Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Jeffrey cohen monster culture
Jeffrey jerome cohen monster culture
Jeffrey jerome cohen monster culture
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Individuals and groups within a society have an intolerant tendency to exclude and discriminate against persons or groups who appear to be different from the rest of their society. Differences in race, gender, ethnicity, sexual orientation, etc., can often lead to this kind of treatment. Humans have been prone to unfairly treat anyone who appears different or anyone who does not follow the "normal" trends. This leads one to examine and question the current norms which Jeffrey Jerome Cohen's explores in his essay "Monster Culture". Humans perceive the "Other" as different from themselves and not one of their society, which leads to humans fearing the monster. This fear stems from the misconception that the "Other" pose a threat to their society. …show more content…
Cohen states that, "When the monsters come back, they bring a fuller knowledge of our place, but they bear self-knowledge, human knowledge—and a disclosure all the more sacred as it arises from the Outside" (Cohen 20). As the monsters evolve, their intelligence and knowledge levels begin to surpass those of the humans. The monsters begin to question the humanity of humans by asking them, "How do they perceive the world, and how have they misrepresented what they have attempted to place" (Cohen 20). The monsters bring awareness to concerns and issues that exist in society. In one way, monsters appear to have been created to aid the "real humans", but the humans feel so threatened by the monsters that they fail to realize the positive influence they bring to society. Due to the poor treatment the "Other" receive, Cohen demands humans, "To reevaluate our cultural assumptions about race, gender, sexuality, perception of difference, and our tolerance toward its expansions" (Cohen 20). Ideologies that disparage or discriminate, such as evil lies behind homosexuality or that women play an inferior role in society, must be abandoned and left in the past. These mindsets are unsupportable, and it is counterproductive and simply wrong for any group to exclude others merely because of their
In society, there have always been different roles in defining the boundaries between right and wrong; Monsters take a big part of that role. In Jeffrey Cohen’s “Monster Culture,” Cohen explains seven theses which provide a clearer explanation of how monsters take a part in establishing these boundaries. The oldest Anglo-Saxon story written- “Beowulf”- provides three different monsters which all connect to Cohen’s seven theses. In the older version, however, the monsters do not relate to humans in any way, except that they are enemies. The modern version of Beowulf portrays Grendel’s mother to still be evil but also have relations with the humans in the story.
Cohen closes his first thesis with this sentence, explaining the monster's ability to be full of energy because of the different secrets that surround the world; when the secrets are revealed, the fear comes to life. Monsters have the ability to change as time goes on, though they are never actually gone from our society. Instead of the monster being erased is merely shifted, "monster are our children"(Cohen, 466), claiming that they are a part of us. Reassuring us that we fear this because it is a part of our
“The only motive that there was was to completely control a person… and keep them with me as long as possible, even if it meant just keeping a part of them.” Using this statement, Jeffrey Dahmer offers his insight about what made him the cruel, demented being people have known him to be for the last 25 years. Many questions still remain, however. How do we, in society, define the term “monster”? What makes a monster? What shapes our perceptions of monsters, and how do these perceptions change over time? Several centuries passed between the time of Grendel from the epic poem, Beowulf, and the Milwaukee Monster, Jeffrey Dahmer, for instance. Grendel is a creation of the Anglo-Saxons, whose culture
Flawed, contemplative, and challenging are three descriptive words to describe equality, or the lack of it. The lack of equality is a “monster” according to Cohen’s fourth thesis “The Monster Dwells at the Gates of Difference.” Cohen’s fourth thesis explains how differences among people in regards to race, gender, culture, etc. create “monsters” in society, even when people do not want them to exist. According to “Monster Culture (Seven Theses)” by Jeffrey Jerome Cohen: “Monsters are our children. They can be pushed to the farthest margins of geography and discourse, hidden away at the edges of the world and in the forbidden recesses of our mind, but they always return.” This quote means that the monsters society creates
Jeffery Cohen's first thesis states “the monster's body is a cultural body”. Monsters give meaning to culture. A monsters characteristics come from a culture's most deep-seated fears and fantasies. Monsters are metaphors and pure representative allegories. What a society chooses to make monstrous says a lot about that society’s people. Monsters help us express and find our darkest places, deepest fears, or creepiest thoughts. Monsters that scare us,vampires, zombies, witches, help us cope with what we dread most in life. Fear of the monstrous has brought communities and cultures together. Society is made up of different beliefs, ideas, and cultural actions. Within society there are always outcasts, people that do not fit into the norm or do not follow the status quo. Those people that do not fit in become monsters that are feared almost unanimously by the people who stick to the status quo.
...rs were and still are very active, but how we decide to define these monsters is changing. As our understanding of these monsters becomes clearer, our perception of the monsters will change. In his article and book chapter Monsters and the Moral Imagination and chapter 5 of On Monsters, Stephen Asma suggests that monstrosity, as we know it, is on the rise as humans progress and how we perceive monsters can often define monstrosities in itself, providing evidence of reasons why monster cultures are on the rise, and showing how human progress has evolved our perception of how we think on the topic that is monsters.
In "Monster Culture," Cohen widely talks about and investigates monsters regarding the way of life from which they climb. Keeping up the formal tone of a scholastic, he battles that monster climb at the intersection of a society, where contrasts develop and nervousness increases. The beast is an exemplification of distinction of any quality, whether it be ideological, social, sexual, or racial, that rouses trepidation and instability in its inventors. The creature or monster is habitually an irritating half breed that challenges categorization its hybridism defies nature. Yet despite the fact that there are unreliable monsters, real individuals can get to be monsters as well. Keeping in mind the end goal to bring oddity under control, the individuals who submit to the standard code of the day bestow huge personalities to the individuals who don't. Nervousness is the thing that breeds them and characterizes their presence. In this manner placing the beginning of creatures, Cohen strives to uncover our way of life's qualities and inclinations. For the larger part of the article, the monster is just the subject of our examination, an extraordinary animal under our investigation.
When the monster dwells on the fact that he has no friends, money, and property because of the way he looks he claims, “I was besides, endued with a figure hideously deformed and loathsome; I was not even of the same nature as man”(Shelley 102). With the monster’s emotion toward his first encounters, he struggles with accepting who he is because he feels the hatred from others. The words “deformed and loathsome” express the disgusted and discomfort that clouds the thoughts of each human during their first encounter. He recognizes his differences in comparison to others and begins to become self-conscious when he attempts to come out into the community. In the same aspect, humans today feel the same way when they look different than the ones around them.
The otherization of people that are different scares people because seeing the world in a different way widens the diversity of lifestyles that we are not aware of (Harris). America prides itself on being a melting pot of cultures, but how we react to newcomers is often at odds with that self-image (Winters). If people stopped responding with passive complicity to carefully crafted messages designed to "otherize" those whose needs deserve fair treatment and justice and those whose voices speak for them, certain media outlets and popular personalities might soon be out of business (Harris). When people are different and new, people get scared because they are not aware of the lifestyles they live. The unknown is a fear to many, and when people are different and act different, people become scared until they become known to how their lifestyles are.
A person is not satisfied if they are not treated fairly. When people are mistreated because they look, act, or are different they face a stage where their feelings are mixed. These feelings vary from depression all the way to wanting to end someone’s life. In the novel of Frankenstein by Mary Shelly, the monster faces difficulties because he is different the only thing he wants is to be treated equally; the monster actually discovered the meaning of justice.
Left on his own to strike out in the world the monster soon experienced the prejudices of those he came meet. Prejudices based upon his frightful, or unusual, appearance and his inability to communicate initially. I quickly had empathy for the abandoned creature, despite the descriptions of his gruesome appearance, and felt mixed emotions about his actions towards others in the story. Were the violent actions of the monster towards others spawned from their violent rejection of ...
Reading Frankenstein, I began to feel that it mirrored modern society. It is a sad fact, but most people today are either alienated by others or they alienate themselves. People that are alienated, like the Creation, tend to become monsters out of retaliation for their situation. They feel a loss of faith in the world around them and this leads to despair and destruction. Mary Shelley seems to foresee what society has to offer us today, which is an amazing feat in itself. In my interpretation, I feel that she also reflects hugely on human nature. It seems she is saying that people do not have an innate evilness but instead they acquire it through their circumstances.
By means of looking at different representations of monstrosity we find how two different characters are effected by their surroundings and how their dissimilarity in nature has caused others to isolate or lower them in society. With this, we discover what monstrosity suggests about the human condition and how a living thing that does not relate closely to what is essentially “human” is seen as unnatural and
The Monster’s confusion about the world and his inability to understand why he cannot simply be accepted in society drives his actions. Dutoit elaborates on the not so apparent truth that The Monster goes to great lengths to assimilate by acquiring language, understanding mannerisms and participating in customs. The Monster grows fond of a family, at first he watches them carefully, paying close attention to the details of their life and even steals food, unaware of their poverty. Supporting evidence which allows for the conclusion that he is innately good and simply longing for domesticity is shown by The Monsters willingness to help the family with chores, in secret of course. Nevertheless, he is universally shunned by everyone he encounters, except for the old blind man who was willing to have a social connection with him, until his family returned home and in fear rebelled against The Monster. This constant exile only leads to a greater alienation from the social world he deeply longs to be a part of. Unfortunately, due to his outward appearance, his good intentions are ill received by the people he
Mary Shelley’s novel Frankenstein expresses human nature specifically through the character of the “Creature” and his development. The Creature has an opportunity to explore his surroundings, and in doing so he learns that human nature is to run away from something so catastrophic in looks. The Creature discovers that he must limit himself in what he does due to the response of humans because of his deformities. I feel that Mary Shelley tries to depict human nature to running away from the abnormal, which results in alienation of the “abnormal.” Even today, people have a prejudice against someone or something that is abnormal, and these people will act differently towards this abnormality that is put in front of them. In the novel, Shelley seems to suggest a conception of humanity that is deeply influe...