Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Impact of ethics on business performance
Surbanes-oxley act
Impact of ethics on business performance
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Enron and Arthur Anderson were both giants in their own industry. Enron, a Texas based company in the energy trading business, was expanding rapidly in both domestic and global markets. Arthur Anderson, LLC. (Anderson), based out of Chicago, was well established as one of the big five accounting firms. But the means by which they achieved this status became questionable and eventually contributed to their demise. Enron used what if often referred to as “creative” accounting methods, this resulted in them posting record breaking earnings. Anderson, who earned substantial audit and consultation fees from Enron, failed to comply with the auditing standards required in their line of work. Investigations and reports have resulted in finger pointing and placing blame, but both companies contributed to one of the most notorious accounting scandals in history. There remains much speculation as to what steps could and should have been taken to protect innocent victims and numerous investors from experiencing the enormous loses that resulted from this scandal. Accounting Practices at Enron Unethical accounting practices involving Enron date back to 1987. Enron’s use of creative accounting involved moving profits from one period to another to manipulate earnings. Anderson, Enron’s auditor, investigated and reported these unusual transactions to Enron’s audit committee, but failed to discuss the illegality of the acts (Girioux, 2008). Enron decided the act was immaterial and Anderson went along with their decision. At this point, the auditor’s should have reevaluated their risk assessment of Enron’s internal controls in light of how this matter was handled and the risks Enron was willing to take The history of unethical accounting practic... ... middle of paper ... ...6). Enron and Arthur Andersen: The Case of the Crooked E and the Fallen A. Global Perspectives on Accounting Education: Vol. 3: Iss. 1, Article 3. Retrieved from: http://digitalcommons.bryant.edu/gpae/vol3/iss1/3 Giroux, G. (Winter 2008). What went wrong? Accounting fraud and lessons from the recent scandals. Social Research, 75, 4. p.1205 (34). Retrieved June 16, 2011, from Academic OneFile via Gale: http://find.galegroup.com.proxy.davenport.edu/gtx/start.do?prodId=AONE&userGroupName=lom_davenportc Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX), Pub. L. No. 107-204, 116 Stat. 745 (codified as amended in scattered sections of 15 U.S.C.) Thomas, C.W. (April, 2002). The rise and fall of enron. When a company looks too good to be true, it usually is. Journal of Accountancy, Retrieved June 15, 2011, from http://www.journalofaccountancy.com/Issues/2002/Apr/TheRiseAndFallOfEnron.htm
A Guide to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (2006). Retrieved December 16, 2009 from www.soxlaw.com
The Enron Corporation was founded in 1985 out of Houston Texas and was one of the world 's major electricity, natural gas, communications, and pulp and paper companies that employed over 20,000 employees. This paper will address some of the ethical issues that plagued Enron and eventually led to its fall.
Flynt, Sean. “Enron Whistleblower Tells Chilling Tale of Corporate Ruin.” Samford University. Ed. Donna Fitch. 19 Feb. 2004. 3 Mar. 2005.
The Enron scandal is one of the biggest scandals to take place in in American history. Enron was once one of the biggest companys in the world. It was the 6th largest energy company in the world. Due to Enron’s downfall investors of the company lost nearly 70 billion dollars. This was all due to many illegal activities done by Eron's employees. One of these employees was Andrew Fastow, the chief financial officer of the Enron corporation had a lot to do with the collapse of the Enron company.
Madura, Jeff. What Every Investor Needs to Know About Accounting Fraud. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2004. 1-156
Thirteen years ago, the biggest energy company in the world experienced the biggest accounting scandal of the century. The company was called Enron and was doing very well in business but unfortunately, after many bad decisions were made by the executives of the company, Enron went bankrupt. The executives of Enron were essentially gamblers in the stock market. They took terrible risks and misreported their financial standings in order to encourage people to invest in their stocks. When the stocks crashed in 2001, these people fell victim to the lies and misleading information that Enron reported. Finally, Enron had reached the point of no return and was bankrupt. Arthur Andersen was a company that had a significant role in Enron’s collapse.
Retrieved April 6, 2005 from the World Wide Web: A Guide To The Sarbanes-Oxley Act, 2002. http://www.soxlaw.com/
"This is why the market keeps going down every day - investors don't know who to trust," said Brett Trueman, an accounting professor from the University of California-Berkeley's Haas School of Business. As these things come out, it just continues to build up"(CBS MarketWatch, Hancock). The memories of the Frauds at Enron and WorldCom still haunt many investors. There have been many accounting scandals in the United States history. The Enron and the WorldCom accounting fraud affected thousands of people and it caused many changes in the rules and regulation of the corporate world. There are many similarities and differences between the two scandals and many rules and regulations have been created in order to prevent frauds like these. Enron Scandal occurred before WorldCom and despite the devastating affect of the Enron Scandal, new rules and regulations were not created in time to prevent the WorldCom Scandal. Accounting scandals like these has changed the corporate world in many ways and people are more cautious about investing because their faith had been shaken by the devastating effects of these scandals. People lost everything they had and all their life-savings. When looking at the accounting scandals in depth, it is unbelievable how much to the extent the accounting standards were broken.
This week’s case study, Enron: Questionable Accounting Practices Bring New Regulation to the United States, reflects the increased government control regarding accounting and financial issues in corporations. This increased control was implemented due to the downward economic spiral occurring in the late 1990s. Although, Enron had successfully concealed their debt for years, they inevitably collapsed under an avalanche of debt and profit misrepresentation (Ferrell, Hirt, & Ferrell, 2009). Flawed principles and disclosures surfaced within accounting practices. Therefore, the government implemented the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act provided oversight to corporate financial reporting protocols, ethical employee standards, and financial
Enron Corporation was based in Houston, Texas and participated in the wholesale exchange of American energy and commodities (ex. electricity and natural gas). Enron found itself in the middle of a very public accounting fraud scandal in the early 2000s. The corruption of Enron’s CFO and top executives bring to question their ethics and ethical culture of the company. Additionally, examining Enron ethics, their organization culture, will help to determine how their criminal acts could have been prevented.
Enron was on the of the most successful and innovative companies throughout the 1990s. In October of 2001, Enron admitted that its income had been vastly overstated; and its equity value was actually a couple of billion dollars less than was stated on its income statement (The Fall of Enron, 2016). Enron was forced to declare bankruptcy on December 2, 2001. The primary reasons behind the scandal at Enron was the negligence of Enron’s auditing group Arthur Andersen who helped the company to continually perpetrate the fraud (The Fall of Enron, 2016). The Enron collapse had a huge effect on present accounting regulations and rules.
Specifically, auditors and accounting firms hired by Enron “enable[ed] Enron’s fraud as well as being partners to it” (Cemgage.com, n.d.). For example, one executive was responsible for an arrangement with an accounting firm that would buy “an asset off Enron’s hands—usually a poor performing asset, usually at the end of a quarter—and then sell it back to the company at a profit once the quarter was over and the ‘earnings’ had been booked” (Cengage.com, n.d.) effectively creating revenue when there was none. External partners had monetary motivation to participate and aid unethical practices because Enron “hire[d] and pay[ed] its own auditors, [so]...the auditor has an incentive not to issue an unfavourable report on the company that is paying him or her” (Scu.edu, 2015). These illicit partnerships further illustrate the lack of appropriate controls within the company and how they allowed individuals within the company to commit financial
Dowd (2016) runs above and beyond with the clarification to state accounting fraud incorporates the change of accounting records in regards to sales, incomes, costs and different components for a profit motive, for example, boosting organization stock prices, getting ideal financing or maintaining a strategic distance from obligation commitments. Dowd is of the feeling that covetousness, absence of straightforwardness, poor administration data and poor accounting interior controls are a couple of explanations behind accounting fraud. (Dowd,
The Enron Corporation was an American energy company that provided natural gas, electricity, and communications to its customers both wholesale and retail globally and in the northwestern United States (Ferrell, et al, 2013). Top executives, prestigious law firms, trusted accounting firms, the largest banks in the finance industry, the board of directors, and other high powered people, all played a part in the biggest most popular scandal that shook the faith of the American people in big business and the stock market with the demise of one of the top Fortune 500 companies that made billions of dollars through illegal and unethical gains (Ferrell, et al, 2013). Many shareholders, employees, and investors lost their entire life savings, investments,
By placing themselves in the same business area and mixing businesses placed the auditing company in a compromising position. In addition to that, once the SEC started their investigations on Enron Andersen knew that they had not been forthcoming and truthful with their audits of the financial statements of Enron and they decided to shred as much evidence as they could so that when the gavel came down they would not be reprimanded as severely as they should be. According to Thomas Enron later terminated Andersen as their auditor reason being for “document destruction and lack of guidance on accounting policy”. Just as Enron knew the shortcuts that they were taking were morally and professionally wrong, as the reader, it is hard to believe that the company was unaware that their own auditing company had destroyed auditing records of the company’s financial statements. In the end of 2002 the Andersen company was destroyed due to their lack of business morality and all of Enron employees were left without jobs, savings and benefits. Enron’s collapse afforded other businesses in the same line of work to pick up some clientele that was lost during the scandal, however the scandal also made clients more cognizant of the business relationships they started and caused them to pay close attention to the accounting firms that