Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Significance of the resurrection of jesus
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The resurrection of Jesus is a topic in Christian Apologetic that confirms the faith of a believer. Groothuis submits, “Of all the world’s religions Christianity alone purports to be based on the resurrection of its divine founder. No other religion or worldview makes such an audacious and consequential claim. Throughout the Gospels, Jesus himself predicts his own betrayal, death and resurrection.”1 The Bible reveals the importance of the resurrection in Corinthians 15:14-17, “And if Christ wasn’t raised to life, our message is worthless, and so is your faith. If the dead won’t be raised to life, we have told lies about God by saying that he raised Christ to life, when he really did not. So if the dead won’t be raised to life, Christ wasn’t raised to life. Unless Christ was raised to life, your faith is useless, and you are still living in your sins.” …show more content…
The historical facts involving the resurrection of Jesus, according to Groothuis must be interpreted through the filters of theistic worldview.
Groothuis conveys to his readers, “It is the supremely significant event in providential history. Jesus’ resurrection from the dead is explained on the basis of a supernatural event brought about by God.”2 The resurrection in relation to theistic worldview focus on the character of God as it relates to the human race. Therefore, if our background belief is a well-established theism, it will promote historical evidence for the resurrection of Jesus with a more open attitude than would an atheist or
agnostic.3 The evidence of the appearances of Jesus to the general public can also be associated with the transformation of the disciples.4 Groothuis proclaims, “These men went from dejected, dispirited and grieving followers of a crucified rabbi to the apostles, those who had beheld the risen Christ and who, on the basis, preached him as the Lord of life and the Judge of history.”5 The naturalistic theories refute the resurrection as narrated in the New Testament by asserting the lack of historicity. Several theories point to a Christian conspiracy, among these is one that believes that the disciples were thought to have stolen the body of Jesus to start a religion. However, the greatest challenge comes from the theory that people hallucinated and believed that they had seen Jesus come back from death.6 The best response is that it’s not possible for all the people that witnessed the appearances of Jesus to have hallucinated or imagined seeing Him alive.
The article Reasonable Doubt by Alice Camille presents reasons for defending the actions of Thomas, the apostle of Jesus Christ, and relates the factors that not only made Thomas doubt his faith, but the testimonies of the resurrection witnessed by Thomas himself. The article also discusses evidence demanded by Thomas to prove that Jesus had risen from the dead.
Normally, it is generally believed that the statement gap between broadminded and conventional Christian theologians is more ruthless than the statement gap between broadminded and conventional Politicians. Most of the time the Politicians are fewer forced to confront each other in elections but the broadminded and conventional Christians can spent most of their time keeping away from each other. In a book, ‘Meaning of Jesus’ the authors Marcus Borg and Tom Wright has discussed a lot of issues like resurrection. Even though Borg and Wright take different diverse methods but they has discussed each other point of view in a reasonable manner, and they both directly faced points of their discrepancy.
The purpose of the Bible is for humanity to acknowledge their sins and build a relationship with God because our goal is to go to heaven. The Bible is also a guide for humanity because it demonstrates how to live life. For instance, the Bible states we should love the individuals we encounter as ourselves. Furthermore, some individuals question that if Jesus was not physically resurrected, then Christianity would be a false religion. However, after watching the video, I believe Jesus physically rose from the dead because there are many historical events to substantiate this claim.
•God shows us the promise of new life in the resurrection and of new society in the Reign of God
Luckily, none of the above is true. Because Jesus died on the cross and was raised to life three days later. Believers are forgiven from their sin and are given a new life. As Christians, our belief is not in vain because the resurrections is an actual event. Christ is not dead and our faith is not useless.
Above all, faith is the crux of Bultmann’s of the thesis and followers of Christianity. Hence, the core of devotion for all Christians is Jesus suffers death by crucifixion in order to redeem mankind. More importantly, he conquers death after God resurrects him on the third day. Specifically, it is the spirit which is redeemed not so much the physical body. Granted, because of the fall of Adam all suffer physical death; man’s spirit is preserved thru faith in Jesus.
In the previous two posts, we have gone over the importance of the apostles ' martyrdom for the resurrection argument, as well as a summary of Sean McDowell 's findings concerning their martyrdom. Now the question arises, is this evidence enough? The short answer is, yes. All the resurrection argument requires is that some apostles who claimed to have experiences of the resurrected Jesus were martyred for their faith. The idea is that if the apostles had invented the story of the resurrection they wouldn 't be willing to die for it. If they were martyred then they truly believed that they had experienced encounters of the resurrected Jesus, adding credence to the resurrection argument and disproving the possibility that
The Latin Cross displayed in nearly most if not all Protestant Churches throughout the world tells the story that Jesus is no longer on the cross but has risen. Jesus conquering death is the proclamation of our faith. The death and resurrection tells only some of the story. In the book Resurrection: The power of God for Christians and Jews, gives any reader the deeper meaning of what the kingdom of God means to us today, what it meant to Christians in antiquity and what it meant to the Jews primarily during the Second Temple period. Many of the things I was taught or learned throughout my Christian life have been challenged, as I will sprinkle some of them in this book review. As challenging as it was, this also provided me answers to questions
The Gospel of Matthew is an eyewitness story written for an audience of believers, under great stress, and persecution. Matthew develops a theological plot incorporating genealogy, speeches, parables, inter and intra textual references, common vocabulary, and fulfillment quotations, with a tension that builds as we are invited into the story. The crucifixion and resurrection bring us to a Christological climax that symbolically points beyond its conclusion to God’s Kingdom, bringing atonement, salvation and the ushering in the Eschaton. The extraordinary events surrounding the crucifixion act as commentary, adding important details concerning the death of Jesus.1
One of the most talked about myths in Christianity is the story of how Jesus Christ was crucified but came back to life. When he was crucified for human sins and when he resurrected he took mankind sins away with him. There are many functions and theories that try to explain this myth. Whether individuals believe in the myth is up to them. That being said, this myth is one that is followed by numerous people around the world.
Jesus’s followers were heartbroken when he was killed. Since they believed he was the Messiah, they may have begun to sense that he was still with them, guiding them, living on in their hearts in spirit (211). Many people believe this complicated story, in order to deny the truth of the resurrection. However, Keller references 1 Corinthians 15:3-6, where Paul “not only speaks of the empty tomb and resurrection on the ‘third day’ (showing he is talking of a historical event, not a symbol or metaphor) but he also lists the eyewitnesses” (212). This proves that Jesus’s resurrection was not only remembered through the four gospel
I found that there are lots of facts and conversation that tell people resurrection of
Many people do no believe in the resurrection of Jesus because most of the evidence depends on the Bible. I; however, do believe in the resurrection because of three main reasons. The first reason in that I don't believe that it would be possible for so many people to believe in a lie for hundreds of years. The second reason I believe in the resurrection is because many people claim that their was a mass hallucination, but it is highly unlikely for that many people to have the same hallucination at the same time. Finally, my last reason is that if the apostles had faked it, I highly doubt that they would be willing to die for a lie. In conclusion, I believe in the resurrection because it would be hard for so many people to believe in a lie and all the arguments against it don't make sense.
In this paper, I will examine Jesus’ resurrection from the dead because, according to many scholars, there is no other event in the life of Jesus that is as significant. In order to better comprehend the magnitude of this event, I will begin by looking at what can be discerned from the Resurrection of Jesus. Then, I will explore the two different kinds of resurrection testimony that there are: the confessional tradition and narrative tradition. For the confessional tradition, I will look at a few examples including St. Paul’s confession in First Corinthians which is composed of four parts: Jesus’ death, the question of the empty tomb, the third day, and the witnesses. For the narrative tradition, I will briefly examine the two sources of information
The Resurrection of Jesus Christ. No other event in history has been the object of as much scrutiny and criticism as the resurrection of Jesus Christ. The resurrection of Christ is the basis upon which all Christianity stands. If the resurrection never happened, then there would be no Christianity, as the Apostle Paul says in 1 Corinthians 15:14, "And if Christ has not been raised, our preaching is useless and so is your faith." This is why opponents of the Christian faith have tried to attempt to discredit the Biblical account of the resurrection. Of the many theories of the resurrection, the Biblical account is the only historically reliable and possible explanation of the resurrection.