Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Aristotle point of view on art
Art and its impact on society
Aristotle point of view on art
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Aristotle point of view on art
My admiration and reverence for the realm of art continues to grow the more I encounter various works of art, and learn of their origins and significance. Once upon a time I would casually glance at artwork and not think much of it afterwards, but now I can see them with a different appreciation and respect, and that is truly an exciting prospect. There is a quote related to art that now resonates profusely within me, and that quote is by none other than the great Aristotle. Aristotle once said,"The aim of art is to represent not the outward appearance of things, but their inward significance." I may not have understood the level of accuracy this quote entails months ago, but I definitely do now. When we can understand the significance of the …show more content…
The title of this work undoubtedly aids in interpretation. The title of the work is Last Supper, and that is exactly what the work is supposed to be. You can see Jesus at the center of the pic, and you can see he is surrounded by 12 other men, better known as 'The 12 Disciples'. There is definitely a focal point in this work, and rightfully so, there should be a focal point in the depiction of such a historic and profound biblical moment. The focal point in the work is Jesus and He is in the center of everyone. I also noticed that there is a distinct lighting and illumination differentiation between Jesus and the disciples in the picture. Jesus, being the focal point, appears to have the most light shining on Him. This was surely not something you can chalk up to coincidence, and I theorize it was done deliberately. The disciples closest to Jesus in the painting have more light than some of the others further away. I believe if we could see the work as it progresses, then ultimately all the disciples would have light on them and appear illuminating, which metaphorically would showcase the glory of Jesus spreading and radiating on the disciples. I believe the predominant color scheme most likely falls under the umbrella of analogous colors, and the enhancement of the colors utilized gives it a warm yet pretty and aesthetically pleasing sight. The work can be classified as representational since it is surely recognizable for what it is suppose to be, and because it is intended to represent reality. The work is intended to represent the actual last supper and it does a great job in accomplishing
There has been few works of art that have created as much esteem, contestation and conjecture as The Last Supper, which was completed by Da Vinci in 1498. The painting depicts the scene of the last supper of Jesus with his disciples as depicted in the gospel of John 13:21: “When Jesus had said these things, he was troubled in the Spirit, and testified, and said, Verily, verily I say unto you, that one of you shall betray me.” The painting shows all of the disciples, Bartholomew, James, Andrew, Judas, Peter, John, Thomas, James the greater, Philip, Matthew, Jude Thaddeus, and Simon the zealot, all which are surprised by the accusation that Jesus made onto them, as depicted by Leonardo Da Vinci. What is the most captivating about this painting is not what we know, but what we don’t know. In other words, it is the enigma of this painting that enamors.
People can have many different opinions depending on a topic, but what is truly difficult is getting a complete level of understanding from every opinion, or understanding the point of view of each opinion. Even accepting the points of view can be difficult for some people, who believe that their opinions are right. Luckily, people can learn about the other person’s frame of reference, and at the very least understand the topic or the person a little better. This particular topic is art, which is known for its multiple possible perceptions or its many different messages that it can send a person or group of people. In this way, people can learn more about the thought processes and feelings of others. Unfortunately, with differing opinions,
Art is a language of its own and with out he proper understanding, people are like expression goes “left on the outside looking in”. In other words, people without the proper understanding of art, technique and form as well as other elements can’t appreciate a work of art as much as when you understand why an artist painted in the way they did and what they are trying to get across to his audience. Despite artists attempts to try and make their works as viewer friendly as possible, without the understanding and knowledge gained from an art class as this one people will never fully understand the a work of art as it is meant to be.
It is split up into sections, each containing definitions, historical context, factual examples, and in many cases addressed flaws. In the begging of the article, the author provides the readers with his intensions, and ends with a recapitulation, providing the readers with a list of art definitions as the last page. (5b) The article is structured around the concept of having an accurate definition of art and artworlds—analyzes how the earliest art was created by individuals who certainly did not possess the concept, to how modern artists’ decide to alternate the it. (6)The word “Defining” best crystalizes the article. A well-developed concept of art needs to have a stable definition. (7a) Davies supports his article with plenty of experts, but prominently himself, a professor of philosophy and humanities at the University of Auckland, since he contributes not only extensive definitions of art but addressed problems within them. Another prominent expert cited in the article is Robert Stecker, affiliated with the University of Wisconsin and Pennsylvania State University, who examines the meanings and values of contemporary art, and also explains how an artwork at time t if and only it is in one of the central art forms at t and is intended to fulfill a function art had at t then it is an excellent piece of art. Expert Monroe Beardsley, from Cornell University, provides classical statements of aesthetics, with concrete details of how artwork is an arrangement of conditions intended to be able to afford an aesthetic experience. (7b) There are some instances where logic was implied; art demonstrates emotions, skills, and quality. Another instance of logic is that the artworld does not necessarily contain core sets of art forms: fictional narratives, dramas, poetry, picturing, sculpting, music, song,
... be a need for self expression and a desire to understand the perception of others. Whether it is a masterpiece or the simplicity of a mother nurturing a newborn babe, art is in the impact of the experience.
It is said that art is like a mirror to the soul, a way to see what
The Last Temptation of Christ by Martin Scorsese shows the life of Jesus Christ and his struggle such as fear, reluctance, depression, doubt, and fear. However, the movie departs from the accepted Biblical depiction of the life of Jesus Christ. In other words, the movie is remotely derived from the Gospel of John, Luke, Mark, and Mathew. The movie starts with the renunciation that it is not based on the above gospels. Instead the movie is derived from the book, The Last Temptation of Christ by Nikos Kazantzakis. The book focuses on the dual nature of Christ or his humanity (Greydanus).
Leonardo da Vinci used flawless subject matter, form, content, and iconography to create his painting The Last Supper. Leonardo da Vinci painted his interpretation of what the Last Supper looked like through his work of art. In the center of his painting he painted Jesus Christ, the son of God, in the middle of all of his disciples. On each side of him there are an even number of six disciples sitting at a table pointing to themselves and to each other. Da Vinci painted this scene inside of a dark room with three windows, eight doors, and a beautiful outside environment. In order to paint this scene da Vinci used flawless form.
Unlike science, art is subjective. The artist leaves behind a part of himself in his work. Therefore, each piece has its own distinct perspective. Frida Kahlo’s self-portraits show her view on her life, on how she has faced so many struggles, yet managed to be a strong person. When we see or hear or read an artistic creation, it produces a mood such as calm or loud, fear or safety. For example, the Eiffel Tower gives Paris a majestic awe; everyone who passes by feels the strength of the 113-year-old grand structure. Art also has a texture. Photographs reveal much through their textures; grainy surfaces often make the picture more realistic while smooth ones seem softer. When we hear a piece of music or see a film, a rhythm carries us from one part to another. Not just true for these two genres, rhythm is present in any artistic work. These few properties are characteristic of everything we encounter in the world of art, the world of human expression. Most have other special features also. Most of the time, though, we do not think about these characteristics because we do not have enough time to pay attention to anything for more than a few seconds.
The Jewish tradition of the Passover has been very important for the welfare and freedom of the Jews since the Old Testament. Each part of the Passover brings forth the knowledge of what God promises to his people. “The name “Passover” is derived from the Hebrew word Pesach which is based on the root “pass over” and refers to the fact that G-d “passed over” the houses of the Jews when he was slaying the firstborn of Egypt during the last of the ten plagues.” The Christian belief is that the Last Supper fulfills the promise made to the Jews through Jesus Christ. The Passover and the Last Supper are important in understanding the relationship between the Jewish belief and Christian belief. They are also important to help grasp what it means to be free with a God.
Art is not just brushstrokes, a proposal, a melody and not just the movement of a body, in fact, it is all of those things. Art can be done with a group of people or just by an invidious. Art can range from professionals to moochers from creators to thinkers. One piece of art can be expressed in many different ways. An example of this is Shakespeare; the famous tragedy of Romeo and Juliet turned from a piece of writing into a playwright then to a performance play and even now every educational system is required to know a famous piece of work and learn from it. Likewise, Leonardo Da Vinci was an Italian Renaissance polymath who used art to express his unforeseen creative
Aristotle, in his Poetics, states that the creation of art stems in part from the innate desire of man to imitate what he finds to be true:
For over two thousand years, various philosophers have questioned the influence of art in our society. They have used abstract reasoning, human emotions, and logic to go beyond this world in the search for answers about arts' existence. For philosophers, art was not viewed for its own beauty, but rather for the question of how art and artists can help make our society more stable for the next generation. Plato, a Greek philosopher who lived during 420-348 B.C. in Athens, and Aristotle, Plato’s student who argued against his beliefs, have no exceptions to the steps they had to take in order to understand the purpose of art and artists. Though these two philosophers made marvelous discoveries about the existence of art, artists, and aesthetic experience, Plato has made his works more controversial than Aristotle.
The relationship between art and society: Mimesis as discussed in the works of Aristotle, Plato, Horace and Longinus The relationship between art and society in the works of Plato are based upon his idea of the world of eternal Forms. He believed that there is a world of eternal, absolute and immutable Forms (the world of the Ideal) and thought that this is proven by when man is faced with the appearance of anything in the material world, his mind is moved to a remembrance of the Idea or an absolute and immutable version of the thing he sees. It is this moment of recollection that he wonders about the contrast between the world of shadows and the world of the Ideal. It is in this moment of wondering that man struggles to reach the world of Forms through the use of reason. Anything then that does not serve reason is the enemy of man. Given this, it is only but logical that poetry should be eradicated from society. Poetry shifts man’s focus away from reason by presenting man with imitations of objects from the concrete world. Poetry, with its focus on mimesis or imitation, has no moral value. While Plato sees reality as a shadow of a realm of pure Ideas (which in turn is copied by art), Aristotle sees reality as a process of partially realized forms moving towards their ideal realizations. Given this idea by Aristotle, the mimetic quality of art is redefined as the duplication of the living process of nature and its need to reach its potential form.
As complex as the topic of art is, I define art as an act of expressing our feelings, thoughts, and observations in our daily lives. Famous French artist, Edgar Degas, had once said, “ Art is not what you see, but what you make others see.” In other words, creating art, is the ability to open a person’s eye-mind, allowing them to interpret their own meaning. Degas’ definition combined with my own, is an explanation of how different people see different things in their interpretation of everything they see, either it be from books to art work or events that happen in our everyday lives. I chose my definition of art combined with Degas’s definition because art, profoundly, means being able to let our emotions out in the form of any concept we