Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Gender equality in the law
Gender equality united states
Gender equality united states
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
JPMorgan Chase seems to be in a legal bind this year and possibly needs to review their policies and procedures. Following in the wake of a discrimination lawsuit, JPMorgan is now being sued by their female working force. In mid-2012, JPMorgan failed to equally compensate 93 female workers that held such positions as application developers, project managers, and technology directors. The workers claim that men working in the same positions were being paid more for identical work being performed. The female employees advised that JPMorgan failed to ensure that the compensation system was fair and just. The employees are currently seeking lost pay and salary adjustments. JPMorgan stated that it is committed to diversity in the workplace …show more content…
The lawsuit was a discrimination case filed, stating that JPMorgan discriminated against possibly thousands of African American and Hispanic mortgage borrowers. The bank was said to have charged higher mortgage interest rates and fees compared to white borrowers. This was a bold move because it is such a blatant form of discrimination. JPMorgan just received praise for its diversity efforts, so it is strange that they are now in such legal hot water. When on their website, they state they rate one hundred percent on the human rights campaign for corporate equality, voted best company for multicultural women for eleven years straight, and one of only three megabanks listed worldwide. The article is an example of Title VII in this module. This case is a prime example of sex discrimination. The law blatantly states that you cannot discriminate based on race, color, religion, sex, and national origin. By the information given so far, I believe the women have a solid case against the bank. I would like to see the evidence that they have presented to evaluate just how far the discrimination with this company has gone. The article does not advise on the pay differential and how the knowledge was
This case is based on Mrs. Jennifer Sharkey, who sued J.P. Morgan & Co. (JCMC), Mr. Kenny, Mr. Green, and Mrs. Lassiter, alleging breach of contract and violations of the SOX anti-retaliation statute. The facts started when Mrs. Sharkey was assigned to a Suspect Client 's account where members of JPMC expressed to her their concern regarding to this account because they suspected that the Suspect Client was involved in illegal activities. After Mrs. Sharkey’s investigation, she claimed that she informed her conclusions to superiors Mr. Kenny, Mr. Green, and Mrs. Lassiter, of the Suspect Client 's potential unlawful activities, such as: money laundering, mail fraud, bank engaged in fraud, and violations of federal securities laws. After
To resolve the gender wage gap, the government should consult with employers in federally-regulated sectors to apply a gender-based analysis to the design, development, implementation and evaluation of the policy. The law should clearly outline the systematic discrimination that women face in the workforce. This policy would entail employers to determine whether gender-based disparities exists and reevaluate the current pay system from an equity perspective to ensure and promote pay transparency. The law of ensuring pay equity should first be applied to the public sector, including federal public servants, employees of Crown cooperation and federally regulated companies. After this law has been found to be effective, it is also recommended that private corporations follow the same suit and comply with the pay equity
There were a few issues of fairness presented in Michael Simpson’s case that happens in in real world work places that prevents employees from working to their full potential or causing them to leave the work place all together. In this case study Michael Simpson is faced with the dilemma of whether or not he should leave Avery McNeil, the accounting at which he is currently working at. Simpson had interviewed with many consulting firms before graduating college, and had chosen Avery McNeil because it had the potential to allow him the most rapid advancement in his career. Within two years of working their he was promoted to manager and he received a great pay raise. However, a few days later Simpson came upon a sheet with pay grades of other
Sex Discrimination in the American Workplace: Still a Fact of Life. (2000, July 01). Retrieved from National Women's Law Center : www.nwlc.org
This involved sacking of all the employees who had involved themselves in the scam and ensuring that they faced the full force of the law as it is required under the law. A back with such kind of reputation to be implicated in a huge scandal like the one it was involved cannot be looked upon lightly. The news posts suggest that such acts and those who were involved should not be left to go scot free as they have gained a lot from the scandal. The news post also questions the code of ethics in operation in the bank. Ideally, bank staffs are supposed to observe high levels of disciplines especially when the customers are involved. The employees’ actions were a manifestation of how weak the code of conduct with which the bank is applying is and therefore needs a lot of
JPMorgan Chase & Co. is one of the world’s largest and well-known financial institutions. The firm was founded in New York in 1799. JPMorgan Chase & Co. was built on the foundation of past institutions that have come together throughout the years to form the firm that JPMorgan Chase & Co. is today. JPMorgan Chase & Co. is a global financial service firm with operations in more than 50 countries. The firm is a leader in investment banking, financial services for consumers, small business and commercial banking, financial transaction processing, asset management, and private equity. JPMorgan Chase & Co. serves millions of consumers in the United States and many corporate institutions.
Marco “Marlo Kaitlin,” a former Wells Fargo employee, claims she was harassed and mocked to the point that brought her near to suicide. Her lawsuit against Wells Fargo was filed with Los Angeles Superior Court last July 14th. She alleged wrongful termination, discrimination, harassment, hostile work environment, retaliation, and intentional and negligent infliction of emotional distress on the part of Wells Fargo. She claims it all started with her decision to transition from a man to a woman.
The 1987 Supreme Court ruling in Johnson v. Transportation Agency, Santa Clara County was pivotal supporting company’s affirmative action plans. In this particular case, a woman, Diane Joyce, was promoted to a position at the Santa Clara County Transportation Agency over several men of equal qualifications. A male, Paul Johnson, received a right-to-sue letter from the EEOC and filed suit that he was discriminated against for his sex and it violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
This decision is unfair to victims of pay discrimination. It ignored the truths of the workplace. Employees generally are no informed enough about what their co-workers earn,
Schipani, C. (2013). Class Action Litigation After Dukes: In Search of a Remedy for Gender Discrimination in Employment. University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform, 46(4), 1249-1277.
Women are more than half the work force and are graduating at higher rates then men and continue to earn considerably less then men. There are several contributing factors to the gender wage gap. Women experience gender discrimination in the work force even though it’s been illegal since the Equal Pay Act in 1963. One of the challenges for women is uncovering discrimination. There is a lack of transparency in earnings because employees are either contractually prohibited or it’s strongly discouraged from being discussed. Discrimination also occurs in the restricting of women’s access to jobs with the highest commission payments, or access to lucrative clients.
The suit is being issued by the DOJ, but clearly being driven by American Express and Discover respectively. These companies, the two remaining credit card brands that make up the main players in the industry, have much to gain in a judgement against Visa and MasterCard. To understand the issues, and stakes a basic understanding of the current industry structure is necessary.
Discrimination at work is a touchy issue. Most people, if not all, have experienced some sort or form of it and they ignored it, quit, or got fired from their job. Women tend to be more emotional than men and when women are judged and discriminated they are offended by it immediately. Also, the fact of women getting a lower income than men for the same job is almost unbelievable. It is very important to be concerned on the issue because it is constantly increasing throughout the United States. It upsets me that women are paid less than men because women have the same ability and work ethic as men do, but they are looked at differently. According to AAUW, women are making 77 percent of what men make. This rate hasn’t changed since 2002 (Hill, 2013). Statistics show that women will never make as much as men due to the thought of never being comparable to men (Williams, 2013).
Such as many women couldn’t get cash rewards, month or year of the employee award, and other benefits, however their male coworker receive all of these.
Another problem women have in the workplace is getting promotions. Woman who have worked for their company for many years, receiving great reviews and employee-of-the-year awards are often filled by less qualified men (Armour, 2008). The next problem women face is unfair pay. The U.S Bureau of Labor Statistics found that women working 41 to 44 hours per week earn 84.6 percent of what men working similar hou...