a number of characters performed chivalrous acts to achieve the status of an ideal knight. Their characteristics of respect for women and courtesy for all, helpfulness to the weak, honor, and skill in battle made the characters King Arthur, King Pellinore, and Sir Gryfflette examples of a what knights strove to be like in Medieval society. Because of the examples ofchivalry, Le Morte d’Arthur showed what a knight desired to be, so he could improve theworld in which he lived.
The story begins with the Marquise de Merteuil corresponding with Vicomte de Valmont regarding a luscious new act of ‘revenge’, as she describes it, against the Comte de Gercourt. The young Cecile de Volanges has just come home from the convent and her marriage to Gercourt has been arranged. However, before he can wed the innocent child, Merteuil proposes Valmont ‘educate’ her, thus spoiling Gercourt’s fancy for untarnished convent girls. Valmont is uninterested in such an easy seduction and is far more aroused by the thought of lulling The Presidente’ de Tourvel, the very epitome of virtue, into submission. And so the tale unfolds.
The medieval romances seem particularly in danger of being misinterpreted in the manner suggested, possibly because the word 'romance' itself inevitably calls to the mind the general vague term 'romance* or the adjective 'romantic*.However, real meaning of medieval romance are stories of adventure in which the chief parts are played by knights, famous kings, or distressed ladies, acting most often under the impulse of love, religious faith, or in many, mere desire for adventure. Though, if we think in terms of medieval romance, I shall confine myself to what we still call 'romances of chivalry', particularly in a way how it is revealed in Sir Tryamour and Amis and Amiloun. Rejecting the fact that these two works of art were written with interval of a century, they have quite a lot of similar themes and motifs. Sir Tryamour was written by unknown author at the end of fourteen century and one hundred years before Amis and Amiloun appeared in publication. The most common motifs of these two works are the treachery of stewards, a tournament involving protagonists, a support of loyal friend, mistaken identity and family discord. Both romances have a main character, who is reunited with their family after a long separation, passes through checking his chivalric abilities involving the testing and assert his honor at the end of romance. Nevertheless, in most romances there are minor characters (stewards) who try to mislead main heroes by deception such as Marrok in Sir Tryamour and the duke’s “loyal” steward in Amis and Amiloun. Moreover, further paragraphs of the essay will examine how these two themes are revealed.
The tales of King Arthur and many of their numerous characters are well known in literature. The Arthurian world is one of the great myths of modern times. Those great pieces of literature have many common themes, one of them being courtly love “L’amour Courtois”. This paper talks of courtly love as seen in King Arthur’s world especially examining “Yvain or the Knight with the Lion” and “Lancelot: or the Knight of the Cart”. Furthermore, one of the goals is to show how that courtly love could be seen in today in our world.
In this article, Lieberman introduces the idea of what makes a man develop to a knight. He insists that that the elaboration of knighting ritual has changed throughout the later Middle Ages. In the beginning of 11th century, Lieberman explains how every man that has displayed homage, has not been proclaimed as a knight. Additionally, the term “knight” wasn’t even an actual term that many European countries used to describe a chivalric man. For this reasoning, Lieberman wanted to answer the questions of what physical acts were involved and how these acts are what makes men defined as knights (Lieberman 398). Throughout many researches about the true meaning of knights, he argues that there’s no single noun that can be related to the notion of
The poem Sir Gawain And The Green Knight was written anonymously around 1375 for the royal court in London. This work is a combination of comedy and satire. The poem also has two plots: "the beheading contest, in which two parties agree to an exchange of blows with a sword or ax, and the temptation, an attempted seduction of the hero by a lady" (Norton, 200). This essay will discuss one description of the setting of the poem, the characters' behavior, and how this courtly society has deteriorated from the ideal.
Sir Malory once again makes us ponder whether this could be true after we witness Lancelot’s actions in “Morte D’Arthur”. Sir Lancelot’s heroism and constant response to King Arthur’s call of duty show us that he is chivalrous. However, once Sir Lancelot “slew Sir Agravain, and after twelve of his fellows” his chivalry was stained (p 444). The controversy of Lancelot’s chivalry is inflamed when his “love for Guinevere drives him into battle” and causes the “deaths of Sir Gareth and Sir Gaheris” (Harrington 67). Is the killing of several people justified by one act of chivalry? Sir Lancelot essentially “modifies his points of honor” in order to justify his actions.(Harrington 69) Sir Lancelot’s need to modify his code of honor in order to escape a predicament let us know that his character is at times
In the reading, Roberts offers an illustration of and an explanation of Fanon's ideas of inherent violence with anti-colonialism. Rather than argue against Fanon's point, he elaborates on the different conditions and types of violence. Roberts names four stages of intrinsic value within violence, which converge with gender divisions and various types of violence. His position gives a new light to violence, as a natural occurrence, rather than something created by men to further anti-colonialism. Revolutionary violence follows suit when colonies fight for liberation.