Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Leadership styles and their effects
Different types of leadership styles and when each are effective and ineffective
Strength of leadership styles
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Leadership styles and their effects
According to Kellerman, he believes that within the roles of bad leaders can fall into two basic categories, “bad as in ineffective and bad as in unethical.” This is true that there are leaders in the world that can be considered to be bad but who is the judge weather a leader is bad. Kellerman feels that the best way to determine & pin-point if a leader is mad we will look at the seven subdivided into seven smaller groups to determine a leader is bad.
The seven smaller groups that would fall under Kellerman’s belief of what makes a leader bad would include: incompetent leadership, rigid leadership, intemperate leadership, callous leadership, corrupt leadership, insular leadership and evil leadership. How do these seven different categorizes provide a bad influence on the leader and their followers? If a leader is consider be in the position of a being an Incompetent leadership, this will mean the leader lacks either the idea of the will power or skill to effectively more their orgazaiation forward. While the first three forms of leadership that were mentioned because it focuses on how the leader’s personally can are ineffective to lead their group to success. On the other hand, the four other types of leadership skills that were mentioned
…show more content…
He was enabled to adopt a vision and concentrate on the bigger picture that eventually helped claim a strong victory for his nation. Although some felt that Churchill was a ruthless leader that didn’t take no for answer was able to perform his democrat leader duties not even from a totalitarian dictator could stand his way. With his communication skills, innovation and trustworthiness made his followers strongly believe in him and eventually becoming the one of the greatest leader in history. Despite Churchill being considered to be a ruthless leader, he knew what Hitler was doing was completely wrong and was able to put an end to
Like I said before, he uses his words to paint a picture of everything, which leads to manipulation. Using detailed descriptions, Churchill is able to manipulate everyone who watched or listened to his speech. The tone of seriousness that Churchill uses hypnotized some people, as well as his words did. He uses words to manipulate people into actually realizing how bad Hitler is, and what the Nazis planned to do. “Behind all this glare, behind all this storm, I see that a small group of villainous men who plan, organize, and launch their cataract of horrors upon mankind” (Churchill). Furthermore, Churchill was very well-respected in Britain, and was given the name “the British bulldog” for his work ethic and fearlessness. People believed what he was saying because of his reputation, along with the details and language he provided. He used everything he could, and this led to powerful manipulation from
One may wonder exactly what it is that qualities a strong leader possesses. A strong leader is determined, and strong willed. They must be of good judgment, and without bias. They cannot easily be persuaded, and they are firm, yet at the same time, a good lead must also empathize with his subordinates, and have the best interest at heart for said subordinates, at all times. However, with that being said, a good leader cannot be afraid to discipline his subordinates when necessary. Unmistakably, being a leader is a very difficult feat – one which not everyone can accomplish. A leader must be an authority, a friend and a counsellor, all at once. They must be responsible, and always take into account the disadvantages of a situation. Not everyone is suitable to be a leader, whereas, just about anybody can be a good role model.
The tension he was partial responsible for creating with the US, led to both countries developing new technologies. He also led to the arms race, creating a new type of warfare throughout the entire world. This war helped change the path of the world. (Arms
“Before you are a leader, success is all about growing yourself. When you become a leader, success is all about growing others” (Welch). Leadership is inspiring others to learn more, do more, and become more. Ineffective fail to possess certain characteristics which effective leaders do. Willingness to help others, selflessness, and strictness; these are the qualities of a both good and effective leader. Without these qualities, leadership would fail and being a leader would mean nothing.
...spects of what makes up an effective leader, it is clear that there cannot be one clear- cut and dry definition of what a leader is. A leader is a make up of many different attributes and qualities. An effective Leader encompasses all of the attributes which go along with facilitating ideas and allowing an organization to grow and flourish, as well as inspiring and motivating those he or she oversees to do the same. A Leader has the ability and almost the reflex action to surface when it is time for a difficult task to be accomplished or a difficult decision to be made. Leadership may be a type of management but a manager is not always a leader. “Leadership is the art of accomplishing more than the science of management says is possible.”
In conclusion, Winston Churchill was a confident and big achiever. His life started out bumpy but he knew his worth so he was able to overcome the challenges. Winston Churchill took on similar roles of his father but he did not have his support. He was able to explore and experience things that not everyone was able to do back in his time. Although some people did not want him to become a prime minister, he kept pushing to be the best. Two of his biggest achievements were becoming the Prime Minister of Britain and leading Britain to victory in World War II. His literary works caught a lot of people’s attention as well. Many people were able to purchase his famous book titled, “The Second World War”. He was praised by many people for his great achievements. Winston Churchill’s braveness and leadership is what made him successful.
Adolf Hitler came into the lime light as a man with a totally reputable objective and the antidote for poverty in Germany after the war. Hitler actually seemed to be living up to his word as he rebuilt the country and so Germans gave his more and more power.
Kellerman, B. (2004). Bad Leadership: What it is, How it Happens, Why it Matters. Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard Business Press.
...nd his wife hardly had time to spend together. A quote that stands out is the quote that he made at his first inaugural Address on March 4th, 1933 where he said, “ The only thing we have to fear is fear itself.” He gave hope and a sense of pride to the American people that everything was going to be alright even in a time such as the Great Depression and with the future uncertain. It takes a great leader to accomplish what Franklin D. Roosevelt had accomplished and not every president that is put in the same situation can achieve the success that he has accomplished, even with a disability that might feel limiting. It is not easy being a leader with everyone looking up too you and expecting you to know every move. Being a great leader is taking what you are dealt with and turning it into greatness and Franklin D. Roosevelt is an exceptional example of a leader.
Barbara Kellerman is a unique theorist – she was one of the first theorists to focus the bulk of her research on something overlooked by other researchers: followers. Kellerman (2005) sees leadership in a way few others do: as a relationship that exists between leaders and followers and the context in which that relationship operates. By that logic followership must be an extension of leadership, rather than a result of it.
Leadership is the action of leading a group of people or an organization. Leadership is leading a group of people or company to reach a result or further and the organization. A leader is supposed to be an example of how all employees are expected to act and what they should be striving for. Good leaders also don’t use their position within a company to take advantage of the company and its employees. A good leader is supposed to be able to perform their job with high standards, efficiency, and honor. However, for every good leader, there are bad leaders and the worse the leader the more detrimental he or she becomes to employees and the company they run. Poor leadership skills can ultimately ruin a company 's chance of success. The attitude
Some scholars have categorized followers based on their behaviors and roles under different leadership styles. The benign followers serve their leader without questioning their actions, which can have a destructive outcome. If subordinates blindly follow bad leaders, it defines that they lack the insight to distinguish between good and bad leader. While some followers are there to serve their leader 's ego, malevolent followers are seeking opportunities to defeat the leader and take over his role out of greed and envy (Uhl-Bien et al., 2014). The followers play different roles to improve the follower-leader relationship. Some followers play the interactive role by supporting the leader. This role can have a positive or negative impact depending on the leadership. The followers who play the independent role are independent with high level of competency to complement the role of the leader. During the leadership process, the role of the leader and the followers can change depending on the situation, which has been defined as a shifting role. The followers play a key role in the leadership process, which can be very influential and powerful. The followers have to be aware of their leader 's practice and use of power to avoid pitfalls as a result of misuse of power by the leaders. Uhl-Bien et al. (2014), identified four types of leadership
Many Scholars characterize the core qualities and skills necessary for an effective leader. Useem defines leadership as “Creating a vision and translating that vision into actions”. Historically, an effective leader was assumed to be exceptionally knowledgeable, authoritative, and dominate. Those leaders applied the command and control method to lead an organization. With the passage of time, this definition has been changed. The modern definition of an effective leader is honest, courageous, trustworthy, inspirational, and result-oriented. Today’s leaders create shared values and vision, and empower others to achieve their targets.
Number of leaders from movies like Captain Queeg, Gordon Gekko, Daniel Dravot, Dorfman are all flawed leaders in some way or the other who are not considered most effective. I choose Gordon Gekko who is a flawed leader form the movie Wall Street to describe his “dark side” characteristics and show how he might fall into Kellerman’s types of bad leader, suffer from narcissistic tendencies, fall short of ethics etc. According to Kellerman’s type of bad leadership, a callous leader is uncaring, harsh and ignores the needs of the folowers and the organization. An insular leader disregards the welfare of the group. Gordon Gekko exhibits the same characteristics. He is portrayed as a very greedy person, least bothered about the many number of
...ason Hitler rose up and became one of the most charasmatic and respected leader at the time, this was due to many different factors which each played a key role in his rise to power. From the great depression in 1929 to the date of becoming Chancellor in 1933, Hitler managed to seize power by decieving the population and making them believe that he was the solution. From the long term causes to the immédiate causes Hitler managed to build himself up to become one of the most powerfully people in Germany.