Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Investment analysis and portfolio management
Stock investment analysis
Essays regarding investment analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Investment analysis and portfolio management
Business Problem and Recommended Solution Intrigued by the opportunity of owning his business, Larry Brownlow must decide whether a distributorship opportunity with Coors is a worthy venture. To aid Larry with his decision, the following pages provide an assessment of this business opportunity. With a limited research budget of $9,500 (p.143), careful selection of reports was essential to obtain both the necessary data to project profitability (e.g., revenues, cost of sales, other expenses, Coors projected market share, retail pricing data) and to provide a qualitative, consumer-focused perspective that would give these quantitative projections a solid foundation. Considering the given financial background, if Larry does not go forward with this investment, we assume he will choose to continue earning annual income from his trust at $40,000 per year (p.143). However, if he goes forward with the investment, he will cash in entire trust and take a significant financial risk. Therefore, we can reasonably assume that Larry will go forward with this investment as long as he can recover his initial investment and earn a salary that exceeds his current annual income. After calculating the possible financial income and analyzing sensitive variables, we suggest Larry takes this opportunity. Forecasting Coors’ Potential Market Share Firstly, to assess potential profitability, we sought to project Coors’ anticipated percent market share for the two-county market to determine the potential consumer base for Larry’s distributorship. From the following calculations, we found that the projected market share is sufficiently large to justify Larry’s investment. Using consumer survey information, we devised a metric for calculating and projecting Coors market share. While only 300 customers were surveyed (Research Study G), we made an assumption that this sample sufficiently represents the preferences of the greater population in the two-county market area. We also assumed that attitudes toward Coors were equally distributed amongst consumer weekly beer consumption levels. Then, we forecasted Coors market share by multiplying the percentage of people with a certain preference by the Coors purchase percentage for that preference. We projected an anticipated market share range, between 13.7% and 21.5%, illustrated in Exhibit 2. Calculations relied upon customers’ “Attitude Toward Coors” because we felt this measure was more indicative of regular purchasing frequency than simply an “Intention to Buy Coors”. Additionally, South Delaware beer consumers consume on average less per capita than the state as a whole, so there may be room to increase consumption among those who are light drinkers.
The two organizations explained in this assignment are “Anheuser Busch” and “MOLSON Coors”. Anheuser Busch is a multinational company brewing more than 100 brands in the United States and holds a 45.8 percent of the beer market share1. The company is recognized as the No. 1 brewing company by Fortune magazine – “World’s Most Admired Company”2. Dreaming Big, Unity and Culture are the three main driving values and guiding principles which account for the success the company has achieved during the years1. All these combined with the dedication and motivation
The beer brands were classified as popular, premium, super premium, and ultra-premium. The distinguishing factor determining if brands belonged to different classes was whether beer was produced by four largest companies (Anheuser-...
From the review of U.S Census on the size of the market segment to which the marketing campaign of Dr. Thunder would target, it has been found that the marketing campaign would target around 3 million Americans. Over the past 10 years, it has been noticed that the target market segment has grown for about 7.7% (United States Census Bureau, 2013). Moreover, the target segment would expand by another 8.9% in the coming ten years. Upon understanding the dynamics of soft drink industry in USA, it is found that the following three factors have an impact on the consumer behavior of this industry:
Simpson, B. (2008). “New Belgium Brewing (B)” in Ferrell, O. C., and Hartline, Michael D., Marketing Strategy, Fourth Edition, Mason, Ohio: Thompson Southwestern Publishing, pp. 1-5.
The scope of this report is an evaluation of the profitability of each brand. The report does not intend to make recommendations of how invest and promote new products and how to increase brewing capacity.
As larger beer corporations move toward this growing market, NBB will have to develop measures to maintain market share (Gorski, 2013).
Senior Management of PepsiCo is evaluating the potential acquisition of two companies – Carts of Colorado and California Pizza Kitchen – in order to expand the company’s restaurant business. If indeed PepsiCo decides to pursue the acquisition of one or both, they must decide how to align each of these business units in its historically decentralized management approach and how to forge relationships between the acquired business units and existing business units. In their evaluation, Senior Management is faced with the question of whether the necessary capital investment in order to purchase one or both of the businesses can be profitable for each of the acquired business units, but must also take into consideration that the additional business units will not hinder the profitability of the existing business units.
As stated in the case, “the market for energy drinks was growing; between 2010 and 2012, the market for energy drinks had grown by 40%. It was estimated to be $8.5 billion in the United States in 2013 [and] forecasts projected that figure to reach $13.5 billion by 2018” (pg 5). However, much of this market’s revenue -- 85% in fact -- is dominated by five major brands, while the remaining 15% is split between approximately 30 regional and national companies. (pg. 5). With this saturated market, it might not be best for Crescent Pure to enter as a completely new product to the industry, as there is the possibility that it will be squeezed out of the profit shares by more established brands -- especially if it is not properly secure in its identity. In addition, while the market for energy drinks appeared to be growing at an exponential rate compared to the market for sports drinks -- which increased only 9% in five years and would be at approximately 60% of the rate for energy drinks in 2017 (pg 6) -- the consumers appeared to be wary of partaking in the market for several reasons, which would potentially harm the reach of Crescent Pure. These concerns included rising news reports discussing the safety of energy drinks (pg. 5). Taking into consideration the data provided in the case that concerns reasonings of why consumers choose specific drinks over others, there
Monster Beverage Corp. shows that they understand their customers’ needs. They are a successful business with higher growing revenue every year. Their revenues did decrease during the economy’s recent recession (2008...
The beverage industry is highly competitive and presents many alternative products to satisfy a need from within. The principal areas of competition are in pricing, packaging, product innovation, the development of new products and flavours as well as promotional and marketing strategies. Companies can be grouped into two categories: global operations such as PepsiCo, Coca-Cola Company, Monster Beverage Corp. and Red Bull and regional operations such as Ro...
The soft drink industry in the United States is a highly profitably, but competitive market. In 2000 alone, consumers on average drank 53 gallons of soft drinks per person a year. There are three major companies that hold the majority of sales in the carbonated soft drink industry in the United States. They are the Coca Cola Company with 44.1% market share, followed by The Pepsi-Cola Company with 31.4% market share, and Dr. Pepper/Seven Up, Inc. with 14.7% market share. Each company respectively has numerous brands that it sales. These top brands account for almost 73% of soft drink sales in the United States. Dr. Pepper/Seven Up, Inc. owns two of the top ten brands sold. Colas are the dominant flavor in the U.S carbonated soft drink industry; however, popularity for flavored soft drinks has grown in recent years. The changing demographics of the U.S population have been an important factor in the growing popularity of these flavored soft drinks. The possible impact of this factor will be addressed later in the case.
Relationships with interest groups and the public policy makers has been one of the many things that the Boston Beer Company has strived to maintain and expand. The company realizes that these relationships are critical for the future success of the company. Being in the brewing industry the policies and publics opinion can influence the changes in future policies and procedures that would affect the industry. Developing and maintaining the relationships with the interest groups as well as the policy makers could prove to be very beneficial to not only the company but the brewing industry as a whole.
The recent product, liquor filled chocolates is a viable business that can sell if it is implemented professionally. This recent innovation should be able to acquire attention from the market owing to its combination of selling products. Put simply, the liquor-filled chocolates are chocolates that contain alcohol. According to Novellino (2011), Chocolate-candy sales summed up to $16 billion in 2008 in the U.S. Furthermore, the statistics on alcohol reveals that liquor sales hit $19.9 billion in 2011. What does the statistics reveal about the product? This reveals that the market for the two products is present and combining them will result in a profitable business. This paper is a report on targeting and segmenting the new liquor filled chocolates as a potential business.
The purpose of this report is to compare financial reports from the two largest soft drink manufacturers in the world. The Pepsi Co. and Coca Cola have been the industry's leaders in their market since the early 1900's. I will use relevant figures to determine profitability, and break down key ratios in profitability, liquidity, and solvency. By breaking down financial statements, and converting them to percentages and ratios, comparisons can be made between competitors regardless of size.
Experimentation with the new market for carbonated beverages on the decline coke has done experiments in new flavors and healthier alternatives to try to stay competitive. As well as investing in “Keurig Green Mountain is a K-Cup maker but has a new Keurig Cold that can deliver Coca-Cola through the new system.” (Cooper, 2014)