Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Lord of the flies jack character essay
Holy grail quest king arthur
Lord of the flies jack character analysis essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Lord of the flies jack character essay
Name
Course
Tutor
Date
Characters Analysis: Leadership
The ability to lead is an in-born power, which not everyone enjoys (Maxwell, 12). Some people are great by nature while other people learn leadership qualities as they progress in life. However, a majority of people get into leadership positions with selfish ambitions, and the consequences are unexpected downfalls. For persons who understand why they are in leadership, it ends well with them, unless there is a plot to see them fail. Nonetheless, another major reason for failure in leadership is friends or acquaintances with ill intentions. This paper discusses two main characters Jack (in Lord of the Flies) and King Arthur. In the above characters, two traits that stand out are that they are blinded by the quest/ power hungry, and gutsy. Ideally, they are two outstanding characters with no form of fear for other people and go about doing things, which they believe is right. The fact that they are blinded by the quest means they will do anything while going at all length to see themselves in leadership positions. This also requires some level of huts, and not bothering what other people expect.
The quest for power stands out as one major feature linking these two characters. With this desire they are ready to go at any length in achieving leadership. For instance, King Arthur’s quest for power begins when he offers to compete in the tournament and get the sword (White 34).By accepting the challenge, it implies he can risk his life for an opportunity to heir the throne. It is further imperative to note that there are many viscous people in the competition and they can terminate Arthur’s life, as well. Similarly, Jack’s quest for power begins the moment he sees his frie...
... middle of paper ...
...ower and gutsy. However, there are remarkable differences in Jack’s and Arthur’s approaches to leadership evidenced by what they do. Jack ends up in a leadership position out of jealousy he has for Ralph. For this reason, he leads other boys astray from their main objective in the island. Arthur, however, remains an outstanding leader with qualities that every future leader can emulate. He takes no pride in being harsh to anyone even in his old days. He seems to enjoy leadership and his downfall appears to be mere circumstances, which no one can avoid.
Works Cited
Golding, William. Lord of the Flies: New Educational Edition. New York: Faber &Faber, 2012.
White, T, H. The Once and Future King. New York: Penguin Group US, 2011.
Maxwell, John. The 21 Indispensable Qualities of a Leader: Becoming the Person Others Will Want to Follow. New York: Thomas Nelson Inc., 2007.
The role of a leader is often inaccurately defined as an individual who is in a position to give orders. However, there are enormous differences in the attributes of an outstanding leader, and one of mediocrity. An outstanding leader, above all else, is a role model for their peers. In doing so, a leader of the highest caliber is trustworthy in both their peer’s trust for the leader as well as the leader’s trust of their peers. A leader must also display exceptional skill in communication which transcends speaking and, more importantly, includes listening and consideration to the ideas presented to them. Furthermore, a leader must be supportive of and willing to help their peers build their own strengths. The attributes listed above represent only a small subset of what makes an outstanding leader. Yet,
Jack, William Golding’s antagonist in Lord of the Flies, reveals through his experience on the island that it is an individual’s assertiveness, manipulative abilities, and charisma which dictate who commandeers power and privilege over others, and that possessing these traits often negatively impacts the lives of the people leaders seek to control.
Jack is the leader of the boys choir group in civilization and he is the complete opposite of Ralph. Jack wants to be leader and won’t let anyone stand in his way he rules through fear and shows signs of militarism and dictatorship. He is cruel, sadistic and preoccupied with hunting and killing pigs to help the rest signal for help. His sadism only gets worse throughout the novel, and eventually turns cruelly on the other boys. Jack pretends to show an interest in the rules of order on the island, but he views the differently because they only allow him to inflict punishment. Jack represents greed, savage and the anarchic aspects of man.
Leadership is something that stands out in people. In a group, people tend to look to the strongest person to follow. However, the strongest person may not be the best choice to follow. In Lord of the Flies by William Golding, Ralph and Jack each have leadership qualities. Jack is probably the stronger of the two; however, Ralph is a better leader. He has a better understanding for the boys. He also has more common sense and treats the boys better than Jack.
Hostile demand is not what makes a great leader. Jack doesn't understand priority, and it's seen in chapter four after a ship passes the island and there is no fire to create smoke as a signal. Ralph says, “You let the fire go out.” (Golding 80). Jack's unprioritized guilty mind is noticed here in this quote, “He flushed, conscious of a fault. "The fire's only been out an hour or two. We can light up again--" He noticed Ralph's scarred nakedness, and the sombre silence of all four of them” (Golding 81). This is why it's unreasonable to say that Jack would be a better leader. He is unable to prioritize the needs of their society and of his peers because he doesn't fully understand what it means to be a leader and look at the bigger picture. Jack is the definition of chaos, and with him as a leader, the society would deteriorate quickly without the proper structure that Ralph
In the novel, The Lord of the Flies, leadership is one of the main important qualities. If I had to choose between Jack and Ralph to follow in the story, I would choose Ralph. Although he ended up struggling near the end of the story, I still found him to be a good leader.
Leadership is something that stands out in people; the ability to show courage, initiative, responsibility, and determination. Within a group, people tend to look for an individual with these traits to follow. The main protagonist in William Golding’s novel, Lord of the Flies, Ralph who was immediately elected leader by a group of schoolboys who were stranded on the uninhabited island due to a plane crash, strives to recreate a civilized society to which he was accustomed to previously and apply it to the group of adolescents that accompany him. The qualities of leadership Ralph possess deemed him to be a fitted leader as they are demonstrated throughout the course of the novel by keeping order among the group, appearing confident in his leadership
Throughout William Golding's novel Lord of the Flies there is an ever-present conflict between two characters. Ralph's character combines common sense with a strong desire for civilized life. Jack, however, is an antagonist with savage instincts, which he cannot control. Ralph's goals to achieve a team unit with organization are destroyed by Jack's actions and words that are openly displayed to the boys. The two leaders try to convince the boys that their way of survival is correct.
An individual by the name of Donald McGannon once said, “Leadership is an action, not a position.” In order for a leader to know what needs to be achieved and be able to relentlessly drive to complete it, they must exhibit different qualities and abilities that will be beneficial and vital to their success. This is important in view of the fact that it prompts and inspires others to be able to follow in their example. In Lord of the Flies, by William Golding, after a group of boys crash onto a deserted island, an example of this is seen through Ralph, who best exhibits good leadership qualities that will help bring the boys to safety and rescue. This is especially in comparison to the power-hungry Jack Merridew. The three main leadership qualities
There are always people who, in a group, come out with better qualities to be a leader than others. The strongest people however, become the greater influences which the others decide to follow. However, sometimes the strongest person is not the best choice. Authors often show how humans select this stronger person to give an understanding of the different powers that people can posses over others.
In conclusion, Jack was overall an unique leader and person, he went from killing pigs to killing humans, and being the nicest person, to not so nice. With great power comes great responsibility; having determination, being intelligent, and possessing great outdoors skills, is what Jack had to be, to be a great
In this book, the authors Tom Rath and Barry Conchie examine the question “What are the keys to being an effective leader?” To answer this question they had a team that reviewed data collected from Gallup polls. The data came from interviews from 20,000 senior leaders, over a million teams and more than fifty years of Gallup Polls of the most admired leaders in the world. The authors then had the team do a study of more than 10,000 followers to find out why they follow the influential leaders in their life.
A few positive leadership qualities Jack possesses are qualities such as bravery, authoritativeness and dedication. Jack illustrates bravery when he grabs a hold of the boar and risks getting wounded. The dedication Jack exhibits is apparent throughout the novel by the way he dedicates his time to finding meat for the helpless boys. Lastly, Jack's authoritativeness is depicted when the boys and littuns all obey his orders. Jack's authoritativeness is apparent when he says “Go on!” and the two savages respond together by saying “The chief has spoken” (155). These lines demonstrate that the two savages think highly of Jack and respect his authority. To conclude, Jack Merridew possesses many positive leadership qualities that would make him an effective leader of the group of lost and scared boys.
Out of the many characters in the novel The Other Side of the Bridge the protagonist that I was most sympathetic to was Arthur. Unlike his brother Jake, Arthur was not gifted everything or possess a charm that made others love him instantly and he instead blended into the background and was often overlooked by the others. Arthur’s struggle to gain love and rise from Jake’s shadows made him a character that was much easier to relate to. Jake, on the other hand, was given everything since the moment he was born and was barely subjected to suffering, making it harder to sympathise or root for him. One of the most humiliating acts that Arthur experienced was his rejection from the Canadian Military. He desperately wanted to help his country, create
In King Lear William Shakespeare gives king Lear a very kind personality and a very caring father towards his daughters. King Lear possesses traits that make him a soft person one that is very, calm and gentle hearted. His softness comes out in the beginning when he exclaims he tells his daughters she who loves him the most will get all the land. Lear falls victim to the lies of Reagan and Goneril while he casts out Cordila his only daughter that did not sweet talk him and loves him truly. You learn that his daughters Goneril and Reagan want to betray him so they get the kingdom to themselves. The two evil sisters plot to kill Lear seeing that he is blinded by his love for them and his willingness to help them in times of need. The author betrays lear as king but the reader knows the plot from the beginning on to the end on what his daughters plans are for their father and how it leads into the later parts of the story.