Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Contemporary issues in audit standards
Contemporary issues in audit standards
Contemporary issues in audit standards
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Contemporary issues in audit standards
Introduction
New auditing standards require members of the audit team to discuss the potential for material misstatement due to fraud. This discussion should include an exchange of ideas or “brainstorming” among the audit team members about (1) how and where they believe that an entity’s financial statements might be susceptible to material misstatement due to fraud, and (2) how management could perpetrate and conceal fraudulent financial reporting. The brainstorming can take place during audit planning or during any part of the auditors’ information gathering (and members of the audit engagement are expected to communicate about fraud risk factors throughout the audit until its completion).
Investigating the effects of brainstorming
Key words: Fraud risk, audit planning, nature of audit procedures, brainstorming
Research objectives
Objectives of this research could be summarized as follows:
• Assuring the importance of brainstorming in fraud detecting process.
• Exploring how could brainstorming improve planning of audit procedures in response to fraud risk.
Research questions
• Have previous academic research and auditing settings explained how could brainstorming improve fraud detection process?
• Does auditors ' groups that brainstorm design more effective audit procedures than those who do not
99, Consideration of Fraud in a Financial Statement Audit, to supersede SAS No. 82 (AICPA 2002), highlighting the new requirement for audit teams to conduct a brainstorming session, in which auditors will exchange ideas about where an entity’s financial statements may be susceptible to fraud. This standard suggests that brainstorming will aid auditors in detecting fraud. Failure to detect existing fraud in financial statements has proved quite costly to auditing firms.
According to SAS No. 99, brainstorming is supposed to make the auditor more skeptical and also improve the auditor’s fraud risk assessment and search for fraud. Hence it is important to investigate how brainstorming effects auditors’ fraud risk assessments and search for material misstatements during planning of audit
When it comes to the audit objectives, the public and the auditing profession maintain varying expectations. The public expects the prevention of fraud to be the auditor’s responsibility. However, the auditors believe that they are responsible for fraud detection, but not obliged to find all of it. In addition, the public views the fraud by the characteristics displayed by management and employees. For example, WoolEx Mills’ management wanted to exude a prevailing financial position and to uphold reputations. By committing financial statement fraud, it made the company look successful even though Sales and cash flows were decreasing. The public would view these particular characteristics as pressures to why the company committed fraud. Greed, recognition, and influences also impacted the public’s view of Wool Ex Mills’ fraud scheme. The CEO used authority to influence employees to take part in the fraud scheme. The public would see that the CEO utilized power to manipulate shareholders, which impacted their trust with WoolEx Mills (Cohen, Ding, Lesage, & Stolowy 2015) (Krishnan & Shah
Madura, Jeff. What Every Investor Needs to Know About Accounting Fraud. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2004. 1-156
In the year 2002, Adelphia Communications Corporation faced a massive accounting scandal that led to company’s bankruptcy and later reorganization. This paper will attempt to identify, analyze and evaluate the consequences of misrepresentation of financial accounts on a company, industry and economic level. Moreover, it will attempt to examine factors influencing the corporate failure from an auditor’s point of view, and consider the measures that auditor could have taken in order to enable quality and completes of information communicated to external users.
Issue(s): A bonus system based on profit, could incentivize Lakeside Company’s employees to manipulate financial information for their own potential personal gain. Each location under Lakeside will be working towards increasing their profits so they receive the biggest bonus possible. Since their internal controls are weak, this increases the possibility of this fraud. However, it is important to mention that the predecessor auditor believed that the people at Lakeside, that they worked with, are people of integrity. This type of positive organizational culture tends to decrease potential fraud risk.
[17] Robert K. Elliot, CPA and John J. Willingham PhD, CPA, Management Fraud: Detection and Deterrence. New York: Petrocelli Books, Inc., 1980, pp. vii.
The term “fraud” is commonly used to describe the use of deception to deprive, disadvantage or cause loss to another person or party. This can include theft, the misuse of funds or other resources, or more complicated crimes such as false accounting and the supply of false information. This case study of Mountain State Sporting Goods is an excellent example of individuals acting on the opportunity to financial benefit by committing what they thought was harmless adjustments, but in reality was fraud. In this case study there are is just so much wrong with this company and how it operates. We noticed multiple areas of concern before even seeing the financial statements and my concerns were confirmed upon further investigation.
All audit companies should be aware of the conditions in which fraud exists: incentive and pressure, opportunity, and rationalization. When Main Hudman planned Crazy Eddie’s audit in 1986, the auditors needed to see that the electronic industry boom days were over. This should have been a red flag for the auditors during this time; to be sure, they were evaluating
Rather than just executing an idea, they need to think about everything that could go right or go wrong with the idea—and if it is already in existence, if they are making it better and more user
Sunbeam committed the following two fraud schemes while Al Dunlap was the company’s Chief Executive Officer (CEO): (1) Improper Timing of Revenue Recognition via Bill Hold Sales, Consignment Sales, and Other Contingency Sales and (2) Overstating Earnings via Improper Use of Restructuring Reserves. A series of detection methods were utilized in each fraud scheme to determine the indicators that proved that Sunbeam was involved in manipulating its financial data. The most utilized method for detecting Sunbeam’s fraud was Financial Statement Analysis. Utilization of Annual Reports and Disclosures were utilized just as much as Corporate Research and Media while Business Plan Analysis was ranked as being the fourth most used. Finally; leadership
Though no fraud has currently occurred, the conditions exist for the management team to engage in fraudulent activities. Risk of Fraud and the Fraud Triangle Fraud as defined by American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) is the intentional act that causes a misstatement of financial statements which are subject to audit (Maddox, 2004). Based upon this definition and the current conditions, Mr. Luck’s
In today’s day and age, there is a lot of news that is related to corporate accounting fraud as companies intentionally manipulate their financial statements to show a better picture of their financial health. The objective of financial reporting is to provide financial information about a company to its various stakeholders such as investors and creditors so that these stakeholders can make decisions accordingly. Companies can show a better image of their financial well being by providing misleading information. This can be done by omitting material information from the books or deceitful appropriation of assets such as inventory theft, payroll fraud, check forgery or embezzlement. Fraudulent financial reporting will have an effect on the This includes but is not limited to; check forgery, inventory theft, cash or check theft, payroll fraud or service theft.
Giroux, G. (Winter 2008). What went wrong? Accounting fraud and lessons from the recent scandals. Social Research, 75, 4. p.1205 (34). Retrieved June 16, 2011, from Academic OneFile via Gale:
The principle territory we are planning to address is accounting fraud and how it could impact an organization by answering, the who, what, when and how. Its goal is to increase the awareness of accounting fraud and fraud counteraction. The intriguing thing about accounting fraud is that little disclosure as a rule usually leads to an enormous increase in fraud. A number of categories and sub-categories can be divided up for fraud.
This leaves me talking out of point sometimes. I spent more time brainstorming because they enhance the atmosphere. Innovative operation or ideas motivates everyone. No idea is criticised during brainstorming, captivating proposals can be refined progressively. Combined effort effect allows better ideas to be generated.
Auditing has been the backbone of the complicated business world and has always changed with the times. As the business world grew strong, auditors’ roles grew more important. The auditors’ job became more difficult as the accounting principles changed. It also became easier with the use of internal controls, which introduced the need for testing, not a complete audit. Scandals and stock market crashes made auditors aware of deficiencies in auditing, and the auditing community was always quick to fix those deficiencies. Computers played an important role of changing the way audits were performed and also brought along some difficulties.