Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
European settlements of the americas
The colonization of europeans into north america
European colonization north america
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: European settlements of the americas
The Age of Exploration is a time period where Europeans discovered the America’s and they were eagerly exploring them in the hopes of finding trade routes, knowledge, and riches. During this time period many accounts of the New World were recorded through things like letters and journals, describing the land and the people found in the America’s. A lot of the information in these accounts was featured in works of literature during this time period, such as in William Shakespeare’s The Tempest, providing a window into the Age of Exploration as well as the interaction between the Old and New World. This is evident in The Tempest as observed through the interactions between the characters. We can see parallels of interactions between indigenous people in the play and indigenous people as described in travel journals, as well as the interactions that the Europeans have and the varied opinions of the natives they hold.
In The Tempest there are two characters that can be considered to be, and compared to, indigenous people. These two characters are Miranda who is the daughter of Prospero, the main character of the play, and Caliban who was born on the island that Miranda and Prospero are exiled on and is essentially a slave to Prospero. Miranda can be compared to being indigenous in the way that the island is the only thing she knows and while she has been educated by her father, which Prospero claims ‘Have I, thy schoolmaster, made thee more profit Than other Princes can, that have more time For vainer hours and tutors not so careful.’ (Act I, Scene II, Lines 206-208), she is obviously kept ignorant as in the way that he chooses to tell her about how they arrived at the island in Scene II of Act I for the first time in the twelv...
... middle of paper ...
...trade that began to occur between the New and Old world. This trade was only possible because the Europeans came to the America’s and took everything as theirs despite the fact there were people already living there and despite the fact that sometimes those goods were owned by the natives. That’s why wars began to occur during the Age of Exploration in the Americas, and why the native’s population began to decrease so much, all because of the European’s believe they deserve ownership simply because they’re Europeans.
The Tempest is a play that serves as a window into what it was like during the Age of Exploration as well as what encounters between the old and new world were like. Through Shakespeare’s characters it is evident what interactions between Europeans and natives were like during this time, as well as what society thought of such experiences.
When the European conquer the New World many debates born on the Indigenous people. Most of the voyagers didn’t think of the natives as humans, they looked strange and different with their dark skin, long hair and unusual language. Even the thinkers of the colonizers weren’t sure if the Indians - whom they thought are the native people of India – could been taken as normal people. Meanwhile, the Indigenous people had some similar thoughts on their conquers. They wore fancy clothes, had huge ships and advanced armory. In some records which were left by the Aztec ad Mayan people, they view the voyagers as gods, people who were sent to save them. Of course, after a while they realized, they are being conquered and being colonized. It was hard
The Europeans came to the Americas with an imperialistic attitude. They wanted to take over the land and they thought their goods and beliefs were better than those of the Natives. Document 7 shows that the Mother Country sent over many goods of their own for trade from the colonies. The goods from the Mother Country overpowered and took the place of the Native’s goods.
Miranda's schooling in The Tempest shows the audience the conflicting arrangement white women in the Shakespearean drama as well as Shakespearean times are forced to act within. Paul Brown points out that "the discourse of sexuality…offers the crucial nexus for the various domains of colonialist discourse" (208) and the conduct in Prospero manipulates his followers' sexuality is the mainstay of his power. The Miranda-Prospero relationship servers to represent a sort of patriarchy, which is unarguably the system many Renaissance women and women of Shakespeare's time found themselves in. It is thus unsurprising that Prospero controls Miranda and her sexuality as well. The system of patriarchy is demonstratd again and again throughout the play. For example, we see that Prospero's wisdom, magic, and education of Miranda, as well as his civilizing of Caliban demonstrates a system of authoritative love. There is no question that Prospero loves and wishes to protect his daughter; for example, Prospero continuously reiterates how much he cares for Miranda. However, at the same time, he exhibits enough power over her to be considered a patriarch. Prospero's authority over Miranda is so great that she cannot do anything but follow her father's wishes; it almost appears as if she has no choice in the matter for she, like Ariel and Caliban, can also be subject to Prospero's magical control. However, it appears that upon a closer study of this, we see that, patriarchalism makes specific, and often apparently contradictory demands of its "own" women, which can often cause confusion and problems for the woman involved.
A Tempest, by Aime Cesaire, has been the center of controversy for over twenty years now. The argument is not concerning whether the play has substance, or whether its themes are too racy; the criticism is about its parallel to another work. The work in question is that of The Tempest by William Shakespeare. Cesaire has been bluntly accused of mirroring, misrepresenting, and misinterpreting Shakespeare's last play. I challenge these critics to research Cesaire and his works, rather than pick apart this most insightful play. It is pertinent to understand a few key ideas when examining A Tempest because Cesaire was not attempting to mirror Shakespeare; he was merely using him as a reference. Cesaire, who understood that Shakespeare is an icon of the Western world, himself is iconoclastic. He knew by adapting The Tempest to his own voice, he would draw attention from the West and raise awareness of his intended audience, the oppressed blacks of the world. But valuing this idea requires the reader to be aware of who Aime Cesaire is, what ideas he embraces, and the message he wishes to convey to his readers.
Overall, Shakespeare’s The Tempest mirrors certain themes that were carried out into the real world. From the early settlements during the time of The Requerimiento to The Tempest to the Trail of Tears, Ethnocentrism has led to violence and dehumanization. The ways that the natives were treated because of their different lifestyles makes it harder and harder to come together and live as one. The old saying goes, “people are set in their ways” and that holds true. Both parties, in their belief that they are better, refuse to compromise and communicate. In The Tempest, this theme led to rape and slavery. In the New World, the theme led to death and hundreds of years of discrimination. Shakespeare is known for being a wise man and pulling from universal and eternal themes for his plays and sonnets, and ethnocentrism is one of them.
Prospero has long been read as one of Shakespeare’s most cherished and provocative protagonists. His timeless role in “The Tempest” has provided readers and critics with insights into many attributes of Shakespeare as a man, his works, and the political views that are personified in his play. The historical context of “The Tempest” is one that convincingly conveys the political views of the English people of his time, relating to the colonization of the New World, the expansion of British powers, and the domination of the indigenous peoples that was necessary for the British to thrive in the Americas. Of course, many people from the 1600’s would argue that domination of these natives would have been completely justified, from this view, Prospero conversely did nothing truly evil in taking rule of the Island from Caliban. However, a modern critic reading or watching a performance of “The Tempest” may find that Prospero is not very different from Antonio when standing the play and the colonial era next to each other. The reader will see through basic observation that these two men have more in common than they do in disparity, and more so that he closely resembles the attitude of European colonists settling in the New World. Prospero is simply a ruler, bent for power, and to him, the end justifies the means. The only true difference between Prospero and Antonio may be that that Prospero is not quite as willing to kill as Antonio is, and that he may not be addicted to gaining power and fratricide as Antonio may be. Prospero is capable of forgiveness, as seen in the end of the play.
John Wilders' lecture on The Tempest given at Oxford University - Worcester College - August 4th, 1999.
The Tempest in the Wilderness is an insightful and well-written article. It brings up some interesting ideas and draws surprising parallels between The Tempest and the colonization of the New World. Ronald Takaki skillfully analyzes the play and carries out his ideas to their completion. His research is extensive and it incorporates all perspectives. It is an important piece to re ad for a CSJ student because it includes all of the facts and tells both sides of the story, similar to A People’s History. Articles such as this are essential to having a well rounded perspective of history and of works of art such as The Tempest.
The second character is Caliban, the only creature that lives in the island. We can think of him as a creature because during “The Tempest”, Caliban receives the name of “monster”, “wild”, “beast” and also “a mix of fish and human”. As an inhabitant of this new land, he is related to the Natives of the New World. His name is an anagram of the word cannibal. He was described as a monster and it was far from being consider the hero of the play.But it is not his appearance that makes Caliban monstrous in Prospero's eyes, nor was Caliban treated as a slave, at least not initial...
According to Stephen Greenblatt the preoccupation with political power was not unfamiliar to Shakespeare and his audience. In his essay, "The Best Way to Kill Our Literary Inheritance Is to Turn It Into a Decorous Celebration of the New World Order," Greenblatt argues that recognizing the presence of issues such as colonialism and slavery in The Tempest will deepen the pleasure of the ordinary reader. He explains that it is very difficult to look at The Tempest without thinking about imperialism. The play, which is set on a mysterious island inhabited by natives and taken over by a European prince, is filled with allusions to the process of colonization. For example, one can f...
Deborah Willis, 'Shakespeare's Tempest and the Discourse of Colonialism', Studies in English Literature 1500-1900, 29, no.2, (1989)
Shakespeare was intending to represent several different groups of people in society through his plays and “The Tempest” was no exception to the rule. I aim to show how the “human” relationships in the play reflect real life relationships within Shakespeare’s own society (as well as his future audience), for which his plays were written and performed.
The Tempest was written in 1610 by William Shakespeare. Now I ask, how could it relate to the new world when it was written centuries back. Such as the treatment of Caliban, the indigenous slave, is compared to racial attitudes in the 17th century. Other relations include more that compare characters to important parts of the new world, as well as very specific explanations that trace over to new world ocurrances. Here is how Shakespeare’s The Tempest relates to the new world.
In The Tempest (TT) William Shakespeare creates social distinctions between the character’s in the book and then deconstructs them by placing them on an island. Shakespeare shows that social distinctions matter very little in the face of nature. Characters who realize this attempt to gain power, however Prospero reestablishes order and places them back where they were before. The character’s disregard social class all throughout The Tempest due to their new setting.
One specific text Shakespeare incorporated into The Tempest was Michel de Montaigne’s 1580 essay “Of Cannibals.” Montaigne described the natives of what is now Brazil not as savages,