Key Issues One of the key issues Forked River Brewing Company will face is the distribution channels of bottled beers. Although the operations of retail sales ran smoothly in the past, the company still need to focus on the problem in the future. The sales through LCBO and Beer Stores are limited because of limited shelf space. In order to enlarge customer base and increase sales, the company should solve the problem in the future. Another key issue is the high tax rate on alcoholic drinks if they produce more than 50,000 hectolitres. If the company keep growing, they cannot control their production under 50,000 hectolitres in the long term. Therefore, the high tax rate cannot be avoided and the tax will have a big impact on the profitability of the company since they were paying only one-10th of what large beer enterprises pay.
Implementable Strategic Alternatives
Alternative #1: Focus differentiation and creating a joint venture with Molson Coors Canada with more than 51% of the total shares. The company will keep focus on the craft beer industry and differentiate their products in the short run. One of the weaknesses of Fork River is distribution, they could overcome the problem with a joint venture with Molson Coors Canada. Molson Coors is one of the shareholders of the Beer Store which has a monopoly on selling
…show more content…
During the first two-year cooperation, the company should distribute its products to Eastern Canada. The joint venture should sell the craft beers to the whole nation and expand its customer base. The Molson Coors Canada could help Forked River to advertise its high-quality craft beers using its high brand awareness. Forked River should learn advanced brewing technologies from Molson Coors to increase production volumes, improve product quality and reduce manufacturing
The strengths of Creemore Springs are their access to natural spring water, unique recipe, and reputation for producing high quality beer. This reputation has earned them numerous awards since their induction in 1987. Creemore Spring’s weaknesses is their current, complex cleaning process which results in broken and chipped bottles. Opportunities available to Creemore Springs include the municipal sewer service that would provide them with financial savings when disposing of their effluent water. The current threats to Creemore Spring’s successful operation are the two major beer brands that control 90% of the beer market and the bottle cleaning contracts lack of quality control.
Quality of products can be quoted as one prime quality that can be observed in both the companies. Manufacturing products that are environmental friendly is another common and a beautiful aspect that is common among the two companies. Molson Coors, being an old company is driven mostly by its values whereas Anheuser Busch is moving forward with the motto of “dreaming big” [1]. Both the organizations treat the employees in a good manner making them feel like they are a part of the organization and providing them with the necessary amenities required. Passion and Integrity are a few ground values on which both the companies rely on. Values such as Creativity of Molson Coors sometimes result in a product that might not gain popularity among the customers which would result in the loss of time, thinking and money invested in getting the product out. On the other hand, Anheuser Busch is growing popularity day by day by setting up high goals and working hard to make its presence
95% of beer was distributed through a three-tier system: producer - wholesaler - retailer. Since there were about 6 thousand brands and the retails stores could only carry forty - fifty brands, it was quite difficult to persuade distributors to deal with the MCB products. However, the distinct packing drove much of distributors' attention to Zebra beer.
Belgium is known for a culture of high-quality beer and this concept was formulated by an electrical engineer from Fort Collins, Colorado. The electrical engineer, Jeff Lebesch, was traveling through Belgium on his fat-tired mountain bike when he envisioned the same high-quality beer in Colorado. Lebesch acquired the special strain of yeast used in Belgium and took it back to his basement in Colorado and the experimentation process was initiated. His friends were the samplers and when they approved the beer it was marketed. In 1991, Lebesch opened the New Belgium Brewing Company (NBB) with his wife, Kim Jordan, as the marketing director. The first beer and continued bestseller, Fat Tire Amber Ale, was named after the bike ride in Belgium. The operation went from a basement to an old railroad depot and then expanded into a custom-built facility in 1995. The custom-built facility included an automatic brew house, quality-assurance labs and technological innovations. NBB offers permanent, seasonal and one-time only beers with a mission to be a lucrative brewery while making their love and talent visible. In the cases presented by the noted authors (Ferrell & Simpson, 2008), discusses the inception, marketing strategy, brand personality, ethics and social responsibility that New Belgium Brewing Company has demonstrated. The key facts with New Belgium Brewing Company are the marketing strategy, promotion, internal environment and social responsibility with the critical issues of the public, brand slogan, growth and competition.
This report addresses the issue of whether Amsterdam Brewery should invest and promote new products or continue to focus on current products. And, whether Jeff Carefoote should pay attention to whole brands or spent expense to increase brewing capacity. The report describes a strategic plan to ensure Amsterdam Brewery’s competitiveness in the market.
Business Problem and Recommended Solution Intrigued by the opportunity to own his business, Larry Brownlow must decide whether a distributorship opportunity with Coors is a worthy venture. To aid Larry in his decision, the following pages provide an assessment of this business opportunity. With a limited research budget of $9,500 (p.143), careful selection of reports was essential to obtain both the necessary data to project profitability (e.g., revenues, cost of sales, other expenses, Coors projected market share, retail pricing data) and to provide a qualitative, consumer-focused perspective that would give these quantitative projections a solid foundation. Considering the given financial background, if Larry does not go forward with this investment, we assume he will choose to continue earning annual income from his trust at $40,000 per year (p.143). However, if he goes forward with the investment, he will cash in on the entire trust and take a significant financial risk.
Strives to be the leader in micro brewing while maintaining the core values it started with and had employee buy in even before it went” 100 % employee owned in2013” (Gorski, 2013).
Deutsche Brauerei has been a family owned and operated corporation for 12 generations, which has created a high level of focus and control. Each generation has kept the management and operations processes relatively simple, centered on brewing practices and quality. Deutsche Brauerei’s rapid growth in recent years can be attributed to several factors. First and foremost, the company’s success is centered on the product itself, which has won numerous quality awards and is quite popular in Germany. Another contributing factor to the recent growth may have been a bit inadvertent. The purchase of new equipment in 1994, which was necessary as a result of a fire that destroyed the old equipment, allowed the company to increase brewing capacity and efficiency. Finally, Deutsche Brauerei’s decision to enter the Ukranian market in 1998 contributed significantly to the rapid growth. The collapse of the U.S.S.R. brought market reforms, and Deutsche Brauerei jumped on the opportunity to enter the fragmented beer industry, capture the large population and capitalize on the prime location in Europe. Lukas Schweitzer was savvy enough to hire local expert Oleg Pinchuk away from a competitor as the marketing manager, and Oleg was instrumental in building the business in Ukraine by securing accounts and implementing the field warehousing to support distributors. Deutsche’s beer was hugely popular in the Ukraine almost immediately, and volume sales more than offset the depreciation of the Ukrainian currency. Sales in Ukraine accounted for 28% of Deutsche’s total sales, and skyrocketed from 4,262 euros in 1998 to 25,847 euros in 2001.
Senior Management of PepsiCo is evaluating the potential acquisition of two companies – Carts of Colorado and California Pizza Kitchen – in order to expand the company’s restaurant business. If indeed PepsiCo decides to pursue the acquisition of one or both, they must decide how to align each of these business units in its historically decentralized management approach and how to forge relationships between the acquired business units and existing business units. In their evaluation, Senior Management is faced with the question of whether the necessary capital investment in order to purchase one or both of the businesses can be profitable for each of the acquired business units, but must also take into consideration that the additional business units will not hinder the profitability of the existing business units.
to reinvent themselves and build a long-term relationship with their shareholders. On June 23, 1998 Molson reacqui...
The beverage industry is highly competitive and presents many alternative products to satisfy a need from within. The principal areas of competition are in pricing, packaging, product innovation, the development of new products and flavours as well as promotional and marketing strategies. Companies can be grouped into two categories: global operations such as PepsiCo, Coca-Cola Company, Monster Beverage Corp. and Red Bull and regional operations such as Ro...
When I think of corporation culture I think of vision, beliefs, values having a united front and activities of member within the company that affect society and the environment. A company’s leadership provides the vision and support needed for ethical conduct, in order to be successful. As well as to maintain a good relationship with society companies needs plans and structure for addressing ethical concerns. (Ferrell et al, 2013 p.219)
Keurig Green Mountain in many ways has delivered on all of key goals and priorities. Green Mountain Coffee (GMC) has welcomed a significant number of new brands into the Keurig® family; launched the Keurig® 2.0 system and accelerated new product innovation; implemented continuous productivity and efficiency enhancements throughout the company’s operations; and began the process of globalizing the Company with the launch in the U.K. At the same time, we generated significant value for shareholders by investing behind organic growth and returning nearly $1.2 billion to shareholders via dividends and share repurchases.
Compared to the industry as a whole, Mondavi is not responding to the changing marketplace and demands. While there has been some growth in the ultra and luxury premium market segments, the explosion in the last 15 years had been in the popular premium ($3-7 per bottle) and super-premium ($7-14) sector. Mondavi’s own Woodbridge offering is responsible for 76% of its case volume and 57% of its revenue as of 2001, but seemingly exists in isolation amidst all the high-end offerings from the company. Competitors that have established themselves in jug wine, beer, and other spirits are taking advantage of their sales volume and migrating upward. While E&J Gallo, Constellation, and the beer producers may not have the reputation for quality and craft that RMW possesses, their substantial financial weight has allowed them to develop or purchase brands that could compete in the higher altitudes and price segments. Meanwhile, competitors with similar histories in premium winemaking are taking advantage of lower production costs to horizontally integrate, acquire land, and build new wineries in different countries, as Kendall Jackson has done with the Villa Arceno (Italy) and Yangarra Park (Australia) wines.
Relationships with interest groups and the public policy makers has been one of the many things that the Boston Beer Company has strived to maintain and expand. The company realizes that these relationships are critical for the future success of the company. Being in the brewing industry the policies and publics opinion can influence the changes in future policies and procedures that would affect the industry. Developing and maintaining the relationships with the interest groups as well as the policy makers could prove to be very beneficial to not only the company but the brewing industry as a whole.