Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Employment law case studies
Aspects of employment law
Legal aspects of employment
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Marco “Marlo Kaitlin,” a former Wells Fargo employee, claims she was harassed and mocked to the point that brought her near to suicide. Her lawsuit against Wells Fargo was filed with Los Angeles Superior Court last July 14th. She alleged wrongful termination, discrimination, harassment, hostile work environment, retaliation, and intentional and negligent infliction of emotional distress on the part of Wells Fargo. She claims it all started with her decision to transition from a man to a woman.
Throughout the negotiations, part of Gallegos’ case was dismissed due to a long history of job performance issues and absenteeism. Wells Fargo claimed that they had a strong commitment dating back 25 years to the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender community. They also publicly stated that they believed discrimination of any kind against any group is wrong. They responded to Gallegos’ allegations by stating that the claims were wrong and inconsistent with how Wells Fargo treats its employees.
Facts of the Case According to the Lawsuit:
• When Gallegos was hired for the Wells Fargo El Monte consumer call Center in August of 2010, she presented herself to the public as a male.
• In December 2010, Gallegos began taking testosterone blocker and other hormones designed to help
…show more content…
Gallegos’ attempts to transfer to another area at work (the Spanish speaking call center) were mocked, but she was given the new position. Yet colleagues immediately began using demeaning comments (i.e. “I thought he was just an ugly woman!” and nicknaming Gallegos “The Mask.”) Gallegos again lodged a complaint with a supervisor, but saw no appropriate response. She eventually changed her name from Marco to Marlo
MILLERSBURG — After deliberating for three hours, a jury of four women and eight men found a Holmesville man guilty of making and possessing methamphetamine, all within the vicinity of juveniles and a school.
Analysis / Ruling of the Court. The district court granted the employer’s motion for summary judgement on the sexual harassment claim due to the fact that Sherry Lynch treated both men and women equally in this case; that is, she behaved in the same vulgar and inappropriate way towards both genders. For this reason, Smith’s gender was not a contributing factor to the harassment, which is one of the conditions that would have to be met for the sexual harassment claim. The appellate court agreed and affirmed the district court’s judgement. The district court ended up excluding evidence pertaining to the sexual harassment claim because the sexual harassment claim had been dismissed on summary judgement, and because the court decided that the details of the harassment bore little relevance to the retaliation case whereas this evidence would be unfairly prejudicial to Hy-Vee. The appellate court affirmed the district court’s judgement. Smith did not offer any specifics on what evidence she would have wanted to present, which made it hard for the court to determine whether this evidence was material to the retaliation case or not. In her opposition to the motion in limine, she said she only wanted to discuss the harassment case in general, including mentioning that Lynch had harassed/touched her inappropriately. Hy-Vee had no objection to this, and Smith got to present this much evidence in the trial. Therefore, the appellate court found that she waived any objection to the
First of all, they will not be able to buy tangible properties such as house, car and etc. because of that their credit ratings got a huge hit. Moreover, only 5,300 of the employees that were fired from the Bank, 10% were Managers. What could have motivated them to engage in this sham? This is not an attempt to imply all were of malicious but certainly most them led the way. The aggressive sales goals pushed employees to break the rules. “On average one percent 1 percent of employees have not done the right thing, and we terminated them. I don’t want them here if they don’t represent the culture of the company,” says John Stumpf, the company’s longtime chief executive, in an interview with The Washington Post. It is obvious that simple employees and managers could not break the law if someone from the top did not allow them to do so. But the executive board of Wells Fargo claimed that they only fired 1 percent of below employees and some managers for fraudulent accounts, however they also might be involved in that business crime although to build a case against a company executive, prosecutors would have to show “they knew there was a plan to create false accounts to drive up sales,” said Brandon L. Garret, a professor at the University of Virginia School of Law. Even if it appears that the executive purposefully attempted to avoid knowing about the fraud, prosecutors may be able to build a case. Because they don’t have to participate if there is willful
One of the most recent white-collar crime involved Wells Fargo, a banking and financial services provider. In 2016 San-Francisco based bank Wells Fargo (WFC) employees secretly created millions of unauthorized bank and credit card accounts without permission of their customers. Opening about 1.5 million fraudulent deposit accounts and submitting 565,443 credit card applications allowed Wells Fargo employees to boost their sales targets and receive bonuses. Consequently, customers were wrongly charged fees for accounts they did not know existed. In this business crime scenario, Wells Fargo involved to pay $185 million in fines and refund $5 million to affected customers. Also, around 5,300
UST Inc. is a dominant player in the smokeless tobacco industry. We have been tasked with weighing the cost and benefits of having leverage in their capital structure and to advise the CEO whether or not to go ahead with the recapitalization. After solving for UST’s credit ratings and value given three different stock buyback scenarios, $700 million, $1 billion, and $1.5 billion, we would suggest that UST move forward with the recap at $1 billion.
Employees were using the cross-selling which is a concept of attempting to sell multiple products to consumers. This concept led to fraudulent actions, in fact employees were encouraged to order credit cards for pre-approved customers without their consent, and to use their own contact information when filling out requests to prevent customers from discovering the fraud. " The Wells Fargo scandal was far different. Instead of a select few doing bad things, the unethical behavior was widespread at the bank, with thousands of employees engaged in secretly creating new bank and credit-card accounts for customers without their knowledge, resulting in overdraft and other fees." (Kouchaki, 2016). According to the Los Angeles City Attorney, employees were opening and funding accounts without customers' permission or knowledge in order to "satisfy sales goals and earn financial rewards under the bank's incentive-compensation program." This means that the board members of the bank were aware of that it wasn't by the employees' own wills. In fact, they were pressured by aggressive goals and performance which led them to immoral behaviors. Facing this problem, Wells Fargo bank had to take some measures to avoid bankruptcy, losing customers, or loosing brand
One of the key issues Forked River Brewing Company will face is the distribution channels of bottled beers. Although the operations of retail sales ran smoothly in the past, the company still need to focus on the problem in the future. The sales through LCBO and Beer Stores are limited because of limited shelf space. In order to enlarge customer base and increase sales, the company should solve the problem in the future.
In January 2011, The City of Kansas City, MO lost its second multi-million dollar employment discrimination lawsuit in a one-week period. The former city employees, Jordan Griffin and Coleen Low, were awarded $345,000 and $517,000 respectively by the jury. Griffin, a former Senior Analyst and Commissioner of Revenue, says she was given the nickname “White Chocolate” in the false belief she would favor minority hires. She also says she was harassed when she refused to participate in the biased-hiring process and was overlooked for an interview for the Commissioner of Revenue position on a permanent basis because it was already “pre-determined” that the position would be filled by an African American. When the then Senior Analyst Low spoke up on her colleague’s behalf, she says the city laid her off as well. The city’s, assistant attorney, said the city did nothing wrong and that the city was forced to layoff another 73 people that year due to the slump in the economy (Evans). Did Griffin and Low deserve the money they were compensated and does reverse discrimination exist?
Cramer came out right after talking about Wells Fargo code of ethics. The code of ethics states that Wells Fargo will act with responsibility such as honesty and integrity and that they
Although Wells Fargo has maneuvered the recent crisis very responsibly and prudent, it is lumped together with other Wall Street firms and their failure during the crisis. Its’ reputation, as the reputation of any firm on Wall Street, has suffered. The trust in Wall Street firms is destroyed It is believed that the economic crisis was triggered by failures in leadership; we are in a so-called leadership crisis, meaning that the majority of the American public doesn’t have trust in their leaders anymore, and neither do employees trust their managers. This leadership crisis influences the productivity of banks, as can be seen at the falling stock value of Wells Fargo. Therefore, to guarantee enduring productivity, Wells Fargo has to adjust some managerial aspects because only a strong leadership provides a stable future and avoid another crisis.
Filotea de la Cruz, a female. Sor Juana bashes on the fact that he who despises women
...y couple who co-habituate. Hal is the breadwinner of the Goldsmith family and it would be devastating if he were unable to provide financially if fired because of his sexual orientation. Not only could the lack of discrimination policy create money hardship but also have the potential to deny the family access to necessary healthcare.
The Wells Fargo scandal started in 2016 when it came to light that starting back in 2011 employees created over 1.5 million fraudulent bank
There are two main problems that led up to the scandal. The first problem is that the CEO of Wells Fargo at the time, Stumpf, was pressuring the employees to meet specific and almost impossible sales goals. Stumpf made it seem like the employees must meet the goals he expects otherwise there will be consequences (“Wells Fargo Fake Accounts,” 2017). The first problem of Stumpf pressuring the employees ties into the second main problem of why and how this scandal occurred. The second problem is that because Stumpf pressured the employees to meet goals, the employees felt that they needed to meet those expected goals no matter what it takes. In result, many employees created fake accounts and set up credit cards illegally because the employees did not let the customers know what they were doing and did not get the permission from customers to do so (“Wells Fargo Fake Accounts,” 2017). The evidence that I have to support the identification of these problems include credible sources through online databases, journal articles, and more specifically Forbes, Fortune, and Wells Fargo online websites. This is a very well-known scandal that occurred recently so in the future I know that there will be even more evidence that ties to the scandal, but there is a lot of relevant and reliable information about this scandal that occurred a little over
During the past year Wells Fargo, a well-recognized bank of the United States, has been trying to clean its name and the mess it got itself into, when it was brought to the public that the bank was involved in generating fraudulent checking and savings accounts for its clients without their knowledge or their authorization. “The way it worked was that employees moved funds from customers' existing accounts into newly-created ones without their knowledge or consent”