There was a lot that went wrong with my groups film. We started off with only three group members. I can’t say that the small group was the cause of all our issues because some great films have been made with tiny crews. If anything it was the people within the group (including me) that were the problem. We started somewhat strong during pre production. We had a script, scene breakdowns, and started storyboarding. What I would’ve liked was more teamwork. I took charge and did most of the script and all of the breakdowns. While some of the members only really made some notes on the story and characters, or even just found simple photos on google for our character ‘sketches’. I also went out and bought the majority of the props and wardrobe. I didn't hate taking charge as it build leadership skills as well as raises my confidence with taking charge in future productions, but i would’ve liked the work to have been more spread out and equal. …show more content…
The only way we could’ve gotten around this would’ve been to shoot earlier. We were cutting it close by planing to shoot during the last week before it was due, and edit over the weekend and monday before the class it was due. I think our production was moving along slower than others because the earlier mentioned problems. We probably would’ve been able to salvage something into a decent film seeing how the ultimate due date got moved to the 13th, but one of the group members split off to do his own thing, bringing the original number of members from three to
I found working within a team enabled us to spread responsibility and we determined ...
My analysis is on the film The Goonies. While I view the movie and determine the various norms, behaviors, roles and interaction between group members, as well as individuals the examination within the realm of film can present many of the same components. Thus, our group selected this movie to analyze based on its formation of a cohesive problem-solving group full of unforgettable characters. The Goonies portray many different theories and aspects of small group communication.
In the documentary “Fed Up,” sugar is responsible for Americas rising obesity rate, which is happening even with the great stress that is set on exercise and portion control for those who are overweight. Fed Up is a film directed by Stephanie Soechtig, with Executive Producers Katie Couric and Laurie David. The filmmaker’s intent is mainly to inform people of the dangers of too much sugar, but it also talks about the fat’s in our diets and the food corporation shadiness. The filmmaker wants to educate the country on the effects of a poor diet and to open eyes to the obesity catastrophe in the United States. The main debate used is that sugar is the direct matter of obesity. Overall, I don’t believe the filmmaker’s debate was successful.
We all have had individual ideas that we used to support each one of us. We proceeded with the project with an open mind and made every effort to go according to what was discussed before embarking on the task. It could be said that the reason we were successful was that we followed all the sequences as discussed, especially the last one. It was apparent that we were all committed to the success of the team, we were able to motivate each other by engaging all the team members to aim to achieve at the highest level. We all followed open communication to follow the processes in
"Fed Up (Soechtig, 2014)." narrated by Katie Couric, focuses on the growing link between sugar consumption and the obesity epidemic. The film aggressively attacks the food industry, advertising, and the government who, it claims, all contribute to the U.S. sugar-dependent, obesity problem. The film sets out to prove the government, and food industry is knowingly causing an increase in the amount of obese children. It reserves its most critical comments for government advisory panels who make and enforce food and health policy, and its failure to properly regulate the food industry. They claim lobbyists for the sugar board have been instrumental in the removal of negative statistics from research papers worldwide. Instead
The group has reached the Norming stage when they begin the second stage. “The team is faced with creating cohesion and unity, differentiating roles, identifying expectation for members, and enhancing commitment. Providing supportive feedback and fostering commitment to a vision are ne...
In conclusion, by going through the five stages of team development, resolving the conflicts along the way and utilizing an efficiency model along with an execution strategy, my team effectively completed the task we were assigned as well as gained plenty of team experience for use in our future projects. My team now knows each other’s strengths and weaknesses much better and will definitely utilize this knowledge to further enhance our team’s efficiency and effectiveness in the future.
Throughout the process and progress, we have made, I personally felt like my team should have put enough effort communicating as much as I did. I know we all have busy schedules, but at the end of the day, I didn’t want to feel or be stuck trying to figure out strategies for this organization.
I don’t take all the credit for our group being great, but I do however like to think that I got the ball rolling and then kept it going. No leader is anyone without their peers to help them lead.
The only problem was that there wasn’t (that) much of a teamwork. Because it was the first time we have ever done this, it was difficult for us to discover what we are supposed (actually have) to do and what is expected of us. After we were divided in two groups and the indications were given, there was a “fight” (in our group) because many of us wanted to take part in the (in the) marketing department, because it seemed (to be) the easiest one, right? WRONG! The marketing department was the hardest and I was in it. We had to come up with a plan that would BURST OUT the selling for “Smootjies”. The plan had to include what we want to do, where we want it to be done, who are we actually targeting, how much should we charge our clients etc. while the other departments didn’t seem to have that much work to do. And so, we started by sharing ideas, approaching them, balancing them (pros/cons) and making them happen, thereby (thus) starting being proactive. Everyone took responsibility for the whole project. We treated this “game” as an actual task, as if it (this) was our company and we HAD not only to keep it above the floating line, but actually aim for the sky line. This attitude won us the second place, receiving the reward of honor. We were determined and we took the whole thing in our
However, since my section, percussion, was so large, it technically consisted of two different sections: drumline and the pit, which included instruments such as keyboards. For the most part, the captains had prefered to be in drumline, so the pit, of which I was a part of, was left alone for the most part. Since we had no one to guide us, we were unfocused in the beginning. I decided then to take an initiative and to focus our group. As I began to do this, our work ethic increased and it became very apparent that we were doing better than we have in previous years. Seeing this, my director decided to promote me to captain, something which surprised me as this usually did not
When it came to getting the work done we all had a deadline to stick to. These deadlines were generally met as we set realistic time frames. There was an evident chairperson in the group as we would seek confirmation from them to make sure what we had done was correct. The “plant” within the group was helpful. They helped by piecing the final project together and making sure it was correct.
The only thing was that one of group members missed class, therefore, she was behind on what we were doing. Even though we communicated within the google doc, there was still confusion on what we were doing. I would say that next time we all meet up after class and discuss things through.
This turned out to be the positive group experience for me and other group members. The team was sufficiently strong from the very beginning through the development phase to the end without any incident of conflict and disagreement. Every group member is reliable and understands their roles working in a group. They also understand the significance of progressing collectively towards the shared and common goal. In other words, our group reflected the synergy by the association we held with each other as a team and, thus, reflecting an example of being a successful
During the entire duration of the project, I was fully involved. I was the lead writer along with Kathryn on the Pantheon myth. We made sure to complete the rough draft at least three days before it was due, so others had time to revise and edit, so I took notes of everyone's ideas during the first meeting and completed the first draft of the pantheon immediately. After everyone was finished editing and revising, I took their suggestions and applied them to the draft. Also, I attended every meeting on time with all of my required materials and tools as well as the group assignment prior to the meeting. For example, during our three hour meeting at my house on September 24th, 2015, I made sure to clear out my entire living room, so my team has space to work, I made sure to have lots of cardboard, tape, fabric, thread and